Clicca qui per scaricare

Performance e co-produzione dei servizi pubblici: la problematica della misurazione
Titolo Rivista: MANAGEMENT CONTROL 
Autori/Curatori: Daniela Sorrentino, Pasquale Ruggiero, Riccardo Mussari 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2021 Fascicolo: suppl. 2  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  27 P. 115-141 Dimensione file:  271 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MACO2021-002-S1006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 




The article explores how public administrations develop co-produced public services performance measurement, addressing a relevant turning point in the literature on public services co-production. The authors adopt the single-case study methodology, and the investigation is guided by key theoretical concepts for analysing performance measurement in public administrations. The empirical setting is a participatory security practice implemented by a Tuscan municipality. The security practice is an example of collective co-production. Results from document analysis and interviews with key actors highlight how performance measurement is anchored to how the co-production practice is experienced. This paper advances the knowledge on co-production of public services and delivers practical contributions through empirical evidence on how co-production works in practice and how public administrations can measure the co-production results. Finally, a deeper dialogue between scholars and practitioners is encouraged to help both perspectives and backgrounds build systematic and valuable performance measures for co-produced public services.
Keywords: Co-production, Performance measurement, Public service, Participa-tory security, Italian municipality.

  1. Agostino D., Arnaboldi M. (2018), Performance measurement systems in public service networks. The what, who, and how of control. Financial Accountability and Management, 34(2), 103-116., DOI: 10.1111/faam.12147
  2. Alford J. (2014), The Multiple Facets of Co-Production: Building on the work of Elinor Ostrom. Public Management Review, 16(3), 299-316., DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.806578
  3. Alford J., O’flynn J. (2012), Rethinking public service delivery: Managing with external providers, Macmillan International Higher Education.
  4. Arnaboldi M., Lapsley I., Steccolini I. (2015), Performance Management in the Public Sector: The Ultimate Challenge. Financial Accountability and Management, 31(1), pp. 1-22.
  5. Barbera C., Jones M., Korac S., Saliterer I., Steccolini I. (2017), Governmental financial resilience under austerity in Austria, England and Italy: How do local governments cope with financial shocks? Public Administration, 95(3), pp. 670-697.
  6. Behn R.D. (2003), Why Measure Performance ? Different Purposes Require Mesures, Public Administration Review, 63(5), pp. 586-606.
  7. Bovaird T., Flemig S., Loeffler E., & Osborne S.P. (2019), How far have we come with co-production – and what’s next? Public Money and Management, 39(4), pp. 229-232., DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1592903
  8. Bovaird T., Loeffler E. (2013), We’re all in this together: harnessing user and community co-production of public outcomes. Birmingham: Institute of Local Government Studies: University of Birmingham, 1(2013), 15.
  9. Bracci E., Fugini M., Sicilia M. (2016), Co-production of public services: meaning and motivations, Co-production in the Public Sector (pp. 1-11), Springer.
  10. Brandsen T., Honingh M. (2016), Distinguishing different types of coproduction: A conceptual analysis based on the classical definitions, Public Administration Review, 76(3), pp. 427-435.
  11. Brandsen T., Steen T., Verschuere B. (2018), Co-creation and co-production in public services: Urgent issues in practice and research, Co-Production and Co-Creation (pp. 3-8), Routledge.
  12. Catturi G., Ricci Paulesu L. (2020), L’azienda "organismo intelligente": il fenomeno dell’omeostasi ed i sistemi di controllo, Management Control, 2, pp. 11-36., DOI: 10.3280/MACO2020-002002
  13. Cepiku D., Marsilio M., Sicilia M., Vainieri M. (2020), The Co-production of Public Services. Springer Books.
  14. Cepiku D., Mussari R., Giordano F. (2016), Local governments managing austerity: Approaches, determinants and impact, Public Administration, 94(1), pp. 223-243.
  15. Chaturvedi S., Gaur A. (2008), A dynamic model of trust and commitment development in strategic alliances, -- Available at SSRN 1115963.
  16. Clark M. (2015), Co-production in mental health care, Mental Health Review Journal.
  17. Crouch C. (2016), The march towards post‐democracy, ten years on. The Political Quarterly, 87(1), pp. 71-75.
