Clicca qui per scaricare

Public communication and pandemic crisis: the case of the Municipality of Peccioli
Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE  
Autori/Curatori: Manuela Farinosi, Chiara Piccolo 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2021 Fascicolo: 61 Public Sector Communication: hybridizations and trajectories of development in the digital era Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  10 P. 159-168 Dimensione file:  218 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SC2021-061011
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


In the last twenty years public communication has profoundly changed, and institutions have begun to increasingly use methods based on listening, participa-tion and citizen engagement. This paper explores public communication during the Covid-19 crisis, focusing on the local context of Peccioli. In light of the initiatives implemented by the Municipality, it addresses these research questions: how do citizens consider public communication during the emergency, and which channels have been mostly used to stay updated on municipal initiatives? How do citizens evaluate the emergency management by the municipality, and how do they sug-gest improving it in the event of a return of the virus? Through a quali-quantitative approach 268 structured interviews were conducted. Participants were selected from the municipal registry following a proportional allocation based on three so-ciodemographic variables: age, gender and place of residence. The findings high-lighted a) information practices based on the integration of official and unofficial channels and traditional media and digital platforms; b) preference for one-to-one communication, mediated and not; and c) highly positive perception of the work of the municipality.


Keywords: Covid-19, public communication, local government, citizenship, par-ticipation, active listening.

  1. Voogd, H., Woltjer, J. (1999), The communicative ideology in spatial planning, in «Environment and Planning B» n. 26(6), pp. 835-854.
  2. Allegretti U. (2010), Democrazia Partecipativa: esperienze e prospettive in Italia e in Europa, Firenze University Press, Firenze.
  3. Arnstein S. R., (1969), A ladder of citizen participation, in «Journal of the American Institute of Planners» n. 35(4), pp. 216-224., DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225
  4. Bobbio L., Pomatto G. (2007), Il coinvolgimento dei cittadini nelle scelte pubbliche, in «Meridiana» n. 58, pp. 45-67.
  5. Canel M.J., Luoma-aho V. (2018), Public Sector Communication. Closing Gaps Between Citizens and Public Organizations, Wiley, Hoboken.
  6. Caspretti S. (2013), La strategia del consenso nel caso della discarica di Peccioli, in «Partecipazione e Conflitto» n. 6(1), pp. 102-120., DOI: 10.3280/PACO2013-001006
  7. Ciaffi D., Mela A. (2006), La partecipazione, Carocci, Roma.
  8. Connor D. M. (1988), A new ladder of citizen participation, in «National Civic Review» n. 77(3), pp. 249-257.
  9. Creighton J. L. (2005), The public participation handbook: Making better decisions through citizen involvement, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  10. Dahlgren P. (2009), Media and political engagement. Citizens, Communication and Democracy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  11. Doolittle A., Faul A.C. (2013), Civic engagement scale: A validation study, in «SAGE Open» n. 3(3), pp. 1-8., DOI: 10.1177/2158244013495542
  12. Ducci G. (2017), Relazionalità consapevole. La comunicazione pubblica nella società connessa, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  13. Eurostat (2020). Urban and rural living in the EU, -- https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/EDN-20200207-1
  14. Farinosi M. (2019), Comunicazione e processi partecipativi. Amministrazione pubblica e coinvolgimento dei cittadini nel Comune di Peccioli, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  15. Farinosi M., Fortunati L., O’Sullivan J., Pagani L. (2019), Enhancing classical methodological tools to foster participatory dimensions in local urban planning, in «Cities» n. 88, pp. 235-242.
  16. Gret M., Sintomer Y. (2002), Porto Alegre. L’espoir d’une autre démocratie, La Découverte, Paris.
  17. Schlossberg M., Shuford E. (2005), Delineating “public” and “participation” in PPGIS, in «URISA Journal» n. 16(2), URISA, pp. 15-26.
  18. Sclavi M. (2002), Avventure urbane. Progettare la città con gli abitanti, Eleuthera, Milano.
  19. Silverman D. (1997), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, Sage, London.
  20. Urbinati N. (2014), Democracy disfigured. Opinion, truth, and the people, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  21. Wilcox D. (1994), The guide to effective participation, Partnership Books, Brighton.

Manuela Farinosi, Chiara Piccolo, in "SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE " 61/2021, pp. 159-168, DOI:10.3280/SC2021-061011

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche