Experiences in Groups as a key to "late" Bion

Journal title GRUPPI
Author/s Giuseppe Civitarese
Publishing Year 2023 Issue 2021/2
Language Italian Pages 35 P. 13-47 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/gruoa2-2021oa15805
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In order to understand the “late” Bion, i.e. his production from Learning from Experience onwards, the most difficult and controversial, it is worth re-reading not only the essays in Second Thoughts, but also Experiences in Groups. The hypothesis of this work is that Bion spent his life as a scholar - probably without even being fully aware of it, since he never talks about it - to transpose his theory of groups into his theory of individual psycho-analysis. To illustrate this thesis, the author systematically compares some of the principles of both. Going back to Experiences in Groups, then, is also useful for another reason. Bion revolutionises theory but still works as a Kleinian. Despite brilliant suggestions, he does not fully develop a new technique. To have a tool box that anyone can use, we have to wait the analytic field theory, which is an original development of his thought. In this model the analyst sees in the analytical pair not two isolated subjects that interact, but a group. There is no ‘fact’ of analysis that cannot be heard as unconsciously co-created. Here then, highlighting the group inspiration of late Bion’s helps us to grasp the meaning of this technical principle, so easily misunderstood, and vice versa.

Keywords: ; Field theory; Bion; Group; O; Basic assumption; Reversive perspective

