Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
Donne e rom. Segregazione razziale, oppressione di genere e resistenze
Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE 
Autori/Curatori: Claudia Mantovan, Gaja Maestri 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2021 Fascicolo: 125 Ghetti urbani e rurali. Contributi di ricerca Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  18 P. 62-79 Dimensione file:  309 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SUR2021-125004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Ispirandosi al recente filone di ricerca dei critical Romani studies, l’articolo si prefigge di connettere la letteratura intersezionale con quella sulla segregazione abitativa e razziale delle minoranze rom e sinte, con l’obiettivo di gettare luce sulle specificità di genere di questo fenomeno. L’analisi delle traiettorie abitative e sociali di tredici donne rom immigrate in Italia permette di evidenziare l’intreccio tra discriminazione razziale e oppressione di genere, ma anche le forme di resistenza e di "ordinary agency" attraverso cui le donne cercano di fronteggiare le proprie difficoltà e di migliorare la propria situazione.


Keywords: donne, rom, segregazione abitativa e razziale, oppressione di genere, critical Romani Studies, resistenze.

  1. AA. VV. (2013). Donne Rom: condizione femminile, diritti umani e non discriminazione. Roma: Arti Grafiche Kolbe.
  2. Agamben G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford Uni-versity Press.
  3. Agamben G. (2005). State of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Alunni L. (2012). “After all, They are Nomads, Aren’t They?”: Roma Transnationalism and Health Issues. MMG Working Paper 12-20. Gottingen: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity.
  4. Armillei R. (2015), The ‘camps system’ in Italy: corruption, inefficiencies and practices of resistance. Romani Studies. -- Testo disponibile al sito: http://romanistudies.eu/the-camps-system-in-italy.
  5. Associazione 21 Luglio (2020). Asy(s)lum. Dalle “istituzioni totali” di Goffman ai “campi rom” della città di Roma. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.21luglio.org/2018/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/asyslum-web.pdf.
  6. Bogdan M., Dunajeva J., Junghaus T., Kóczé A., Rostas I., Rövid M., Szilvasi M. (2018). Introducing the New Journal of Critical Romani Studies. Critical Romani Studies, 1(1): 2-7.
  7. Bourdieu P. (2015). Forme di capitale. Roma: Armando.
  8. Brooks E.C. (2012). The Possibilities of Romani Feminism. Signs, 38(1): 1-11., DOI: 10.1086/665947
  9. Ciniero A. (2016a). Life Trajectory of Dorina - 34 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  10. Ciniero A. (2016b). Life Trajectory of Safia - 55 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  11. Clavé-Mercier A., Olivera M. (2018). Inclusion and the ‘Arts of Resistance’. Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 4(2): 149-168.
  12. Clough Marinaro I. (2009). Between Surveillance and Exile: Biopolitics and the Roma in Italy. Bulletin of Italian Politics, 1(2): 265-287.
  13. Clough Marinaro I., Daniele U. (2014). A failed Roma revolution: Conflict, fragmentation and status quo maintenance in Rome. Ethnicities, 14(6): 775-792., DOI: 10.1177/1468796814542181
  14. Corradi L. (2018). Il femminismo delle zingare. Intersezionalità, alleanze, attivismo di genere e queer. Sesto San Giovanni: Mimesis.
  15. Crenshaw K.W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Femi-nist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1: 139-167.
  16. Crenshaw K.W. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6): 1241-1299., DOI: 10.2307/1229039
  17. Daniele U. (2011). ‘Nomads’ in the eternal city. Local policies and Roma participation in the ‘emergency’ era. Géocarrefour, 86(1): 15-24.
  18. Daniele U., Pasta S., Persico G. (2018). From Public Enemy to Urban Ghost. Roma Migrants and the Dismantling of the Nomad Camp Systems in Milan and Rome. Intersections. East Euro-pean Journal of Society and Politics, 4(3): 106-135.
