Click here to download

Shared leisure and couple satisfaction
Journal Title: PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE 
Author/s: Rosalba Raffagnino, Camilla Matera, Martina Fabbrizzi, Alice Pennatini, Luisa Puddu 
Year:  2015 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  24 Pg. 87-110 FullText PDF:  183 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PDS2015-003005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


This research aimed to examine how shared leisure can influence couple satisfaction and how this association might vary according to partners’ gender, relationship length and parental status. A questionnaire assessing the variables of interest was administered to 200 heterosexual couples (N = 400). Path analysis revealed an indirect effect (through the quality of shared leisure) of parental status and a direct effect of relationship length on dyadic satisfaction. An interaction effect between relationship length and participants’ gender on shared leisure was observed. Also familial satisfaction, which was higher among men, was influenced by the quality of shared leisure, on which a main effect of parental status and a relationship length X gender interaction effect were observed. These findings show that the quality of shared time has a clear role in influencing couple satisfaction. From an applicative point of view, this research highlights the importance of focusing interventions on positive dimensions of couple life.
Keywords: Shared leisure, sharing, couple satisfaction, gender, relationship length, parenting

  1. Adams K.B. (2004). Changing investment in activities and interests in elders' lives: Theory and measurement. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 58 (2): 87–108., DOI: 10.2190/0UQ0-7D8X-XVVU-TF7
  2. Agate J.R., Zabriskie R.B., Agate S.T. and Poff R. (2009). Family leisure satisfaction and satisfaction with family life. Journal of Leisure Research, 41(2): 205-223.
  3. Agate S.T., Zabriskie R.B. and Eggett D.L. (2007). Praying, playing and successful families: An examination of family religiosity, family leisure, and family functioning. Marriage & Family Review, 42(2): 51 -75., DOI: 10.1300/J002v42n02_0
  4. Aleem S. and Danish L. (2008). Marital satisfaction and anxiety among single and dual career women. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 34, Special Issue: 141-144.
  5. Allendorf K. and Ghimire D.J. (2013). Determinants of marital quality in an arranged marriage society. Social Science Research, 42 (1): 59-70., DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.00
  6. Attili G. (2004). Attaccamento e amore. [Attachment and love] Bologna: Il Mulino.
  7. Barnet-Verzat C., Pailhé A. and Solaz A. (2011). Spending time together: The impact of children on couples’ leisure synchronization. Review of Economics of the Household, 9 (4): 465-486., DOI: 10.1007/s11150-010-9112-
  8. Berg E.C., Trost M., Schneider I.E. and Allison M.T. (2001). Dyadic exploration of the relationship of leisure satisfaction, leisure time, and gender to relationship satisfaction. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23(1): 35-46., DOI: 10.1080/0149040015050223
  9. Bertoni A. and Bodenmann G. (2010). Satisfied and dissatisfied couples positive and negative dimensions, conflict styles, and relationships with family of origin. European Psychologist 15(3): 175-184., DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040/a00001
  10. Bianchi S.M. and Milkie M.A. (2010). Work and family research in the first decade of the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72: 705-725., DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00726.
  11. Bradbury T.N. and Karney B.R. (2004). Understanding and altering the longitudinal course of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66: 862-879., DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00059.
  12. Bradbury T.N. and Lavner J.A. (2012). How Can We Improve Preventive and Educational Interventions for Intimate Relationships? Behavior Therapy, 43 (1): 113-122., DOI: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.02.0
  13. Caldwell L.L. (2005). Leisure and health: Why is leisure therapeutic? British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 33(1): 7-26., DOI: 10.1080/0306988041233133593
  14. Claxton A. and Perry-Jenkins M. (2008). No fun anymore: Leisure and marital quality across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70 (1): 28-43., DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00459.
  15. Cowan C.P. and Cowan P.A. (1995). Interventions to ease the transition to parenthood: Why they are needed and what they can do. Family Relations, 44: 412-423., DOI: 10.2307/584997
  16. Crawford D.W., Houts R.M., Huston T.L. and George L.J. (2002). Compatibility, leisure, and satisfaction in marital relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64 (2): 433- 449., DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00433.
  17. Deeg D.J. (2005). Longitudinal characterization of course types of functional limitations. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(5): 253-261., DOI: 10.1080/09638280400006507
  18. Dush C.M.K. and Amato P.R. (2005). Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22 (5): 607-627., DOI: 10.1177/0265407505056438
  19. Fincham F.D., Beach S.R.H. and Kemp-Fincham S. (1997). Marital quality: A new theoretical perspective. In Sternberg R.J. and Hojjat M., editors, Satisfaction in close relationships. New York: Guilford Press, 275-304.
  20. Fincham F.D. and Beach S.R.H. (2010). Marriage in the new millennium: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3): 630-649., DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00722.
  21. Gere J. and Helwig C.C. (2012). Young adults’ attitudes and reasoning about gender roles in the family context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36 (3): 301-313., DOI: 10.1177/036168431244427
  22. Gere J., Schimmack U., Pinkus R.T. and Lockwood P. (2011). The effects of romantic partners’ goal congruence on affective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 45: 549-559., DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.06.01
  23. Glade A., Bean R.A. and Vira R. (2005). A prime time for marital/relational intervention: A review of the transition to parenthood literature with treatment recommendations. American Journal of Family Therapy, 33 (4): 319-336., DOI: 10.1080/0192618059096213
  24. Hellström I., Nolan M. and Lundh U. (2005). “We do things together”: A case study of couplehood in dementia. Dementia, 4(1): 7-22. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 1471301205049188.
  25. Hribernik J. and Mussap A.J. (2010). Research note: Leisure satisfaction and subjective wellbeing. Annals of Leisure Research, 13(4): 701-708., DOI: 10.1080/11745398.2010.968687
  26. Hu L. and Bentler P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1): 1-55., DOI: 10.1080/1070551990954011
  27. Jackson J.B., Miller R.B., Oka M. and Henry R.G. (2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76 (1): 105-129 105., DOI: 10.1111/jomf.1207
  28. James S.L. (2015). Variation in trajectories of women’s marital quality. Social Science Research, 49, 16-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.07.010 0049-089X/
  29. Johnson H.A., Zabriskie R.B. and Hill B. (2006). The contribution of couple leisure involvement, leisure time, and leisure satisfaction to marital satisfaction. Marriage and Family Review, 40 (1): 69-91., DOI: 10.1300/J002v40n01_0
  30. Joudrey A.D. and Wallace J.E. (2009). Leisure as a Coping Resource: A Test of the Job Demand-Control-Support Model. Human Relations, 62 (2): 195-218., DOI: 10.1177/001872670810035
  31. Kalmijn M. and Bernasco W. (2001). Joint and separated lifestyles in couple relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(3): 639-654., DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00639.
  32. Kline R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
  33. Işınsu Halat M. and Hovardaoğlu S. (2011). The relationship between forms and durations of relationships and attachment styles of couples. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30: 2567-2574., DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.50
  34. ISTAT (2010). Famiglia e società. La divisione dei ruoli nelle coppie [Family and society. Roles’ division in couples] Anno 2008-2009.
  35. Lasio D. (2011). Differenze di genere e distribuzione del carico familiare nelle famiglie eterosessuali. [Gender differences and household labour in heterosexual families]. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 2: 69-82., DOI: 10.3280/RPR2011-002006LasioD.,SerriF.,DeSimoneS.andPutzuD.(2013).Ilgenereeilcaricofamiliare.Ilcontributodellapsicologiadiscorsivaperunaricerca“rilevante”.[Relevantresearchongenderandhouseholdlabour:Thecontributionofdiscursivepsychology]PsicologiaSociale,1:85-106.DOI:10.1482/7313
  36. Lesnard L. (2008). Off-scheduling within dual-earner couples: An unequal and negative externality of family time. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2): 447-490., DOI: 10.1086/59064
  37. Mannino C.A. and Deutsch F.M. (2007). Changing the division of household labor: A negotiated process between partners. Sex Roles, 56 (5-6): 309-324., DOI: 10.1007/s11199-006-9181-
  38. McPheters J.K. and Sandberg J.G. (2010). The relationship among couple relationship quality, physical functioning, and depression in multiple sclerosis patients and partners. Families, Systems & Health, 28 (1): 48-68., DOI: 10.1037/a0018818
  39. Miller R.B., Hollist C.S., Olsen J. and Law D. (2013). Marital quality and health over 20 years: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75 (3): 667-680., DOI: 10.1111/jomf.1202
  40. Ng K.M., Loy J.T.C., Gudmunson C.G. and Cheong W. (2009). Gender differences in marital and life satisfaction among Chinese Malaysians. Sex Roles, 60 (1-2): 33-43., DOI: 10.1007/s11199-008-9503-
  41. Orthner D.K. (1975). Leisure activity patterns and marital satisfaction over the marital career. Journal of Marriage and Family, 37 (1): 91-102
  42. Perry-Jenkins M., Goldberg A.E., Pierce C.P. and Sayer A.G. (2007). Shift work, role overload, and the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69 (1): 123-138.
  43. , DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00349.
  44. Preacher K.J. and Hayes A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3): 879-891., DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.87
  45. Proulx C.M. and Snyder-Rivas L.A. (2013).The longitudinal associations between marital happiness, problems, and self-rated health. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(2): 194-202., DOI: 10.1037/a003187
  46. Raffagnino R. (2008). Vulnerabilities and strengths in marital quality and stability: A multidimensional perspective. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 256: 3-18. ISSN:0006-6761
  47. Raffagnino R. (2010). Liberi di scegliersi ancora. Un percorso clinico con la coppia. [Free to choose ourselves again. A clinical pathway with the couple]. Firenze: Le Lettere. Raffagnino R. e Matera C. (2015). Development and validation of two measures for assessing relationship satisfaction. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 14 (4): 322-341.
  48. Raffagnino R. e Penzo I. (2015). La Couple’s Affectivity Scale (CAS): uno strumento multidimensionale per la misurazione dell’affettività nella relazione di coppia [The Couple’s Affectivity Scale (CAS): A multidimensional tool for the assessment of affectivity in couple relationship]. Psicoterapia Cognitiva e Comportamentale. Italian Journal of Cognitive and Behavioural Psychotherapy, 21 (2): 189-223.
  49. Saginak K.A. and Saginak M.A. (2005). Balancing work and family: equity, gender, and marital satisfaction. The Family Journal, 13(2): 162-166., DOI: 10.1177/106648070427323
  50. Scabini E. e Cigoli V. (2006). Family identity. Ties, symbols, and transitions. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  51. Shaw S.M. (1992). Dereifying family leisure: An examination of women’s and men’s everyday experiences and perceptions of family time. Leisure Sciences, 14(4): 271-286., DOI: 10.1080/0149040920951317
  52. Shaw S.M. and Dawson D. (2001). Purposive leisure: Examining parental discourses on family activities. Leisure Science: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23(4): 217-231., DOI: 10.1080/01490400152809098
  53. Smith T.D. and McMillan B.F. (2001). A primer of model fit indices in structural equation modeling. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
  54. Swim T. and Surra C. (1999). Role of gender in behavioral interdipendence and relationship outcome for premarital couples. Sex Roles, 41(1-2): 49-70., DOI: 10.1023/A:101888562465
  55. Tani F. e Steca P. (2007). Soddisfazione di coppia e benessere della persona: Determinanti personali e relazionali. [Couple satisfaction and individual well-being: Personal and relational determinants]. Età Evolutiva, 1: 67-76.
  56. Trudel G., Dargis L., Villeneuve L., Cadieux J., Boyer R. and Préville M. (2013). Marital, sexual and psychological functioning of older couples living at home: The results of a national survey using longitudinal methodology (part one). Sexologies, 22: 101-107., DOI: 10.1016/j.sexol.2013.03.005
  57. Trudel G. and Goldfarb M.R. (2010). Marital and sexual functioning and dysfunctioning, depression and anxiety. Sexologies, 19 (3): 137-142., DOI: 10.1016/j.sexol.2009.12.009
  58. van Nes F., Jonsson H., Abma T. and Deeg D. (2013). Changing everyday activities of couples in late life: Converging and keeping up. Journal of Aging Studies, 27(1): 82-91., DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2012.09.00
  59. Voorpostel M., van der Lippe T. and Gershuny J. (2010). Spending time together-changes over four decades in leisure time spent with a spouse. Journal of Leisure Research, 42 (2): 243-265.
  60. West P.C. and Merriam L.C. Jr. (2009). Outdoor recreation and family cohesiveness: A research approach. Journal of Leisure Research, 41(3): 351-359.
  61. Wilcox W.B. and Nock S.L. (2006). What’s love got to do with it? Equality, equity, commitment and women’s marital quality. Social Forces 84 (3): 1321-1345., DOI: 10.1353/sof.2006.007
  62. Zanatta A.L. (2008). Risorse, potere e lavoro familiare. [Resources, power and family work] In Facchini C., a cura di, Conti aperti. Denaro, asimmetrie di coppie e solidarietà tra le generazioni. [Open accounts. Money, couple asymmetries and intergenerational solidarity]. Bologna: Il Mulino, 147-170.

Rosalba Raffagnino, Camilla Matera, Martina Fabbrizzi, Alice Pennatini, Luisa Puddu, Shared leisure and couple satisfaction in "PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE" 3/2015, pp. 87-110, DOI:10.3280/PDS2015-003005

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content