In Search of Mechanisms. The Role of the Agent-Based Model in connecting Analytical Sociology and Classical Social Research: the Case of Merton’s Theory of Values Homophily

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE
Autori/Curatori Hynek Jerábek, Carmelo Lombardo, E. Neri Ballati, Juraj Schenk
Anno di pubblicazione 2015 Fascicolo 2015/106
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 34 P. 81-114 Dimensione file 236 KB
DOI 10.3280/SR2015-106005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Thanks Analytical Sociology, the concept of mechanism occupies a central place in contemporary sociology. Its intuitive and spontaneous use, however, characterized a part of empirical social research in the past, especially that developed by Paul F. Lazarsfeld and Robert K. Merton at Columbia University in the 1940’s and 1950’s. In this article, our aim is to explore a possible connection between these two research traditions, using the methodological tool of computational simulation. Specifically, the article discusses two hypotheses formulated by Lazarsfeld and Merton: the hypothesis of gratification, resulting from the duration of social interaction, and the hypothesis of formation of new social ties after a friendship breakup. Therefore, we implement four scenarios, each representing a specific combination of hypotheses. The results allow us to clearly observe four different emerging social patterns that are generated from the micro level by the interaction between individual agents who follow the mechanisms inspired by the original formulation of the theory. Through thes simulations, we can examine the unexpected effects - on a system of action - caused by the introduction of Lazarsfeld and Merton’s hypotheses;

  1. R. Axelrod (1997), The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  2. H.M. Blalock jr. (1968), The Measurement Problem: A Gap between the Languages of Theory and Research, in H.M. Blalock jr., A.B. Blalock (eds.), Methodology in Social Research, New York, Mc Graw-Hill.
  3. H.M. Blalock jr. (1969), Theory Construction. From Verbal to Mathematical Formulations, Englewood Cliffs-New York, Prentice-Hall.
  4. R. Boudon (1965), «Réflection sur la logique des modèles simulés», Archives Européenne de Sociologie, 6, 1, pp. 3-20, DOI: 10.1017/S0003975600001119
  5. R. Boudon (1971), La crise de la sociologie, Paris-Genève, Droz.
  6. R. Boudon (1973), L’inegalité des chances. La mobilité sociale dans les sociétés industrielles, Paris, Armand Colin.
  7. R. Boudon (1979), La logique du social, Paris, Hachette.
  8. R. Boudon (1992), Traité de sociologie, Paris, PUF.
  9. R. Boudon (1993), European Sociology: The Identity Lost?, in B. Nedelmann, P. Sztompka (eds.), Sociology in Europe. In Search of Identity, Berlin-New York, De Gruyter.
  10. R. Boudon (1998), Social Mechanisms without Black Boxes, in P. Hedström, R. Swedberg (eds.), Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, New York, Cambridge University Press.
  11. R. Boudon (2003), «Beyond Rational Choice Theory», Annual Review of Sociology, 29, pp. 1-21, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100213
  12. R. Boudon (2011), Ordinary Rationality: The Core of Analytical Sociology, in Demeulenaere (ed.) (2011). N. Braun, N.J. Saam (Hrsg.) (2014). Handbuch Modellbildung und Simulation in den Sozialwissenschaften. Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  13. W.A. Brechwald, M.J. Prinstein (2011), «Beyond Homophily: A Decade of Advances in Understanding Peer Influence Processes», Journal of Research on Adolescence, XXI, 1, pp. 166-79, DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x
  14. M. Bunge (2004a), «How Does It Work? The Search for Explanatory Mechanisms», Philosophy of Social Sciences, XXXIV, 2, pp. 182-210, DOI: 10.1177/004839310326255
  15. M. Bunge (2004b), «Clarifying Some Misunderstandings about Social Systems and their Mechanisms», Philosophy of Social Sciences, XXXIV, 3, pp. 371-81, DOI: 10.1177/0048393104266860
  16. V. Buskens, W. Raub, M.A. van Assen (eds.) (2012), Micro-Macro Links and Microfondations in Sociology, Routledge, New York.
  17. L.E. Cederman (2005) «Computational Models of Social Forms: Advancing Generative Process Theory», American Journal of Sociology, CX, 4, pp. 864-93, DOI: 10.1086/426412
  18. J.S. Coleman (1965), «The Use of Electronic Computers in the Study of Social Organizations », Archives Européenne de Sociologie, VI, 1, pp. 89-107, DOI: 10.1017/S0003975600001156
  19. J.S. Coleman (1986), «Social Theory, Social Research and a Theory of Action», American Journal of Sociology, XCVI, 6, pp. 1309-35.
