Planning the European architecture: The contribution of Robert Marjolin

Titolo Rivista HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY
Autori/Curatori Katia Caldari
Anno di pubblicazione 2022 Fascicolo 2021/2 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 25 P. 5-29 Dimensione file 122 KB
DOI 10.3280/SPE2021-002001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

In his autobiographical notes, Robert Marjolin defines himself as "architect of European Unity". He played a pivotal role in the reconstruction of France after WWII and in the construction of the European Economic Community. He was a strict collaborator of Jean Monnet far before the end of the war and vice-President of the European Commission from 1958 to 1967. He was a fervent advocate of European integration and strongly believed in the urgency to develop a planning approach at European level that was coherent with his idea of economic and monetary union. Accordingly, he bustled about the attempt to spread and to make accepted his idea of Europe as "Europe organisée" by coordinating meetings and seminars and by creating a network of people that shared and sustained the idea of economic planning. He promoted a communitarian "action programme" which should go beyond the customs union and would consider some long-term commu-nitarian targets. A large part of the literature overlooks Marjolin’s contribution to the European project. Main aim of this paper is to focus on Marjolin’s role in the European integration process and show that building a strong (economic but also political, social, and military) European union was his main goal and the leitmotif of his whole career.

Keywords:Robert Marjolin, European integration, economic planning, CGP

Jel codes:B31, F15, N14, N44, O2, P11

  1. Arena R. (2000). Les économistes français en 1950, Revue économique, 51(5): 969-1007.
  2. Arena R. (2003). Robert Marjolin’s Theory of business Cycles between Simiand and Keynes, History of Economic Ideas, XI(1): 95-111.
  3. Audier S. (2008). Le colloque Lippmann: Aux origines du neé-libéralisme, Lormont, Editions le Bord de l’eau.
  4. Bauchet P. (1966). La Planification française. Vingt ans d’expérience, Paris, éditions du Seuil.
  5. Benest S. (2021). The Politics of funding: The Rockefeller Foundation and French Economics, 1945-1955, OSF Preprints, May 26,
  6. Bossuat G. (2012). La France et la Construction de l’Unité Européene, Paris, Armand Colin.
  7. Bossuat G., Bussière E., Frank R., Loth W., Varsori A. (eds) (2010). L’expriéence Européenne. 50 ans de construction de l’Europe 1957-2007, Bruxelles, Etablissements Emile Bruylant.
  8. Brelaz M. (1976). Henri de Man et le néosocialisme belge, Res Publica, 18(2): 251-266.
  9. Briebricher T. (2017). Ordoliberalism as a variety of Neoliberalism. In J. Hien and C. Jorgers (eds), Ordoliberalism, Law and the rule of Economics, Oxford, Hart Publishing (pp. 103-114).
  10. Byé M. (1970). Les problèmes économiques Européens, Paris, Editions Cujas.
  11. Caldari K. (2019). From ‘planning’ to ‘programming’: a lost opportunity for the European Project?, Forum of Social Economics. Published online: DOI: 10.1080/07360932.2019.1688670
  12. Caldari K. (2021). Corporatism and Planning in Monnet’s Idea of Europe. In Mendes Cunha A. and Suprinyak C. E. (Eds), Political Economy and International Order in Interwar Europe, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan, 93-115.
  13. Camera di Commercio di Milano (1950), L’ERP e l’economia europea. Conference di Robert Marjolin e Roberto Tremelloni, Milano, Istituto per gli Studi di economia.
  14. Canihac H. (2019). Un marché sans économistes? La planification et l’impossible émergence d’une science économique européenne (1957-1967), Revue Française de Science Politique, 69(1): 95-115.
