Clicca qui per scaricare

Cronache psicoanalitiche: il dibattito critico sull’analisi didattica all’interno dell’American Psychoanalytic Association
Titolo Rivista: PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE 
Autori/Curatori: Fredric T. Perlman 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2021 Fascicolo: 3  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  62 P. 363-424 Dimensione file:  689 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PU2021-003001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Dopo una nota redazionale, viene tracciato un panorama sulle controversie attorno all’analisi di-dattica nell’American Psychoanalytic Association (APsaA), con una revisione della letteratura critica. Vengono poi descritti i recenti tentativi per riformare il sistema dell’analisi didattica. Tra le altre cose, si accenna ai problemi della certificazione da parte del Board of Professional Standards (BoPS), ai conflitti tra il BoPS e il Board of Directors dell’APsaA che poi sfociarono in una cau-sa legale, e a tre proposte di riforma dell’analisi didattica, delle quali viene anche pubblicato il te-sto: la cosiddetta "proposta PPP" (un acronimo che si riferisce alle iniziali dei tre firmatari, Fredric Perlman, Warren Procci e Robert Pyles), la proposta di Mark Poster e Michael Robbins, e quella di Luba Kessler, Kerry Kelly Novick e Lance Dodes. Viene anche sottolineato il bisogno di una governance democratica dell’APsaA. Nell’ultima parte vengono pubblicati gli interventi di alcuni di coloro che hanno contribuito al dibattito critico sull’analisi didattica: Richard Almond, Emanuel Berman, Lance Dodes, Ralph Fishkin, Henry Friedman, Robert M. Galatzer-Levy, Jane Hall, Otto Kernberg, Luba Kessler, Douglas Kirsner, Henry Zvi Lothane, Paul Mosher, Kerry Kelly Novick, Frederic Perlman, Mark Poster, Warren Procci, Bob Pyles, Arnold Richards, Michael Robbins, Mitchell Wilson.


Keywords: Analisi didattica; American Psychoanalytic Associa-tion; Training psicoanalitico; Autoritarismo; Candidati in psicoanalisi

  1. Ablon S. & Jones E. (2002). Validity of controlled clinical trials of psychotherapy: Findings from the NIMH Collaborative Study of Depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 5: 775-783.
  2. Arlow J.A. (1970). Chairman’s Report, Board of Professional Standards (BoPS), 57th APsaA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, May 7-10, 1970 (non pubblicato)
  3. Arlow J.A. (1972). Some dilemmas in psychoanalytic education. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 20, 3: 556-566., DOI: 10.1177/000306517202000310
  4. Balint M. (1947). On the psycho-analytic training system. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1948, 29, 2: 163-173 (trad. it.: Il sistema didattico in psicoanalisi. In: Balint, 1974, pp. 17-47).
  5. Balint M. (1953). Analytic training and training analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1954, 35, 2: 157-162 (trad. it.: Formazione analitica e analisi didattica. In: Balint, 1974, pp. 49-64).
  6. Balint M. (1974). L’analisi didattica. Chi psicoanalizzerà gli psicoanalisti? Rimini: Guaraldi (vedi anche: L’amore primario. Rimini: Guaraldi, 1973; Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1991).
  7. Benedek T. (1955). A contribution to the problem of termination of training analysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 3, 4: 615-629.
  8. Bergmann M.S. (1993). Psychoanalytic education and the social reality of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Review, 80, 2: 199-210.
  9. Berman E. (2004). Impossible Training: A Relational View of Psychoanalytic Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press (trad. it.: Il training impossibile. Un punto di vista relazionale sulla formazione degli psicoanalisti. Roè Volciano [BS]: Arpa, 2019 [questo libro è segnalato a pp. 527-528 del n. 3/2021 di Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane]).
  10. Berman E. (2017). Change from within in a traditional psychoanalytic institute: Twenty-five years of debate and transformation at the Israel Psychoanalytic Society. In: Zagermann, 2017, pp. 1-34.
  11. Bernardi R. (2008). Letter from Uruguay. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 89, 2: 233-240.
  12. Bernfeld S. (1952). On psychoanalytic training. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 1962, 31, 4: 453-482.
