Contribution to italian validation of the new lindauer’s aesthetic test

Author/s Simona Ruggi, Gabriella Gilli, Lucia Colombo, Semira Tagliabue, Monica Gatti
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2012/4
Language Italian Pages 21 P. 583-603 File size 244 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIP2012-004001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The aim of this study is to offer a contribution to the validation of the Italian version of the New Aesthetic Test proposed by Lindauer in 1985 and adapted from Dogana et al. (1999, 2002). The test measured aesthetic sensibility, a personality trait which includes cognitive, experiential, behavioral and aesthetically sensitive dimensions, shown by individuals with a deep interest in beauty in its various forms and with a vivid imaginative life. The questionnaire adapted from Dogana et al. (1999, 2002) in a 25-item version was tested on a small number of adolescents (16-20 years). In this research a sample of 1046 subjects, aged 15 to 50 years and equally distributed by gender, filled in the scale. The factor structure was checked by an exploratory and a confirmatory factor analysis. The instrument proved to be reliable and valid; it also allowed us to evaluate gender differences (aesthetic sensitivity is higher in females) and age (aesthetic sensitivity increases with age).

Keywords: Aesthetic sensibility, Italian validation test.

  1. Akkermans, H.A., Lammers, I.S., & Weggerman, M.C. (2004). All we need to know? Aesthetics from a design perspective. Department of Technology Management, Technische Universiteit: Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
  2. Al-Sabaty, I., & Davis, G. (1989). Relationship between Creativity and Right, Left and Integrated Thinking Styles. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 111-117. DOI: 10.1080/10400418909534304
  3. Allport, G.V., Vernon, P.E., & Lindzey, G. (1960). Study of values. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  4. Arbuckle, J.L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: IBM.
  5. Arnheim, R. (1984). Arte e percezione visiva. Feltrinelli: Milano.
  6. Barron, F., & Welsh, G.S. (1952). Artistic perception as a possible factor in personality style: its measurement by a Figure Preference Test. Journal of Psychology, 33, 199-203. DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1952.9712830
  7. Barron, F.X. (1963). Creativity and psychological health: Origins of personal vitality and creative freedom. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
  8. Berlyne, D.E. (1971). Aesthetic and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  9. Berlyne, D.E. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington: Hemisphere.
  10. Bezruczko, N., & Schroeder, D.H. (1994). Differences in visual preferences and cognitive aptitudes of professional artists and non artists. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 4, 19-32. DOI: 10.2190/92C4-L35B-FC60-89UH
  11. Burt, C. (1933). The Psychology of art. In: How the mind Works. (ch.15). London: Allen and Unwin.
  12. Buzzi, C., Cavalli, A., & De Lillo, A. (2007). Rapporto giovani. Sesta indagine dell’Istituto IARD sulla condizione giovanile in Italia. Bologna: il Mulino.
  13. Caracena, F.F., King, G.F. (1962). Generality of individual differences in complexity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 18, 234-238. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(196204)18:2<234::AID-JCLP2270180239>3.0.CO;2-O
  14. Child, I.L. (1964). Observation of the meaning of some measures of aesthetic sensitivity. Journal of Psychology, 57, 49-64. DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1964.9916671
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. CA. 36.
  16. Dogana, F., Colombo, L., & Ruggi, S. (2002). Esteti e sinesteti. Psicologia Contemporanea, 174, 58-63.
  17. Dogana. F., Gilli, G., & Colombo, L. (1999). Differenze individuali nella sensibilità estetica. In L.M. Lorenzetti (Ed.), Il pensiero della bellezza. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  18. Eysenck, H.J. (1940a). The general factor in aesthetics judgements. British Journal of Psychology, 31, 94-102.