  19. Daniele U. (2016a). Life Trajectory of Ana - 23 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  20. Daniele U. (2016b). Life Trajectory of Aurelia - 20 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  21. Daniele U. (2016c). Life Trajectory of Magdalena - 23 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  22. De Certeau M. (1990). L’invention du quotidien. Tome 1, Arts de faire. Paris: Gallimard.
  23. Dell’Agnese E., Vitale T. (2007). Rom e sinti, una galassia di minoranze senza territorio. In Amiotti G., Rosina A. (a cura di). Identità ed integrazione. Passato e presente delle mi-noranze nell’Europa mediterranea. Milano: FrancoAngeli. Goffman E. (1961). Asylums. Essays on the social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Doubleday: Anchor Books.
  24. Humphris R. (2019). Home-Land: Romanian Roma, Domestic Spaces and the State. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
  25. Isin E. (2002). Being Political: Genealogies of Citizenship. Minneapolis: University of Min-nesota Press.
  26. Katz I. (2015). From spaces of thanatopolitics to spaces of natality - A commentary on ‘Geogra-phies of the camp’. Political Geography, 49: 84-86.
  27. Kóczé A. (2009). The Limits of Rights-Based Discourse in Romani Women’s Activism: the Gender Dimension in Romani Politics. In Sigona N., Trehan N. (eds.). Romani Politics in Contemporary Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  28. Kóczé A. (2018). Transgressing Borders: Challenging Racist and Sexist Epistemology. In Beck S., Ivasiuc A. (eds.). Roma Activism. Reimagining Power and Knowledge. Oxford, NY: Berghahn Books.
  29. Ivasiuc A. (2018a). Introduction. Renewing Research and Romani Activism. In Beck S., Ivasiuc A. (eds.). Roma Activism. Reimagining Power and Knowledge. Oxford, NY: Berghahn Books.
  30. Ivasiuc A. (2018b). Alter-Narratives. Seeing Ordinary Agency. In Beck S., Ivasiuc A. (eds.). Roma Activism. Reimagining Power and Knowledge. Oxford, NY: Berghahn Books.
  31. Izsàk R. (2009). The European Romani Women’s Movement: The Struggle for Human Rights. Development, 52(2): 200-207.
  32. Maestri G. (2017). The Contentious Sovereignties of the Camp: Political Contention Among State and Non-state Actors in Italian Roma Camps. Political Geography, 60: 213-222.
  33. Maestri G. (2019). Temporary Camps, Enduring Segregation. The Contentious Politics of Roma and Migrant Housing. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  34. Maestri G., Vitale T. (2017). A Sociology of the Camps’ Persisting Architecture. Why Did Rome not Put an End to Expensive Ethnic Housing Policies? In Mendes M., Sá T., Ca-bral J. (eds.). Architecture and the Social Sciences. Cham: Springer.
  35. Mantovan C. (2018). Cultura giuridica e politiche locali per i rom e i sinti: il caso del Co-mune di Venezia. In Pennisi C., Prina F., Quiroz M., Reiteri M. (a cura di). Amministra-zione, cultura giuridica e ricerca empirica. Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli.
  36. Martin D. (2015). From spaces of exception to “campscapes”: Palestinian refugee camps and informal settlements in Beirut. Political Geography, 44: 9-18.
  37. Mayall D. (2004). Gypsy Identies 1500-2000: From Egipcyans to Moon-men to the Ethnic Rom-any. London: Routledge.
  38. Miele C. (2016). Living through the camp: Roma segregation and border-crossing in the city of Naples. In Brambilla C., Laine J., Scott J.W., Bocchi G. (eds.). Borderscaping: Imaginations and practices of border making. Oxon: Routledge.