  13. Bibring G.L. (1953). The training analysis and its place in psycho-analytic training. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1954, 35, 2: 169-173.
  14. Bird B. (1968). On candidate selection and its relation to analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 49, 4: 513-526.
  15. Bolko M. (2011). Eppur si muove? Forse, chissà. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 45, 4: 481-487., DOI: 10.3280/PU2011-004005
  16. Bolko M. & Rothschild B. (2006). Una “pulce nell’orecchio”. Cronaca del controcongresso dell’International Psychoanalytic Association di Roma del 1969. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 40, 3: 703-718; ristampa: 2015, 49, 3: 431-446.
  17. Breger L. (2009). A Dream of Undying Fame: How Freud Betrayed his Mentor and Invented Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
  18. Bush F., editor (2020). Dear Candidate: Analysts from around the World Offer Personal Reflections on Psychoanalytic Training, Education, and the Profession. New York: Routledge.
  19. Casement P. (2005). The Emperor’s clothes: Some serious problems in psychoanalytic training. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 4: 1143-1160., DOI: 10.1516/58N3-PXKL-PDGE-VLXA
  20. Castiello D’Antonio A. (2008). Sulla selezione degli psicoanalisti. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 42, 3: 357-394.
  21. Cremerius J. (1986). Spurensicherung: Die “Psychoanalytische Bewegung” und das Elend der psychoanalytischen Institution. Psyche, 40, 12: 1063-1091 (trad. it.: Alla ricerca di tracce perdute. Il “Movimento psicoanalitico” e la miseria della istituzione psicoanalitica. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 1987, 22, 3: 3-34).
  22. Kernberg O.F. (2011c). Psychoanalysis and the university: A difficult relationship. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 92, 3: 609-622.
  23. Cremerius J. (1987). Wenn wir als Psychoanalytiker die psychoanalytische Ausbildung organisieren, müssen wir sie psychoanalytisch organisieren! Psyche, 41, 12: 1067-1096 (trad. it.: Quando noi, psicoanalisti, organizziamo il training psicoanalitico, dobbiamo farlo in maniera psicoanalitica! Quaderni. Associazione di Studi Psicoanalitici [Setting], 1991, II, 3: 5-23 [I e II parte], 4: 24-35 [III parte]).
  24. Cremerius J. (1988). Analisi didattica e potere. La trasformazione di un metodo di insegnamento-apprendimento in strumento di potere della psicoanalisi istituzionalizzata. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 1989, 23, 3: 3-27. Ristampa: 2021, 55: 487-508.
  25. Cremerius J. (1996). Die Begrenzung der analytischen Selbstaufklärung durch die Ausbildungshierarchie. Luzifer-Amor, 9, 17, 18: 68-83 (trad. it.: I limiti dell’autorischiaramento analitico e la gerarchia della formazione istituzionalizzata. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 1999, 33, 3: 5-22). Edizione su Internet: www.priory.com/ital/riviste/psicouman/cremerius99.htm.
  26. Desmond H. (2004). Training analysis: Oxymoron or viable compromise? Training analysis, power, and the therapeutic alliance. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 24, 1: 31-50., DOI: 10.1080/07351692409349069
  27. Dulchin J. & Segal A.J. (1982a). The ambiguity of confidentiality in a psychoanalytic institute. Psychiatry, 45, 1: 13-25., DOI: 10.1080/00332747.1982.11024128
  28. Dulchin J. & Segal A.J. (1982b). Third-party confidences: The uses of information in a psychoanalytic institute. Psychiatry, 45, 1: 27-37., DOI: 10.1080/00332747.1982.11024129
  29. Duncan B.L. (2002). The legacy of Saul Rosenzweig: The profundity of the Dodo bird. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 12, 1: 32-57., DOI: 10.1037/1053-0479.12.1.32
  30. Eisold K. (2007). The erosion of our profession. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24, 1: 1-9., DOI: 10.1037/0736-9735.24.1.1
  31. Ekstein R. (1966). Concerning the teaching and learning of psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1969, 17, 2: 312-332., DOI: 10.1177/000306516901700202
  32. Ferenczi S. (1932). Sprachverwirrung zwischen den Erwachsenen um dem Kind. In: Schriften zur Psychoanalyse. Frankfurt: Fischer, 1972, Vol. 2, pp. 303-313 (trad. it.: Confusione delle lingue tra adulti e bambini. In: Fondamenti di psicoanalisi, Vol. 3. Rimini: Guaraldi, 1974, pp. 415-427. Anche in: Opere, 1927-1933, Vol. IV. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2002, pp. 91-100).
