Life Cycle Impact Assessment applied to cactus pear crop production for generating bioenergy and biofertiliser

Journal title RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Author/s Antonio Comparetti, Carlo Greco, Kestutis Navickas, Santo Orlando, Kestutis Venslauskas
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2019/2 Suppl.
Language English Pages 15 P. 315-329 File size 218 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2019-002-S1020
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Among the potential uses of cactus pear, the generation of bioenergy (biogas) and biofertiliser (digestate), from the Anaerobic Digestion (AD) of cladodes and fruits, is surveyed in this paper. Data for Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) was drawn from a farm located in Roccapalumba (Palermo, Sicily, Italy), where three cultivars were cultivated: 1) yellow pulp cultivar; 2) red pulp cultivar; 3) white pulp cultivar. LCIA was applied to six scenarios: 1) current dry crop; 2) current irrigated crop; 3) dry crop for fruit and bioenergy production; 4) irrigated crop for fruit and bioenergy production; 5) dry crop for bioenergy production; 6) irrigated crop for bioenergy production. According to LCIA, the highest total GHG emissions were found in Scenarios 2 and 4, while the lowest ones were found in Scenario 5. Moreover, the highest share of environmental impact for Scenarios 2, 4 and 6 is associated with the consumption of cardboard boxes used for collecting and transporting fruits, crop irrigation and a higher human work load. Furthermore, the digestate obtained from the AD process contains nutrients which make it a valuable biofertiliser, so that it reduces the expenditure for mineral fertilisers.

Keywords: Opuntia, cladodes, anaerobic digestion, biogas, biomethane, digestate.

