The determinants explaining the high performance of the store brand in the Italian retail market: survey on the thirty categories with the best result

Journal title MERCATI E COMPETITIVITÀ
Author/s Guido Cristini, Fabrizio Laurini, Gaia Rossi
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/3
Language Italian Pages 22 P. 163-184 File size 242 KB
DOI 10.3280/MC2014-003009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

During the last year Italy was subject to a significant growth of the store brands within the most important groups of modern distribution. However, in this positive scenario, the private label showed a distinctive performance in terms of market share achieved at level of store format, geographical area or a single category. In this perspective, this paper analyzes the issue of the determinants to the base of the growth of store brands share. Categories were chosen according to their strong performances, in particular where store brands was more consistent. The paper aim at verifying whether the reasons of this positive result rely on management of the retail mix lever (composition of assortment, price promotion, the price positioning). In this contest, the paper examines the issue downstream of process of segmentation of the categories considered on the basis of level of innovation of the assortment realized by distributors. To the light of this segmentation (innovative categories vs "commodities" categories) the research shows that the successful retail mix policies differ to the basis of the profile and the marketing’s role played from the two cluster considered.

Keywords: Retail, Store Brands, Assortment, Category management, Retail mix policy

  1. Ailawadi K.L., Harlem B. (2004). An Empirical Analysis of the Determinants of Retail Margins: The Role of Store Brand Share. Journal of Marketing, 68 (1): 147-166, DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.68.1.147.24027
  2. Bellizzi J.A., Hamilton J.R., Krueckeberg H.F. and Martin W.S. (1981). Consumer Perceptions of National, Private and Generic Brands. Journal of Retailing, 57: 56-70.
  3. Burger P.C., Scott B.(1972). Can Private Brand buyers be identified? Journal of Marketing Research, 9, 3: 219-222, DOI: 10.2307/3149961
  4. Cole C.H. (1955). Manufacturers Brands Vs Distributors Brands. Bureau of Economics on Business Research, University of Illinois.
  5. Collins A., Burt S. (2003). Market Sanctions, Monitoring and Vertical Coordination within Retailer-manufacturer Relationships. The case of Retail Brand Suppliers. European Journal of Marketing, 37, 5/6: 668-689, DOI: 10.1108/03090560310465080
  6. Cotterill R.W., Putsis W.P. and Dhar R.(2000). Do models of vertical strategic interaction for national and store brands meet the market test. Journal of Retailing, 77: 83-109, DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4359(00)00038-5
  7. Corstjen J., Corstjen M. and Lal R.(1995). Retail Competition in Fast Moving Consumer Goods Industry: The Case of France and the UK. European Management Journal, 13, 4: 363-373, DOI: 10.1016/0263-2373(95)00028-j
  8. Cristini G. (1992). Le strategie di marca del distributore. Milano: Egea.
  9. Cristini G. (2005). Le marche commerciali di primo prezzo: reale opportunità per i retailer europei? Mercati & Competitività, Milano: FrancoAngeli, 3: 101-128, DOI: 10.1400/63131
  10. Cristini G. (2010). Unificazione d’insegna e sostituzione della marca commerciale in un gruppo distributivo leader: ricadute di ordine economico, strategico e gestionale. Mercati & Competitività, Milano: FrancoAngeli, 4: 121-144, DOI: 10.3280/MC2010-004008
  11. Cunningham I.C.M., Hardy A.P. and Imperia G. (1982). Generic Brands versus National Brands and Store Brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 22 (5): 25-32.
  12. Dhar S.K., Hoch S.J. (1997). Why Store brand Penetration varies by retailer. Marketing Science, 16 (3): 208-227, DOI: 10.1287/mksc.16.3.208
