How do Covid-19 Emergency Policies Relate to Political Trust? A Cross-Country Analysis

Journal title WELFARE E ERGONOMIA
Author/s Ilaria Di Tullio, Serena Tagliacozzo, Marco Cellini
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/1 Language English
Pages 35 P. 105-139 File size 615 KB
DOI 10.3280/WE2022-001010
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page .

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The paper investigates the influence of the measures implemented by national governments to curb the spread of the Covid-19 pandemic on the citizens’ trust in government, within European countries. Data collected from the Eurofound’s Living, Working and Covid-19 survey and data from the Oxford Covid-19 Government response tracker database has been analysed through the employment of a multivariate OLS regression model. Overall, the analysis shows a negative relation between the emergency policies implemented by governments and political trust when considered at aggregated level. However, when considered at a disaggregated level, different kinds of emergency policies yield diverse relations with trust in government. The analysis points out how the policies concerning school and workplace closure, restrictions on gatherings and the economic measures concerning income support and debt contract relief has a negative relation with trust in government, while cancelling public events and restrictions on internal movement displays a positive relation.

Keywords: Covid-19; trust in government; political trust; emergency policies; closing policies.

  1. Ahrendt D., Sandor E., Leonçikas T., Wilkens M. and Mascherini M. (2020). Living, working and COVID-19: Methodological Annex to Round 1. Eurofound Working Paper No. WPEF20005. - Retrieved from https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/wpef20005.pdf.
  2. Albertson B. and Gadarian S.K. (2015). Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Altiparmakis A., Bojar A., Brouard S., Foucault M., Kriesi H. and Nadeau R. (2021). Pandemic politics: policy evaluations of government responses to COVID-19. West European Politics, 1-21.
  4. Aidukaite J., Saxonberg S., Szelewa D. and Szikra D. (2021). Social policy in the face of a global pandemic: Policy responses to the COVID‐19 crisis in Central and Eastern Europe. Social Policy & Administration, 55(2): 358-373.
  5. Akbar M.S. and Aldrich D.P. (2017). Determinants of post‐flood social and institutional trust among disaster victims. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 25(4):279-288. DOI: 10.1111/1468-5973.12152
  6. Albrecht F. (2017). Government accountability and natural disasters: The impact of natural hazard events on political trust and satisfaction with governments in Europe. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 8(4): 381-410.
  7. Barber B. (1983). The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  8. Bargain O. and Aminjonov U. (2020). Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of COVID-19. Journal of Public Economics, 192(104316).
  9. Bol D., Blais A., Giani M. and Loewen P.J. (2021). The effect of COVID-19 lockdowns on political support: Some good news for democracy?. European Journal of Political Research, 60(2): 497-505. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12401
  10. Bouckaert G. (2012). Trust and Public Administration. Administration, 60(1): 91-115.
  11. Bowler S. and Karp J.A. (2004). Politicians, scandals, and trust in government. Political behavior, 26(3): 271-28.
  12. Braithwaite V. & Levi M., Eds. (1998). Trust and governance. Russell Sage Foundation.
  13. Breusch T.S. and Pagan A.R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 47(5): 1287-1294. DOI: 10.2307/1911963
  14. Caceres L.R. (2019). Determinants of trust in government in Latin America. Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas (REMEF): nueva época, 14(3): 329-351.
  15. Chamlee-Wright E. and Storr V.H. (2010). Expectations of government’s response to disaster. Public choice, 144(1-2): 253-274.
  16. Chen C.W., Lee S., Dong M.C. and Taniguchi M. (2021). What factors drive the satisfaction of citizens with governments’ responses to COVID-19?. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 102: 327-331.
  17. Christensen T. and Lxgreid P. (2005). Trust in government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4): 487-511. DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2005.11051848
  18. Cook R.D. and Weisberg S. (1983). Diagnostics for heteroscedasticity in regression. Biometrika, 70(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.2307/2335938
  19. Presidency of the Ministers. (2020). “Urgent measures to contain and manage the epidemiological emergency due to COVID-19”. Decree Law n° 6. 23 February. -- Available at: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2020/02/23/20G00020/sg.
  20. Esaiasson P., Sohlberg J., Ghersetti M. and Johansson B. (2020). How the coronavirus crisis affects citizen trust in institutions and in unknown others: Evidence from ‘the Swedish experiment’. European Journal of Political Research. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12419
