The regularisation industry: a qualitative analysis of the legal-administrative intermediation field

Journal title MONDI MIGRANTI
Author/s Paola Bonizzoni, Serena Caroselli, Fabio De Blasis, Minke Hajer
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2024/2
Language English Pages 23 P. 85-107 File size 255 KB
DOI 10.3280/MM2024-002004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The bureaucratic management of the legal and administrative statuses of mi-grants is a pervasive yet scarcely researched aspect of the migratory experi-ence. This article describes the field of intermediation services for migrants, with a particular focus on legal and bureaucratic support. Using the 2020 regu-larization of irregular migrant workers in Italy as a case study, it shows that actors related to this emerging segment of the ‘migration industry’ are not only concerned with facilitating migrants’ physical border crossings but also that intermediation services increasingly involve the crossing of internal borders, particularly between different (il)legal migration statuses. The article describes the field of legal-administrative status-intermediation, highlighting the different actors involved, who differ widely in their legal competency and the degree to which they marketize their services. The article argues that the com-bination of legal uncertainty and the specific features of the institutional and regulatory framework concerning intermediation services in Italy creates space for the emergence and expansion of for-profit actors. These actors oper-ate on a sliding scale between legal and illegal, formal and informal service-provision, ranging from commercial intermediation to illicit practices and fraud. Additionally, the article shows increasing forms of competition and ten-sion between non-profit and for-profit actors in the field. The analysis is based on 45 interviews with different actors of civil society, employers and migrants involved in the amnesty. The article looks at the migration industry as a field of intermediation in a context marked by the pandemic and on the forms of embeddedness of irregular migrants in local society.

Keywords: migration industry; intermediaries; amnesty; regularisation; civil society actors.

  1. Ambrosini M. (2021). The battleground of asylum and immigration policies: a conceptual inquiry. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 44, 3: 374-395; DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2020.1836380/
  2. Ambrosini M. (2017). Why irregular migrants arrive and remain: the role of intermediaries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43, 11: 1813-1830; DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2016.1260442/
  3. Ambrosini M. (2015). From “illegality” to Tolerance and Beyond: Irregular Immigration as a Selective and Dynamic Process. International Migration, 54, 2: 144-159;
  4. Artero M. and Fontanari E. (2021). Obstructing lives: Local borders and their structural violence in the asylum field of post-2015 Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47, 3: 631-648; DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2019.1608168/
  5. Ataç I. and Rosenberger S. (2019). Social policies as a tool of migration control. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 17, 1: 1-10; DOI: 10.1080/15562948.2018.1539802/
  6. Bonizzoni P. (2017). The shifting boundaries of (un)documented ness: a gendered understanding of migrants’ employment-based legalization pathways in Italy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40, 10: 1643-1662; DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2016.1229488/
  7. Bonizzoni P. and Artero M. (2023). I Couldn’t Figure Out What to Do’: Salvadorean Asylum Seekers Facing the Uncertainties of the 2020 Italian Amnesty. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies: 1-15; DOI: 10.1080/15562948.2023.2198982/
  8. Bonizzoni P. and Dotsey S. (2023). Migration and Legal Precarity in the Time of Pandemic: Qualitative Research on the Italian Case. DVE DOMOVINI, 54: 117-130.
  9. Bonizzoni P. and Hajer M.H.J. (2023a). Civil Society Actors and the 2020 Italian Amnesty: Bordering to Deborder? Journal of Intercultural Studies, 44, 1: 44-60.
  10. Bonizzoni P. and Hajer M.H.J. (2023b). Politicising the Amnesty: Struggles for Migrants’ Legality during a Pandemic. Partecipazione e conflitto, 16, 1: 119-137.
  11. Bonizzoni P. and Odasso L. (2024). Legal-Administrative Intermediation in the Migration Field. An Introduction. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, 17, 2: 195-211.
  12. Brambilla C. (2015). Exploring the critical potential of the borderscapes concept. Geopolitics, 20, 1: 14-34.
  13. Bendixsen S. (2018). Differentiation of rights in the Norwegian welfare state: Hierarchies of belonging and humanitarian exceptionalism. Social Inclusion, 6, 3: 162-171.
  14. Calavita K. (2005). Immigrants at the Margins: Law, Race, and Exclusion in Southern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Collyer M. and de Haas H. (2012). Developing dynamic categorisations of transit migration: Categorisations of transit migration. Population, Space and Place, 18, 4: 468-481.
  16. Conlon D. (2011). Waiting: Feminist Perspectives on the Spacings/Timings of Migrant (Im)Mobility, Gender, Place and Culture, 18, 3: 353-360.
  17. Cranston S., Schapendonk J. and Spaan E. (2018). New directions in exploring the migration industries: introduction to the special issue. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 4: 543-557.
  18. Crawley H. and Skleparis D. (2018). Refugees, migrants, neither, both: Categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe’s ‘migration crisis’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 1: 48-64.
