Investigating expected civic engagement of immigrant and non-immigrant young adolescents in Europe: findings from ICCS 2016

Journal title CADMO
Author/s Valeria Damiani, Elisa Caponera
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/1
Language English Pages 20 P. 83-102 File size 218 KB
DOI 10.3280/CAD2018-001010
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This paper aims at expanding some findings of the International Civic and Citizenship Education Study (ICCS 2016), analysing the associations between European immigrant and non-immigrant students’ civic knowledge, perceptions of good citizenship, and expected civic engagement (students’ expected participation in legal/illegal activities and in electoral/political participation) using structural equation modelling. Descriptive analyses are also presented to investigate the extent to which immigrant students’ perceptions of different aspects of citizenship and their expected civic engagement differ from their native-born counterparts. Result show that immigrant adolescents who took part in the survey seem to prefer a type of engagement that does not trust the traditional methods related to electoral participation, but is willing to be committed to other forms of participation, either in political or legal activities, or even in illegal protests. The structural equation model highlighted no difference in the relation between immigrant and non-immigrant students’ perceptions of citizenship and their civic engagement, stressing the relevance that formal education plays in fostering students’ civic engagement during adulthood.

Keywords: ICCS 2016; immigrant students; civic engagement; citizenship perceptions; Europe.

  1. Adler, R., Goggin, J. (2005), “What do we mean by ‘Civic Engagement’”, Journal of Transformative Education, 3 (3), pp. 236-253.
  2. Almond, G., Verba S. (1963), The Civic Culture. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. Blasko, Z., Costa, P., Vera-Toscano, E. (2018), Civic Attitudes and Behavioural Intentions among 14-year-Olds. How can Education make a Difference towards a More Democratic and Cohesive Europe?. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  3. Byrne, B.M. (2001), “Structural Equation Modeling: Perspectives on the Present and The future”, International Journal of Testing, 1 (3-4), pp. 327-334.
  4. Campbell, D. (2006), “What is Education’s Impact on Civic and Social Engagement?”, in R. Desjardins, T. Schuller (eds), Measuring the Effects of Education on Health and Civic Engagement. Proceedings of the Copenhagen Symposium. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  5. Carens, J.H. (2000), Culture, Citizenship, and Community. A Contextual Exploration of Justice as Evenhandedness, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Cohen, J. (1999), “Changing Paradigms of Citizenship and the Exclusiveness of the Demos”, International Sociology, 14 (3), pp. 245-268.
  7. Coley, R.J., Sum, A. (2012), Fault Lines in Our Democracy. Civic Knowledge, Voting Behaviour, and Civic Engagement in the United States. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, http://www.ets.org/s/research/19386/ (last accessed May 14th, 2018).
  8. Conover, P.J., Crewe, I.M., Searing, D.D. (1991), “The Nature of Citizenship in the United States and Great Britain: Empirical Comments on Theoretical Themes”, The Journal of Politics, 53 (3), pp. 800-832.
  9. Diller, E.C. (2001), Citizens in Service: The Challenge of Delivering Civic Engagement Training to National Service Programs. Washington (DC): Corporation for National and Community Service.
  10. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley.
  11. Foster-Bey, J. (2008), Do Race, Ethnicity, Citizenship and Socio-economic Status Determine Civic-Engagement?, CIRCLE (The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement) Working Paper #62, -- https://civicyouth.org/PopUps/WorkingPapers/WP62_Foster.Bey.pdf) (last accessed May 14th, 2018).
  12. Gibson, C., Levine, P. (2003), The Civic Mission of Schools. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York and the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning.
  13. Granberg, D., Holmberg, S. (1990), “The Intention-Behavior Relationship Among U.S. and Swedish Voters”, Social Psychology Quarterly, 53 (1), pp. 44-54.
  14. Henderson, A., Brown, S.D., Pancer, S.M. (2012), “Political and Social Dimensions of Civic Engagement: The Impact of Compulsory Community Service”, Politics and Polity, 40 (1), pp. 93-130.
  15. Huddy, L. Khatib, N. (2007), “American Patriotism, National Identity, and Political Involvement”, American Journal of Political Science, 51 (1), pp. 63-77.
  16. Jennings, M.K., Stoker, L. (2004), “Social Trust and Civic Engagement across Time and Generations”, Acta Politica, 39, pp. 342–379.
  17. Jensen, L.A., Flanagan, C.A. (2008), “Immigrant Civic Engagement: New Translations”, Applied Developmental Science, 12 (2), pp. 55-56. Kymlicka, W., Norman, W. (1994), “Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory”, Ethics, 104 (2), pp. 352-381.
  18. Lane, R.E. (1965), “The Tense Citizen and the Casual Patriot: Role Confusion in American Politics”, The Journal of Politics, 27 (4), pp. 735-760.
  19. Lechner, C.M., Pavlova, M.K., Sortheix, F.M., Silbereisen, R.K., Salmela-Aro, K. (2017), “Unpacking the Link between Family Socioeconomic Status and Civic Engagement during the Transition to Adulthood: Do work Values play a Role?”, Applied Developmental Science, DOI: 10.1080/10888691.2017.1291352.
  20. Leydet, D. (2011), “Citizenship”, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford (CA): The Center for the Study of Language and Information, -- https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/citizenship/#Bib) (last accessed May 14th, 2018).
  21. Lopez, M.H., Marcelo, K.B. (2008), “The Civic Engagement of Immigrant Youth: New Evidence From the 2006 Civic and Political Health of the Nation Survey”, Applied Developmental Science, 12 (2), pp. 66-73.
  22. More, S.S., Hope, E.C., Eisman, A.B., Zimmerman, M.A. (2016), “Predictors of Civic Engagement among Highly Involved Young Adults: Exploring the Relationship between Agency and Systems Worldview”, Journal of Community Psychology, 44 (7), pp. 888-903.
  23. Nie, N.H., Junn, J., Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996), Education and Democratic Citizenship in America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  24. Nishishiba, M., Nelson, H.T., Shinn, C.W. (2005), “Explicating Factors That Foster Civic Engagement among Students”, Journal of Public Affairs Education, 11 (4), pp. 269-285.
  25. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) (2017), Migrant Political Participation: A Review of Policies and Integration Results in the OSCE Region, -- https://www.osce.org/odihr/367936 (last accessed May 14th, 2018).
  26. Reichert, F., Murray, P. (2017), “Civic Participation of High School Students: The Effect of Civic Learning in School”, Educational Review, 70 (3), pp. 318-341.
  27. Salter, E., Kuemmerling, A., Bond, R., Sabates Aysa, R. (2017), “Education and Civic Engagement: A Comparative Study of the Benefits of Post-compulsory Education in England and Germany”, Longitudinal and Lifecourse Studies, 8 (2), pp. 152-168.
  28. Schulz, W. (2004), “Scaling Procedures for Likert-type Items on Students’ Concepts, Attitudes and Actions”, in W. Schulz, H. Sibberns (eds), IEA Civic Education Study: Technical report. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), pp. 193-126.
  29. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., Losito, B. (2010), ICCS 2009 International Report: Civic Knowledge, Attitudes, and Engagement among Lower-Secondary School Students in 38 Countries, Amsterdam (The Netherlands): International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
  30. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., Agrusti, G. (2016), ICCS Assessment Framework. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
  31. Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., Agrusti, G., Friedman, T. (2018), Becoming Citizens in a Changing World. IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016 International Report. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
  32. Schulz, W., Fraillon, J., Ainley, J. (2015), “Assessing the Intended Participation of Young Adolescents as Future Citizens: Comparing Results from five East Asian countries”, in World Education Research Yearbook 2015. London (UK) and New York (NY): Routledge, pp. 74-93.
  33. Schulz, W., Friedman, T. (2011), “Scaling Procedures for ICCS Questionnaire Items”, in W. Schulz, J. Ainley, J. Fraillon (eds), ICCS 2009 Technical Report. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), pp. 157-259.
  34. Seif, H. (2010), “The Civic Life of Latina/o Immigrant Youth: Challenging the Boundaries and Creating Safe Spaces”, in L. Sherrod, J. Torney-Purta, C. Flanagan (eds), Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth, Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley, pp. 445-470.
  35. Setzler, M., McRee, N. (2005), The Civic Incorporation of Young Immigrants in the United States, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington (DC), -- http://www.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/4/2/5/0/pages42503/p425031.php (last accessed May 14th, 2018).
  36. Stepick, A., Stepick, C.D., Labissiere, Y. (2008), “South Florida’s Immigrant Youth and Civic Engagement: Major Engagement: Minor Differences”, Applied Developmental Studies, 12 (2), pp. 57-65.
  37. Theiss-Morse, E. (1993), “Conceptualizations of Good Citizenship and Political Participation”, Political Behavior, 15 (4), pp. 355-380.
  38. Torney, J.V., Oppenheim, A.N., Farnen, R.F. (1975), Civic Education in Ten Countries: An Empirical Study. New York: Halsted Press.
  39. Torney-Purta, J. (2002), “The School’s Role in Developing Civic Engagement: A Study of Adolescents in Twenty-eight Countries”, Applied Developmental Science, 6 (4), pp. 203-212.
  40. Torney-Purta, J., Barber, C., Wilkenfeld, B. (2006), “Differences in the Civic Knowledge and Attitudes of Adolescents in the United States by Immigrant Status and Hispanic Background”, Prospects, 36 (2), pp. 343-354.
  41. Torney-Purta, J., Barber, C., Wilkenfeld, B. (2007), “Latino Adolescents’ Civic Development in the United States: Research Results from the IEA Civic Education Study”, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36 (2), pp. 111-125.
  42. Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., Schulz, W. (2001), Citizenship and Education in Twenty-eight Countries. Civic Knowledge and Engagement at the Age of Fourteen. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
  43. Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L., Brady, H.E. (1995), Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

Valeria Damiani, Elisa Caponera, Investigating expected civic engagement of immigrant and non-immigrant young adolescents in Europe: findings from ICCS 2016 in "CADMO" 1/2018, pp 83-102, DOI: 10.3280/CAD2018-001010