  21. Espinal R., Hartlyn J. and Kelly J.M. (2006). Performance still matters: Explaining trust in government in the Dominican Republic. Comparative Political Studies, 39(2): 200-223. DOI: 10.1177/2F0010414005281933.
  22. Ervasti H., Kouvo A. and Venetoklis T. (2019). Social and institutional trust in times of crisis: Greece, 2002-2011. Social Indicators Research, 141(3): 1207-1231.
  23. Eurofound (2018). Societal change and trust in institutions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. -- Available at: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/ report/2018/societal-change-and-trust-in-institutions.
  24. Fetzer T., Witte M., Hensel L., Jachimowicz J.M., Haushofer J., Ivchenko A., ... and Yoeli E. (2020). Perceptions of an Insufficient Government Response at the Onset of the COVID-19: Pandemic are Associated with Lower Mental Well-being. Harvard Business School.
  25. Foster C. and Frieden J. (2017). Crisis of trust: Socio-economic determinants of Europeans’ confidence in government. European Union Politics, 18(4): 511-535.
  26. Fukasawa M., Kawakami N., Umeda M., Akiyama T., Horikoshi N., Yasumura S., ... and Bromet E.J. (2020). Long-lasting effects of distrust in government and science on mental health eight years after the Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster. Social Science & Medicine, 258(113108).
  27. Gozgor G. (2021). Global Evidence on the Determinants of Public Trust in Governments during the COVID-19. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1-20.
  28. Groeniger J.O., Noordzij K., van der Waal J. and de Koster W. (2021). Dutch COVID-19 lockdown measures increased trust in government and trust in science: A difference-in-differences analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 275(113819).
  29. Habibov N., Cheung A. and Auchynnikava A. (2017). Does social trust increase willingness to pay taxes to improve public healthcare? Cross-sectional cross-country instrumental variable analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 189: 25-34.
  30. Hale T., Petherick A., Phillips T. and Webster S. (2020). Variation in government responses to COVID-19. Blavatnik school of government working paper, BSG-WP-2020/032. -- Available at: http://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/covidtracker.
  31. Han Q., Zheng B., Cristea M., Agostini M., Belanger J., Gutzkow B. and Leander P. (2020). Trust in government and its associations with health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic. PsyArXiv, June 29.
  32. Han Z., Hu X. and Nigg J. (2011). How does disaster relief works affect the trust in local government? A study of the Wenchuan earthquake. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 2(4): 1-20. DOI: 10.2202/1944-4079.1092
  33. Hardin R. and Offe C. (1999). Democracy and trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Hetherington M.J. and Nelson M. (2003). Anatomy of a rally effect: George W. Bush and the war on terrorism. Political Science and Politics, 36(1): 37-44. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3649343.
  35. Hommerich C. (2012). Trust and subjective well‐being after the great east Japan earthquake, tsunami and nuclear meltdown: Preliminary results. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 21(1): 46-64.
  36. ILO (2020). A policy framework for responding to the COVID-19 crisis. Policy brief. -- Available at: https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/coronavirus/impacts-and-responses/WCMS_739047/lang--en/index.htm.
  37. Johansson B., Hopmann D.N. and Shehata A. (2021). When the rally-around-the-flag effect disappears, or: when the COVID-19 pandemic becomes “normalized”. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1): 321-334, DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2021.1924742
  38. Keele L. (2007). Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2): 241-254.
  39. Kentmen Cin C. (2013). Blaming the government for environmental problems: a multilevel and cross-national analysis of the relationship between trust in government and local and global environmental concerns. Environment and Behavior, 45(8): 971-992. DOI: 10.1177/2F0013916512453840
  40. Lalot F., Heering M.S., Rullo M., Travaglino G.A. and Abrams D. (2020). The dangers of distrustful complacency: Low concern and low political trust combine to undermine compliance with governmental restrictions in the emerging Covid-19 pandemic. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1368430220967986.
  41. Lee H.C., Deng C.Z. and Chen H. (2021). Trust in Government, Social Determinants, and Resource Distribution after a Catastrophic Typhoon. Natural Hazards Review, 22(1), 04020050. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000434
  42. Lee J. (2021). The social impact of natural hazards: a multi‐level analysis of disasters and forms of trust in mainland China. Disasters, 45(1), 158-179.
  43. Luhmann N. (2018). Trust and power. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  44. Rump M. and Zwiener-Collins N. (2021). What determines political trust during the COVID-19 crisis? The role of sociotropic and egotropic crisis impact. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1): 259-271. DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2021.1924733
