Towards a paradigm shift: policies and tools for a post car mobility

Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Paola Pucci
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2021/99 Language Italian
Pages 4 P. 13-16 File size 121 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2021-099002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page .

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This opening paper introduces the debate on a post car mobility model and the main conditions for rethinking the role and the space given to the car in our daily mobility practices, to frame the articles that make up this section aimed at proposing mobility policies designed to target a post car mobility model. Dealing with the feasibility and scalability of these policies, the articles offer some reflections for adding value with respect to the investments foreseen in the National Recovery and Resilience Plan in terms of sustainable and fair urban mobilities.

Keywords: accessibility by proximity; post car mobility; National Recovery and Resilience Plan

  1. Banister D., 2008, «The sustainable mobility paradigm». Transport Policy, 15, 2: 73-80.
  2. Bausells M., 2016, «Superblocks to the rescue: Barcelona’s plan to give streets back to residents». -- www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/ may/17/superblocks-rescue-barcelona-spain-plan-give-streets-back-residents (accesso: 2020.09.15).
  3. Bertolini L., 2020, «From ‘streets for traffic’ to ‘streets for people’: Can street experiments transform urban mobility?». Transport Reviews, 40, 6: 1-20. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2020.1761907
  4. Cathcart-Keays A., 2015, «Will we ever get a truly car-free city?». -- www. theguardian.com/cities/2015/dec/09/car-free-city-oslo-helsinki-co- penhagen (accesso: 2020.09.15).
  5. Cathcart-Keays A., 2017, «Oslo’s car ban sounded simple enough. Then the backlash began». -- www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/jun/13/oslo-ban-cars-backlash-parking (accesso: 2020.09.15).
  6. Comune di Milano, 2020, Milano 2020. Strategia di adattamento. Documento aperto al contributo della città.-- www.comune.milano. it/documents/20126/992518/Strade+Aperte_IT_200430_rev.pdf/ a100d04c-6b55-ae74-e0f8-b52563e07822?t=1589460655416 (accesso: 2020.09.15).
  7. Glaser M., Krizek K.J., 2021, «Can street-focused emergency response measures trigger a transition to new transport systems? Exploring evidence and lessons from 55 US cities». Transport Policy, 103: 146-155.
  8. Jones S., 2018, «It’s the only way forward: Madrid bans polluting vehicles from city centre». -- www.theguardian.com/cities/2018/nov/30/its-the- only-way-forward-madrid-bans-polluting-vehicles-from-city-centre (accesso: 2020.09.15).
  9. Laker L., 2020, «Milan announces ambitious scheme to reduce car use after lockdown». -- www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/21/ milan-seeks-to-prevent-post-crisis-return-of-traffic-pollution (accesso: 2020.04.21).
  10. Lanza G., Pucci P., 2022, «Distributing, de-synchronizing, digitalizing: towards a new mobile urbanity in the COVID-19 era». In: Armondi S., Balducci A., Bovo M., Galimberti B. (eds.), Planning prepared territories. London and New York: Routledge, in corso di stampa.
  11. Levine J., Grengs J., Merlin L.A., 2019, From mobility to accessibility: Transforming urban transportation and land-use planning. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
  12. Lucas K., 2012, «Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?».Transport Policy, 20, C: 105-113.
  13. Martens K., 2006, «Basing transport planning on principles of social justi-ce». Berkeley Planning Journal, 19, 1: 1-17. DOI: 10.5070/BP319111486
  14. Martens K., 2017, Transport justice: Designing fair transportation sys- tems. London and New York: Routledge.
  15. Moreno C., 2016, «La ville du quart d’heure. Pour un nouveau chro- no-urbanisme». -- www.latribune.fr/regions/smart-cities/la-tribu- ne-de-carlos-moreno/la-ville-du-quart-d-heure-pour-un-nouveau- chrono-urbanisme-604358.html (accesso: 2021.09.27).
  16. Moreno C., Allam Z, Chabaud D., Gall C., Pratlong F., 2021, «Introducing the ‘15-minute city’: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities». Smart Cities, 4, 1: 93-111.
  17. Preston J., Rajé F., 2007, «Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion». Journal of Transport Geography, 15, 3: 151-160.
  18. Pucci P., 2021, «Spatial dimensions of electric mobility. Scenarios for efficient and fair diffusion of electric vehicles in the Milan Urban Region». Cities, 110: 103069.
  19. Pucci P., Carboni L. Lanza G., 2021, «Accessibilità di prossimità in un territorio montano. Un approccio analitico e operativo per garantire ‘basic accessibility’». Paper presentato alla xlii Conferenza Italiana di Scienze Regionali, Territorial challenges in the post-Covid era. Web Conference, 8-10 settembre.
  20. Pucci P., Colleoni M., Daconto L., Vendemmia B., 2021, «Accessibilità di prossimità in contesti a bassa densità: reti e servizi di mobilità per territori inclusivi». In: Coppola A., Del Fabbro M., Lanzani A., Pessina G., Zanfi F. (a cura di), Ricomporre i divari. Politiche e progetti territoriali contro le disuguaglianze e per la transizione ecologica. Bologna: il Mulino, 311-321.
  21. Thaler R., Sustein C., 2009, Nudge. La spinta gentile. Milano: Feltrinelli. Vitale Brovarone E., Cotella G., 2020, «Improving rural accessibility: A multilayer approach». Sustainability, 12, 7: 2876.

Paola Pucci, Per un cambiamento di paradigma: politiche e strumenti per una post car mobility in "TERRITORIO" 99/2021, pp 13-16, DOI: 10.3280/TR2021-099002