Click here to download

Communicative analysis of the allegations of child sexual abuse: The role of age.
Journal Title: MALTRATTAMENTO E ABUSO ALL’INFANZIA 
Author/s: Sarah Miragoli, Rossella Procaccia, Paola Di Blasio 
Year:  2016 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  19 Pg. 51-69 FullText PDF:  224 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MAL2016-002004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Many studies have systematically explored the association between interviewing conditions and the quantity and quality of information retrieved by child-witnesses in both laboratory and forensic settings. Because alleged victims are often the only available source of information, this study aims to investigate the interactional dynamics of question-response in the allegations of child sexual abuse, with particular attention to the role of age of the child in this process. Transcripts of 76 forensic interviews of alleged victims between the ages of 4 and 17 years were analyzed: each testimony was divided into utterances that were coded according to the format of question and response. Our results showed that closed-ended questions (yes/no questions) are the most used in the interviews and that there are age differences in the way the interviews are managed and in the quality of the information obtained. In particular, preschool children seem to have the greatest difficulty in entering into the interaction process of the forensic interview.
Keywords: Child sexual abuse, forensic interview, child testimony, research interview.

  1. American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (2002). Guidelines on investigative interviewing in cases of alleged child abuse. Charleston, SC: APSAC.
  2. Biscione, M. C., & Calabrese, C. (2003). L’ascolto giudiziario del minore: metodologie a confronto. Maltrattamento e abuso all’infanzia, 5, 1, 67-83.
  3. Bruck, M., Ceci, S., & Hembrooke, H. (2002). The nature of children’s true and false narrative. Developmental Review, 22, 520-554,, DOI: 10.1016/S0273-2297(02)00006-0
  4. Camisasca, E., Miragoli, S., & Di Blasio, P. (2014). La disorganizzazione dell’attaccamento spiega i sintomi post-traumatici nei bambini vittime di violenza? Maltrattamento e abuso all’infanzia, 16, 2, 35-55,, DOI: 10.3280/MAL2014-002003
  5. Camisasca, E., Miragoli, S., & Di Blasio, P. (2016). Families with distinct levels of marital conflict and child adjustment: Which role for maternal and paternal stress? Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 3, 733-745,, DOI: 10.1007/s10826-015-0261-
  6. Carnes, C. (2000). Forensic evaluation of children when sexual abuse is suspected. Huntsville: National Children’s Advocacy Center.
  7. Carnes, C., Nelson-Gardell, D., Wilson, C., & Orgassa, U. (2001). Extended forensic evaluation when sexual abuse is suspected: A multi-site field study. Child Maltreatment, 6, 3, 230-242,, DOI: 10.1177/1077559501006003004
  8. Cederborg, A. C., Orbach, Y., & Sternberg, K. (2000). Investigative interviews of child witnesses in Sweden. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1355-1361,, DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00183-6
  9. Confalonieri, E. M., & Miragoli, S. (2014). Does culture shape the professional self? An exploration of teacher narratives. In A. Antonietti, E. M. Confalonieri & C. Marchetti (Eds.), Reflective thinking in educational settings: A cultural framework (pp. 284-307). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Craig, R. A., Scheibe, R., Raskin, D. C., Kircher, J. C., & Dodd, D. H. (1999). Interviewer questions and content analysis of children’s statements of sexual abuse. Applied Developmental Science, 3, 2, 77-85,, DOI: 10.1207/s1532480xads0302_2
  11. Cronch, L. E., Viljoen, J. L., Hansen, D. J. (2006). Forensic interviewing in child sexual abuse cases: Current techniques and future direction. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 3, 195-207,, DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2005.07.009
  12. Davies, G. M., Westcott, H. L., & Horan, N. (2000). The impact of questioning style on the content of investigative interviews with suspected child sexual abuse victims. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 6, 81-97,, DOI: 10.1080/10683160008410834
  13. Di Blasio, P., Miragoli, S., & Procaccia, R. (2012). The role of PTSD in understanding child allegation of sexual abuse. In V. Ardino (Ed.), Post-traumatic syndromes in childhood and adolescence: A handbook of research and practice (pp. 177-198). London: Wiley and Sons Publications.