  18. Dahlberg S., Linde J. (2016), Losing happily? The mitigating effect of democracy and quality of government on the winner-loser gap in political support, International Journal of Public Administration, 39(9), pp. 652-664.
  19. Di Mascio F., Natalini A. (2015), Fiscal retrenchment in southern Europe: Changing patterns of public management in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain, Public Management Review, 17(1), pp. 129-148.
  20. Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert G., & Halligan J. (2015). Performance Management in the Public Sector (2nd ed., Vol. 11, Issue July). Routledge., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-2762-0
  21. Dudau A., Glennon R., Verschuere B. (2019), Following the yellow brick road? (Dis)enchantment with co-design, co-production and value co-creation in public services. Public Management Review, 21(11), 1577-1594., DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1653604
  22. Dunleavy P., Hood C. (1994), From old public administration to new public management. Public Money & Management, 14(3), pp. 9-16.
  23. Eltrudis D., Monfardini P. (2019), La performance organizzativa in Italia: un’analisi critica, pp. 157-170.
  24. Emerson K., Nabatchi T., Balogh S. (2012), An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), pp. 1-29.
  25. Foster J.W., Spector M.P., Wiley A. J. (2011), Program Evaluation Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines (4th ed.), Pearson.
  26. Deidda Gagliardo E., Bigoni M., Papi L., Gobbo G. (2019), La programmazione dei Ministeri nella nuova stagione della performance. Dalla burocrazia della performance alla performance utile, Management Control, 1, pp. 169-189., DOI: 10.3280/MACO2019-001008
  27. Hinna L., Monteduro F. (2010), Misurazione, valutazione e trasparenza delle performance nella riforma Brunetta: una chiave di lettura, Impresa & Stato, 88.
  28. Honingh M., Bondarouk E., Brandsen T. (2020), Co-production in primary schools: a systematic literature review, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(2), 222-239.
  29. Kuhn T.S. (2012), The structure of scientific revolutions, University of Chicago press.
  30. Lapsley I., Miller P. (2019), Transforming the public sector: 1998-2008. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2211-2252., DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-06-2018-3511
  31. Liguori M., Sicilia M., Steccolini I. (2012), Some like it non-financial… Politicians’ and managers’ views on the importance of performance information, Public Management Review, 14(7), pp. 903-922.
  32. Lune H., Berg B.L. (2016), Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, Pearson Higher Ed.
  33. Marchi L., Bertei M. (2016), Performance Audit in the Public Sector. What is the contribution to the Performance Management?, Management Control, 3, pp. 49-63., DOI: 10.3280/MACO2016-003004
  34. Mari L. (2005), The problem of foundations of measurement. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 38(4), 259-266.
  35. Meijer A. (2012), Co-production in an information age: Individual and community engagement supported by new media, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), pp. 1156-1172.
  36. Merchant K.A., Van der Stede W.A. (2017), Management control systems: performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (4th ed.), Pearson.
  37. Monteduro F. (2010), Il ciclo di gestione delle performance, in Hinna L., Valotti G. (a cura di), Gestire e Valutare Le Performance Nella PA. Guida per Una Lettura Manageriale Del D. Lgs, 150, 2009.
  38. Monteduro F. (2017), The Adoption of Outcome-Related Performance Indicators in External Reporting: An Empirical Study, International Journal of Public Administration, 40(10), 860-874., DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2017.128082
  39. Moynihan D.P. (2008), The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform, Georgetown University Press.
  40. Mussari R. (2000), La valutazione dei programmi nelle aziende pubbliche, Giappichelli.
  41. Mussari R., Ruggiero P. (2010), Public managers’ performance evaluation systems and public value creation: Behavioral and economic aspects, International Journal of Public Administration, 33(11), 541-548., DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2010.507115
  42. Nabatchi T., Sancino A., Sicilia M. (2017), Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction, Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766-776.
  43. Norris P. (2011), Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. Cambridge University Press.
  44. Ostrom E. (1972), Metropolitan reform: Propositions derived from two traditions. Social Science Quarterly, pp. 474-493.
