Diseguaglianze e discontinuità nel governo delle grandi metropoli. Un’agenda di ricerca

Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Patrick Le Galès, Tommaso Vitale
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/74
Language Italian Pages 11 P. 7-17 File size 237 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2015-074001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Il saggio suggerisce che la connessione tra la governance metropolitana e le disuguaglianze consente di considerare queste ultime non solo come un esito delle politiche ma anche come componente del modo in cui le stesse vengono implementate. Superando una visione razionale o positivista della governance, sosteniamo che i processi di governo delle città non siano mai né completi né lineari: sono in continua costruzione e producono significative differenze nelle diverse città e nel corso del tempo. L’analisi sistematica della letteratura mostra la necessità di descrivere e documentare in modo sinergico 1) il modo in cui i processi di governance agiscono in relazione ai progetti di sviluppo urbano e all’implementazione delle politiche pubbliche e 2) cosa questo comporti in termini di disuguaglianze

Keywords: Diseguaglianze; metropoli; sociologia

  1. Agier M., 1999, L’Invention de la ville. Banlieues, townships, invasions et favelas. Paris: Editions des Archives Contemporaines.
  2. Aguilera T., 2012, «Gouverner les illégalismes. Les politiques urbaines face aux squats à Paris». Gouvernement et action publique, 3: 101-124. DOI: 10.3917/gap.123.0101
  3. Augé M., 1995, Non-places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London: Verso.
  4. Bairoch P., 1988, Cities and Economic Development: From the Dawn of History to the Present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  5. Boltanski L., 2012, Énigmes et complots : une enquête à propos d’enquêtes. Paris: Gallimard.
  6. Borraz O., Le Galès P., 2010, «Urban Governance in Europe: The Government of What?». Pole Sud, 32: 137-151. DOI: 10.1002/9781444395105.ch65
  7. Brenner N., 2004, New State Spaces, Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. Oxford: Oxford U.P.
  8. Brenner N., 2009, «Open Questions on State Rescaling». Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2, 1: 123-139. DOI: 10.1093/cjres/rsp002
  9. Brenner N., Theodore N., 2002, eds., Spaces of Neoliberalism. Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Oxford, Blackwell.
  10. Brenner N., Peck J., Theodore N., 2010, «Variegated Neoliberalization: Geographies, Modalities, Pathways». Global Networks, 10, 2: 182-222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x
  11. Brown A., Lyons M., Dankoco I., 2010, «Street Traders and the Emerging Spaces for Urban Voice and Citizenship in African Cities». Urban Studies, 47, 3: 666-683. DOI: 10.1177/0042098009351187
  12. Castro J.W., 2006, Power and Citizenship, Social Struggle in the Basin of Mexico. Basingstoke: Plagrave.
  13. Commaille J., Jobert B., 1999, dir., Les métamorphoses de l’action publique. Paris: lgdj.
  14. Cross J., Morales A., 2007, eds., Street Entrepreneurs: People, Place and Politics in Local and Global Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.
  15. Crouch C., Le Galès P., 2012, «Cities as National Champions?». Journal of European Public Policy, 19, 3: 405-419. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2011.640795.
  16. Dahl R., 1961, «Who Governs: Democracy and Power in an American City». New Haven: Yale U.P.
  17. Davies M., 2006, Planets of Slums. London: Verso.
  18. Davis E.D., 1994, Urban Leviathan: Mexico City in the Twentieth Century. Philadelphia: Temple U.P.
  19. De Soto H., 2000, The Mystery of Capital. New York: Basic Books.
  20. Dear M., 2000, The Postmodern Urban Condition. Oxford: Blackwell.
  21. Dematteis G., 2000, «Spatial Representations of European Urbanism».
  22. In: Bagnasco A., Le Galès P. (eds.), Cities in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.: 179-208.
  23. Faucher F., Le Galès P., 2014, L’esperienza del New Labour. Un’analisi critica della politica e delle politiche. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  24. Favre P., Schemeil Y., 2003, dir., Etre gouverné. Etudes en l’honneur de Jean Leca. Paris: Presses de SciencesPo.
  25. Fligstein N., McAdam D., 2012, A Theory of Fields. Oxford: Oxford U.P.
  26. Gandy M., 2005, «Cyborg Urbanization, Complexity and Monstruosity in the Contemporary City». International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29, 1: 26-49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00568.x
  27. Giddens A., 1984, The Constitution of Society. New York: Polity.
  28. Gilli F., Offner J.-M., 2009, Paris, Métropole hors les murs. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
  29. Gordon I., Travers T., 2010, «London: Planning the Ungovernable City». City, Culture, Society, 1, 2: 49-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccs.2010.08.005
