The spatial turn as analytical category

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE
Author/s Carolina Mudan Marelli
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/128 Language Italian
Pages 15 P. 160-174 File size 187 KB
DOI 10.3280/SUR2022-128013
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page .

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Starting from the debate on the concept of spatial turn, this article will attempt to question the concept from an empirical point of view, moving away from the formulations that identify it only as a pure theoretical turn, to think of it as an analytical category, capable to provide a framework of analysis useful to read what emerged in an ethnographic research within a Neapolitan periphery. An exploration of the concept starting from field research allows to think about the notion beyond its mere theoretical status, trying to grasp its manifestations in the everyday life of a place. We will therefore try to consider space as a fundamental explicative variable, trying to understand who puts space at the centre of his action (who does the turn?) and the reasons for this centrality of space (why they do it? Towards which spatial?).

Keywords: spatial turn, neighborhood, ethnography, Naples, policies, scholars

  1. Agier M. (2009). Esquisse d’une anthropologie de la ville: lieux, situations, mouvements. Paris: Academia.
  2. Barca F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. -- Testo disponibile al link: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/regi/dv/barca_report_/barca_report_en.pdf (consultato il 21 aprile 2022).
  3. Beebe K., Davis A., Gleadle K. (2012). Introduction: Space, place and gendered identities: Feminist history and the spatial turn. Women’s History Review, 21(4): 523-532. DOI: 10.1080/09612025.2012.65817
  4. Bergamaschi M. (2003). Prove di innovazione: territorializzazione delle politiche pubbliche e intervento sociale. Sociologia urbana e rurale, 71: 41-55.
  5. Blank Y., Rosen-Zvi I. (2010). The spatial turn in legal theory. Hagar: Studies in Culture, Polity and Identity.
  6. BURC (2013). Comune di Napoli e Fondazione con il Sud. 2013. Comune di Napoli - Bando di gara - CIG Lotto 1 Z2E07BF486, CIG Lotto 2 ZA007BF5D6. Recuperato 13 novembre 2014
  7. Castrignanò M. (2021). Sociologia dei quartieri urbani. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  8. Crang M., Thrift N. (2000). Thinking Space. London & New York: Routledge.
  9. Di Costanzo (2012). La guerra dei “Girati”. La domenica settimanale, 24 ottobre. -- Testo disponibile al link: https://www.ladomenicasettimanale.it/2012/10/24/la-guerra-dei-qgiratiq/ (consultato il 21 aprile 2022).
  10. Fava F. (2010). Lo Zen di Palermo. Antropologia dell’esclusione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  11. Györke A. (2019). Cities: Literature and the Urban Imagination. HJEAS: Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies, 25(1): 13-17.
  12. Levy J. (2012). A Cartographic Turn? Bridging the Gap between Sciences and Technologies of the Inhabited Space. EspacesTemps.net. -- Testo disponibile online al link: https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/183338 (consultato il 21 aprile 2021)
  13. Borrelli N., Mela A. (2018). Lo spazio del cibo. Roma: Carocci editore.
  14. Mela A. (1996). Sociologia delle città. Roma: Carocci editore.
  15. Richardson D.B., Volkow N.D., Kwan M.P., Kaplan R.M., Goodchild M.F., Croyle R.T. (2013). Spatial turn in health research. Science, 339(6126): 1390-1392.
  16. Regione Campania (2014). Centro Territoriale a Scampia. -- Testo disponibile al link: http://www.regione.campania.it/assets/documents/file_6832_GNR.pdf (consultato il 21 aprile 2021).
  17. Laino G., De Leo D. (2002). Le politiche pubbliche per il quartiere Scampia a Napoli. Report written as part of the NEHOM (NEighbourhood HOusing Models). Project for the European Union (5th Programme of Action 1998-2002).
  18. Lossau J., Lippuner R. (2004). Geographie und spatial turn (Geography and the Spatial Turn). Erdkunde, 58(3): 201-211.
  19. Tissot S., Poupeau F. (2005). La spatialisation des problèmes sociaux. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 4: 4-9.
  20. Warf B., Arias S. (2009). The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London & New York: Routledge.
  21. Wacquant L. (2007). Parias urbains: Ghetto, banlieues, État. Paris: La Decouverte.
  22. Wilson W.J. (1987). The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  23. Withers, C. W. (2009). Place and the ‘spatial turn’ in geography and in history. Journal of the History of Ideas, 70(4): 637-658.

Carolina Mudan Marelli, Lo spatial turn come categoria analitica in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 128/2022, pp 160-174, DOI: 10.3280/SUR2022-128013