  45. Miller D.S. (2016). Public trust in the aftermath of natural and na-technological disasters. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 36(5/6): 410-431. DOI: 10.1108/IJSSP-02-2015-0030
  46. Murtin F., Fleischer L., Siegerink V., Aassve A., Algan Y., Boarini R., ... et al. (2018). Trust and its determinants: Evidence from the Trustlab experiment. -- Available at: https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03596480/document.
  47. Naumann E., Möhring K., Reifenscheid M., Wenz A., Rettig T., Lehrer R., Krieger U., Juhl S., Friedel S., Fikel M., Cornesse C. and Blom A.G. (2020). COVID‐19 policies in Germany and their social, political, and psychological consequences. European Policy Analysis, 6(2): 191-202.
  48. Nicholls K. and Picou J.S. (2013). The impact of Hurricane Katrina on trust in government. Social Science Quarterly, 94(2): 344-361.
  49. OECD (2017). Trust and Public Policy: How better governance can help rebuild public trust. OECD Public Governance Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  50. OECD (2013). Trust in government, policy effectiveness and the governance agenda. Government at a Glance. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  51. Ohrling M., Øvretveit J., Lockowandt U., Brommels M. and Sparring V. (2020). Management of the emergency response to the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) outbreak in Stockholm, Sweden, and winter preparations. Journal of primary health care, 12(3): 207-214. DOI: 10.1071/HC20082
  52. Porat R., Tamir M., Wohl M.J.A., Gur T. and Halperin E. (2019). Motivated emotion and the rally around the flag effect: Liberals are motivated to feel collective angst (like conservatives) when faced with existential threat. Cognition and Emotion, 33(3): 480-491. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1460321
  53. PytlikZillig L.M. and Kimbrough C.D. (2016). Consensus on conceptualizations and definitions of trust: Are we there yet?. In: Shockley E., Neal T.M., PytlikZillig L.M. and Bornstein B.H., Eds., Interdisciplinary perspectives on trust: Towards theoretical and methodological integration, 17-47. Berlin: Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22261-5_2.
  54. Price D., Bonsaksen T., Ruffolo M., Leung J., Chiu V., Thygesen H., Schoultz M. and Geirdal A.O. (2021). Trust in public authorities nine months after the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-national study. Preprints 2021, 2021060469 (
  55. Reeskens T., Muis Q., Sieben I., Vandecasteele L., Luijkx R. and Halman L. (2021). Stability or change of public opinion and values during the coronavirus crisis? Exploring Dutch longitudinal panel data. European Societies, 23(sup1): S153-S171.
  56. Reinhardt G.Y. (2019). The Intersectionality of Disasters’ Effects on Trust in Public Officials. Social Science Quarterly, 100(7): 2567-2580.
  57. Rieger M.O. and Wang M. (2021). Trust in government actions during the COVID-19 crisis. Social Indicators Research, 1-23.
  58. Sabat I., Neuman-Böhme S., Varghese N.E., Barros P.P., Brouwer W., van Exel J., ... et al. (2020). United but divided: Policy responses and people’s perceptions in the EU during the COVID-19 outbreak. Health Policy, 124(9), 909-918.
  59. Schraff D. (2020). Political trust during the Covid‐19 pandemic: Rally around the flag or lockdown effects? European journal of political research. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12425
  60. Seabo B. and Molefe W. (2017). The determinants of institutional trust in Botswana’s liberal democracy. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 11(3): 36-49.
  61. SPS TREND (2020). ResPOnsE COVID-19. Risposta dell’Opinione Pubblica all’Emergenza Covid-19 in Italia. Rapporto finale - La luce in fondo al tunnel: tra riduzione dei contagi e timori per l’economia. Edizione 30 luglio 2020 (dati 6 aprile-8 luglio 2020). In collaborazione con Swg.
  62. Tabri N., Hollingshead S.J. and Wohl M.J.A. (2020). Framing COVID-19 as an Existential threat predicts anxious arousal and prejudice towards Chinese people. PsyArXiv, 31 Mar.
  63. Toya H. and Skidmore M. (2014). Do natural disasters enhance societal trust?. Kyklos, 67(2): 255-279.
  64. Van der Meer T.W. (2017). Political trust and the “crisis of democracy”. In: Kaplan J., Ed., Oxford research encyclopedia of politics.
  65. Wang C.H. (2016). Government performance, corruption, and political trust in East Asia. Social science quarterly, 97(2): 211-231.
  66. Woelfert F.S. and Kunst J.R. (2020). How Political and Social Trust Can Impact Social Distancing Practices During COVID-19 in Unexpected Ways. Frontiers in psychology, 11(PMC7767922).
  67. Zhao D. and Hu W. (2017). Determinants of public trust in government: Empirical evidence from urban China. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(2): 358-377.
  68. Rump M. and Zwiener-Collins N. (2021). What determines political trust during the COVID-19 crisis? The role of sociotropic and egotropic crisis impact. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(supl 1): 259-271. DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2021.1924733

Ilaria Di Tullio, Serena Tagliacozzo, Marco Cellini, How do Covid-19 Emergency Policies Relate to Political Trust? A Cross-Country Analysis in "WELFARE E ERGONOMIA" 1/2022, pp 105-139, DOI: 10.3280/WE2022-001010