  19. De Blasis F. and Bonizzoni P. (2024). High Stakes and Hidden Traps. Migration Industry, Risks of Deception, and Legal Status Precarity in the Lottery of the Decreto Flussi. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, 17, 2: 237-262.
  20. De Haas H., Natter K. and Vezzoli S. (2018). Growing restrictiveness or changing selection? The nature and evolution of migration policies. International Migration Review, 52, 2: 324-367.
  21. Devitt C. (2023). Continuity and Change in Immigration Regimes: An Institutionalist Analysis of Italian Labor Immigration Regulations 1990-2020. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies; DOI: 10.1080/15562948.2023.2180128/
  22. Dimitriadis I. (2018). Asking around”: immigrants' counterstrategies to renew their residence permit in times of economic crisis in Italy. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 16, 3: 275-292.
  23. El-Kayed N. and Hamann U. (2018). Refugees’ access to housing and residency in German cities: Internal border regimes and their local variations. Social Inclusion, 6, 1: 135-146.
  24. Engbersen G. and Broeders D. (2009). The State Versus the Alien: Immigration Control and Strategies of Irregular Immigrants. West European Politics, 32, 5: 867-885.
  25. Engbersen G., Van San M. and Leerkes A. (2006). A Room with a View. Irregular Immigrants in the Legal Capital of the World. Ethnography, 7, 2: 205-238.
  26. Esaiasson P., Lajevardi N. and Sohlberg J. (2022). Reject, limbo, and accept: the effect of migration decisions on asylum seekers. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48, 15: 3469-3483.
  27. Faist T. (2014). Brokerage in Cross-Border Mobility: Social Mechanisms and the (Re)Production of Social Inequalities. Social Inclusion, 2, 4: 38-52.
  28. Gammeltoft-Hansen T. and Nyberg-Sørensen N. (2013). The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration. New York: Routledge.
  29. Garapich M. (2008). The Migration Industry and Civil Society: Polish Immigrants in the United Kingdom Before and After EU Enlargement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34, 5: 735-752.
  30. Goldring L. (2022). Precarious legal status trajectories as method, and the work of legal status. Citizenship Studies, 26, 4-5: 460-470.
  31. Goss J. and Lindquist B. (1995). Conceptualising International Labour Migration: A Structuration Perspective. International Migration Review, 29, 2: 317-351.
  32. Groutsis D., van den Broek D. and Harvey W. (2015). Transformations in Network Governance: The Case of Migration Intermediaries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41, 10: 1558-1576.
  33. Guentner S., Lukes S., Stanton R., Vollmer B.A. and Wilding J. (2016). Bordering practices in the UK welfare system. Critical Social Policy, 36, 3: 391-411.
  34. Harvey W.S., Groutsis, D. and van den Broek D. (2018). Intermediaries and Destination Reputations: Explaining Flows of Skilled Migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 4: 644-662.
  35. Hernández León R. (2013). Conceptualizing the Migration Industry. In: Gammeltoft-Hansen T. and Nyberg Sorenson N., eds., The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration (pp. 24-44). Oxford: Routledge.
  36. Hernández León R. (2008). Metropolitan Migrants: The Migration of Urban Mexicans to the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  37. Jones R. (2009). Categories, borders and boundaries. Progress in Human Geography, 33, 2: 174-189; DOI: 10.1177/030913250808982
  38. Kolossov V. and Scott J. (2013). Selected conceptual issues in border studies. Belgeo. Revue belge de géographie, 1: 1-19.
  39. Könönen J. (2018). Border struggles within the state: Administrative bordering of non-citizens in Finland. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 8, 3: 143-150;
  40. Ibrido R., Cerrina Feroni G. and Federico V. (2021). Governing through uncertainty? Migration law and governance in a comparative perspective. DPCE Online, 45, 4: 5130-5135.
  41. Infantino F. (2023). The interdependency of border bureaucracies and mobility intermediaries: a street-level view of migration infrastructuring. Comparative Migration Studies, 11: 1;
  42. Koh S.Y. and Wissink B. (2018). Enabling, Structuring and Creating Elite Transnational Lifestyles: Intermediaries of the Super-Rich and the Elite Mobilities Industry. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 4: 592-609; DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1315509/
  43. Lindquist J. (2010). Labour Recruitment, Circuits of Capital and Gendered Mobility: Reconceptualizing the Indonesian Migration Industry. Pacifica Affairs, 83, 1: 115-132.
  44. Lindquist J., Xiang B. and Yeoh B. (2012). Opening the Black Box of Migration, Brokers, the Organization of Transnational Mobility and the Changing Political Economy in Asia. Pacific Affairs, 85, 1: 7-19.
  45. Maher S. (2018). Out of West Africa: Human Smuggling as a Social Enterprise. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 676, 1: 36-56; DOI: 10.1177/0002716217743935/
  46. Mau S. (2012). Liberal states and the freedom of movement: Selective borders, unequal mobility. Palgrave Macmillan.
  47. McCollum D. and Findlay A. (2018). Oiling the Wheels? Flexible Labour Markets and the Migration Industry. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 4: 558-574; DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1315505/
  48. McCollum D. and Findlay A. (2015). ‘Flexible’ Workers for ‘Flexible’ Jobs? The Labour Market Function of A8 Migrant Labout in the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 29, 3: 427-443; DOI: 10.1177/0950017014568137/
  49. Misje T. (2020). Social work and welfare bordering: The case of homeless EU migrants in Norway. European Journal of Social Work, 23, 3: 401-413; DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2019.1682975/
  50. Montagna N. (2023). The two emergencies of migration policy in Italy during the first wave of COVID-19: the spread of the virus, the shortage of labour, and the irregular arrivals. Journal of International Migration and Integration, online first, open access: DOI: 10.1007/S12134-023-01042-8/
  51. Montagna N. (2021). Libia-Italia: la rotta del Mediterraneo centrale e l’industria della migrazione. In: Colombo M., ed., CIRMiB, MigraReport 2021 (pp. 107-122). Milano: Vita&Pensiero.
  52. Morris L. (2002). Managing migration: Civic stratification and migrants’ rights. London: Routledge.
  53. Nyberg-Sørensen N. (2012). Revisiting the Migration–Development Nexus: From Social Networks and Remittances to Markets for Migration Control. International Migration, 50, 3: 61-76.
  54. Nyberg-Sørensen N. and Gammeltoft-Hansen T. (2013). Introduction. In: Nyberg-Sørensen N. and Gammeltoft-Hansen T., eds., The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration (pp. 1-24). London: Routledge.
  55. Odasso L. (2021). Negotiating legitimacy: Binational couples in the face of immigration bureaucracy in Belgium and Italy. Anthropologica, 63, 1: 1-30.
  56. Pallister-Wilkins P. (2018). Médecins Avec Frontières and the making of a humanitarian borderscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36, 1: 114-138.
  57. Pannia P. (2021). “Institutional uncertainty” as a technique of migration governance. A Comparative Legal Perspective. DPCE Online, 45, 4: 5136-5157.
  58. Paul R. (2015). The political economy of border drawing: Arranging legality in European labor migration policies. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
  59. Salt J. and Stein J. (1997). Migration as a Business: The Case of Trafficking. International Migration, 35, 4: 467-494.
  60. Schapendonk J. and Steel G. (2014). Following Migrant Trajectories: The Im/Mobility of Sub-Saharan Africans en Route to the European Union. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104, 2: 262-270.
  61. Schuster L. (2005). The Continuing Mobility of Migrants in Italy: Shifting between Places and Statuses. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 4: 757-774.
  62. Spaan E. (1999). Labour Circulation and Socioeconomic Transformation: The Case of East Java, Indonesia. The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute.
  63. Spaan E. (1994). Taikongs and Calos: The Role of Middlemen and Brokers in Javanese International Migration. International Migration Review, 28, 1: 93-113.
  64. Spaan E. and Hillmann F. (2013). Migration Trajectories and the Migration Industry: Theoretical Reflections and Empirical Examples from Asia. In: Gammeltoft-Hansen T. and Nyberg Sorensen N., eds., The Migration Industry and the Commercialization of International Migration (pp. 64-86). Abingdon: Routledge.
  65. Spaan E. and Van Naerssen T. (2018). Migration Decision-making and Migration Industry in the Indonesia-Malaysia Corridor. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 4: 680-695; DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1315523/.
  66. Spener D. (2009). Some Critical Reflections on the Migration Industry Concept. Accessed March 1, 2024; http://www.trinity.edu/ dspener/clandestinecrossings/related%20articles/migration%20industry.pdf/.
  67. Spener D. (2004). Mexican Migrant-Smuggling: A Cross-Border Cottage Industry. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 5, 3: 295-320.
  68. Schweitzer R. (2022). Managing irregularity through the provision of social assistance. In: Micro-management of irregular migration: Internal borders and public services in London and Barcelona (pp. 155-188). Springer.
  69. Xiang B. and Lindquist J. (2014). Migration Infrastructure. International Migration Review, 48, S1: S122-S148.
  70. Triandafyllidou A. and Ambrosini M. (2011). Irregular immigration control in Italy and Greece: Strong fencing and weak gate-keeping serving the labour market. European Journal of Migration and Law, 13, 3: 251-273.
  71. Tuckett A. (2018). Ethical brokerage and self-fashioning in Italian immigration bureaucracy. Critique of Anthropology, 38, 3: 245-264.
  72. Tuckett A. (2015). Strategies of navigation: migrants' everyday encounters with Italian immigration bureaucracy. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 33, 1: 113-128.
  73. Van Houtum H. and Van Naerssen T. (2002). Bordering, ordering and othering. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 93, 2: 125-136.
  74. Yuval-Davis N., Wemyss G. and Cassidy K. (2019). Bordering. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Paola Bonizzoni, Serena Caroselli, Fabio De Blasis, Minke Hajer, The regularisation industry: a qualitative analysis of the legal-administrative intermediation field in "MONDI MIGRANTI" 2/2024, pp 85-107, DOI: 10.3280/MM2024-002004