  14. Di Blasio, P., Miragoli, S., Camisasca, E., Di Vita, A. M., Pizzo, R., & Pipitone, L. (2015). Emotional distress following childbirth: An intervention to buffer depressive and PTSD symptoms. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11, 2, 214-232., DOI: 10.5964/ejop.v11i2.779
  15. Faller, K. C. (2000). Questioning children who may have been sexually abused. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 2, 37-58,, DOI: 10.1300/J146v02n02
  16. Faller, K. C. (2003). Understanding and assessing child sexual maltreatment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  17. Faller, K. C. (2007). Interviewing children about sexual abuse. Controversies and best practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
  18. Fivush, R., Peterson, C., & Schwarzmueller, A. (2002). Questions and answers: The credibility of child witnesses in the context of specific questioning techniques. In M. L. Eisen, J. A. Quas, & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 331-354). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  19. Ghetti, S., Goodman, G. S., Eisen, M. L., Jianjian, Q., & Davis, S. L. (2002). Consistency in children’s reports of sexual and physical abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26, 977-995,, DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00367-8
  20. Hewitt, S. D. (1999). Assessing allegations of sexual abuse in preschool children. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  21. Korkman, J., Santila, P., & Sandnabba, K. (2006). Dynamics of verbal interaction between interviewer and child in interviews with alleged victims of child sexual abuse. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 109-120,, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00498.x
  22. Kortesluoma, R., Hentinen, M., & Nikkonen, M. (2003). Conducting a qualitative child interview: Methodological considerations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42, 5, 434-441,, DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02643.x
  23. Lamb, M., Sternberg, K. J., & Esplin, P. W. (2000). Effect of age and length of delay on the amount of information provided by alleged abuse victims in investigative interviews. Child Development, 71, 1586-1596,, DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00250
  24. Lamb, M., & Fauchier, A. (2001). The effects of question type on self-contradictions by children in the course of forensic interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 483-491,, DOI: 10.1002/acp.726
  25. Lamb, M., Sternberg, K. J., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P. W., Steward, H., & Mitchell, S. (2003). Age differences in young’s children’s responses to open-ended invitations in the course of forensic interview. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 5, 926-934,, DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.5.926
  26. Lamb, M., & Garretson, M. E. (2003). The effects of interviewer gender and child gender on the informativeness of alleged child sexual abuse victims in forensic interviews. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 2, 157-171,, DOI: 10.1023/A:1022595129689
  27. Lamb, M., & Brown, D. A. (2006). Conversational apprentices: Helping children become competent informants about their own experiences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 215-234,, DOI: 10.1348/026151005X57657
  28. Lamb, M., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). Structured forensic interview protocols improve the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 11-12, 1201-1231,, DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
  29. Lamb, M., & Thierry, K. L. (2005). Understanding children’s testimony regarding their alleged abuse: Contributions of field and laboratory analog research. In D. M. Teti (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in developmental science (pp. 489-508). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  30. Lamb, M., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2008). Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. West Sussex, England: Wiley.
  31. Leichtman, M. D., Morse, M. B., Dixon, A., & Wilch-Ross, M. (2000). Source monitoring and suggestibility: An individual differences approach. In K. P. Roberts & M. Blades (Eds.), Children’s source monitoring (pp. 257-288). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  32. Lyon, T. D. (1999). The new wave in children’s suggestibility research: A critique. Cornell Law Review, 84, 1004-1087.
  33. Lyon, T. D., & Saywitz, K. J. (2006). From post-mortem to preventive medicine: Next steps for research on child witnesses. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 833-861,, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00489.x
  34. Merchant, L., & Toth, P. (2001). Child interview guide. Seattle, WA: Harborview Center for Sexual Assault and Traumatic Stress.