  33. Frank J.D. (1961). Persuasion and Healing: A Comparative Study of Psychotherapy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press (2nd edition: 1973; 3rd edition, with Julia B. Frank: 1991).
  34. Freud S. (1914 [1915]). Nuovi consigli sulla tecnica della psicoanalisi: 3. Osservazioni sull’amore di traslazione. Opere, 7: 362-674. Torino: Boringhieri, 1975.
  35. Freud A. (1938). Probleme der Lehranalyse. In: Max Eitingon in Memoriam. Jerusalem: Israel Psychoanalytic Society, 1950, pp. 80-94 (trad. it.: Problemi dell’analisi didattica. In: Opere di Anna Freud. Vol. 1. Torino: Boringhieri, 1978, pp. 267-280).
  36. Galli P.F. (2013). From Basle to Milan to Zurich: On psychoanalytic training. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 94, 6: 1209-1214.
  37. Garza-Guerrero C. (2002a). “The crisis in psychoanalysis”: What crisis are we talking about? International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 83, 1: 57-83., DOI: 10.1516/YD5L-DCMK-V90C-2VYP
  38. Garza-Guerrero C. (2002b). Organisational and educational internal impediments of psychoanalysis: contemporary challenges. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 83, 6: 1407-1433., DOI: 10.1516/T9ET-VHK6-29ND-2T8U
  39. Garza-Guerrero C. (2004). Reorganisational and educational demands of psychoanalytic training today: Our long and marasmic night of one century. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 85, 1: 3-13., DOI: 10.1516/218T-E85E-7RA8-03U
  40. Gedo J. (1977). Essay on psychoanalytic education. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 7: 315-325. Una nuova versione in: Psychoanalysis and Its Discontents. New York: Guilford, 1984, cap. 11, pp. 167-178.
  41. Gitelson M. (1948). Problems of psychoanalytic training. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 17, 2: 198-211.
  42. Gitelson M. (1954). Therapeutic problems in the analysis of the “normal” candidate. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 35, 2: 174-183. Anche in: Gitelson, 1973 (trad. it.: Problemi terapeutici nell’analisi del candidato “normale”, cap. 11, pp. 171-190).
  43. Gitelson M. (1973). Psychoanalysis: Science and Profession. New York: International Universities Press (trad. it.: Psicoanalisi: scienza e professione. Torino: Boringhieri, 1980).
  44. Greenacre P. (1966). Problems of training analysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 35, 4: 540-567., DOI: 10.1080/21674086.1966.11926405
  45. Grotjahn M. (1954). About the relation between psychoanalytic training and psycho-analytic therapy. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 35, 2: 254-262.
  46. Heimann P. (1954). Problems of the training analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 35, 2: 163-168.
  47. Hinshelwood R.D. (1985). Questions of training. Free Associations, 2: 7-18
  48. Imber R.R. (2017). The training analyst’s self-enhancement. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 26, 2: 112-120., DOI: 10.1080/0803706X.2016.1209308
  49. Kairys D. (1964). The training analysis. A critical review of the literature and a controversial proposal. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 33, 4: 485-512., DOI: 10.1080/21674086.1964.11926324
  50. Kernberg O.F. (1986). Institutional problems of psychoanalytic education. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Associaton, 34, 4: 799-834.
  51. Kernberg O.F. (1996). Thirty methods to destroy the creativity of psychoanalytic candidates. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77, 5: 1031-1040. Edizione su Internet: www.psychomedia.it/pm/modther/probpsiter/kernberg-2.htm (trad. it.: Trenta metodi per distruggere la creatività dei candidati in psicoanalisi. Gli argonauti, 1998, 76: 1-14. Anche in: Kernberg, 1998, cap. 14, pp. 238-249 (trad. it.: pp. 259-270); e in: Kernberg, 2016a, pp. 79-91. -- Edizione su Internet: www.psychomedia.it/pm/modther/probpsiter/kernberg-1.htm).
