Le risposte. Psicoanalisi e psicoterapia: teorie, pratiche e contesti multipli

Journal title PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE
Author/s Paul L. Wachtel
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/3
Language Italian Pages 8 P. 617-624 File size 42 KB
DOI 10.3280/PU2016-003060
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

  1. Alexander F., French T.M. et al. (1946). Psychoanalytic Therapy: Principles and Applications. New York: Ronald Press (trad. it. dei capitoli 2, 4 e 17: La esperienza emozionale correttiva. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 1993, XXVII, 2: 85-101. Edizione su Internet: http://www.psychomedia.it/pm/modther/probpsiter/alexan-1.htm).
  2. Aron L. & Starr K. (2013). A Psychotherapy for the People. New York: Routledge.
  3. Aron L. (1991). Working through the past – working toward the future. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 27, 1: 81-108. DOI: 10.1080/00107530.1991.10746694
  4. Aron L. (1996). A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press (trad. it.: Menti che si incontrano. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2004).
  5. Bromberg P.M. (1998a). Standing in the Spaces: Essays on Clinical Process, Trauma, and Dissociation. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press (trad. it.: Clinica del trauma e della dissociazione. Standing in the spaces. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2007).
  6. Eissler K.R. (1953). The effect of the structure of the ego on psychoanalytic technique. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1, 1: 104-143. Trad. it.: Effetto della struttura dell’Io sulla tecnica psicoanalitica. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 1981, XV, 2: 50-79; anche in: Genovese C., a cura di, Setting e processo psicoanalitico. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1988, pp. 3-35. Edizione su Internet: www.psychomedia.it/pm/modther/probpsiter/eiss53-1.htm). DOI: 10.1177/00030651530010010
  7. Fonagy P. (1999). Memory and therapeutic action. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 80, 2: 215-223. DOI: 10.1516/0020757991598620(conuninterventodiPaoloMigone[2000,81,2:356-357]eunarispostadiPeterFonagy[2000,81,2:357])
  8. Friedman L.(1986). Kohut’s testament. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 6, 3: 321-347. DOI: 10.1080/07351698609533638
  9. Friedman L. (1997). Introduction to panel: Does the face of analytic treatment show its character? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 45: 1225-1229.
  10. Gill M.M. (1954). Psychoanalysis and exploratory psychotherapy. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2, 4: 771-797. DOI: 10.1177/000306515400200413
  11. Gill M.M. (1979). The analysis of the transference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 27 (supplement): 263-288.
  12. Gill M.M. (1983). The interpersonal paradigm and the degree of the therapist’s involvement. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 19, 2: 200-237. DOI: 10.1080/00107530.1983.1074660
  13. (trad. it.: Il paradigma interpersonale e la misura del coinvolgimento del terapeuta. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 1995, XXIX, 3: 5-44).
  14. Gill M.M. (1984). Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy: A revision. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 11, 2: 161-179 (trad. it.: Psicoanalisi e psicoterapia: una revisione. In Del Corno F. & Lang M., a cura di, Psicologia Clinica. Vol. 4: Trattamenti in setting individuale. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 1989, pp. 128-157; II ed.: 1999, pp. 206-236). Edizione su Internet con una introduzione di Paolo Migone: www.priory.com/ital/10a-Gill.htm (dibattito: www.psychomedia.it/pm-lists/debates/gill-dib-1.htm).
  15. Gill M.M. (1994). Psychoanalysis in Transition: A Personal View. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press (trad. it.: Psicoanalisi in transizione. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1996).
  16. Greenberg J. (1996). Psychoanalytic words and psychoanalytic acts – A brief history. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 32, 2: 195-213. DOI: 10.1080/00107530.1996.10746949
  17. Greenberg J.R. & Mitchell S.A. (1983). Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (trad. it.: Le relazioni oggettuali nella teoria psicoanalitica. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1986).
  18. Hoffman I.Z. (1998). Ritual and Spontaneity in the Psychoanalytic Process: A Dialectical-Constructivist View. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press. Internet edition of chapter 9: www.psychomedia.it/rapaport-klein/hoffma95.htm (trad. it.: Rituale e spontaneità in psicoanalisi.
  19. Roma: Astrolabio, 2000; trad. it. del cap. 9: Ritualità e spontaneità nel processo psicoanalitico. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 2000, XI, 2: 115-142).
  20. Lachmann F.M. & Beebe B. (1992). Reformulations of early development and transference: Implications for psychic structure formation. In: Barron J.W., Eagle M.N. & Wolitzky D.L., editors, Interface of Psychoanalysis and Psychology. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1992, pp. 133-153.
  21. Lyons-Ruth K. (1998). Implicit relational knowing: Its role in development and psychoanalytic treatment. Infant Mental Health Journal, 19, 3: 282-289. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0355(199823)19:3%3C282::AID-IMHJ3%3E3.3.CO;2-F
  22. Mitchell S.A. (1988). Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (trad. it.: Gli orientamenti relazionali in psicoanalisi. Per un modello integrato. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1993).
  23. Mitchell S.A. (1993). Hope and Dread in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books (trad. it.: Speranza e timore in psicoanalisi. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1995).
  24. Mitchell S.A. (1997). Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press (trad. it.: Influenza e autonomia in psicoanalisi. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1999).
  25. Orange D.M., Atwood G.E. & Stolorow R.D. (1997). Working Intersubjectively: Contextualism in Psychoanalytic Practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press. Renik O. (1993). Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 62: 553-571.
  26. Stern D., Sander L.W., Nahum J.P., Harrison A.M., Lyons-Ruth K., Morgan A.C., Bruschweile-Stern N., Tronick E.Z. (1998). Non-interpretive mechanisms in psychoanalytic therapy: The “something more” than interpretation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79, 5: 903-921. Anche in: Boston Change Process Study Group, Change in Psychotherapy: A Unifying Paradigm. New York: Norton, 2010, pp. 1-29. Edizione su Internet in PDF: www.changeprocess.org/articles/NonInterpretiveMechanisms1.pdf (trad. it.: Meccanismi non interpretativi in terapia psicoanalitica. Il “qualcosa in più” dell’interpretazione. In: Il cambiamento in psicoterapia. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2012, cap. 1, pp. 1-24).
  27. Stern D.B. (1997). Unformulated Experience: From Dissociation to Imagination in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press (trad. it.: L’esperienza non formulata. Dalla dissociazione all’immaginazione in psicoanalisi. Tirrenia [PI]: Edizioni del Cerro, 2007).
  28. Stolorow R.D., Brandchaft B. & Atwood G.E. (1987). Psychoanalytic Treatment: An Intersubjective Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  29. Wachtel P.L. (1990). Should psychoanalytic training be training to be a psychoanalyst? In: Meisels M. & Shapiro E., editors, Tradition and Innovation in Psychoanalytic Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1990, pp. 173-180.
  30. Wachtel P.L. (1993). Therapeutic Communication: Principles and Effective Practice. New York: Guilford, 2011 (trad. it.: La comunicazione terapeutica. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1999).
  31. Wachtel P.L. (1994). Cyclical processes in psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 1: 51-54. DOI: 10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.51
  32. Wachtel P.L. (1977). Psychoanalysis and Behavior Therapy: Toward an Integration. New York: Basic Books (nuova edizione ampliata: Psychoanalysis, Behavior Therapy, and the Relational World. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1997).
  33. Wachtel P.L. (2003). The surface and the depths: The metaphor of depth in psychoanalysis and the ways in which it can mislead. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 39, 1: 5-26. DOI: 10.1080/00107530.2003.10747197
  34. Wachtel P.L. (2006). Psychoanalysis, science, and hermeneutics: The vicious circles of adversarial discourse. Journal of European Psychoanalysis (JEP), 22: 25-46.
  35. Wachtel P.L. (2008). Relational Theory and the Practice of Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford.
  36. Wachtel P.L. (2009). Knowing oneself from the inside out, knowing oneself from the outside in. The “inner” and “outer” worlds and their link through action. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 26, 2: 158-170. DOI: 10.1037/a0015502
  37. Wachtel P.L. (2009). Trad. it.: “Psicodinamica ciclica”: il mondo esterno, il mondo interno e il loro rapporto attraverso l’azione. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 2016, L, 2: 189-206. DOI: 10.3280/PU2016-002002
  38. Wachtel P.L. (2010). Beyond “ESTs”. Problematic assumptions in the pursuit of evidencebased practice. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27, 3: 251-272. DOI: 10.1037/a002053
  39. Wachtel P.L. (2010). Trad. it.: Al di là degli “EST”. Problemi di una pratica psicoterapeutica basata sulle evidenze. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 2011, XLV, 2: 153-180. DOI: 10.3280/PU2011-002002
  40. Wachtel P.L. (2011). Therapeutic communication: Knowing what to say when, Second Edition. New York: Guilford.
  41. Wachtel P.L. (2014). Cyclical Psychodynamics and the Contextual Self: The Inner World, the Intimate World, and the World of Culture and Society. New York: Routledge.
  42. Wachtel P.L. (2016). Psychoanalysis and the Moebius strip: Reexamining the relation between the internal world and the world of daily experience. Psychoanalytic Psychology, in stampa.
  43. Waelder R. (1960). Basic Theory of Psychoanalysis. New York: International Universities Press.

Paul L. Wachtel, Le risposte. Psicoanalisi e psicoterapia: teorie, pratiche e contesti multipli in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 3/2016, pp 617-624, DOI: 10.3280/PU2016-003060