  30. Hall P., 1998, Cities in Civilization. New York: Pantheon.
  31. Harding A., 2007, What Policies for Globalizing Cities? Rethinking the Urban Policy Agenda. Paris: oecd Press.
  32. Healey P., 2003, Città e istituzioni. Piani collaborativi in società frammentate. Napoli: Dedalo.
  33. Heinelt H., Kübler D., 2005, eds., Metropolitan Governance. London: Routledge.
  34. Hohenberg P., Lees L., 1985, The Making of Urban Europe. Cambridge: Harvard U.P.
  35. Hernandez F., Kellett, P., Allen, L.K., 2009, Rethinking the Informal City. Critical Perspectives from Latin America. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
  36. Holston J., 2008, Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton U.P.
  37. Huchzermeyer M., 2008, «Slum Upgrading in Nairobi within the Housing and Basic Services Market: A Housing Rights Concern». Journal of Asian and African Studies, 43, 1: 19-39. DOI: 10.1177/0021909607085586
  38. Jessop B., 1998, «The Rise of Governance and the Risks of Failure». International Social Science Journal, 50, 155: 29-46. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2451.00107
  39. Jessop B., 2002, «Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Urban Governance: A State Theoretical Perspective». Antipode, 34, 3: 452-472. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00250
  40. Jouve B., Lefèvre C., 2002, dir., Des métropoles ingouvernables. Paris: Elsevier.
  41. King D., Le Galès P., 2011, «Sociologie de l’Etat en recomposition». Revue Française de Sociologie, 52: 453-480. DOI: 10.3917/rfs.523.0453
  42. Koolhas R., 1997, Pearl River Delta, in Politics-Poetic. Documenta X – The book. Kassel: Cantz.
  43. Kooning K., Kruijt D., 2009, Megacities: The Politics of Urban Exclusion and Violence in the Global South. London: Zed Books, London.
  44. Kornenberg M., 2012, «Governing the City, from Planning to Urban Strategy». Theory Culture, Society, 29: 84-106. DOI: 10.1177/0263276411426158
  45. Lange P., Regini M., 1989, eds., State, Market and Social Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P.
  46. Lascoumes P., Le Galès P., 2009, a cura di, Gli strumenti per governare. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.
  47. Lascoumes P., Le Galès P., 2012, Sociologie de l’action publique. Paris: Armand Colin.
  48. Le Galès P., 1998, «Regulation and Governance in European Cities». International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22, 3: 482-506. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00153
  49. Le Galès P., 2002, European cities. Social conflicts and governance. Oxford: Oxford U.P.
  50. Le Galès P., 2011, «Urban Governance in Europe: What is Governed?».
  51. In: Bridge G., Watson S. (eds.), The New Blackwell Companion to the City. Oxford: Blackwell: 747-758.
  52. Le Galès P., Lorrain D., 2003, «Gouverner les très grandes métropoles. Institutitions et réseaux. Revue Française d’Administration Publique, 107: 307-320. DOI: 10.3917/rfap.107.0305
  53. Lefevre C., 1998, «Metropolitan Government and Governance in Western Democracies: A Critical Review». International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 22: 9-25. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00120
  54. Lindell I., 2010, eds., Africa’s Informal Workers: Collective Agency, Alliances and Transnational Organizing in Urban Africa. London-Uppsala: Zed Books-Nai.
  55. Lorrain D., 2011, dir., Métropoles XXL en pays émergents. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
  56. Jones-Correa M., 2001, eds., Governing American Cities: Inter-Ethnic Coalitions, Competitions, and Conflict. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  57. Turner J.H., 2010, Theoretical Principles of Sociology. Volume 1, Macrodynamics. New York: Springer.
  58. Maggioni A., 2012, «The Link Between Urban Infrastructure, Network Utilities and the Urban fabric: Theoretical Issues and Perspectives of Analysis». University of Milano-Bicocca: Working Paper, Urbeur.
  59. March J.G., Olsen, J.P., 1995, Democratic Governance. New York: The Free Press.
  60. Marcuse P., 2009, «From Critical Urban Theory to the Right to the City». City, 13, 2-3: 185-197. DOI: 10.1080/13604810902982177
  61. Marques E., 2011, «State Institutions, Power, and Social Networks in Brazilian Urban Policies». Latin American Research Review, 47, 2: 27-50. DOI: 10.1353/lar.2012.0020
  62. McCartney P., Stren R., 2003, eds., Governance on the Ground: Innovations and Discontinuities in Cities of the Developing World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U.P.
  63. Miller P., Rose N., 1995, «Production, Identity, and Democracy». Theory & Society, 24, 3: 427-467.
  64. Molotch H., 2002, «School’s Out: A Response to Michael Dear». City & Community, 1, 1: 39-43. DOI: 10.1111/1540-6040.00004
  65. Mossberger K., Stoker G., 2001, «The Evolution of Urban Regime Theory». Urban Affairs Review, 36, 6: 810-835. DOI: 10.1177/10780870122185109
