Coping in Transplanted Patients

Journal title RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA
Author/s Carlos Siopa, Diogo Telles Correia
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/2 Language English
Pages 15 P. 25-39 File size 161 KB
DOI
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page .

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The theoretical model of coping mechanisms (CM) is based on a discussion between its main determinant factors: individual and situational (related to the 2 approaches of coping: dispositional and constitutional). The most used classification of CM is based on the division of CM in two main dimensions: coping focused on emotions and coping focused on problem resolution. It is essential that classification methods of CM have in consideration the coexistence of stable dispositional elements with a situational variability. Some instruments to evaluate CM are introduced, based on different theories. Coping can influence health through different mechanisms (neuroendocrine system, health threatening behaviours and adherence) and is included in two of the more important theoretical models applied to health (Moos & Schafer’s and Leventhal’s). Based on a systematic literature review we concluded that the most prevalent CM in pre transplantation period are acceptance, active coping, seeking support, and the less used are self-blame and avoidance. In post transplantation period the more prevalent CM continue to be active coping and support seeking, associated to confrontation, self-confidence, religion and problem focused coping. Evasive, emotive and fatalistic CM are associated to less control sensed by patients. Confrontation is associated to a better quality of life and avoidance to a reduction of quality of life and higher depression levels and denial to non-adherence increase. Control sensed by patients, CM related to the expression of emotions and denial change through clinical evolution of transplanted patients.

Keywords: Coping mechanisms, transplantation, model, psychosomatics.