  52. Kernberg O.F. (1998). Ideology, Conflict, and Leadership in Groups and Organizations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press (trad. it.: Le relazioni nei gruppi. Ideologia, conflitto, leadership. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1999).
  53. Kernberg O.F. (2000). A concerned critique of psychoanalytic education. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81, 1: 97-120., DOI: 10.1516/0020757001599555.
  54. Kernberg O.F. (2001). Some thoughts regarding innovations in psychoanalytic education (Presented at the International Psychoanalytic Association [IPA] Executive Council Meeting in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, January 7, 2001). IPA Newsletter, 10: 6-9 (trad. it.: Alcuni pensieri sulle innovazioni nella formazione psicoanalitica. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 2003, 37, 2: 35-49).
  55. Kernberg O.F. (2011a). La formazione in psicoanalisi e psicoterapia dinamica oggi: conflitti e sfide. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 45, 4: 460-471.
  56. Kernberg O.F. (2011b). Replica agli interventi. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 45, 4: 496-498.
  57. Kernberg O.F. (2012a). Three problematic assumptions about psychoanalytic education. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 60, 1: 97-102., DOI: 10.1177/0003065111435816.
  58. Kernberg O.F. (2012b). Suicide prevention for psychoanalytic institutes and societies. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 60, 4: 707-719.
  59. Kernberg O.F. (2013). Twilight of the training analyst system (Presidential Symposium tenuto il 18 gennaio 2013 al Congresso dell’American Psychoanalytic Association, New York, 15-20 gennaio 2013). Anche in: Kernberg, 2016a (trad. it.: Il tramonto del sistema dell’analisi didattica, pp. 232-249).
  60. Kernberg O.F. (2016a). Psychoanalytic Education at the Crossroads. London: Routledge (trad. it.: Psicoanalisi e formazione: cambiamenti e prospettive del training psicoanalitico. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 2018 [questo libro è segnalato a pp. 537-538 del n. 2/2019 di Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane]).
  61. Kernberg O.F. (2016b). A proposal for innovation in psychoanalytic education. Division/Review, 15: 13-16.
  62. Kerr J. (2004). “The goody-goods are no good”. Notes on power and authority in the early history of psychoanalysis, with special reference to training. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 24, 1: 7-30., DOI: 10.1080/07351692409349068
  63. Kirsner D. (1990). Is there a future for American psychoanalysis? Psychoanalytic Review, 77, 2: 175-200.
  64. Kirsner D. (2000). Unfree Associations: Inside Psychoanalytic Institutes. London: Process Press (Updated edition: 2009).
  65. Kirsner D. (2001a). The future of psychoanalytic institutes. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 18, 2: 195-212.
  66. Kirsner D. (2001b). Off the radar screen. In: Frisch S., Hinshelwood R. & Gauthier J., editors, Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. London: Karnac, 2001, pp. 111-121.
  67. Kirsner D. (2004). Psychoanalysis and its discontents. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 21, 2: 339-352., DOI: 10.1037/0736-9735.21.3.339
  68. Kirsner D. (2010). Training analysis: The shibboleth of psychoanalytic education. Psychoanalytic Review, 97, 6: 971-995.
  69. Knight R.P. (1953). The present status of organized psychoanalysis in the United States. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1, 2: 197-221.
  70. Lampl-De Groot J. (1954). Problems of psychoanalytic training. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 35, 2: 184-187.
  71. Laplanche J. (1999). Essays on Otherness. London: Routledge.
  72. Levine F. (2003). The forbidden quest and the slippery slope: Roots of authoritarianism in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51, S (Suppl.): 203-245.
  73. Levinson H. (1990). Freud as an entrepreneur: Implications for contemporary psychoanalytic institutes. In: Lapierre L., editor, Clinical Approaches to the Study of Managerial and Organizational Dynamics. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Symposium of the International Society for the Psychoanalytic Study of Organizations. Montreal: Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales, May 24, 1990 -- (https://internationalpsychoanalysis.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/LevinsonFreudasanEntrepreneur.pdf).