  15. Cohen A. (2006a). Du Corporatisme au Keynésianisme, Revue française de Science politique, 56: 555-592.
  16. Cohen A. (2006b). De la Révolution Nationale à l’Europe Fédérale. Les metamorphoses de la troisième voie aux origins du movement fédéraliste francais: la Fédération (1943-1948), Le Mouvement social, 217: 53-72.
  17. Denord F. (2001). Aux origines du néo-libéralisme en France: Louis Rougier et le Colloque Walter Lippmann de 1938, Le mouvement social, 2(195): 9-34.
  18. Denord F. (2008), “Néo-libéralisme et ‘économie sociale de marché’: les origines intellectuelles de la politique européenne de la concurrence (1930-1950)”, Histoire, économie et société, 1: 23-33.
  19. Denord F. (2016). Le néo-libéralisme à la Française. Historire d’une idéologie politique. Marseille, Agone.
  20. Denord F. and Schwartz A. (2010). L’Économie (très) politique du Traité de Tome, Politix 1(89): 35-56.
  21. Desolre G. (1974). Henry de Man et le marxisme. Critique critique de la critique, Revue Européenne des sciences sociales, 12(31): 35-62.
  22. Diemer A. (2012). Aspects théorique et pratique de la concurrence dans l’œuvre de Maurice Allais, Cahiers d’économie politique, 1(62): 75-115.
  23. Diemer A. (2014). Le néolibéralisme français ou comment penser le libéralisme au prisme des institutions, Economie et Institutions, 20-21: 1-28.
  24. Dreyfus F.-G. (1990). Histoire de Vichy, Paris, Perrin.
  25. Dyson K. and Featherstone K. (1999). The Road to Maastricht, Oxford University Press.
  26. Dyson K. and Maes I (2016), Architects of the Euro. Intellectuals in the making of European monetary Union, Oxford University Press.
  27. Fabra P. (1962). La Commission européenne propose aux Six un début de planification commune et la création progressive d’une union monétaire, Le Monde, 31 October.
  28. Fontaine P. (1988). Jean Monnet, A grand design for Europe, Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
  29. Forsyth M. (1963). Economic Planning and the Common Market, The Year Book of World Affairs, 17: 29-46.
  30. Fouquet F. (1980). Les Comptes de la Puissance. Histoire de la comptabilité nationale et due plan, Éditions Recherches.
  31. Gillingham J. (2003). European Integration, 1950-2003, Cambridge University Press.
  32. Hackett J. And Hackett A.-M. (1963). Economic Planning in France, London, George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
  33. Hawtrey R.G. (1946). Review of Prix Monnaie et Production, Economica, 13(49): 56-58.
  34. Hien J. and Jorgers C. (eds) (2017). Ordoliberalism, Law and the rule of Economics. Oxford, Hart Publishing.
  35. Hirsch E. (1962). French planning and its European application, Journal of Common Market Studies, 1(2): 117-127.
  36. Hirsch E. (1988). Ainsi va la vie, Lausanne, Centre Jean Monnet pour l’Europe.
  37. Holland S. (1980). Uncommon Market, London, Macmillan.
  38. Kuisel R.F. (1981). Capitalism and the State in Modern France, Cambridge University Press.
  39. Laurent P.-H. (1972). The Diplomacy of the Rome treaty, 1956-57, Journal of Contemporary History, 7(3/4): 209-220.
  40. Lynch F.M.B. (1984). Resolving the Paradox of the Monnet Plan: National and International Planning in French Reconstruction, The Economic History Review, 37(2): 229-43.
  41. Lynch F.M.B. (1997). France and the International Economy, London, Routledge.
  42. Lynch F.M.B. (2000), De Gaulle’s First Veto: France, the Rueff Plan and the Free Trade Area, Contemporary European History, 9(1): 111-135.
  43. Maes I. (2004a). On the Origins of the Franco-German EMU Controversies, European Journal of Law and Economics, 17(1): 21-39.
  44. Maes I. (2004b). Macroeconomic and monetary policy-making at the European Commission, from the Rome Treaties to the Hague Summit, NBB Working Paper, No. 58, National Bank of Belgium, Brussels.