  1. Attard G., Comparetti A., Febo P., Greco C., Mammano M.M. and Orlando S. (2017). Case Study of Potential Production of Renewable Energy Sources (RES) from Livestock Wastes in Mediterranean Islands. XXXVII CIOSTA & CIGR Section V Conference, Palermo, Italy, 13-15 June 2017. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 58: 1-6.
  2. Caballero-Nolasco Y. (2017). Codigestion anaerobica Opuntia ficus indica – estiercol de bovino: efecto de la perturbacion de la carga organica. Ingeniería Agrícola y Uso Integral del Agua, Universidad Autonoma Chapingo, Mexico.
  3. Cárdenas A., Higuera-Ciapara I. and Goycoolea F. (1997). Rheology and aggregation of cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) mucilage in solution. J. Profess. Assoc. Cactus Develop., 2: 152-159.
  4. Comparetti A., Greco C., Navickas K. and Venslauskas K. (2012). Evaluation of potential biogas production in Sicily. Proceedings of the 11th International Scientific Conference “Engineering for Rural Development”, Jelgava, Latvia, 24-25 May 2012: 555-559.
  5. Comparetti A., Febo P., Greco C. and Orlando S. (2013a). Current state and future of biogas and digestate production. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 19(1): 1-14.
  6. Comparetti A., Febo P., Greco C., Orlando S., Navickas K. and Venslauskas K. (2013b). Sicilian potential biogas production. X Convegno Nazionale di Ingegneria Agraria, Viterbo, 8-12 settembre 2013. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, XLIV(s2), e103: 522-525.
  7. Comparetti A., Febo P., Greco C., Orlando S., Navickas K., Nekrosius A. and Venslauskas K. (2013c). Biogas yield from Sicilian kitchen waste and cheese whey. X Convegno Nazionale di Ingegneria Agraria, Viterbo, 8-12 settembre 2013. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, XLIV(s2), e106: 535-538.
  8. Comparetti A., Febo P., Greco C., Navickas K., Nekrosius A., Orlando S. and Venslauskas K. (2014). Assessment of organic waste management methods through energy balance. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(9): 1631-1644.
  9. Comparetti A., Febo P., Greco C., Mammano M.M. and Orlando S. (2017). Potential Production of Biogas from Prinkly Pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) in Sicilian Uncultivated Areas. XXXVII CIOSTA & CIGR Section V Conference, Palermo, Italy, 13-15 June 2017. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 58: 1-6.
  10. Cushman J.C., Davis S.C., Yang X. and Borland A.M. (2015). Development and use of bioenergy feedstocks for semi-arid and arid lands. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66(14): 4177-4193.
  11. FAO (2013). Agro-industrial utilization of cactus pear (original title: Utilización agroindustrial del nopal; translation from Spanish: William Edwardson). Technical coordination: Roberto Cuevas García, Rome, 2013: FAO - Rural Infrastructure and Agro-Industries Division, in collaboration with the International Technical Cooperation Network on Cactus (FAO-111CACTUSNET): 152 p.
  12. Frati-Munari A., Vera Lastras O. and Ariza Andraca C.R. (1992). Evaluación de capsulas de nopal en Diabetes Mellitus. Gaceta Médica de México, 128(4): 431-436.
  13. Galati E.M., Pergolizzi N., Monforte M.T. and Tripodo M.M. (2002). Study on the increment of the production of gastric mucus in rats treated with Opuntia ficusindica (L.) Mill. cladodes. J. Ethnopharmacol., 83: 229-233.
  14. Gardiner D., Felker P. and Carr T. (1999). Cactus extract increases water infiltration rates in two soils. Comunn. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 30(11-12): 1707-1712.
  15. Garti N. (1999). Hydrocolloids as emulsifying agents for oil-in-water emulsions. J. Disper. Sci. Technol., 20(1&2): 327-355. Guinee J., Gorree M., Heijungs R., Huppes G., Kleijn R., De Koning A., Van Oers L., Wegener Sleeswijk A., Suh S. and Udo de Haes H. (2001). Life Cycle Assessment – an Operational Guide to the ISO Standards – Part 3: Scientific Background, Centre for Environmental Studies (CML). Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
  16. Inglese P. (1999). Plantación y manejo de huertos. In: Barbera G., Inglese P. and Pimienta E. (Eds.). Agroecología, cultivo y usos del nopal. FAO Plant Production and Protection, Paper 132. Rome: 82-96.
  17. Koszela M. and Lorencowicz E. (2015). Agricultural use of biogas digestate as a replacement fertilizers. Farm Machinery and Processes Management in Sustainable Agriculture, 7th International Scientific Symposium, Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 7: 119-124.
  18. Lee G.C., Kim H.R. and Jang Y.S. (2002). Antioxidant property of an ethanol extract of the stem of Opuntia ficus-indica var. Saboten. J. Agric. Food Chem., 50: 6490-6496.
  19. Loro J.F., Del Río I. and Pérez-Santana L. (1999). Preliminary studies of analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties of Opuntia dillenii aqueous extract. J. Ethnopahrmacol., 61: 213-218.
  20. Medina-Torres L., Brito-De la Fuente E., Torrestiana-Sánchez B. and Alonso S. (2003). Mechanical properties of gels formed by mixtures of mucilage gum (Opuntia ficus-indica) and carrageenans. Carbohydr. Polym., 52: 143-150.
  21. Pimienta-Barrios E. (1993). Vegetable cactus (Opuntia). In: Williams J.T. (Ed.). Pulses and vegetables. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, pp. 177-192.
  22. Quintanar-Orozco E.T., Vázquez-Rodríguez G.A., Beltrán-Hernández R.I., Lucho-Constantino C.A., Coronel-Olivares C., González Montiel S. and Islas-Valdez S. (2018). Enhancement of the biogas and biofertilizer production from Opuntia heliabravoana Scheinvar. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(28): 28403-28412.
  23. Rutamu I. (1999). Low cost biodigesters for zero grazing smallholder dairy farmers in Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 11(2).
  24. Sudzuki F., Muñoz C. and Berger H. (1993). El cultivo de la tuna (cactus pear). Departamento de Reproducción Agrícola, Universidad de Chile, Santiago. Uribe J.M., Varnero M.T. and Benavides C. (1992). Biomasa de tuna (Opuntia ficusindica L. Mill) como acelerador de la digestión anaeróbica de guano de bovino. Simiente, 62(1): 14-18.
  25. Varnero M.T. (1991). Manual de reciclaje orgánico y biogás. Ministerio de Agricultura (FIA)-Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Santiago, Chile.
  26. Varnero M.T. and García de Cortázar V. (1998). Energy and biofertilizer production: alternative uses for pruning-waste of cactus-pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L. Mill).
  27. In: Saenz C (ed.). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Cactus Pear and Nopalitos Processing and Uses. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Universidad de Chile, FAO International Technical Cooperation Network on Cactus Pear (FAO-CACTUSNET), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome: 96-102.
  28. Wiese J., Mc Pherson S., Odden M. and Shlipak M. (2004). Effect of Opuntia ficusindica on symptoms of the alcohol hangover. Arch. Intern. Med., 164: 1334-1340.

Antonio Comparetti, Carlo Greco, Kestutis Navickas, Santo Orlando, Kestutis Venslauskas, Life Cycle Impact Assessment applied to cactus pear crop production for generating bioenergy and biofertiliser in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 2 Suppl./2019, pp 315-329, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2019-002-S1020