  74. Levinson H. (1994). The changing psychoanalytic organization and its influence on the ego ideal of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 11, 2: 233-249.
  75. Lewin B.D. & Ross H. (1960). Psychoanalytic Education in the United States. New York: Norton.
  76. Limentani A. (1974). The training analyst and the difficulties in the training psychoanalytic situation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 55, 1: 71-77.
  77. Lothane H.Z. (2007). Ethical flaws in training analysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24, 4: 688-696., DOI: 10.1037/0736-9735.24.4.688
  78. Luborsky L., Singer B. & Luborsky L. (1975). Comparative studies of psychotherapies: is it true that everyone has won and all must have prizes? Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 8: 995-1008.
  79. Lustman S.L. (1967). The meaning and purpose of curriculum planning. Bulletin of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 23, 2: 862-875., DOI: 10.1177/000306516701500408
  80. Maroda K.J. (2009). Analytic training and the problem of infantilization and dependency. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 45, 3: 316-321., DOI: 10.1080/00107530.2009.10746006
  81. Masur C. (1998). The training analyst system: Asset or liability? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 46, 2: 539-549., DOI: 10.1177/00030651980460020801
  82. McLaughlin F. (1967). Addendum to a controversial proposal: Some observations on the training analysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 36, 2: 230-247., DOI: 10.1080/21674086.1967.11926423
  83. McLaughlin F. (1974). A discussion of the paper by Daniel Shapiro on “The training setting in training analysis: A retrospective view of the evaluative and reporting role and other ‘hampering’ factors”. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 55, 2: 307-309.
  84. Mosher P.W. & Richards A.D. (2005). The history of membership and certification in the APsaA: Old demons, new debates. Psychoanalytic Review, 92, 6: 865-894.
  85. Nacht S. (1954). The difficulties of didactic psychoanalysis in relation to therapeutic psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 35, 2: 250-253.
  86. Nielsen N. (1954). The dynamics of training analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 35, 2: 247-249.
  87. Orgel S. (2002). Some hazards to neutrality in the psychoanalysis of candidates. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 71 3: 419-443.
  88. Paine T. (1776). Common Sense (trad. it.: Senso comune. Macerata: Liberilibri, 2005).
  89. Perlman F.T. (2021). Cronache psicoanalitiche: il dibattito sull’analisi didattica all’interno dell’American Psychoanalytic Association. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 55, 3: 363-424.
  90. Pinsky E. (2011). The Olympian delusion. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 59, 2: 351-375., DOI: 10.1177/0003065111406274
  91. Pyles R.L. (2000). The good fight: Psychoanalysis in the age of managed care. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2003, 51 (Supplement): 23-41.
  92. Pyles R.L. (2014). The good fight continues. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2016, 64, 1: 161-175., DOI: 10.1177/0003065116628569
  93. Quinodoz J.-M. (2008). Letter from Geneva. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 89, 3: 475-479.
  94. Reeder J. (2004). Hate and Love in Psychoanalytical Institutions: The Dilemma of a Profession. New York: Other Press.
  95. Renik O. (2003). Standards and standardization. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 51 (Supplement): 43-55.
  96. Rosenzweig S. (1936). Some implicit common factors in diverse methods of psychotherapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 6, 3: 412-415.
  97. Rothstein A. (2017). Fostering the educational value of candidate evaluation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 98, 6: 1641-1668., DOI: 10.1111/1745-8315.12613
  98. Roustang F. (1982). Dire Mastery: Discipleship from Freud to Lacan. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
  99. Salsburg D. (1985). The religion of statistics as practiced in medical journals. American Statistician, 39, 3: 220-223., DOI: 10.1080/00031305.1985.10479435
  100. Schachter J., Gorman B., Pfäfflin F. & Kächele H. (2013). Comparison of vignette-based ratings of satisfaction with TA and non-TA treatment by Training Analysts and by non-Training Analysts. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30, 1: 37-56.
  101. Schachter J., Pfäfflin F., Gorman B. & Kächele H. (2014). A questionnaire/interview comparison of satisfaction with Training Analysis to satisfaction with analysis by a non- Training Analyst: Implications for Training Analysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 31, 3: 357-374.