  35. Miragoli, S., Procaccia, R., & Di Blasio, P. (2014). Language use and PTSD symptoms: Content analyses of allegations of child sexual abuse. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 14, 5, 355-382,, DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2014.970423
  36. Orbach, Y., & Lamb, M. (1999). Assessing the accuracy of a child’s account of sexual abuse: A case study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 91-98,, DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00114-8
  37. Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M., Esplin, P., & Horowitz, D. (2000). Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 6, 733-752,, DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00137-X
  38. Orbach, Y., & Lamb, M. (2001). The relationship between within-interview contradictions and eliciting interviewer utterances. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25, 323-333,, DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00254-4
  39. Procaccia, R., Miragoli, S., & Di Blasio, P. (2013). L’utilizzo del Blacky Pictures’ Test nella valutazione dei minori vittime di abuso sessuale. Maltrattamento e abuso all’infanzia, 15, 3, 109-130,, DOI: 10.3280/MAL2013-00300
  40. Peterson, C., Biggs, M. (1997). Interviewing children about trauma: Problems with “specific” questions. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 10, 279-290,, DOI: 10.1002/jts.2490100208
  41. Peterson, C., Dowden, C., & Tobin, J. (1999). Interviewing preschoolers: Comparison of yes/no and why-questions. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 5, 539-555,, DOI: 10.1023/A:1022396112719
  42. Poole, D. A., & Lamb, M. (1998). Investigative interviews of children. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  43. Olivari, M. G., Confalonieri, E., & Ionio, C. (2011). Italian psychologists’ and midwives’ perceptions of the pregnant adolescent: A qualitative study. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 29, 4, 343-353.
  44. Ripamonti, S., & Scaratti, G. (2012). Weak knowledge for strengthening competences: A practice-based approach in assessment management. Management Learning, 43, 2, 183-197,, DOI: 10.1177/1350507611429911
  45. Ripamonti, S., Galuppo, L., Gorli, M., Scaratti, G., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2016). Pushing action research toward reflexive practice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25, 1, 55-68,
  46. Roberts, K. P. (2002). Children’s ability to distinguish between memories from multiple sources: Implication for the quality and accuracy of eyewitness statements. Developmental Review, 22, 403-435,, DOI: 10.1016/S0273-2297(02)00005-9
  47. Roberts, K. P., & Blades, M. (2002). Children’s source monitoring. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  48. Roberts, K. P., & Powell, M. (2006). The consistency of false suggestions moderates children’s reports of a single instance of a repeated event: Predicting increases and decreases in suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 1, 68-89,, DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.12.003
  49. Saywitz, K., Goodman, G. S., & Lyon, T. D. (2002). Interviewing children in and out of court. In J. Myers, L. Berliner, J. Briere, C. Hendrix, C. Jenny & T. Reid (Eds.), The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (pp. 349-377). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  50. Saywitz, K., & Lyon, T. D. (2002). Coming to grips with children’s suggestibility. In M. L. Eisen, G. S. Goodman & J. A. Quas (Eds.), Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview (pp. 85-113). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  51. Scali, M., & Calabrese, C. (2003). La conduzione dell’audizione protetta: analisi dell’interazione comunicativa tra esperto e minore presunta vittima di abuso sessuale. Maltrattamento e abuso all’infanzia, 5, 1, 53-66.
  52. Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P., Redlich, A., Sunshine, N. (1996). The relationship between investigative utterance types and the informativeness of child witnesses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 17, 439-451,, DOI: 10.1016/S0193-3973(96)90036-2
  53. Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M., Hershkowitz, I., Yudilevitch, L., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P., & Hovav, M. (1997). Effects of introductory style on children’s abilities to describe experiences of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21, 11, 1133-1146,, DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2134(97)00071-9
  54. Sternberg, K., Lamb, M., Orbach, Y., Esplin, P., & Mitchell, S. (2001). Use of structured investigative protocol enhances young children’s responses to free-recall prompts in the course of forensic interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 5, 997-1005,, DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.997
  55. Walker, A. G. (1999). Handbook on questioning children. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Center on Children and Law.
  56. Waterman, A. H., Blades, M., & Spencer, C. (2002). Interviewing children and adults: The effect of question format on the tendency of speculate. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 521-531,, DOI: 10.1002/acp.741

Sarah Miragoli, Rossella Procaccia, Paola Di Blasio, Communicative analysis of the allegations of child sexual abuse: The role of age. in "MALTRATTAMENTO E ABUSO ALL’INFANZIA" 2/2016, pp. 51-69, DOI:10.3280/MAL2016-002004

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content