  66. Neuwirth R., 2004, Shadow Cities: A Billion Squatters, A New Urban World. New York: Routledge.
  67. Oberti M., 2012, «Chicago and Paris: Two Cities with School Segregation? » In: La vie des idées.
  68. Peck J., Tickell A., 2002, «Neoliberalizing Space». Antipode, 34, 3: 380-404. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.00247
  69. Robinson J., 2005, Ordinary Cities. London: Routledge.
  70. Rothberg R., 2004, eds., When States Fail: Causes and Consequences. Princeton: Princeton U.P.
  71. Samers M., 2005, «The Myopia of ‘Diverse Economies’, or a Critique of the ‘Informal Economy’». Antipode, 37, 5: 875-886. DOI: 10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00537.x
  72. Sassen S., 2009, A Sociology of Globalization. New York: WW Norton & Co.
  73. Scott A.J., 2002, eds., Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford U.P.
  74. Scott J., 1998, Seeing Like a State. New Haven: Yale U.P.
  75. Simone A.M., 2004, For the City yet to Come: Changing African Life in Four Cities. Durham: Duke U.P.
  76. Simone A.M., 2009, City Life from Jakarta to Dakar. Movements at the Crossroads. Durham: Routledge.
  77. Singerman D., 2009, eds., Cairo Contested. Governance, Urban Space and Global Modernity. Cairo-New York: The American University in Cairo Press.
  78. Singerman D., Amar P., 2006, eds., Cairo Cosmopolitan: Politics, Culture and Urban Space in the Globalized Middle East. Cairo-New York: The American University in Cairo Press.
  79. Soja E.W., 1996, Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real and Imagined Places. Oxford: Blackwell.
  80. Soja E. W., 2000, Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions.
  81. Oxford: Blackwell. Storper M., 2010, «Why Does a City Grow? Specialization, Human Capital, or Institutions?». Urban Studies, 47, 10: 2027-2050. DOI: 10.1177/0042098009359957
  82. Tayyab M., 2010, «Surplus Humanity’ and Margins of Legality: Slums, Slumdogs, and Accumulation by Dispossession». Chapman Law Review, 14: 1-82.
  83. Tosi S., Palvarini P., 2013, «Globalisation, Stadiums and the Consumerist City. The Case of the New Juventus Stadium in Turin». European Journal for Sport and Society, 10, 2: 161-180.
  84. Tosi S., Vitale T., 2013, «Gouverner la reconversion industrielle dans le Haut-milanais : interrogations sur les processus de représentation et de défense des intérêts territoriaux». Métropoles, 12.
  85. Turner J.H., 2010, Theoretical Principles of Sociology. Volume 3, Mesodynamics. New York: Springer.
  86. UN Habitat, 2011, Cross-currents in Global Urbanization.
  87. Vitale T., 2010, «Regulation by Incentives, Regulation of the Incentives in Urban Policies». Transnational Corporations Review, 2, 2: 58-68. DOI: 10.5148/tncr.2010.1044
  88. Vitale T., Claps E., 2010, «Not Always the Same Old Story: Spatial Segregation and Feelings of Dislike against Roma and Sinti in Large Cities and Medium-size Towns». In: Stewart M., Rövid M. (eds),
  89. Multi-Disciplinary Approaches to Romany Studies. Budapest: ceu Press: 228-253.
  90. Vitale T., Podestà N., 2011, «Territori e innovazione politica: successi e fallimenti dell’azione conflittuale». In: Podestà N., Vitale T. (a cura di), Dalla proposta alla protesta, e ritorno. Conflitti locali e innovazione politica. Milano: Bruno Mondadori: 1-33.
  91. Wacquant L., 2012, «Three Steps to a Historical Anthropology of Actually Existing Neoliberalism». Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 20, 1: 166-179. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8676.2011.00189.x
  92. Williams C., Nadin S., Rodgers P., Round J., Windebank J., 2011, «Mapping the Social Organization of Labour in Moscow: Beyond the Formal/informal Labour Dualism». Sociological Research Online, 16, 13.
  93. Yates D., 1977, The Ungovernable City: The Politics of Urban Problems and Policy making. Cambridge: The mit Press.

  • Governing the bairro clandestino of Cova da Moura (1974–2015): Decentred and collaborative governance in an informal neighbourhood in Lisbon’s metropolitan area Alessandro Colombo, Marco Allegra, in European Urban and Regional Studies /2024 pp.411
    DOI: 10.1177/09697764231188303
  • Quale agency per gli esperimenti urbani? Sperimentalismo e tattiche nel Grands Voisins a Parigi e al Mitreo di Corviale a Roma Marco Cremaschi, Silvia Lucciarini, in SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE 128/2022 pp.95
    DOI: 10.3280/SUR2022-128009
  • The institutional history of Milan metropolitan area Matteo Del Fabbro, in Territory, Politics, Governance /2018 pp.342
    DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2017.1369895
  • La gouvernance territoriale de l’innovation Clément Pin, in Gouvernement et action publique /2020 pp.57
    DOI: 10.3917/gap.201.0057

Patrick Le Galès, Tommaso Vitale, Diseguaglianze e discontinuità nel governo delle grandi metropoli. Un’agenda di ricerca in "TERRITORIO" 74/2015, pp 7-17, DOI: 10.3280/TR2015-074001