Multiple levels of interaction in therapeutic communication. Theory and basic research

Journal title RICERCA PSICOANALITICA
Author/s Wilma Bucci
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/3 Language Italian
Pages 16 P. 9-24 File size 87 KB
DOI 10.3280/RPR2015-003002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Starting from a description of the personal experience that prompted her to develop her model the Author presents the cornerstones of her multiple code theory, revised and updated with the most recent findings from cognitive sciences and psychotherapeutic models field. The qualities characterizing the three main levels of the human emotional information processing - sub-symbolic, symbolic non-verbal, symbolic verbal - and the multiple modality specific codes through which is experienced the interaction with the world are described. Within this new theory of mind crucial clinical concepts and processes are defined as the emotion schemas, the typical interactive sequences from which they emerge and their reactivation in the therapeutic communication, the interactive and internal processes that conduct to the persistence of the painful emotion schemas or to the continuous modification of those promoting the subject’s wellbeing. Finally, the Author describes the referential process that connects the various levels of emotional information processing in the everyday contexts as well as during psychotherapy, where circularly three typical phases follow one other - activation, symbolization and reorganization/ reflection. The Author concludes by highlighting the eminently embodied and relational nature of this process, as well as its risks and paradoxes.

Keywords: Multiple code theory, referential process, emotion schema, embodied communication, emotion change

  1. Bartlett F.C. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Social Psychology. Cambridge, England: University Press.
  2. Bucci W. (1985). Dual Coding: A cognitive model for psychoanalytic research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 33, 571-607. DOI: 10.1177/0003065185-03300305
  3. Bucci W. (1997). Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Science: A multiple code theory. NY: Guilford Press.
  4. Bucci W. (2001). Pathways of emotional communication. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 20, 40-70. DOI: 10.1080/07351692109348923
  5. Bucci W. (2011). The Role of Embodied Communication in Therapeutic Change: A Multiple Code Perspective. In: Tschacher W. & Bergomi C. (Eds), The Implications of Embodiment: Cognition and Communication, pp. 209-228. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
  6. Damasio A. (2003) Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow and the Feeling Brain. New York: Harcourt.
  7. Damasio A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.
  8. Damasio A. R. (1999). The Feeling of What Happens. New York: Harcourt Brace & Co.
  9. Ellsworth P.C., Tong E.M.W. (2006) What does it mean to be angry at yourself? Categories, appraisals, and the problem of language. Emotion, 6, 573-586. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.4.572
  10. Foa E.B., Zoellner L.A., Feeny N.C., Hembree E.A., Alvarez-Conrad J. (2002). Does imaginal exposure exacerbate PTSD symptoms? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 1022-1028. doi 10.1037/0022-006X.70.4.1022.
  11. Holt R.R. (1985). The current status of psychoanalytic theory. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 2, 289-315. DOI: 10.1037/0736-9735.2.4.289.
  12. Kircanski K., Lieberman M.D., Craske M.G. (2012). Feelings into words: Contributions of language to exposure therapy. Psychological Science, 23, 1086-1091. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612443830
  13. Lanius R. A., Bluhm R., Lanius U., Pain C. (2006). A review of neuroimaging studies in PTSD: Heterogeneity of response to symptom provocation. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 40, 709-729. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2005.07.007
  14. LeDoux J. (1998). The emotional brain: the mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Touchstone.
  15. Lieberman M.D., Eisenberger N.I., Crockett M.J., Tom S.M., Pfeifer J.H., Way B.M. (2007). Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling disrupts amygdale activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science, 18, 421-428. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01916.x
  16. McClelland J.L., St.John M., Taraban R. (1989). Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4 (Special Issue), 287-335.
  17. Paivio A. (1971). Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  18. Panksepp J. (1999). Emotions as viewed by psychoanalysis and neuroscience: An exercise in consilience. Neuro-Psychoanalysis, 1, 15-38. DOI: 10.1080/15294145.1999.10773241
  19. Pessoa L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature. 9, 148-158. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2317
  20. Phelps E. A. (2006). Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdale. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 27-53. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.07-0234
  21. Reik T. (1948). Listening with the Third Ear: The Inner Experience of a psychoanalyst. New York: Pyramid Books, 1964.
  22. Schottenbauer M.A., Glass C.R., Arnkoff D.B., Tendick V., Gray S.H. (2008). Nonresponse and dropout rates in outcome studies on PTSD: Review and methodological considerations. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 71, 134-168. DOI: 10.1521/psyc.2008.71.2.134
  23. Thomae H., Kaechele H. (1987). Psychoanalytic Practice 1: Principles. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  24. Tschacher W., Bergomi C. (Eds) (2011). The Implications of Embodiment: Cognition and Communication. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
  25. Wilson-Mendenhall C.D., Barrett L.F., Simmons W.K., Barsalou L.W. (2011). Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1105-1127. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.032

  • Il processo referenziale: cognizione o coscienza incarnata? Alberto Lorenzini, in RICERCA PSICOANALITICA 3/2015 pp.67
    DOI: 10.3280/RPR2015-003006
  • L’apporto dei gruppi a mediazione nella clinica contemporanea. Il metodo Photolangage® Alessandra Micheloni, in Ricerca Psicoanalitica /2022
    DOI: 10.4081/rp.2022.644
  • Relation between referential and reflexive processes: an explorative study Giovanna Esposito, Livia Savarese, Barbara Squitieri, in Counselling Psychology Quarterly /2019 pp.186
    DOI: 10.1080/09515070.2018.1428528
  • Commento al caso clinico di A. Micheloni Giuseppe Martorana, in Ricerca Psicoanalitica /2021
    DOI: 10.4081/rp.2021.536

Wilma Bucci, I molteplici livelli dell’interazione nella comunicazione terapeutica: teoria e ricerca di base in "RICERCA PSICOANALITICA" 3/2015, pp 9-24, DOI: 10.3280/RPR2015-003002