Sustainable Development of the Region: The Spatial Dimension

Journal title RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Author/s Oleksii Voronkov, Daria Serogina, Hanna Bazetska, Natalia Skliaruk
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/1 Language English
Pages 14 P. 11-24 File size 315 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2018-001003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

One of the most important issues in implementing the strategic goals of the sustainable development of the territories of the region is the sustainable development of a project management system for the economy of the whole region, the mechanisms of which will allow concentrating its own resources for implementation of large-scale programs for the sustainable development of territories of agglomerating and peripheral types. The solution of this issue requires the sustainable development of mechanisms that can concentrate its own resources for implementation of large-scale programs, which in turn requires the sustainable development of new methods for assessing the uniformity of the sustainable development of regional territories. In this article we give a description and results of approbation of the methodical approach to modelling the spatial development of the region, based on the method of cenological modelling. Economic cenosises of territories have a pronounced competition, the presence of which is determined by the nature of elements of the subsystem having different properties. For the description of the structure of the economic cenosis itself, a rank-parametric distribution has been used. The result of the modelling is a matrix of concordance coefficients, which, in essence, is an indicator of the existence of problem issues in each group of sustainable development indicators considered in terms of the spatial arrangement of the investigated objects. The results of the research presented in the paper allow us to conclude that it is expedient to use the developed method to evaluate the spatial development of the regions.

Keywords: Region, spatial development, economic cenosis, cenologic modelling.

  1. Hodgson G.M. (1988). Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 365 pp.
  2. Gnatyuk V.I. (2014). The law of the optimal construction of technocenosises. -- Retrieved from http://www.gnatukvi.ru/ind.html (In Russian).
  3. Arrow K.J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. -- Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2144.pdf.
  4. Bichenko L.A. (2014). Zonal approach in diagnostics of agglomerative processes of social development of Kharkiv region. Journal of Municipal economy of cities: a series: economic sciences, 117: 146-150. (In Ukrainian).
  5. Boudeville J.R. (1966). Problems of Regional Economic Planning. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  6. Chebanov S.V. (2005). Optimality and Extremality in Culture, Zipfiada and Lotman’s Law. Journal of Technogenic self-organization and mathematical apparatus of cenologic studies, 28: 411-428. (In Russian).
  7. Clark G.L., Feldman M.P., Gertler M.S. (2003). The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography. USA: Oxford University Press.
  8. Fufaev V.V. (2006). Economic cenosis of organizations. -- Retrieved from http://www.kudrinbi.ru/public/5115/index.htm (In Russian).
  9. Isard W. (1956). Location and Space-Economy: A General Theory Relating to Industrial Location, Market Areas, Land Use, Trade, and Urban Structure. New York: The Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology. London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Chapman & Hall, Ltd., 350 pp.
  10. Kudrin B.I. (2002). Mathematics of cenosises: specific, rank-specific, rank-by-parameter hyperbolic H-distributions and the laws of Lotka, Zipf, Pareto, Mandelbrot. -- Retrieved from http://www.kudrinbi.ru/public/10524/index.htm (In Russian).
  11. Lipsey R. (1960). The theory of customs unions: a general survey. Economic Journal, 70: 496-513.
  12. Loesch A. (1954). The Economics of Location. -- Retrieved from http://www.economia.unam.mx/cedrus/descargas/economicsoflocat00ls.pdf.
  13. Nelson R., Winter S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. -- Retrieved from http://inctpped.ie.ufrj.br/spiderweb/pdf_2/Dosi_1_An_evolutionary-theory-of_economic_change.pdf.
  14. Perroux F. (1950). Economic space: theory and applications. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64: 89-104
  15. Schumpeter J.A. (1961). The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Translated from the German by Redvers Opie. New York: OUP.
  16. Veblen T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. -- Retrieved from http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/LCS/theoryleisureclass.pdf.
  17. Whittaker R.H. (1975). Communities and ecosystems. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan, 385 pp.

Oleksii Voronkov, Daria Serogina, Hanna Bazetska, Natalia Skliaruk, Sustainable Development of the Region: The Spatial Dimension in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 1/2018, pp 11-24, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2018-001003