Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Maria Angela Bedini, Fabio Bronzini
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/96 Language English
Pages 10 P. 127-136 File size 963 KB
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The paper first examines the three components that summarize the fundamental structure of seismic risk: hazard, exposure, vulnerability (and urban vulnerability). Based on the three components considered, the study highlights the positive elements and strategic errors committed and to explains the paradigm shift necessary to overcome the prevailing focus of interventions on the installation of new temporary wooden houses. With reference to the negative and positive aspects found in experiences, the aim of the study is the proposal of improvement solutions and new rules to guide the post-earthquake phase. The research findings identify the need to plan the postearthquake phase in advance and to consider it a priority over the emergency phase.
Keywords: earthquake: the Italian experience; priority post-earthquake interventions; strategies for risk protection and rebirth
Maria Angela Bedini, Fabio Bronzini, Priority in post-earthquake intervention in "TERRITORIO" 96/2021, pp 127-136, DOI: 10.3280/TR2021-096012