  45. Maes I. (2006). The Ascent of the European Commission as an Actor in the Monetary Integration Process in the 1960s, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 53(2): 222-241.
  46. Maes I. and Pasotti I (2021). Robert Triffin: A Life, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  47. Marchal A. (1968). Le secteur public et l’économie de marché dans la C.E.E., Revue économique, 19(5): 737-764.
  48. Margairaz M. (1991). L’État, les finances et l’économie. Histoire d’une conversion. 1932-1952, 2 vols., Paris, Comité pour l’Histoire Économique et Financière de la France.
  49. Marjolin R. (1938a). Reflections on the Blum Experiment, Economica, 5(18): 177-191.
  50. Marjolin R. (1938b), François Simiand’s theory of economic progress, Review of Economic Studies, 5(3): 159-171.
  51. Marjolin R. (1938c). Rationalité et irrationalité des mouvements économiques de longue durée, Annales Sociologiques, series D, part 3.
  52. Marjolin R. (1941). Prix, Monnaie et production. Essai sur le mouvements économiques de longue durée, Paris, Alcan and Presses Universitaires de France.
  53. Marjolin R. (1953). Europe and the United States in the World Economy, Durham, Duke University Press.
  54. Marjolin R. (1989). Architect of European Unity. Memoirs 1911-1986, London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  55. McArthur J. H., & Scott B. R. (1969). Industrial planning in France, Harvard, Harvard University.
  56. Mioche P. (1987). Le Plan Monnet. Genèse et Élaboration 1941-1947, Paris, Publications de la Sorbonne.
  57. Monnet J. (1976). Mémoires, Paris, Fayard.
  58. Moravcsik A. (1998). The Choice for Europe, New York, Cornell University Press.
  59. Pirou G. (1933). La crisi del capitalismo secondo gli economisti francesi. In Vv.Aa., La crisi del capitalismo, Firenze, Sansoni.
  60. Pirou G. (1939). Néo-Libéralisme, Néo-Corporatisme, Néo-Socialisme, Paris, Gallimard.
  61. Pühringer S. (2017). The Success Story of Ordoliberalism as the Guiding Principle. In J. Hien and C. Jorgers (eds). Ordoliberalism, Law and the rule of Economics, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 143-160.
  62. Rousso H. (1988), La planification en crises (1965-1985), Paris, éditions du centre national de la recherche scientifique.
  63. Swann D. and McLachlan D.L. (1964). Programming and Competition in the European Communities, Economic Journal, 74(293): 85-100.
  64. Tirera L. (2007). Du Commissariat Général du Plan au Centre d’Analyse Strategique, Paris, L’Harmattan.
  65. Uri P. (1991). Penser pour l’Action. Paris, Éditions Odile Jacobs.
  66. V.V.A.A. (1992). De Gaulle en son siècle, Actes des Journées internaitonales tenues à l’Unesco, Paris 19-24 novembre 1990, Tome III, Moderniser la France, Paris, Plon. La Documentaiton Française, pp. 17-24.
  67. Warlouzet L. (2011). Le choix de la CEE par la France. L’Europe économique en débat de Mendès France à De Gaulle (1955-1969), Paris, Comité pour l’histoire économique et financière de la France.
  68. Warlouzet L. (2019). The EEC/EU as an Evolving Compromise between French Dirigism and German Ordoliberalism (1957-1995), Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(1): 77-93.
  69. Wexler I. (1983). The Marshall Plan revisited, Westport, Connecticut, Greenwood Press.

  • François Perroux on European integration: “L’application aveugle d’une ‘orthodoxie” Katia Caldari, in The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought /2023 pp.1
    DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2023.2238855
  • European Economic Governance Fabio Masini, pp.9 (ISBN:978-3-031-13093-9)

Katia Caldari, Planning the European architecture: The contribution of Robert Marjolin in "HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY" 2/2021, pp 5-29, DOI: 10.3280/SPE2021-002001