Robust technology and the subtle art of deciding when to use it

Author/s Manuela Delfino
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2013/1
Language Italian Pages 8 P. 139-146 File size 193 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIP2013-01009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Despite what authoritative sources lament, there are educational contexts where technology is an integral part of the scholastic environment, teachers are active and aware users of technology, and changes in the traditional organization of school are allowed. The contribution - based on the first-hand teaching experience of its author - presents a reflection on two elements to be taken into account in this kind of context: the need for robust and reliable technological infrastructure, and the importance of acknowledging situations where not using technology is the best option.

Keywords: Technological infrastructure, secondary school, using and abusing technology.

  1. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology. The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.
  2. Cortigiani, P. (2008). La scuola come mente collettiva: la ricerca organizzativa della “don Milani” di Genova. TD-Tecnologie Didattiche, 45, 4-12.
  3. Crook, C. (2012). The ‘digital native’ in context: tensions associated with importing Web 2.0 practices into the school setting. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 63-80. DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2011.577946
  4. Delfino, M. (2011). Against BibliOblivion: How modern scribes digitized an old book. Computers and Education, 57, 2145-2155.
  5. Delfino, M. (2012). Don’t trash your spam! Reasoning on spam as a way to train critical thinking. In P.M. Pumilia-Gnarini, E. Favaron, E. Pacetti, J. Bishop, & L. Guerra (Eds.), Didactic strategies and technologies for education incorporating advancements (pp. 803-809). Hershey, USA: Information Science Reference.
  6. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2122-0.ch070
  7. Delfino, M. (2013). Il supporto di ambienti online nella didattica: una questione di disciplina. Bricks, 3(1), 16-27.
  8. Ferraris, M. (2007). LabTD: un laboratorio di tecnologie didattiche per docenti. TD-Tecnologie Didattiche, 40, 4-13.
  9. Gibelli, C. (2008). Organizzazione del lavoro in rete: il caso di una scuola media italiana. TD-Tecnologie Didattiche, 45, 13-22.
  10. GISCEL (1975). “Dieci tesi per l’educazione linguistica democratica”,
  11. Papert, S. (1993). The children’s machine. Rethinking school in the age of the computer . New York: Basic Books.
  12. Selwyn, N. (2011). Editorial: In praise of pessimism. The need for negativity in educational technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 713-718. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01215.x
  13. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
  14. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Manuela Delfino, La tecnologia tetragona e la difficile arte di decidere quando usarla in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 1/2013, pp 139-146, DOI: 10.3280/RIP2013-01009