Relations, Communication and Services. The Case of Disabled Workers in a Public Organisation

Journal title EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES
Author/s Vanna Boffo, Sabina Falconi
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2013/1
Language English Pages 16 P. 97-112 File size 193 KB
DOI 10.3280/ERP2013-001007
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The article illustrates the outcome of some empirical research carried out at the University of Florence on the topic of the relations and communication of disabled people employed in the various organisational contexts of the university. The theoretical model followed is that of care in the workplace as a means and end for the formative well-being of subjects who, in a particular existential condition, may suffer the professional environment rather than live it to the full in terms of human and social resources. The survey, conducted according to a qualitative-quantitative method, tends to highlight how the educational-formative practice of everyday working life has to be built up through the highly reflective personal contribution of the subjects who work alongside and with the disabled people.

  1. Deneulin, S., Nabel, M., & Sagovsky, N. (Eds.) (2006). The Capability Approach. Transforming Injust Structures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  2. European Commission, Communication From The Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, (2010). European Disability Strategy 2010-2020: A Renewed Commitment to a Europe without barriers. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUri-Serv/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2011:376:0081:0086:EN:PDF [Accessed 20/06/13].
  3. European Disability Forum, (1997). Manifesto by Disabled Women inEurope. Available at http://www.edfwomen.org.uk/manifesto.htm[Accessed 20/06/13].
  4. European Disability Forum, (2011). 2nd Manifesto by Disabled Women in Europe. Available at: http://www.uildm.org/wp-content/uploads/
  5. 2011/11/2ndmanifestoEN.pdf [Accessed 20/06/13].
  6. European Disability Forum, (2011). 2nd Manifesto on the Rights of Women and Girls with Disabilities in the European Union: A toolkit for activists and policymakers. Available at: http://www.uildm.org/wpcontent/uploads/2011/11/2ndmanifestoEN.pdf [Accessed 20/06/13].
  7. Kittay, E.F. (1999). Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency. London: Routledge.
  8. Kittay, E.F. (2001). A Feminist Public Ethic of Care Meets the New Communitarian Family Policy. Ethics, 111(3), pp. 523-547.
  9. Gilligan, C. (2010). Un regard prospectif à partir du passé. In V. Nurock (Eds.). Carol Gilligan et l’éthique du care, (pp. 19-38). Paris: Puf.
  10. ISFOL (2012). Le competenze per l'occupazione e la crescita. Available at: www.isfol.it [Accessed 20/06/13].
  11. Mortari, L. (2003). Apprendere dall'esperienza. Il pensare riflessivo nella formazione. Roma: Carocci.
  12. Mortari, L. (2007). Cultura della ricerca e pedagogia. Prospettive epistemologiche. Roma: Carocci.
  13. Mortari, L. (2009a). Ricercare e riflettere. La formazione del docente professionista. Roma: Carocci.
  14. Mortari, L. (2009b). La ricerca empirica in educazione: questioni aperte. Studi sulla Formazione, 1-2, pp. 33-46.
  15. Mortari, L. (Eds.) (2010). Dire la pratica. La cultura del fare scuola. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.
  16. Nussbaum, M.C. (2000). Women and Human Development. The Capabilities Aproach. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Nussbaum, M.C. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  18. Nussbaum, M.C. (2002). Giustizia sociale e dignità umana. Da individui a persone. Bologna: il Mulino.
  19. Nussbaum, M.C. (2011). Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  20. Pulcini, E. (2009). La cura del mondo. Paura e responsabilità nell'età globale. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  21. Sità, C. (2012). Indagare l’esperienza. L’intervista fenomenologica nella ricerca educativa. Roma: Carocci.
  22. Tronto, J.C. (1993). Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
  23. Washington Group on Disability Statistics (2004). Washington Group Position Paper, Proposed Purpose of an Internationally Comparable General Disability Measure. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/washington_group/WG_purpose_paper.pdf [Accessed 20/06/13].
  24. Watson, M., McKie, L., Hughes, B., Hopkins, D., & Gregory, S. (2004). (Inter)Dependence, Needs and Care: The Potential for Disability and Feminist Theorists to Develop an Emancipatory Model. Sociology, 38(2), pp. 331-350.
  25. WHO, & World Bank. (2011). World Report on Disability. Available at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789240685215_eng.pdf[Accessed 20/06/13].

Vanna Boffo, Sabina Falconi, Relations, Communication and Services. The Case of Disabled Workers in a Public Organisation in "EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES" 1/2013, pp 97-112, DOI: 10.3280/ERP2013-001007