  13. Fernandez Nogales A., Gomez Suarez M. (2005). Shelf Space Management: a case study in Spanish Retailing, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 12 (3): 205-216, DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2004.06.00
  14. Fornari E. (2007). Economia della marca commerciale. Le dimensioni del branding distributivo. Milano: Egea.
  15. Frank R.E, Boyd H.W. (1965). Are private brand prone grocery consumers really different?. Journal of Advertising Research, 5: 27-35
  16. Johanson J., Vahlne J.E. (1977). The Internationalization Process of the Firm-A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 1: 23-32, DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676
  17. Kopalle P., Biswas D., Chintagunta P.K., Fan J., Pauwels K., Ratchford B.T., Sills J.A. (2009). Retailing pricing and competitive effects. Journal of Retailing, 85 (1): 56-70, DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2008.11.005
  18. Laaksonen H., Reynolds J. (1994). Own brands in food retailing across Europe. Journal of Brand Management, 2, 1, 37-46, DOI: 10.1057/bm.1994.30
  19. Leahy T. (1994). The Emergence of Retail Brand Power. In Stobart P. (Ed.). Brand Power. Guildford: Macmillian Press
  20. Lugli G. (1976). Economia della distribuzione commerciale. Milano: Giuffrè
  21. Lugli G. (1993). Economia e politiche di marketing delle imprese commerciali. Torino: Utet.
  22. Lugli G., Cristini G. (2007). Category value. Il marketing integrato nel largo consumo. Milano: Il Sole 24 ore.
  23. Medina O., Mendez J.L. and Rubio N. (2004). Price-Quality and Market Share of Consumer Goods in Spain: Retail Brands and Manufacturers Brands. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 4 (2): 199-222, DOI: 10.1080/095939604200017819
  24. Morse L. (1967). The Battle of Brands. In Gist R.R. (ed.). Management Perspectives in Retailing. New York: John Wiley
  25. Nandan S., Dickinson R. (1994). Private Brands. Major Brand Perspective. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 11, 4: 18-28, DOI: 10.1108/0736376941007086
  26. Narasimbah C., Wilcox R.T. (1998). Private Labels and the Channels Relationship: A Cross-Category Analysis. Journal of Business, 71, (4): 573-600, DOI: 10.1086/20975
  27. Pachè G. (2007). Private Label Development: the Large Food Retailer Faced with Supplier’s Opportunism. The Services Industries Journal, 27, 2: 175-188, DOI: 10.1080/02642060601122751
  28. Pellegrini L. (1990). Economia della distribuzione commerciale. Milano: Egea.
  29. Sethuraman R. (1995). A Meta-Analysis of National Brand and Store Brand Cross-Promotional Price Elasticities. Marketing Letters, 6(4): 275-286, DOI: 10.1007/bf00996191
  30. Sethumaran R. (1992). Understanding Cross-Category Differences in Private Label Shares of Grocery Products. Marketing Science Institute, Working Paper Report, 92-128.
  31. Sloot M.S., Verhoef P.C. (2008). The Impact of Brand Delisting on Store Switching and Brand Switching Intentions. Journal of Retailing, 84, 3: 281-296, DOI: 10.1016/j.jretai.2008.06.005
  32. Steiner R.L. (1984). Basic Relationships in Consumer Goods industries. In Sheth J.N. (ed.), Research in Marketing, 7, Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 165-208.
  33. Vahie A., Paswan A. (2006). Private label brand image: its relationship with store image and national brand. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34, 1: 67-84, DOI: 10.1108/09590550610642828
  34. Winer R.S. (1986). A Reference Price Model of Brand Choice for Frequently Purchased Products. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 3: 250-256, DOI: 10.1086/209064

  • Growth factors of store brands in different store formats in Italy Guido Cristini, Fabrizio Laurini, in The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research /2017 pp.109
    DOI: 10.1080/09593969.2016.1267658

Guido Cristini, Fabrizio Laurini, Gaia Rossi, Le determinanti alla base del successo della marca commerciale nel mercato italiano: indagine sulle trenta categorie più performanti in "MERCATI E COMPETITIVITÀ" 3/2014, pp 163-184, DOI: 10.3280/MC2014-003009