  45. Parker L.D., Northcott D. (2016), Qualitative generalising in accounting research: concepts and strategies, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
  46. Parks R.B., Baker P.C., Kiser L., Oakerson R., Ostrom E., Ostrom V., Percy S.L., Vandivort M.B., Whitaker G. P., Wilson R. (1981), Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations, Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), pp. 1001-1011.
  47. Pestoff, V. (2009). Towards a paradigm of democratic participation: Citizen participation and co‐production of personal social services in Sweden. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80(2), 197-224.
  48. Pestoff V. (2012), Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: Some concepts and evidence, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), pp. 1102-1118.
  49. Pollitt C., Bouckaert G. (2011), Continuity and change in public policy and management. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  50. Radin B.A. (2009), What can we expect from performance measurement activities? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28(3), pp. 505-512.
  51. Ruggiero P., Sorrentino D., Mussari R. (2020), Performance Measurement and Management in Co-Production, in Hoque, Z. Public Sector Reform and Performance Management in Developed Economies: Outcomes-Based Approaches in Practice.
  52. Sicilia M., Sancino A., Nabatchi T., Guarini E. (2019a), Facilitating co-production in public services: management implications from a systematic literature review, Public Money and Management, 39(4), 233-240., DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1592904
  53. Sicilia M., Sancino A., Nabatchi T., Guarini E. (2019b), Facilitating co-production in public services: management implications from a systematic literature review, Public Money and Management, 39(4), 233-240., DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1592904
  54. Siverbo S., Cäker M., Åkesson J. (2019), Conceptualizing dysfunctional consequences of performance measurement in the public sector. Public Management Review, 21(12), 1801-1823., DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1577906
  55. Sorrentino M., Sicilia M., Howlett M. (2018), Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool. Policy and Society, 37(3), pp. 277-293., DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2018.1521676
  56. Steccolini I. (2019), Accounting and the post-new public management: Re-considering publicness in accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 32(1), pp. 255-279., DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2018-3423
  57. Talbot C. (2010), Theories of Performance. Organizational and Service Improvement in the Public Domain, Oxford University Press.
  58. Tucker B., Ferry L., Steccolini I., Saliterer I. (2020), Debate: The practical relevance of public sector accounting research; time to take a stand – A response to van Helden, Public Money and Management, 40(1), pp. 5-7., DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1660098
  59. Tuurnas S.P., Stenvall J., Rannisto P.H., Harisalo R., Hakari K. (2015), Coordinating co-production in complex network settings, European Journal of Social Work, 18(3), pp. 370-382.
  60. Van Dooren W., Bouckaert G., & Halligan J. (2010). Performance management in the public sector. Routledge.
  61. Van Hengel H., Budding T., Groot T. (2014), Loosely coupled results control in Dutch municipalities, Financial Accountability & Management, 30(1), pp. 49-74.
  62. Van Thiel S. (2014), Research methods in public administration and public management: An introduction, Routledge.
  63. Voorberg W.H., Bekkers V.J.J. M., Tummers L.G. (2015), A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey, Public Management Review, 17(9), pp. 1333-1357., DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
  64. Voorberg William H, Bekkers V.J.J.M., Tummers L.G. (2015), A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey, Public Management Review, 17(9), pp. 1333-1357.
  65. Williams B.N., LePere-Schloop M., Silk P.D., Hebdon A. (2016), The co-production of campus safety and security: a case study at the University of Georgia, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), pp. 110-130.
  66. Williams D. W. (2004), Evolution of performance measurement until 1930. Administration & Society, 36(2), pp. 131-165.
  67. Yin R.K. (2017), Case study research and applications: Design and methods.Sage publications.

Daniela Sorrentino, Pasquale Ruggiero, Riccardo Mussari, in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" suppl. 2/2021, pp. 115-141, DOI:10.3280/MACO2021-002-S1006

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche