Click here to download

Coworking spaces before and during the covid-19 pandemic: typologies, geography and effects
Journal Title: ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE  
Author/s: Ilaria Mariotti, Mina Akhavan 
Year:  2021 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  19 Pg. 66-84 FullText PDF:  362 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ES2021-001006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Digital advancements have contributed to the rise of alternative solutions to traditional workplaces, such as coworking spaces, where self-employed workers, start-ups and small businesses can take advantage of social and professional interactions; to reduce the risks of isolation (particularly in the case of home working) and increase meeting opportunities. The Covid-19 pandemic has had negative impacts on coworking spaces: 21.76% of spaces in the world are closed, and 71.67% recorded a significant reduction in the number of users. In Italy, 59.15% of coworking spaces were closed in March and April 2020, while 36.62% of spaces remained open to essential activities. During the pandemic, the number of remote and home workers increased significantly, and the "proximity coworking" can represent an efficient workplace. Within this context, the current contribution aims to describe the typologies, geography, and main effects of the new workplaces pre- and during the pandemic, with a specific focus on the case of Italy.
Keywords: Coworking Spaces, Effects, Geography, Typologies, Covid-19 pandemic
Jel Code: J0, R1, R3

  1. Akhavan M. (2021). Third places for work: A comprehensive review of the literature on coworking spaces andmakerspaces. In: Mariotti I., Di Vita S., Akhavan M., Eds. New workplaces - Location patterns, urban effects and development trajectories. Cham (Ch): Springer International Publishing., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-63443-8
  2. Akhavan M., Mariotti I. (2018). The effects of coworking spaces on local communities in the Italian context. Territorio, 87(8): 85-92., DOI: 10.3280/TR2018-087014
  3. Avdikos V., Kalogeresis A. (2017). Socio‐economic profile and working conditions of freelancers in co‐working spaces and work collectives: evidence from the design sector in Greece. Area, 49(1): 35-42
  4. Barbieri T., Basso G., Scicchitano S. (2020). Italian workers at risk during the Covid-19 epidemic. Roma: Inapp, WP n. 46, aprile.
  5. Bentley T.A., Teo S.T.T., McLeod L., Tan F., Bosua R., Gloet M. (2015). The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 52 207-215.
  6. Bianchi P. (2018). 4.0 La nuova rivoluzione industriale. Bologna: il Mulino.
  7. Bilandzic M. (2016). Connected learning in the library as a product of hacking, making, social diversity and messiness. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1): 158-177., DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2013.825811
  8. Bilandzic M., Foth M. (2013). Libraries as coworking spaces: Understanding user motivations and perceived barriers to social learning. Library Hi Tech, 31(2): 254-273., DOI: 10.1108/07378831311329040
  9. Boschma R. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1): 61-74., DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
  10. Butcher T. (2018). Learning everyday entrepreneurial practices through coworking. Management Learning, 49(3): 327-345., DOI: 10.1177/1350507618757088
  11. Butcher T. (2013). Coworking: Locating community at work. In: Proceedings of the 27th annual Australia New Zealand Academy of Management Conference.
  12. Capdevila I. (2013). Knowledge Dynamics in Localized Communities: Coworking Spaces as Microclusters. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  13. Capdevila I. (2014). Coworkers, Makers, and Fabbers Global, Local and Internal Dynamics of Innovation in Localized Communities in Barcelona. PhD Thesis. HEC Montréal École affiliée à l’Université de Montréal.
  14. Capdevila I. (2015). Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(03): 15400 04., DOI: 10.1142/S1363919615400046
  15. Capdevila I. (2017). A typology of localized spaces of collaborative innovation. In: van Ham M., Reuschke D., Kleinhans R., Syrett S., Mason C., Eds. Entrepreneurial neighbourhoods – towards an understanding of the economies of neighbourhoods and communities. Elgaronline., DOI: 10.4337/9781785367243.00013
  16. Comune di Milano (2020). Milano 2020. Strategia di adattamento. Documento aperto al contributo della città. Milano -- .
  17. Coworker (2020). How Coworking Spaces are Navigating Covid-19. Coworker.com.
  18. Di Marino M., Lapintie K. (2015). Library as transitory workspaces and spatial incubators. Library and Information Science Research, 37(2): 118-129.
  19. Di Marino M., Lapintie K. (2017). Emerging workplaces in the post-functionalist cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 4(3): 5-25., DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2017.1297520
  20. Di Marino M., Lapintie K. (2018). Exploring multi-local working: challenges and opportunities for contemporary cities. International Planning Studies, 25(2): 1-21., DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2018.1528865.
  21. Florida R. (2002). The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York (NY): Basic Books.
  22. Fuzi A. (2015). Co-working spaces for promoting entrepreneurship in sparse regions: the case of South Wales. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1): 462-469., DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2015.1072053
  23. Fuzi A., Clifton N., Loudon G. (2014). New in-house organizational spaces that support creativity and innovation: the co-working space. R & D Management Conference. Stuttgart, 3-6 June.
  24. Gandini A. (2015). The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organizations, 15(1): 193-205.
  25. Garrett L.E., Spreitzer G.M., Bacevice P.A. (2017). Co-constructing a sense of community at work: the emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organ Stud, 38(6): 821-842., DOI: 10.1177/0170840616685354
  26. Italiancoworking (2021). Italian coworking survey 2021. I numeri del coworking in Italia. 30 gennaio -- .
  27. Jakonen M., Kivinen N., Salovaara P., Hirkman P. (2017). Towards an Economy of Encounters? A critical study of affectual assemblages in coworking. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(4): 235-242.
  28. Kojo I., Nenonen S. (2016). Typologies for co-working spaces in Finland – what and how? Facilities, 34(5-6): 302-313., DOI: 10.1108/F-08-2014-0066
  29. Manieri M., Selloni D., Saturno E. (2021). Coworking di prossimità: nuovi modelli per una città dei 15 minuti. Milano Collabora. Comune di Milano. Forthcoming.
  30. Manzini Ceinar I., Mariotti I. (2021a). The effects of Covid-19 on coworking spaces: patterns and future trends. In: Mariotti I., Di Vita S., Akhavan M., Eds. Shared Workplaces in the Knowledge Economy. Springer International Publishing., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-63443-8
  31. Manzini Ceinar I., Mariotti I. (2021b). Teleworking in post-pandemic times: may local coworking spaces be the future trend? Forthcoming.
  32. Manzini Ceinar I., Pacchi C., Mariotti I. (2021). Emerging work patterns and different territorial contexts: trends for the coworking sector in pandemic recovery. Professionalità Studi, 4(III)-2020: 134-159.
  33. Mariotti I., Akhavan M. (2019). Il coworking in Italia: localizzazione, performance, effetti sul contesto urbano. EyesReg, 9(3) -- .
  34. Mariotti I., Akhavan M. (2020a). Exploring proximities in coworking spaces: Evidence from Italy. European Spatial Research and Policy. 27(1): 37-52. Doi10.18778/1231-1952.27.1.02.
  35. Mariotti I., Akhavan M. (2020b). Gli spazi di coworking a Milano: localizzazione ed effetti sul contesto urbano. Milano: Fondazione Feltrinelli - Ebook Milano City School.
  36. Mariotti I., Akhavan M., Di Matteo D. (2021). The Geography of Coworking Spaces and the Effects on the Urban Context: are pole areas gaining? In: Mariotti I., Di Vita S., Akhavan M., Eds. New workplaces - Location patterns, urban effects and development trajectories. Cham (CH): Springer International Publishing., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-63443-8
  37. Mariotti I., Akhavan M., Rossi F. (2021). The Location of Coworking Spaces in Urban vs. Peripheral Areas. European Planning Studies., DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1895080
  38. Mariotti I., Di Marino M., Akhavan M. (2021). The emergence of coworking models in the face of pandemic. In: Bryson J.R., Lauren A., Reardon L., Ersoy A., Eds. Living with Pandemics: People, Place and Policy. Edward Elgar. Forthcoming.
  39. Mariotti I., Di Matteo D. (2020a). Understanding the economic performance of Coworking Spaces in core vs. peripheral areas. Conferenza AISRe. Lecce. 2-4/09/20.
  40. Mariotti I., Di Matteo D. (2020b). Coworking in emergenza Covid-19: quali effetti per le aree periferiche? EyesReg, 10(2): 1-5 -- .
  41. Mariotti I., Manfredini F., Giavarini V. (2021). La geografia degli spazi di coworking a Milano. Una analisi territoriale. Milano Collabora. Comune di Milano. Forthcoming.
  42. Mariotti I., Pacchi C., Di Vita S. (2017). Coworking Spaces in Milan: Location Patterns and Urban Effects. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(3): 47-66., DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2017.1311556
  43. McCann P. (2008), Globalization and economic geography: the world is curved, not flat. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(3): 351-370.
  44. Micek G., Mariotti I., Di Marino M., Akhavan M., Di Vita S., Lange B., Paas T., Sinitsina A., Alfieri L., Chebotareva M. (2020). Definition and typologies of the new working spaces Deliverable D 1.1. Internal working paper. COST Action CA18214: The geography of new working spaces and impact on the periphery (2019-2023).
  45. Moriset B. (2014). Building new places of the creative economy. The rise of coworking spaces. 2nd Geography of Innovation International Conference 2014. Utrecht. Utrecht University, 23-25 January.
  46. Morrison R.L., Macky K.A. (2017). The demands and resources arising from shared office spaces. Applied Ergonomics, 60: 103-115.
  47. Oldenburg R., Brissett D. (1982). The third place. Qualitative Sociology, 5(4): 265-284., DOI: 10.1007/BF00986754
  48. Oldenburg R. (1989). The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. New York: Paragon House -- .
  49. Osservatorio Smart Working (2020). Smart working: Il future del lavoro oltre l’emergenza. Politecnico di Milano. Dipartimento di Ingegneria Gestionale, novembre.
  50. Pais I., Manzo C., Gerosa A. (2021). I coworking di Milano nell’emergenza pandemica. Milano Collabora. Comune di Milano. Forthcoming.
  51. Spinuzzi C. (2012). Working Alone Together: Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4): 399-441., DOI: 10.1177/1050651912444070
  52. Schopfel J., Roche J., Hubert G. (2015). Co-working and innovation: New concepts for academic libraries and learning centres. New Library World, 116: 67-78., DOI: 10.1108/NLW-06-2014-0072
  53. Sostero M., Milasi S., Hurley J., Fernandez-Marcias E., Bisello M. (2020). Teleworkability and the COVID-19 crisis: a new digital divide? Seville: European Commission JRC and Eurofound.
  54. Yu R., Burke M., Raad N. (2019). Exploring impact of future flexible working model evolution on urban environment, economy and planning. Journal of Urban Management, 8(3): 447-457.
  55. Van Oort F., Weterings A., Verlinde H. (2003). Residential amenities of knowledge workers and the location of ICT-firms in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 94(4): 516-523., DOI: 10.1111/1467-9663.00278

Ilaria Mariotti, Mina Akhavan, Coworking spaces before and during the covid-19 pandemic: typologies, geography and effects in "ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE " 1/2021, pp. 66-84, DOI:10.3280/ES2021-001006

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content