Multi-Actor Platform as a tool to enhance networking of sustainable socio-ecological food systems

Titolo Rivista ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE
Autori/Curatori Rosanna Salvia, Giovanni Quaranta
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2019/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 23 P. 405-427 Dimensione file 191 KB
DOI 10.3280/ECAG2019-002012
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The sustainability of food systems is a central issue in academic and political debate at a national and global level. Involving the various actors in food systems through a multi-actor platform approach is increasingly recognized as a way to promote sustainability because it is a strategy capable of ensuring resilience and an effective mechanism to guarantee the co-creation of knowledge and the definition and implementation of innovation. In order to ensure that the actors/ stakeholders involved are an authentic reflection of the food system, understood as a socio-ecological system i.e. the result of interactions between the socio-economic and ecological components, it is essential to use analytical tools that allow a multidisciplinary approach and that can act as devices for knowledge co-creation and promoting of collaborative approaches. This paper uses a modified version of the SES framework, designed to allow the integration of a range of collaboration behavioural factors for sustainable agri-food chains. The objective is to strengthen the analysis of the structural aspects of SES with assessment of the behavioural factors that can significantly influence the path of sustainable transformation that the SES could undertake. The study analyses the implementation of a good practice multi-actor collaboration and gives an ex ante evaluation of the adaptive mechanisms needed to activate an effective transfer, considering: - the structural characteristics of the agri-food socio-ecological systems involved in the "re-use of good practice"; - the quality and density of behavioural factors present in the socio-ecological systems involved in the "re-use of good practice". The "re-using" socio-ecological systems are all quite different, which makes the challenge of adapting the innovation more complicated. The wine producing systems involved show different levels of aggregation and capacity for adding value. There is a high risk that the costs of implementing the innovation will fall principally to the farmers, while the increase in value generated will not. For this reason, it is important to guarantee, through the initial design and subsequent implementation of the multi-actor platform, that the platform can express, recognize, and address these kinds of challenges.

Keywords:Multi-actor platform; wine sector; rural innovation; agri-food socialecological systems; networks.