  19. Eysenck, H.J. (1940b). Some factors in the appreciation of poetry, and their relation to temperamental qualities. Character and Personality, 9, 160-167. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1940.tb02206.x
  20. Eysenck, H.J. (1941). ‘Type’-factors in aesthetics judgements. British Journal of Psychology, 31, 262-270.
  21. Fechner, G.T. (1865). Ueber die Fragen des Golden Schnitts. Archiv.f.d. Zeichnenden Kunste, 11, 11-112.
  22. Freud, S. (1911). Precisazioni sui due principi dell’accadere psichico (tr. it. 1974), Opere, vol.VI. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  23. George, D., & Malley, P. (2000). SPSS for Windows step by step. A simple guide and reference 9.0 update. Massachusetts, Needham Heights: A. Pearson Education Company.
  24. Graves, M. (1948). Design Judgment Tert. New York: Psychological Corp.
  25. Jackson, S.A., & Marsh, H.W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale the to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18, 17-35.
  26. Iwawaki, S., Eysenck, H.J., & Gotz, K.O. (1979). A new visual aesthetic sensitivity test (VAST): II. Cross-cultural comparison between england and japan. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 859-862. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1979.49.3.859
  27. Lavalach, J.F. (1991). Celebral Hemispherecity, College Major and Occupational Choises. The journal of Creativity Behavior, 25, 218-222. DOI: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1991.tb01372.x
  28. Lindauer, M.S., & ReuKauf, L.C. (1971). Introversion-extraversion and figureground perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19(1), 107-113. DOI: 10.1037/h0031103
  29. Lindauer, M.S., & Dintruff, D.D. (1975). Contrast effect in the response to art. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 40, 155-164. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1975.40.1.155
  30. Lindauer, M.S. (1985). A la recherche de la personne esthetique. Bullettin de Psychologie, 30, 628-635.
  31. Lindauer, M.S., Stergiou, E.A., & Penn, D.L. (1986). Seeing and touching aesthetic abject: Judgments. Bullettin of Psychonomic Society, 24(2), 121-124.
  32. Lindauer, M.S. (1986). Seeing and touching aesthetic abject: Description. Bullettin of Psychonomic Society, 24(2), 125-126.
  33. Litle, P., & Zuckerman, M. (1986). Sensation seeking and music preferences, Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 575-578. DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(86)90136-4
  34. Lorenzetti, L.M. (Ed.) (1999). Il pensiero della bellezza. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  35. Massaro, D., Savazzi, F., Di Dio, C., Freedberg, D., Gallese, V., Gilli, G., Marchetti, A. (2012) When Art Moves the Eyes: A Behavioral and Eye-Tracking Study. PLoS ONE, 7(5):e37285. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037285
  36. Muzio, M., Nitro, G. & Crosta, D. (2001). Il flow nella peak performance. Movimento, 17(1), 11-15.
  37. Muzio, M., Riva, G. & Argenton, L. (Eds.) (2012). Flow, benessere e prestazione eccellente. Dai modelli teorici alle applicazioni nello sport e in azienda. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  38. Scabini, E., & Donati, P. (1988) (Eds.). La famiglia “lunga” del giovane adulto, “Studi interdisciplinari sulla famiglia”. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  39. Spranger, E. (1937). Lebensformen. Leipzig.
  40. Torrance, E.P. (1978). Revised norms technical manual for your style of learning and thinking. Athens, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Georgia.
  41. Winner, E., Casey, M.B. (1992). Cognitive profile of artists. In G.C. Cupchik & J. Laszlo (Eds.) Emerging vision of aesthetic process. New York: Guilford Press.

  • Riflessivita, attivita grafico-pittoriche e arte: un circolo virtuoso Gabriella Gilli, in RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA 3/2016 pp.423
    DOI: 10.3280/RIP2016-003011

Simona Ruggi, Gabriella Gilli, Lucia Colombo, Semira Tagliabue, Monica Gatti, Contributo alla validazione italiana del nuovo test estetico di lindauer in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 4/2012, pp 583-603, DOI: 10.3280/RIP2012-004001