  1. Sidle A., Moos R.H., Adams J., Cady P. Development of a coping scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1969; 20: 225-232.
  2. Lazarus RS. Coping theory and research: Past, Lazarus RS. Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Med 1993; 55: 234-247.
  3. Lazarus R.S., Averill J.R., Opton E.M. The psychology of coping: Issues of research and assessment. In GV Coelho, DA Hamburg & JE Adams eds. Coping and Adaptation. New York Basic Books 1974; 47-68.
  4. Roth S., Cohen L.J. Approach, avoidance, and coping with stress. Am Psychologist 1986; 41: 813-9.
  5. Haan N. Coping and defending: Processes of self-environment organization. New York Academic Press 1977.
  6. Hunter C.G., Goodstein L.D. Ego strength and types of defensive and coping behaviour. J Personal Soc Psychol 1967; 31: 432.
  7. Haan N. Coping and Defense mechanisms related to personality inventories. J Personal Soc Psychol 1965; 29: 373-8.
  8. Folkman S., Lazarus R.S. Stress process and depressive symptomatology. J Abnormal Psychol 1986; 95: 107-113.
  9. Pais-Ribeiro J., Santos C. Estudo conservador de adaptação do Ways of Coping Questionnaire a uma amostra e contexto portugueses. Análise Psicológica 2001; 4: 491502.
  10. Billings E.G., Moos R.H. The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the impact of stressful life events. J Behavioral Med 1981; 4: 139-157.
  11. Carver C.S., Pozo C., Haris S.D. et al. How coping mediates the efect of optimism on distress: A study of women with early stage breast cancer. J Personal Soc Psychol1993;65: 375-390.
  12. Carey M.P., Kalra D.L., Carey K.B. et al. Stress and unaided smoking cessation: A prospective investigation. J Couns Clin Psychol 1993; 61: 831-8.
  13. Parker J.D., Endler N.S. Coping and Defense: A Historical Overview. In Moshe Z, Norman S Endler eds. Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, Applications. Willey 1996.
  14. Folkman S., Lazarur S. Analysis of coping in a middleaged community sample. J Health and Social Behaviour 1980; 21: 219-239.
  15. Bond M., Gardner S.T., Christian J., Sigel J. Empirical Study of self- rated defense styles. Arch Gen Psych 1983; 40: 333-8.
  16. Epstein S., Meier P. Constructive thinking: A broad coping variable with specific components. J Personal Soc Psychol 1990; 58: 332-350.
  17. Folkman S. Making the case for coping. In BN Carpenter ed. Personal coping: Theory, research and application New York: Praeger. 31-46. Carver C.S., Scheier M.F., Weintraub J.K. Assessing coping strategies: A therotically-based approach. J Personal Soc Psychol 1989; 56: 267-283. Moos R.H: Shaefer J.A. Coping resources and processes: Current concepts and measures. In Goldberger & S Brenitz eds. Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects. 2nd ed, 234-257 New York 1993.
  18. Schwarzener R., Schwarzener C. A Critical Survey of Coping Instruments. In Moshe Z, Norman S Endler eds. Handbook of Coping: Theory, Research, Applications. Willey 1996.
  19. Krohne H.W. Vigilance and cognitive avoidance as concepts in coping research. In. Krohne H.W. (ed). Attention and avoidance: Strategies in coping with aversive ness. Seattle WA: Hogrefe & Huber 1993: 19-50. Amirkhan J.H. A factor analytically derived measure of coping: The coping Strategy Indicator. J Personal Soc Psychol 1990; 59: 1066-74. Carver C.S., Scheier M.F., Weintraub J.K. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Personal Soc Psychol 1989; 56(2): 267-283.
  20. Carver C.S. You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the Brief COPE. Internat J Behav Med 1997; 4: 92-100. Lindqvist R., Carlsson M., Sjodén P.O. Coping strategies of people with kidney transplants. J Advanced Nurs 2003; 45(1): 47-52.
  21. Holroyd K.A., Lazarus R.S. Stress, coping, and somatic adaptation. In. Goldberger L., Breznitz S. eds. Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects. New York: The Free Press 1982.
  22. Seyle H. The stress of life (revised ed.) New York 1976: Mcgraw-Hill Amkraut A.A., Solomon G.F. From the symbolic stimulus to the pathofisiologic response: Immune mechanisms. Int. J Psychiat Med 1974; 5: 541-563.
  23. Telles-Correia D., Barbosa A., Mega I., Barroso E., Monteiro E. Adherence in Transplantation. Acta Med Port 2007; 20: 73-85.
  24. Horowitz M., Hulley S., Alvarez W. et al. Life events, risk factors, and coronary disease. Psychosomatics 1979; 20: 586- 592.
  25. Leventhal H., Zimmerman R., Gutmann M. Compliance: A self- regulation perspective. In Gentry D, ed. Handbook of Behavioral Medicine. New York; Pergamon Press 1980;369-434.
  26. Leventhal H., Cameron L. Behavioral theories and the problem of compliance. Patient Education and Counseling 1987; 10: 117-138.
  27. Leventhal H., Fleming R., Glynn K. A Cognitive developmental approach to smoking intervention. In Smaes, Spielberg, Devares, Sarason, eds. Topics in Health psychology. New York; John Wiley 1988.
  28. Folkman S., Lazarus R.S., Dunkel-Schetter C., Delongins A., Gruen R.J. Dynamics of a stressful encounter: cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J Personal Social Psychol 1986; 50.
  29. Forsberg A., Backman L., Svensson E. Liver transplant recipients’ ability to cope during the first 12 months after transplantation-a prospective study. Scand J Caring Sc 2002; 16: 345-352.
  30. Zhang S.J., Huang L.H., Wen Y.L., Hu Z.H., Jin J. Impact of personality and coping mechanisms on health-related quality of life in liver transplantation recipients. Hepatobil Panc Dis Internat 2005; 4: 356-9.
  31. Myaskovsky L, Dew M.A., Switzer G.E. et al. Quality of life and coping strategies among lung transplant candidates and their family caregivers. Social Science Med 2005; 60: 2321-32.
  32. Myaskovsky L, Dew M.A., Switzer G.E. et al. Avoidant coping with health problems is related to poorer quality of life among lung transplant candidates. Progress in Transplantation 2003; 13: 183-192.
  33. Rapisarda F., Tarantino A., De Vecchi G. et al. Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation: Similarities and Differences in the Psychological Aspects of Noncompliance. Transplant Proc 2006; 38: 1006-9.
  34. Sutton T.D., Murphy S.P. Stressors and patterns of coping in renal transplant patients. Nurs Research 1989; 38(1): 46-9.
  35. Myaskovsky L., Dew M.A., Switzer G.E. et al. Trajectories of change in quality of life in 12-month survivors of lung or heart transplant. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 1939-47.
  36. Soyseth T., Dew M.A. Coping Patterns And Emotional Distress In Patients With Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Who Are Undergoing Lung Transplant Evaluation. Prog Transplant. 2020 Sep; 30(3): 228-234.
  37. Grubman-Nowak M., Jezewska M. Occupational Activity After Renal Transplantation vs Quality of Life, Personality Profile, and Stress Coping Styles. Transplant Proc. 020; 52(8): 2423-2429.
  38. Swanson A., Geller J., Demartini K. Active Coping and Perceived Social Support Mediate the Relationship Between Physical Health and Resilience in Liver Transplant Candidates. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2018; 25(4): 485-496.

Carlos Siopa, Diogo Telles Correia, Coping in Transplanted Patients in "RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA" 2/2022, pp 25-39, DOI: