Gli ordinamenti spaziali dell’epoca digitale: oltre il dualismo

Journal title CRIOS
Author/s Luca Gaeta
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2019/18
Language Italian Pages 9 P. 37-45 File size 155 KB
DOI 10.3280/CRIOS2019-018004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The article questions the usefulness of dualism between physical and virtual space for spatial planning. Based on the relational concept of space, it investigates if and how space changes as a result of the digital media that are integral to social life, to the functioning of objects and to the global circulation of information. The article builds on seminal work by Joshua Meyrowitz dedicated to the impact of electronic media on social behavior. Derived from his concept of merging of public spheres is the complementary concept of merging of spaces, namely an interpretation of space that abolishes the dualism between physical and virtual as a path towards an ambivalent kind of space, with relevant consequences for spatial planning of the digital

Keywords: Digital media, merging of spaces, relational space

  1. Appadurai A. (1990). Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. In Theory, Culture & Society 7(2-3): 295-310. DOI: 10.1177/026327690007002017
  2. Aurigi A., De Cindio F. (2008). Augmented Urban Spaces: Articulating the Physical and Electronic City. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  3. Aurigi A., Willis K.S. (2018). Digital and smart cities. London and New York: Routledge.
  4. Castells M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell (trad. it.: La nascita della società in rete. Milano: Università Bocconi Editore, 2002).
  5. Castells M. (2004). Space of Flows, Space of Places: Materials for a Theory of Urbanism in the Information Age. In S. Graham (ed.). The Cybercities Reader. London: Routledge.
  6. Ferraris M. (2005). Dove sei? Ontologia del telefonino. Milano: Bompiani.
  7. Ferraris M. (2015). Mobilitazione totale. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  8. Gaeta L. (2018). La città è il messaggio. Pianta ortogonale, democrazia e media. In Crios 15: 13-24. DOI: 10.3280/CRIOS2018-015002
  9. Gibson W. (1984). Neuromancer. London: Gollancz.
  10. Goffman E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: The Overlook Press.
  11. Graham S., Marvin S. (1996). Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London and New York: Routledge.
  12. Harvey D. (1989). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Inquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
  13. Jurgenson N. (2011). Digital Dualism versus Augmented Reality. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2011/02/24/digital-dualism-versus-augmented-reality.
  14. Lefebvre H. (1974). La production de l’espace. Paris: Anthropos.
  15. Lévy P. (1997). Il virtuale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  16. Massey D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage.
  17. McLuhan M. (1951). The Mechanical Bride: Folklore of Industrial Man. Vanguard Press: New York.
  18. McLuhan M. (1964). Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. New York: New American Library (trad. it.: Capire i media. Gli strumenti del comunicare. Milano: Il Saggiatore, 2011).
  19. Merlini F. (2015). Ubicumque. Saggio sul tempo e lo spazio della mobilitazione. Macerata: Quodlibet.
  20. Meyrowitz J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press (trad. it.: Oltre il senso di luogo. Come i media elettronici influenzano il comportamento sociale. Bologna: Baskerville, 1995).
  21. Moores S. (2004). The Doubling of Place: Electronic Media, Time-Space Arrangements and Social Relationships. In N. Couldry, A. McCarthy (eds.). MediaSpace: Place, Scale and Culture in a Media Age. London: Routledge.
  22. Ong W.J. (1986). Oralità e scrittura. Le tecnologie della parola. il Mulino: Bologna.
  23. Perin C. (1977). Everything in Its Place: Social Order and Land Use in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  24. Sassen S. (2006). Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press (trad. it.: Territorio, autorità, diritti. Assemblaggi dal Medioevo all’età globale. Milano: Bruno Mondadori, 2008).
  25. Scannell P. (1996). Radio, Television and Modem Life: A Phenomenological Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
  26. Souza e Silva A. de (2006). From Cyber to Hybrid: Mobile Technologies as Interfaces of Hybrid Spaces. In Space and Culture 9(3): 261-78. DOI: 10.1177/1206331206289022
  27. Thompson J.B. (1998). Mezzi di comunicazione e modernità. Una teoria sociale dei media. Bologna: il Mulino.
  28. Vailati E. (1997). Leibniz & Clarke. A Study of their correspondence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  29. Van Gennep A. (1909). Les rites de passage. Paris: Nourry.
  30. Winston B. (1998). Media Technology and Society. A History: From the Telegraph to the Internet. London: Routledge.

Luca Gaeta, Gli ordinamenti spaziali dell’epoca digitale: oltre il dualismo in "CRIOS" 18/2019, pp 37-45, DOI: 10.3280/CRIOS2019-018004