  20. J.S. Coleman (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard, Harvard University Press.
  21. J.S. Coleman, L. Hao (1989), «Linear Systems Analysis: Macrolevel Analysis with Microlevel Data», Sociological Methodology, 19, pp. 395-422, DOI: 10.2307/270959
  22. R. Cooper (2005), «Thought experiments», Metaphilosophy, XXXVI, 3, pp. 328-47, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00372.x
  23. P. Demeulenaere (ed.) (2011), Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms, New York, Cambridge University Press.
  24. C. Elsenbroich (2012), «Explanation in Agent-Based Modelling: Functions, Causality or Mechanisms?», Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, XV, 3
  25. J. Epstein (1999), «Agent-Based Computational Models and Generative Social Sciences», Complexity, IV, 5, pp. 41-60,
  26. J. Epstein (2006), Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  27. J. Epstein (2014), Agent_Zero: Toward Neurocognitive Foundations for Generative Social Science, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  28. L. Festinger (1954), «A Theory of Social Comparison Processes», Human Relations, VII, 2, pp. 117-40, DOI: 10.1177/001872675400700202
  29. L. Festinger (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
  30. N. Gilbert (2008), Agent-Based Models, Los Angeles-London-New Delhi-Singapore, Sage. T. Hägerstrand (1965), «A Montecarlo Approach to Diffusion», Archives Européenne de Sociologie, VI, 1, pp. 43-67, 10.1017/S0003975600001132.
  31. P. Hedström (2005), Dissecting the Social. On the Principles of Analytical Sociology, New York, Cambridge University Press.
  32. P. Hedström, P. Bearman (eds.) (2009a), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, New York, Oxford University Press.
  33. P. Hedström, P. Bearman (2009b), What is Analytical Sociology all About?, in Hedström and Bearman (eds.) (2009a).
  34. P. Hedström, R. Swedberg (eds.) (1998), Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, New York, Cambridge University Press. P. Hedström, L. Udehn (2009), Analytical Sociology and Theories of the Middle Range, in Hedström and Bearman (eds.) (2009a).
  35. P. Hedström, P. Ylikoski (2010), «Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences», Annual Review of Sociology, XXXVI, pp. 49-67, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102632
  36. M. Jahoda, P.F. Lazarsfeld, H. Zeisel (1974), Marienthal. The Study of an Unemployed Community, Tavistock, London (1st ed. in German 1933).
  37. E. Katz (1957), «The Two Step Flow of Communication: An Up-To-Date Report on an Hypothesis », Public Opinion Q., XXI, 1, pp. 61-78, DOI: 10.1086/266687
  38. P.F. Lazarsfeld, B.R. Berelson, H. Gaudet (1944), The People’s Choice. How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign, New York, Duel, Sloan and Pearce.
  39. P.F Lazarsfeld, R.K. Merton (1954), Friendship as Social Process: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis, in M. Berger, T. Abel, C. Page (eds.), Freedom and Control in
  40. Modern Society, New York, D. van Nostrand; now in P.L. Kendall (ed.), The Varied Sociology of Paul F. Lazarsfeld, New York, Columbia University Press.
  41. C. Lombardo (2012), «The Missing Heritage. On Lazarsfeld’s Contribution to the Development of Analytical Sociology», Sociologia e ricerca sociale, XXXIII, 97, pp. 42-9, DOI: 10.3280/SR2012-097005
  42. C. Lombardo (2015), «More than a Set of Principles: Analytical Sociology at Work», Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales/European Journal of Sociology, LIII, 1, in press.
  43. M.W. Macy, A. Flache (2009), Social Dynamics from the Bottom up: Agent-Based Models of Social Interaction, in P. Hedström, P. Bearman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, New York, Oxford University Press.
  44. M.W. Macy, R. Willer (2002), «From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling», Annual Review of Sociology, 28, pp. 143-66, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141117
  45. G. Manzo (2005), «Variables, mécanismes et simulations: une synthèse des trois méthodes
  46. est-elle possible?», Revue Française de Sociologie, XLVI, 1, pp. 37-74, DOI: 10.3917/rfs.461.0037
  47. G. Manzo (2010), «Analytical Sociology and its Critics», European Journal of Sociology, LI, 1, pp. 129-70, DOI: 10.1017/S0003975610000056
  48. G. Manzo (ed.) (2014a), Analytical Sociology. Actions and Networks, Chicester, John Wiley & Sons.
  49. G. Manzo (ed.) (2014b), La simulation multi-agents: principes et applications aux phénomènes sociaux, monographic issue of Revue Française de Sociologie, LV, 4, 2014.
  50. G. Manzo (2014c), Data, Generative Models, and Mechanisms. More on the Principles of Analytical Sociology, in Manzo (ed.) (2014a).
  51. G. Manzo (2014d), Potentialités et limites de la simulation multi-agents: une introduction, in Manzo (ed.) (2014b).
  52. R. Mayntz (2004), «Mechanisms in the Analysis of Social Macro-Phenomena», Philosophy of Social Sciences, XXXIV, 2, pp. 237-59, DOI: 10.1177/0048393103262552
  53. R.K. Merton (1936), «The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action», American Sociological Review, I, 6, pp. 894-904.
  54. R.K. Merton (1949), Patterns of Influence: A Study of Interpersonal Influence and of Communications Behavior in a Local Community, in P.F. Lazarsfeld, F. Stanton (eds.), Communications Research 1948-1949, New York, Harper & Brothers.
  55. R.K. Merton, M. Fiske, A. Curtis (1973), Mass Persuasion. The Social Psychology of War Bond Drive, Howard Fertig, New York (1st. ed. 1946, Harper, New York).
  56. N.J. Nersessian (1992), «In the theoretician’s laboratory: Thought Experimenting as Mental Modeling. PSA», Proceedings of the Biennal Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Philosophy of Science Association, pp. 291-301. J.D. Norton (1996), «Are Thought Experiments just what you thought?», Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26, 3, pp. 333-66, DOI: 10.1080/00455091.1996.10717457
  57. K.D. Opp (2014), Modellbildung und Simulation: Einige methodologische Fragen, in N. Braun, N.J. Saam (Hrsg.), Handbuch Modellbildung und Simulation in den Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  58. N.J. Saam (2014), Simulation in den Sozialwissenschaften, in N. Braun, N.J. Saam (Hrsg.), Handbuch Modellbildung und Simulation in den Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  59. R.K. Sawyer (2001), «Emergence in Sociology: Contemporary Philosophy of Mind and Some Implications for Sociological Theory», American Journal of Sociology, CVII, 3, pp. 551-85, DOI: 10.1086/338780
  60. R.K. Sawyer (2002), «Non reductive Individualism: Part I – Supervenience and Wild Disjunction », Philosophy of Social Sciences, XXXII, 4, pp. 537-59, 10.1177/00483930 2237836.
  61. R.K. Sawyer (2003a), «Non reductive Individualism: Part II – Social Causation», Philosophy of Social Sciences, XXXIII, 2, pp. 203-24, DOI: 10.1177/0048393103033002003
  62. R.K. Sawyer (2003b), «Artificial Societies: Multiagent Systems and the Micro-Macro Link in Sociological Theory», Sociological Methods & Research, XXXI, 3 pp. 325-63, DOI: 10.1177/0049124102239079
  63. R.K. Sawyer (2004), «The Mechanisms of Emergence», Philosophy of Social Sciences, XXXIV, 2 pp. 260-82, DOI: 10.1177/0048393103262553
  64. T.C. Schelling (1971), «Dynamic Models of Segregation», Journal of Mathematical Sociology, I, 2, pp. 143-86, DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989794
  65. J. Schenk (2011), Multiagent Modeling in Sociology: Methodological Problems, Slovak Bratislava, Stimul.
  66. T. Sozański (1998) «Socjologia teoretyczna jako nauka normalna», Studia socjologiczne, CLI, 4, pp. 5-37.
  67. F. Squazzoni (2012), Agent-Based Computational Sociology, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.
  68. K.G. Troitzsch (1990), Modellbildung und Simulation in den Sozialwissenschaften, Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag.
  69. W.F. Whyte (1994-1943), Street Corner Society, Chicago, The Chicago University Press (1st ed. 1943).
  70. U. Wilensky (1999), NetLogo, Evaston, Northwestern University.
  71. M. Wooldridge (2009), An Introduction to Multi-Agent System, Chicester, John Wiley & Sons.

Hynek Jerábek, Carmelo Lombardo, E. Neri Ballati, Juraj Schenk, In Search of Mechanisms. The Role of the Agent-Based Model in connecting Analytical Sociology and Classical Social Research: the Case of Merton’s Theory of Values Homophily in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 106/2015, pp 81-114, DOI: 10.3280/SR2015-106005