The impact of EU direct payments and of their recent reform on the concentration of farm income

Journal title RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA AGRARIA
Author/s Simone Severini, Antonella Tantari
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2012/3
Language Italian Pages 22 P. 25-46 File size 442 KB
DOI 10.3280/REA2012-003003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Direct payments are the main instrument of support to farm incomes in the European Union. After their decoupling from production, the redistributive goal has become a major political justification for maintaining this support tool. This paper analyzes the role of direct payments in the formation and concentration of farm incomes. The analysis takes into account the support provided through the annual payments from the first and second pillars of the CAP. The decomposition of the Gini coefficient is used to analyze the impact of both support tools on the concentration of farm income in Italy. The analysis is carried out on the entire sample of Italian FADN farms. These farms are also stratified by districts and by the types of farming where direct payments generate a large share of income. Research results indicate that direct payments are highly concentrated. Nevertheless, they reduce the concentration of total farm income. Thus, a reduction in their level could result in an increased concentration of income especially in some of the types of farming considered. Moreover, after the implementation of the Fischler reform, the role of direct payments in terms of reduction of the concentration of agricultural income has become less relevant than before. This is due not only to reduction of the relative importance of direct payments in the generation of income, but also to a change in their distribution across farms.

Keywords: Income inequality, Common Agricultural Policy, direct payments, the Gini coefficient

Jel codes: D31, Q18, Q12

  1. Agra CEAS (2007). Feasibility study on the implementation of agricultural household sector (IAHS) statistics. Final Report for the European Commission submitted by Agra CEAS Counsulting, March.
  2. Ahearn M., Johnson J., Strickland R. (1985). The distribution of income and wealth of farm operator households. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67 (December), 1.087-94 DOI: 10.2307/1241378.
  3. Allanson P. (2006). The redistributive effects of agricultural policy on Scottish farm incomes, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 57 (1), 117-128 DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552-2006.00035.x.
  4. Allanson P. (2008). On the characterization and measurement of the redistributive effect of agricultural policy, Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 59 (1), 169-187.
  5. Allanson P., Rocchi B. (2008). A comparative analysis of the redistributive effects of agricultural policy in Tuscany and Scotland, Review of agricultural and environmental studies, n. 86, 35-56.
  6. Bodini A., Povellato A., Scardera A. (2010). Effetti a livello aziendale della regionalizzazione degli aiuti diretti attraverso i dati RICA. Agriregionieuropa, anno 6, n. 23, 15-19.
  7. Commissione Europea (2010a). Developments in the income situation of the EU agricultural sector. DG Agriculture and Rural Development, Directorate L. Bruxelles, December.
  8. Commissione Europea (2010b). Farm Accounting Data Network. An A to Z of methodology. Versione del 04/11/2010. Disponibile al sito: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rica/pdf/site_en.pdf.
  9. Commissione Europea (2011a). Report on the distribution of direct aids to agricultural producers (financial year 2010). Agriculture and Rural Development, AGRI.L.2. Bruxelles, November.
  10. Von Witzke H. (1984). A Model of Income Distribution in Agriculture: Theory and Evidence, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 11(1), 65-83 DOI: 10.1093/erae/11.1.65.
  11. Commissione Europea (2011b). Proposta di Regolamento del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio recante norme sui pagamenti diretti agli agricoltori nell’ambito dei regimi di sostegno previsti dalla politica agricola comune, Com (2011) 625 definitivo, Bruxelles, 12.10.2011.
  12. Commissione Europea (2011c). Proposta di Regolamento del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio recante modifica del regolamento (CE) n. 73/2009 in ordine all’applicazione dei pagamenti diretti agli agricoltori per il 2013, Com (2011) 630 definitivo, Bruxelles, 12.10.2011.
  13. De Vivo C., Henke R., Pupo d’Andrea M.R. (2012). Prime valutazioni dell’impatto della regionalizzazione dei pagamenti diretti della Pac. Agriregionieuropa, anno 8, n. 29, giugno.
  14. Findeis J.L., Reddy V.K. (1987). Decomposition of income distribution among farm families. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 16, 165-173.
  15. Gardner B.L. (1969). Determinants of farm family income inequality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51, 753-769 DOI: 10.2307/1237772.
  16. Gardner B.L. (1992): Changing economic perspectives on the farm problem. Journal of Economic Literature, XXX (March), 62-101.
  17. Keeney M. (2000). The distributional impact of direct payments on Irish farm incomes, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(2), 252-265 DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01227.x.
  18. Inea (2010). Il campione RICA: metodologia di calcolo dei pesi e analisi dell’affidabilità delle stime, Roma, agosto.
  19. Lerman R.J., Yitzhaki S. (1985). Income inequality effects by income source: A new approach and applications to the U.S. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67 (February), 151-156 DOI: 10.2307/1928447.
  20. Mishra A.K., El-Osta H.S., Morehart M.J., Johnson J.D., Hopkins J.W. (2002). Income, wealth, and the economic well-being of farm households. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, AER-812, July.
  21. Mishra A.K., El-Osta H.S., Gillespie J.M. (2009). Effect of agricultural policy on regional income inequality among farm households. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31, 325-340 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2008.12.00z.
  22. Moreddu C. (2011). Distribution of support and income in agriculture, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, n. 46 (aprile 2012), OECD Publishing, Paris DOI: 10.1787/5kgch21wkmbx-en.
  23. Podder N., Chatterjee S. (1998). Sharing the National Cake in Post Reform New Zealand: Income Inequality Trends in Terms of Income Sources. Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the New Zealand association of Economics, Government Buildings, Wellington.
  24. Pyatt G., Chen C., Fei J. (1980). The distribution of income by factor components. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95, 451-473 DOI: 10.2307/1885088.
  25. Rocchi B., Sacco G., Pizzoli E. (2011). Le nuove informazioni sulla distribuzione del reddito nell’agricoltura italiana, Agriregionieuropa, anno 7, n. 26, pp. 1-5.
  26. Schmid E., Hofreither M.F., Sinabell F. (2006). Impacts of CAP Instruments on the Distribution of Farm Incomes - Results for Austria. Discussion paper DP-13-2006, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien.
  27. Sotte F. (2005). La natura economica del PUA. Agriregionieuropa, anno 1, n. 3.
  28. Stark O., Taylor J.E., Yitzhaki S. (1986). Remittances and inequality. The Economic Journal, 96 (September), 722-740 DOI: 10.2307/2232987.
  29. Von Witzke H. (1979). Prices, common agricultural price policy and personal distribution of income in West Germany agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 6 (1), 61-80 DOI: 10.1093/erae/6.1.61.
  30. Von Witzke H., Noleppa S. (2007). Agricultural and trade policy reform and inequality: the distributive effects of direct payments to German farmers under the EU’s new common agricultural policy. Working Paper n. 79.

Simone Severini, Antonella Tantari, L’impatto dei pagamenti diretti comunitari e della loro recente riforma sulla concentrazione dei redditi agricoli in "RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA AGRARIA" 3/2012, pp 25-46, DOI: 10.3280/REA2012-003003