  39. Minca C. (2015). Geographies of the camp. Political Geography, 49: 74-83.
  40. Pagano S. (2019). „Nomadin-Sein“ im „Dorf der Solidarität“. Eine kritische Ethnografie zu Camps für Rom_nja in Rom. Göttingen: Institut für Kulturanthropologie/Europäische Ethnol-ogie, Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
  41. Pasta S. (2016). Life Trajectory of Liliana - 37 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  42. Pasta S. (2017a). Life Trajectory of Simona - 41 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project. Pasta S. (2017b). Life Trajectory of Carmen - 30 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  43. Pasta S. (2017c). Life Trajectory of Rosa - 43 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  44. Pasta S. (2017d). Life Trajectory of Cireasa - 35 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  45. Pasta S. (2019). I rom di via Rubattino a Milano: una storia interculturale di educazione alla citta-dinanza. Palaver, 8(1): 157-204.
  46. Persico G. (2017). Life Trajectory of Manuela - 31 - Italy. Scientific report established in the ANR MARG-IN Project.
  47. Persico G., Marcu O., Daniele U., Romano C.C., Santambrogio A. (2020). Youth on dis-crimination: a platform for self-expression through the photovoice. Studi di Sociologia, X: 1-27., DOI: 10.26350/000309_000081
  48. Piasere L. (2006). Che cos’è un campo nomadi? Achab, 8: 8-16.
  49. Picker G. (2017). Racial Cities: Governance and the Segregation of Romani People in Ur-ban Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
  50. Picker G., Greenfields M., Smith D. (2015). Colonial refractions: the ‘gypsy camp’ as a spatio-racial political technology. City, 19(5): 741-752., DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2015.1071123
  51. Picker G., Pasquetti S. (2015). Durable Camps: The State, the Urban, the Everyday. City, 19(5): 681-688., DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2015.1071122
  52. Puggioni R. (2014). Against Camps’ Violence: Some Voices on Italian Holding Centres. Political Studies, 62(4): 945-960., DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.12051
  53. Putnam R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  54. Ramadan A. (2013). Spatialising the refugee camp. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(1): 65-77.
  55. Redclift V. (2013). Abjects or Agents? Camps, Contests and the Creation of ‘Political Space’. Citizenship Studies, 17 (3-4): 308-321., DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2013.791534
  56. Ryder A.R. (2019). A Game of Thrones: Power Struggles and Contestation in Romani Stud-ies. International Journal of Roma Studies, 1(2): 120-143.
  57. Rygiel K. (2011). Bordering solidarities: Migrant activism and the politics of movement and camps at Calais. Citizenship Studies, 15(1): 1-19., DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2011.534911
  58. Saitta P. (2015). Resistenze. Pratiche e margini del conflitto nel quotidiano. Verona: Ombre Corte.
  59. Scott J.C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. London: Yale University Press
  60. Scott J.C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: hidden transcripts. London: Yale University Press.
  61. Sigona N. (2011). The Governance of Romani People in Italy: Discourse, Policy and Practice. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 16(5): 590-606.
  62. Sigona N. (2015). Campzenship: Reimagining the Camp as a Social and Political Space. Citizenship Studies, 19(1): 1-15., DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2014.937643
  63. Sigona N. (2016). Everyday Statelessness in Italy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39(2): 263-279., DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2016.1105995
  64. Stasolla C. (2012). Sulla pelle dei rom. Roma: Alegre.
  65. Stewart M. (2012) (ed.). The Gypsy “Menace”: Populism and the New Anti-Gypsy Politics. London: Hurst.
  66. Tremlett A. (2009). Bringing hybridity to heterogeneity in Romani Studies. Romani Studies, 19(2): 147-168.
  67. Turner S. (2016). What is a refugee camp? Explorations of the limits and effects of the camp. Journal of Refugee Studies, 29(2): 139-148.
  68. Vincze E. (2014). The Racialization of Roma in the “New” Europe and the Political Poten-tial of Romani Women. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(4): 435-442., DOI: 10.1177/1350506814548963
  69. Woolcock M.M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1): 11-17.

Claudia Mantovan, Gaja Maestri, in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 125/2021, pp. 62-79, DOI:10.3280/SUR2021-125004

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche