Flexibility and job satisfaction: A general consideration

Author/s Giorgio Liotti, Marco Musella
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2021/113 Language Italian
Pages 15 P. 13-27 File size 356 KB
DOI 10.3280/QUA2021-113002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page .

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Over the last twenty-five years, Italy has profoundly changed the framework of the general rules underlying the functioning of the labour market (Blanchard et al., 2014; Bassanini e Duval, 2006; O’Higgins, 2012; Dutt et al., 2015; Brancaccio et al., 2018; Arestis and González-Martínez, 2015; Liotti, 2020; 2021). With the declared goal of encouraging the increase in employment and the entry of young people into the world of work, neo-liberal recipes have been applied, making, in this way, more flexible the labour market. One of the problems not analysed by scholars of the labour market is how this change of rules has influenced the relationship of "trust" between entrepreneurs and workers. In other words, like the introduction of flexibility policies, which have gradually made work more unstable and precarious, have influenced the synergy between worker and entrepreneur which - according to New Keynesian theory - represents one of the pillars of the success of the capitalist enterprise. The purpose of this work is to begin to fill this gap, analysing the dynamics of the relationship between labour market flexibility and job "satisfaction" (as a proxy of the confidence of workers in the company) in Italy in the period between 2001 and 2018. Using simple descriptive statistics (without the presumption of wanting to give simple answers to such a complicated topic, both from a theoretical and empirical point of view), two main results can be underlined: i) Considering the period 2001-2008, to a greater labour market flexibility is associated with a sudden reduction of job satisfaction; ii) Analysing the period 2009-2018, the inverse relationship between labour market flexibility and job satisfaction seems to vanish. This evidence should stimulate scholars to analyse more thoroughly also other issues related to flexibility: it is a question, for example, not only of studying in greater depth the abstract relationship between labour market flexibility and job satisfaction, but also of investigating the economic, social and political factors that are the basis of the dynamic change in the trend in the two different periods considered and, also, for example, to understand the impact on productivity.

Keywords: flexibility; labour market; job satisfaction.

  1. Zemanek H. (2010). Competitiveness Within the Euro Area: The Problem That Still Needs to Be Solved. Economic Affairs, 30(3): 42-47.
  2. Akerlof G. A. (1984). Gift Exchange and Efficiency-Wage Theory: Four Views. The American Economic Review, 74(2): 79-83.
  3. Akerlof G. A. e Yellen J. L., a cura di, (1986). Efficiency Wage Models of the Labor Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511559594
  4. Arestis P. e González-Martínez A. R. (2015). Is Job Insecurity a Driver of the Housing Cycle? Some Evidence in the Spanish Case. Panoeconomicus, 62(1): 1-14. DOI: 10.2298/PAN1501001A
  5. Azariadis C. (1975). Implicit Contracts and Underemployment Equilibria. Journal of Political Economy, 83(6): 1183-1202.
  6. Bassanini A. e Duval R. (2006). The Determinants of Unemployment across OECD Countries. OECD Economic Studies, 2006.
  7. Bernal-Verdugo L. E., Furceri D. e Guillaume D. (2012). Labor Market Flexibility and Unemployment: New Empirical Evidence of Static and Dynamic Effects. Comparative Economic Studies, 54(2): 251-273.
  8. Blanchard O. J., Jaumotte F. e Loungani P. (2014). Labor market policies and IMF advice in advanced economies during the Great Recession. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 3(1), 2. DOI: 10.1186/2193-9004-3-2
  9. Boitani A. e Damiani M. (2003). Una nuova economia keynesiana. Bologna: il Mulino.
  10. Brancaccio E., Garbellini N. e Giammetti R. (2018). Structural labour market reforms, GDP growth and the functional distribution of income. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 44: 34-45.
  11. Calderón C. e Chong A. (2005). Are Labor Market Regulations an Obstacle for Long-term Growth? In: Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies Book Series, Vol. 8, pp.: 167-219. Central Bank of Chile. -- https://ideas.repec.org/h/chb/bcchsb/v08c06pp167-219.html. Accessed 12 February 2021.
  12. Dutt A. K., Charles S. e Lang D. (2015). Employment Flexibility, Dual Labour Markets, Growth, and Distribution. Metroeconomica, 66(4): 771-807.
  13. Ferreiro J. e Gómez C. (2018). Employment protection and labour market performance in European Union countries during the Great Recession. Working Paper No. 31. FMM Working Paper. -- https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/181489. Accessed 16 March 2020.
  14. Ferreiro J. e Gomez C. (2019). Employment protection and labor market results in Europe. Journal of Evolutionary Economics.
  15. Ferreiro J. e Serrano F. (2013). Labor Flexibility, Inequality, and Financial Crisis. Journal of Economic Issues, 47(2): 567-574. DOI: 10.2753/JEI0021-3624470231
  16. Gordon D. F. (1974). A Neo-Classical Theory of Keynesian Unemployment. Economic Inquiry, 12(4): 431-59.
  17. Greenwald B. C. (1986). Adverse Selection in the Labour Market. Review of Economic Studies, 53(3): 325-347.
  18. Jha P. e Golder S. (2008). Labour Market Regulation and Economic Performance: A Critical Review of Arguments and Some Plausible Lessons for India. ILO, (1): 1-76.
  19. Jossa B. e Musella M. (1996). Macroeconomia: teorie per la politica economica. Roma: Carocci.
  20. Jossa B. e Musella M. (1998). Inflation, Unemployment and Money: Interpretations of the Phillips Curve (1858th ed.). Cheltenham, UK ; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Pub.
  21. Keynes J. M. (2010). General Theory of Employment Interest and Money. Montana: Whitefish.
  22. Lindbeck A. e Snower D. (1988). Cooperation, Harassment, and Involuntary Unemployment: An Insider-Outsider Approach. American Economic Review, 78(1): 167-88.
  23. Liotti G. (2020). Labour market flexibility, economic crisis and youth unemployment in Italy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 54: 150-162.
  24. Liotti G. (2021). Labour Market Regulation and Youth Unemployment in the EU-28. Italian Economic Journal.
  25. Liotti G., Musella M. e D’Isanto F. (2018). Does Labour market flexibility reduce youth unemployment in time of crisis? Evidence from Italian case. The empirical economics letters.
  26. Lucifora C., McKnight A. e Salverda W. (2005). Low-wage employment in Europe: a review of the evidence. Socio-Economic Review, 3(2): 259-292.
  27. Moreira A., Domínguez Á. A., Antunes C., Karamessini M., Raitano M. e Glatzer M. (2015). Austerity-Driven Labour Market Reforms in Southern Europe: Eroding the Security of Labour Market Insiders. European Journal of Social Security, 17(2): 202-225. DOI: 10.1177/138826271501700204
  28. O’Higgins N. (2012). This Time It’s Different? Youth Labour Markets During “The Great Recession”. IZA, DP No. 6434.
  29. Snowdon B. e Vane H. R. (2005). Modern Macroeconomics: Its Origins, Development And Current State (New edition). Cheltenham, UK ; Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Pub.
  30. Solow R. M. (1986). Monopolistic competition and the multiplier. In: Heller W., a cura di, Essays in Honor of Kenneth J. Arrow, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Stiglitz J. (1974). Alternative Theories of Wage Determination and Unemployment in LDC’s: The Labor Turnover Model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88(2): 194-227.
  32. Stiglitz J. (1987). The Causes and Consequences of the Dependence of Quality on Price. Journal of Economic Literature, 25(1): 1-48.
  33. Stiglitz J. E. (1976). The Efficiency Wage Hypothesis, Surplus Labour, and the Distribution of Income in L.D.C.s. Oxford Economic Papers, 28(2): 185-207.
  34. Stiglitz J. e Weiss A. (1983). Incentive Effects of Terminations: Applications to the Credit and Labor Markets. American Economic Review, 73(5): 912-27.
  35. Yellen J. L. (1984). Efficiency Wage Models of Unemployment. The American Economic Review, 74(2): 200-205.

Giorgio Liotti, Marco Musella, Flessibilità e soddisfazione per il lavoro: Una riflessione generale in "QUADERNI DI ECONOMIA DEL LAVORO" 113/2021, pp 13-27, DOI: 10.3280/QUA2021-113002