The pain of determined. Second nature and recognition among Hegel, Honneth and Butler

Journal title SOCIETÀ DEGLI INDIVIDUI (LA)
Author/s Federica Gregoratto, Filippo Ranchio
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2013/46
Language Italian Pages 14 P. 155-168 File size 170 KB
DOI 10.3280/LAS2013-046011
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This paper aims at briefly reconstructing Hegel’s theory of «second nature» in both its ontological and normative dimension, and at figuring out how the logic of intersubjective recognition can be interpreted within this framework. Such a constellation will be furthermore investigated referring to Honneth’s and Butler’s paradigms. The interaction between the «normative» dimension of the first and the «anormative» strategy of the second shows the double-track structure of recognition as «second nature» (its «double face»), which directly affects the constitution of the autonomy (agency) of the subjects - in particular of their identities. This double-structure discloses the dialectics between autonomy and heteronomy, freedom and constraint, thus furthermore sketching out the guidelines for a critical theory of domination.

  1. N. Rath, Zweite Natur. Konzepte einer Vermittlung von Natur und Kultur im Anthropologie und Ästhe¬tik um 1800, Waxmann, Münster 1996, p. 121.
  2. F. Ranchio, Reificazione e seconda natura: le origini hegeliane di un’idea, in A. Bellan, a cu¬ra di, Teorie della reificazione. Storia e attualità di un fenomeno sociale, Mimesis, Milano-Udine 2013, pp. 47-69.
  3. G. W. F. Hegel, Enciclopedia delle scienze filosofiche in compendio. Parte terza: Filosofia dello Spi¬rito, UTET, Torino 2000, p. 240.
  4. C. Malabou, The Future of Hegel. Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic, Routledge, London-New York 2005.
  5. F. Ruda, Hegels Pöbel, Konstanz Uni¬ver¬si¬ty Press, Konstanz 2011
  6. C. Menke, Autonomie und Befreiung, “Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie“, LVIII, 2010/5, p. 687.
  7. I. Testa, Second Nature and Recognition: Hegel and the Social Space, “Critical Horizons”, X, 2009/3, pp. 341-370.
  8. G.W. F. Hegel, Fenomenologia dello Spirito, Bompiani, Milano 2000, p. 275.
  9. L. Cortella, Autocritica del moderno, Il Poligrafo, Padova 2002, pp. 257-271.
  10. J. Butler, Soggetti di desiderio (1987), Laterza, Roma-Bari 2009, p. 59.
  11. A. Honneth, Das Recht der Freiheit, Suhrkamp, Berlin 2011, p. 229.
  12. Lo ribadisce Butler nel suo diretto confronto con Honneth: J. Butler, Taking Another’s View: Ambi¬va¬lent Implications, in A. Honneth, Reification: A New Look to an Old Idea, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008, pp. 108-109.
  13. J. Butler, The Psychic Life of Power, Stanford University Press, Stanford 1997, p. 29. E. Renault, L’expérience de l’injustice. Reconnaissance et clinique de l’injustice, La Dé¬cou¬ver¬te, Paris 2004, cap. 4.
  14. A. Honneth, Riconoscimento come ideologia, in Capitalismo e riconoscimento, Firenze Uni¬ver¬si¬ty Press, Firenze 2010, p. 90.
  15. J. Butler, La disfatta del genere, Meltemi, Roma 2006, p. 250.
  16. J. Butler, Critica della violenza etica, Feltrinelli, Milano 2006, p. 25.
  17. J. Butler, Precarious Life. The Power of Mourning and Violence, Verso, New York 2004, pp. 27-28.
  18. J. Butler, Frames of War. When Life is Grievable?, Verso, New York 2009, p. 6.

Federica Gregoratto, Filippo Ranchio, Il dolore del determinato. Seconda natura e riconoscimento tra Hegel, Honneth e Butler in "SOCIETÀ DEGLI INDIVIDUI (LA)" 46/2013, pp 155-168, DOI: 10.3280/LAS2013-046011