  102. Schechter K. (2014). Illusions of a Future: Psychoanalysis and the Biopolitics of Desire. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  103. Simenauer E. (1983). Some aspects of training analysis. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 10, 2: 145-157 (trad. tedesca: Aktuelle Probleme der Lehranalyse. Psyche, 1984, 38, 4: 289-306).
  104. Sonnenberg S.M., editor (with contributions by Copeland K., Eisold K., Lee C., Sonnenberg S.M. & Myerson W.) (2006). The prevention and treatment of organizationally induced trauma. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87, 1: 243-246., DOI: 10.1516/FEL2-AVA3-T04R-FP33
  105. Spence D.P. (1982). Narrative Truth and Historical Truth. Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis. New York: Norton (trad. it.: Verità narrativa e verità storica. Firenze: Martinelli, 1987).
  106. Spence D.P. (1994). The Rhetorical Voice of Psychoanalysis: Displacement of Evidence by Theory. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press (trad. it: La voce retorica della psicoanalisi. Roma: Fioriti, 2016).
  107. Stelzer J. (1986). The formation and deformation of identity during psychoanalytic training. Free Associations, 7: 59-74.
  108. Szasz T.S. (1958). Psychoanalytic training. A socio-psychological analysis of its history and present status. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39, 6: 598-613.
  109. Tessman L.H. (2003). The Analyst’s Analyst Within. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
  110. Thompson C. (1957). A study of the emotional climate of psychoanalytic institutes. Psychiatry, 1958, 21, 1: 45-51., DOI: 10.1080/00332747.1958.11023113
  111. Tower L.E. & Calef V. (1954). Training and therapeutic analysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2, 1: 175-178
  112. van der Sterren H.A. & Seidenberg H. (1975). The problem of the training analysis. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 3: 259-267.
  113. Wallerstein R. (2007). The optimal structure for psychoanalytic training today: A feasible proposal? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55, 3: 953-984., DOI: 10.1177/00030651070550032201
  114. Wallerstein R. (2010). The training analysis: Psychoanalysis’ perennial problem. Psychoanalytic Review, 97, 6: 903-936.
  115. Wampold B.E. & Imel Z.E. (2015). The Great Psychotherapy Debate: The Evidence for What Makes Psychotherapy Work. New York: Routledge (trad. it.: Il grande dibattito in psicoterapia. L’evidenza della ricerca scientifica avanzata applicata alla clinica. Roma: Sovera, 2017).
  116. Wampold B.E., Mondin G.W., Moody M., Stich F., Benson K. & Ahn H.-N. (1997). A meta-analysis of outcome studies comparing bona fide psychotherapies: Empirically, “all must have prizes”. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 3: 203-215., DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.122.3.203
  117. Weigert E. (1955a). Special problems in connection with termination of training analysis (Panel report). Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 3, 2: 314.
  118. Weigert E. (1955b) Special problems in connection with termination of training analyses. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 3, 4: 630-640.
  119. Wilson M. (2010). Putting practice into theory: Making the training analyst system coherent. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 58, 2: 287-311., DOI: 10.1177/0003065110368858
  120. Windholtz E. (1955). Problems of termination of the training analysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 3, 4: 641-650.
  121. Zagermann P., editor (2017). The Future of Psychoanalysis: The Debate about the Training Analyst System. London: Karnac [questo libro è segnalato a pp. 647-648 del n. 4/2017 di Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane].



  1. Pier Francesco Galli, Alberto Merini, Johannes Cremerius, Tracce. Analisi didattica e potere. La trasformazione di un metodo di insegnamento-apprendimento in strumento di potere della psicoanalisi istituzionalizzata in PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE 3/2021 pp. 487, DOI: 10.3280/PU2021-003005
  2. Fredric T. Perlman, Cronache psicoanalitiche: il dibattito critico sull'analisi didattica all'interno dell'American Psychoanalytic Association in PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE 3/2021 pp. 363, DOI: 10.3280/PU2021-003001

Fredric T. Perlman, in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 3/2021, pp. 363-424, DOI:10.3280/PU2021-003001

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche