Click here to download

Beyond the deficit perspective: family ties and residential choice of upwardly mobile turkish-germans
Author/s: Christine Barwick 
Year:  2014 Issue: 105 Language: English 
Pages:  16 Pg. 20-35 FullText PDF:  208 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SUR2014-105002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

In modern urban societies, due to means of transportation as well as communication, we can expect that local social ties do not play a major role for intra-urban mobility and neigh borhood selection. The decision where to live in a city should be rather unaffected by considerations of spatial proximity to friends or family members. That this reasoning is more complicated will be shown with the example of upwardly mobile Turkish-Germans in Berlin. Stayers - people living in a socioeconomically disadvantaged area - are compared to movers, who have moved from a disadvantaged to a more advantaged neighborhood. Particularly family ties directly influence whether or not a person will move out of or stay in a neighborhood with a low socioeconomic status.
Keywords: Selection of The Neighborhood, Family Ties, Movers, Belonging, Middle Classes, Turkish-germans.

  1. Andreotti A., Le Galès P. (2011). Elite, Middle Classes and Cities. In (ed.). Favell A., Guiraudon V. Sociology of the European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Andreotti A., Le Galès P., Moreno Fuentes F.J. (2010). Controlling the Urban Fabric. The Complex Game of Distance and Proximity in European Upper-Middle Classes’ Residential Strategies. Working papers du programme Villes & Territoires, 2010, Paris, Sciences Po.
  3. Andreotti A., Le Galès P., Moreno Fuentes F.J. (2013). Controlling the Urban Fabric: The Complex Game of Distance and Proximity in European Upper-Middle-Class Residential Strategies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Re-search, 2: 576-97., DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01177.
  4. Andreotti A., Le Galès P., Moreno Fuentes F.J. (2013). Transnational Mobility and Rootedness: The Upper Middle Classes in European Cities. Global Networks, 1: 41-59., DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2012.00365.x
  5. Bichir R.M., Marques E. (2012). Poverty and Sociability in Brazilian Metropolises: Comparing Poor People’s Personal Networks in SÃo Paulo and Salvador. Connections, 1: 20-32.
  6. Blokland T. (2003). Urban Bonds: Social Relationships in an Inner City Neighbourhood. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell.
  7. Blokland T., Savage M. (2001). Networks, Class and Place. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2: 221-26., DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00308
  8. Bourdieu P. (1987). Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  9. Brown L.A., Moore E.G. (1970). The Intra-Urban Migration Process: A Perspective. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 1: 1-13., DOI: 10.2307/490436
  10. BBB - Bürgschaftsbank zu Berlin-Brandenburg. (2013). Gründerindex. Sonderauswertung Nationalitätenvergleich.
  11. Fischer C.S., Jackson R.M., Stueve C.A., Gerson K., McCallister Jones L., Baldassare M. (1978). Networks and Places. New York: Free Press.
  12. Gans H.J. (1962). The Urban Villagers. Group and Class in the Life of Italian-Americans. New York: Free Press.
  13. Gestring N., Janßen A., Ayca P., Siebel W. (2004). Die Zweite Genera-tion Türkischer Migranten. Einblicke, 40: 8–11.
  14. Horr A. (2008). Ethnische und soziale Unterschiede der Wohnungssuche und Wohnortwahl. In Hillmann F., Windzio M. Migration und städtischer Raum. Chancen und Risiken der Segregation und Integration. Opladen: Budrich UniPress, 175-192.
  15. Janßen A., Ayca P. (2005). Zwischen Integration Und Ausgrenzung: Lebensver-hältnisse Türkischer Migranten Der Zweiten Generation. Universität Oldenburg. http://oops.unioldenburg.
  16. de/126/.
  17. Kecskes R. (1994). Abwanderung, Widerspruch, Passivität. Oder: Wer Zieht Wann Um? Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 2: 129–44.
  18. Le Galès P. (2002). European Cities: Social Conflicts and Governance. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  19. Logan J.R., Spitze G.D. (1994). Family Neighbors. American Journal of Sociology, 2: 453-
  20. 76.
  21. Rossi P.H. (1980). Why Families Move. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  22. Savage M., Bagnall G., Longhurst B. (2005). Globalization and Belonging. London: SAGE. Schneider N., Spellerberg A. (1999). Lebensstile, Wohnraumbedürfnisse Und Räumliche Mobilität. Opladen: Leske+Budrich,.
  23. Spilimbergo A., Ubeda L. (2002). Family Attachment and the Decision to Move by Race. SSRN Scholarly. Paper ID 879612. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
  24. Stack C.B. (1997). All Our Kin: Strategies for Survival in a Black Community. New York: Basic Books.
  25. Watt P. (2009). Living in an Oasis: Middle-Class Disaffiliation and Selective Belonging in an English Suburb. Environment and Planning A, 12: 2874–92., DOI: 10.1068/a41120
  26. Weber M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  27. Wellman B., Leighton B. (1979). Networks, Neighborhoods, and Communities. Urban Affairs Review, 3: 363 –390.
  28. Wellman B., Wortley S. (1990). Different Strokes from Different Folks: Communi-ty Ties and Social Support. The American Journal of Sociology, 3: 558–88.
  29. Wilhelm G. (2011). Generation Koffer: Die Pendelkinder Der Türkei: Die Zurückgelassenen Kinder. Verlag: Orlanda Verlag.
  30. Wolpert J. (1965). Behavioral Aspects of the Decision to Migrate. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 1: 159–69., DOI: 10.1007/BF01947871
  31. Zorlu A. (2009). Ethnic Differences in Spatial Mobility: The Impact of Family Ties. Population, Space and Place, 4: 323–42., DOI: 10.1002/psp.560
  32. Zukin S. (2009). Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Christine Barwick, in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 105/2014, pp. 20-35, DOI:10.3280/SUR2014-105002


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content