"Children who reject a parent: intertwining relationships within separation experiences". Second part

Journal title RIVISTA DI PSICOTERAPIA RELAZIONALE
Author/s Francesco Canevelli
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2021/54
Language Italian Pages 23 P. 37-59 File size 214 KB
DOI 10.3280/PR2021-054003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The Author addresses the phenomenon of parental refusal that a child may manifest in some situations following separation. The issue is framed within specific scenarios in which emerging intertwining relationships support and reinforce the refusal itself and provide frames of meaning for its occurrence. The implications that the refusal and the type of relationships in which it entails have on the development needs of the child and on the entire family system are examined. Finally, the various contexts and possible specialist interventions in this type of situation are discussed.

Keywords: Effects of separation on children, refusal of a parent, intertwining relationships, separation scenarios, development paths, contexts of intervention.

  1. Albertini V., Rontini L., Manfrida G. (2013). L’indiretto interessato: considerazioni sulla supervisione indiretta e indagine sulle interviste ai didatti del Centro Studi. Ecologia della Mente, 36: 152-169. DOI: 10.1712/1399.15561
  2. Bateson G., Bateson M.C. (1987). Angels Fear. Towards an Epistemology of the Sacred, New York: Macmillan Co. Inc.; ed. it. (1989). Dove gli angeli esitano. Verso un’epistemologia del sacro. Milano: Adelphi.
  3. Cancrini L. (1986). Dell’utilità dell’errore. La supervisione come intervento sul sistema terapeutico. Ecologia della Mente, 8: 53-74.
  4. Cotugno A. (1994). A proposito di supervisione indiretta: la storia del Vecchio Marinaio. Ecologia della Mente, 17: 89-92.
  5. De Bernart R., Dobrowolski C. (1996). La supervisione clinica nel training. Terapia Familiare, 52: 93-106.
  6. Haley J. (1997). Formazione e supervisione in psicoterapia. Trento: Erikson.
  7. Manfrida G. (2011). Plausible, Convincing and Appealing. Characteristics and Development of Therapeutic Stories in a Shared Reality Approach. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 2: 22-41.
  8. Manfrida G., Albertini V., Eisenberg E. (2017). Connected: recommendations and techniques in order to employ Internet tools for the enhancement of online therapeutic relationships. Experiences from Italy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39: 314-328.
  9. Manfrida G., Albertini V., Eisenberg E. (2019). Psychotherapy and Technology: Relational Strategies and Techniques for Online Therapeutic Activity. In Linares J.L., Pereira R., a cura di, Clinical Interventions in Systemic Couple and Family Therapy. Switzerland: Springer Nature.
  10. Manfrida G., Albertini V., Eisenberg E. (2020). La clinica e il web. Risorse tecnologiche e comunicazione psicoterapeutica online. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  11. Manfrida G., Albertini V., Eisenberg E. (2021). Psicoterapia on line. Recursos tecnológicos en la clinica psicológica. Madrid: Morata.
  12. Markham L., Chiu J. (2011). Exposing Operations of Power in Supervisory Relationships. Family Process 30: 503-516.
  13. Menghi P., Giacometti K. (1985). Terapia, formazione, supervisione: coerenza di un modello. In Andolfi M., Piccone D., a cura di, La formazione relazionale. Roma: Edizioni ITF.
  14. Milgram S. (1967). The Small-World Problem. Psychology Today, 1: 61‐67.
  15. Searles H.F. (1974). Le esperienze emotive del supervisore come elemento di chiarificazione per il rapporto terapeutico. In Searles H.F., a cura di, Scritti sulla schizofrenia. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  16. Serres M. (2011). Educare nel XXI secolo. Parigi: Institut de France.
  17. Watzlawick P., Beavin J.H., Jackson D.D. (1967). Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: W.W. Norton; ed. it. (1971). Pragmatica della comunicazione umana, Roma: Astrolabio.

Francesco Canevelli, "Figli che rifiutano un genitore: intrecci relazionali nei percorsi di separazione" Seconda parte in "RIVISTA DI PSICOTERAPIA RELAZIONALE " 54/2021, pp 37-59, DOI: 10.3280/PR2021-054003