  1. Baranger M. e Baranger W. (1961-1962). La situazione analitica come campo dinamico. In: La situazione analitica come campo bipersonale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1990.
  2. Bion W.R. (1958). L’arroganza. In: Riflettendoci meglio (1967). Roma: Astrolabio, 2016.
  3. Bion W.R. (1961). Esperienze nei gruppi. Roma: Armando, 1971.
  4. Bion W.R. (1962a). Apprendere dall’esperienza. Roma: Armando, 1988.
  5. Bion W.R. (1962b). Una teoria del pensare. In: Riflettendoci meglio (1967). Roma: Astrolabio, 2016.
  6. Bion W.R. (1963). Gli elementi della psicoanalisi. Roma: Armando, 1979.
  7. Bion W.R. (1965). Trasformazioni. Il passaggio dall’apprendimento alla crescita. Roma: Armando, 1983.
  8. Bion W.R. (1970). Attenzione e interpretazione. Roma: Armando, 1973.
  9. Bion W.R. (1975). Il sogno. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 1993.
  10. Bion W.R. (1992). Cogitations. Roma: Armando.
  11. Bion W.R. (1997 [1963]). La Griglia. In: Addomesticare i pensieri selvatici. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 1998.
  12. Bion W.R. e Rickman J. (1943). Intra-Group Tensions in Therapy – Their Study as the Task of the Group. The Lancet, 242: 678-681. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)88231-8.
  13. Civitarese G. (2008). “Caesura” as Bion Discourse on the Method. Int. J. of Psychoanalysis, 89: 1123-1143. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00089.x.
  14. Civitarese G. (2013). The Grid and the Truth Drive. The Italian Psychoanalytic Annual, 7: 91-114.
  15. Civitarese G. (2015). Transformations in Hallucinosis and the Receptivity of the Analyst. Int. J. of Psychoanalysis, 96: 1091-1116. DOI: 10.1111/1745-8315.12242.
  16. Civitarese G. (2016). Truth and the Unconscious in Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
  17. Civitarese G. (2018). Traduire l’expérience: le concept de Transformation dans Bion et la théorie du champ analytique. Revue Française de Psychanalyse, 82: 1327-1386.
  18. Civitarese G. (2019a). On Bion’s Concepts of Negative Capacity and Faith. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 88: 751-783. DOI: 10.1080/00332828.2019.1651176.
  19. Civitarese G. (2019b). Bion’s O and His Pseudo-Mystical Path. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 29: 388-403. DOI: 10.1080/10481885.2019.1632649.
  20. Civitarese G. (2019c). The Concept of Time in Bion’s “A Theory of Thinking”. Int. J. of Psychoanalysis, 100: 182-205. DOI: 10.1080/00207578.2019.1570216.
  21. Civitarese G. (2020a). Regression in the Analytic Field. Romanian J. of Psychoa-nalysis, 13: 17-41. DOI: 10.2478/rjp-2020-0015.
  22. Civitarese G. (2020b). Bion’s Graph of “In Search of Existence”. The American J. of Psychoanalysis, 81: 326-350. DOI: 10.1057/s11231-021-09306-x.
  23. Civitarese G. (2020c). Plea for a safe place. J. of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 68, 6: 1143-1154.
  24. Civitarese G. (2021). Experiences in Groups as a key to “late” Bion. Int. J. of Psychoanalysis, 6: 1071-1096. DOI: 10.1080/00207578.2021.1927045.
  25. Civitarese G. (2021a). Intersubjectivity and the Analytic Field. J. of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 69, 5: 853-894. DOI: 10.1177/00030651211044788.
  26. Civitarese G. (2021b). The Limits of Interpretation. A Reading of Bion’s ‘On Arrogance’. Int. J. of Psychoanalysis, 102: 236-257. DOI: 10.1080/00207578.2020.1827954.
  27. Civitarese G. e Ferro A. (2020). Vitalità e gioco in psicoanalisi. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  28. Durkheim É. (1912). Le forme elementari della vita religiosa. Il sistema totemico in Australia. Milano-Udine: Mimesis, 2013.
  29. Elliott A. e Prager J. (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Psychoanalysis in the Social Sciences and Humanities. London: Routledge.
  30. Esposito R. (2014). Le persone e le cose: Torino: Einaudi.
  31. Ferro A. (2009). Transformations in Dreaming and Characters in the Psychoanalytic Field. The Int. J. of Psychoanalysis, 90: 209-230. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2009.00131.x.
  32. Freud S. (1899). L’interpretazione dei sogni. OSF, 3. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  33. Freud, S. (1921). Psicologia delle masse e analisi dell’Io. OSF, 9. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  34. Freud S. (1929). Il disagio della civiltà. OSF, 10. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  35. Freud S. (1932). I miei rapporti con Josef Popper-Lynkeus. OSF, 11. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  36. Freud S. (1933). Introduzione alla psicoanalisi (nuova serie di lezioni). OSF, 11. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  37. Gerson S. (2004). The Relational Unconscious: a Core Element of Intersubjectivity, Thirdness, and Clinical Process. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73: 63-98. DOI: 10.1002/j.2167-4086.2004.tb00153.x .
  38. Hegel G.W. (1807). La fenomenologia dello spirito. Torino: Einaudi, 2008.
  39. Heidegger M. (1927). Essere e tempo. Milano: Longanesi, 2006.
  40. Hinshelwood R.D. (2000). Foreword Bion, Rickman, Foulkes and the Northfield Experiments. In: Harrison T., a cura di, Advancing on a Different Front. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  41. Kaës R. (2005). Groupes internes et groupalité psychique: genèse et enjeux d’un concept. Revue de psychothérapie psychanalytique de groupe, 45: 9-30. DOI: 10.3917/rppg.045.0009.
  42. Kernberg O.F. (2011). Divergent Contemporary Trends in Psychoanalytic Theory. The Psychoanalytic Review, 98: 633-666. DOI: 10.1521/prev.2011.98.6.633.
  43. Lacan J. (1947). La psichiatria inglese e la guerra. La psicoanalisi. Studi internazionali del campo freudiano, 4: 9-29, 1988.
  44. Lacan J. (1966). Scritti. Torino: Einaudi, 1974.
  45. Levine H. e Civitarese G., a cura di (2016). The W.R. Bion Tradition: The Lines of Development – Evolution of Theory and Practice Over the Decades. London: Karnac Books.
  46. Mancini R. (2019). La fragilità dello Spirito. Leggere Hegel per comprendere il mondo globale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  47. Meltzer D. (1983). La vita onirica. Roma: Borla, 1989.
  48. Merriam-Webster (2021). “Group”. Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Accessed April 3, 2021. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/group.
  49. Momigliano L.N. (1991). Il tè nel deserto: Ulteriori considerazioni a proposito de “Lo psicoanalista allo specchio”. Rivista di Psicoanalisi, 37: 773-819.
  50. Ogden T.H. (2008). I quattro principi del funzionamento mentale di Bion. In: Riscoprire la psicoanalisi. Pensare e sognare, imparare e dimenticare, Milano: CIS 2009.
  51. Ogden T.H. (2019). Ontological Psychoanalysis or “What Do You Want to Be When You Grow Up?”. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 88: 661-684. DOI: 10.1080/00332828.2019.1656928.
  52. Orange D.M. (2009). The Price of an Open Heart: Book Review Essay on Chris Jaenicke’s, “Das Risiko der Verbundenheit: Intersubjektivitaetstheorie in der Praxis”. Int. J. of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 4: 393-397. DOI: 10.1080/15551020902995355.
  53. Pines M. (1985). Bion and Group Psychotherapy. London: Jessica Kigsley, 2000.
  54. Ricoeur P. (1965). Dell’interpretazione. Saggio su Freud. Milano: Il Saggiatore, 1967.
  55. Seligman S. (2017). Relationships in Development: Infancy, Intersubjectivity and Attachment. New York: Routledge.
  56. Terman D.M. (2014). Self Psychology as a Shift Away from the Paranoid Strain in Classical Analytic Theory. J. of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 62: 1005-1024. DOI: 10.1177/0003065114557864.
  57. Trist E. (1985). Working with Bion in the 1040s: The Group Decade. In: Pines M., a cura di, Bion and Group Psychotherapy. London: Jessica Kigsley, 2000.
  58. Winnicott D W. (1945). Lo sviluppo emozionale primario. In: Dalla pediatria alla psicoanalisi, Firenze: Martinelli, 1975.
  59. Zahavi D. (2001). Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity: A Response to the Linguistic-Pragmatic Critique. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.

  • La figura paterna per una coppia lesbica che sta facendo procreazione medicalmente assistita Giuliana Nico, in Ricerca Psicoanalitica /2023
    DOI: 10.4081/rp.2023.834

Giuseppe Civitarese, Esperienze nei gruppi come chiave per comprendere l’"ultimo" Bion in "GRUPPI" 2/2021, pp 13-47, DOI: 10.3280/gruoa2-2021oa15805