Jel codes:Q13, Q18, Q56

  1. Aldunce, P., Beilin, R., Howden, M., & Handmer, J. (2015). Resilience for disaster risk management in a changing climate: practitioners’ frames and practices. Global Environmental Change, 30, 1-11.
  2. Barratt, M. (2004). Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(1), 30-42. DOI: 10.1108/13598540410517566
  3. Binder, C.R., Hinkel, J., Bots, P.W.G., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2013). Comparison of frameworks for analysing social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 26. DOI: 10.5751/ES-05551-180426
  4. cciaa - Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Agriculture and Crafts (2019). On demand database.
  5. Fischer, C. & Reynolds, N. (2010). Collaborative Advantage, Relational Risks and Sustainable Relationships: a Literature Review and Definition, Agri-food Chain Relationships. CAB International, London, UK, pp. 74-89.
  6. Dania, W.A.P., Xing, K., & Amer, Y. (2018). Collaboration behavioural factors for sustainable agri-food supply chains: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186(10), 851-864.
  7. Davidson, J.L., Jacobson, C., Lyth, A., Dedekorkut-Howes, A., Baldwin, C.L., Ellison, J.C., Holbrook, N.J., Howes, M.J., Serrao-Neumann, S., Singh-Peterson, L. & Smith, T. F. (2016). Interrogating resilience: toward a typology to improve its operationalization. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 27. DOI: 10.5751/ES-08450-210227.
  8. Ericksen, P.J. (2008). Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research. Global Environmental Change, 18, 34-245.
  9. Fearne, A., Hughes, D., & Duffy, R. (2001). Concepts of collaboration: supply chain management in a global food industry. In Eastham, J.F., Sharples, L., Ball, S.D. (Eds.). Food Supply Chain Management. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, pp.55-89.
  10. Garibaldi, R. (2018). Primo rapporto sul turismo enogastronomico italiano 2018. CELSB.
  11. Geeson, N., Quaranta, G., Salvia, R., & Brandt, J. (2015). Long-term involvement of stakeholders in research projects on desertification and land degradation: how has their perception of the issues changed and what strategies have emerged for combating desertification?. Journal of Arid Environments, 114, 124-133
  12. Guimaraes, M.H., Guiomar, N., Surova, D, Godinho, S., Pinto Correia, T., Sandberg, A., Ravera, F., & Varanda, M. (2018). Structuring wicked problems in transdisciplinary research using the Social-Ecological systems framework: An application to the montado system, Alentejo, Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 417-428.
  13. Hubeau, M., Marchand, F., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2017). Sustainability Experiments in the Agri-Food System: Uncovering the Factors of New Governance and Collaboration Success. Sustainability, 9, 1027.
  14. Inea (2012). Il vino in Basilicata: dinamiche evolutive del comparto tra qualita e mercato.
  15. Ipsos-Enit (2017). Be-Italy Indagine sull’attrattivita del Paese. Istat (2010). Censimento dell’Agricoltura.
  16. Dwyer, J., Berriet-Solliec, M., Gael Latast, F., Short, C., Marechal, A., & Hart, K. (2018). A Social-Ecological Systems Approach to Enhance Sustainable Farming and Forestry in the EU. EuroChoices, 17(3). DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12188
  17. Lamine, C. (2018). Transdisciplinarity in Research about Agrifood Systems Transitions: A Pragmatist Approach to Processes of Attachment. Sustainability, 10, 1241.
  18. Levin, S.A. (2006). Learning to live in a global commons: socioeconomic challenges for a sustainable environment. Ecological Research, 21, 328-333.
  19. Lozano, R. (2007). Collaboration as a pathway for sustainability. Sustainable Development, 15, 370-381.
  20. Marshall, G.R. (2015). A social-ecological systems framework for food systems research: accommodating transformation systems and their products. International Journal of the Commons, 9(2), 881-908.
  21. Matopoulos, A., Doukidis, G.I., Vlachopoulou, M., Manthou, V., & Manos, B. (2007). A conceptual framework for supply chain collaboration: empirical evidence from the agri-food industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12, 177-186.
  22. McGinnis, M.D., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 30. DOI: 10.5751/ES-06387-190230.
  23. McGuire, J., Morton, L.W., & Cast, A.D. (2013). Reconstructing the good farmer identity: shifts in farmer identities and farm management practices to improve water quality. Agriculture and Human Values, 30, 57-69.
  24. Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of socialecological systems. Science, 325, 419-422.
  25. Pomeroy, R., Parks, J., Pollnac, R., Campson, T., Genio, E., Marlessy, C., Holle, E., Pido, M., Nissapa, A., Boromthanarat, S., & Thu Hue, N. (2007). Fish wars: conflict and collaboration in fisheries management in Southeast Asia. Marine Policy, 31, 645-656.
  26. Pretty, J., Brett, C., Gee, D., Hine, R., Mason, C., Morison, J., Rayment, M., Van der Bijl, G., & Dobbs, T. (2001). Policy challenges and priorities for internalizing the externalities of modern agriculture. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(2): 263-283. DOI: 10.1080/09640560123782
  27. Quaranta, G., Citro, E., & Salvia, R. (2016). Economic and Social Sustainable Synergies to Promote Innovations in Rural Tourism and Local Development. Sustainability, 8, 668.
  28. Salvia, R. & Quaranta, G. (2017). Place-Based Rural Development and Resilience: A Lesson from a Small Community. Sustainability, 9, 889.
  29. Stuart, D., & Gillon, S. (2013). Scaling up to address new challenges to conservation on US farmland. Land Use Policy, 31, 223-236.
  30. Tendall, D.M., Joerin, J., Kopainsky, B., Edwards, P., Shreck, A., Le, Q.B., Kruetli, P., Grant, M., & Six, J. (2015). Food system resilience: defining the concept. Global Food Security, 6, 17-23.
  31. Van Zwanenberg, P., Cremaschi, A., Obaya, M., Marin, A., & Lowenstein, V. (2018). Seeking unconventional alliances and bridging innovations in spaces for transformative change: the seed sector and agricultural sustainability in Argentina. Ecology and Society, 23(3), 11. DOI: 10.5751/ES-10033-230311
  32. Vervoort, J.M., Thornton, P.K., Kristjanson, P., Forch, W., Ericksen, P.J., Kok, K., Ingram, J.S.I., Herrero, M., Palazzo, A., Helfgott, A.E.S., Wilkinson, A., Havlik, P., Mason-D’Croz, D., & Jost, C. (2014). Challenges to scenario-guided adaptive action of food security under climate change. Global Environmental Change, 28: 383-394.
  33. Vogt, J.M., Epstein, G.B., Mincey, S.K., Fischer, B.C., & McCord, P. (2015). Putting the “E” in SES: unpacking the ecology in the Ostrom social-ecological system framework. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 55.
  34. Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G.S., Janssen, M., Lebel, L., Norberg, J., Peterson, G.D., & Pritchard, R. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology, 6(1), 14.
  35. Williams, A., Kennedy, S., Philipp, F., &Whiteman, G. (2017). Systems thinking: a review of sustainability management research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 866-881.
  36. Wilson, G.A. (2012). Community resilience and environmental transitions. London: Earthscan.

  • Innovation in Basilicata agriculture: From tradition to digital Maria Assunta D’Oronzio, Carmela Sica, in Economia agro-alimentare 2/2021 pp.1
    DOI: 10.3280/ecag2-2021oa12210
  • Assessing Young Consumers’ Responses to Sustainable Labels: Insights from a Factorial Experiment in Italy Carla Rossi, Francesca Rivetti, in Sustainability /2020 pp.10115
    DOI: 10.3390/su122310115

Rosanna Salvia, Giovanni Quaranta, Multi-Actor Platform as a tool to enhance networking of sustainable socio-ecological food systems in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 2/2019, pp 405-427, DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2019-002012