Psychological research, new technologies and school learning

Author/s Alda M. Scopesi
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2013/1
Language Italian Pages 6 P. 171-176 File size 174 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIP2013-01013
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The introduction of digital technologies marks a critical phase in the history of mankind: the school does not move with the speed of this change, which implies very different ways of information processing and transmission in comparison with pre-computer time. On the other hand, psychological research has enhanced the role of computer in knowledge processing and testified its effectiveness in learning processes. Nevertheless, it seems necessary to introduce the use of new technologies in an educational project, which values the relationship between student and teacher. In fact, the most mature forms of critical thinking are acquired only through dialectics and exchange between human minds

Keywords: Digital technologies and information processing

  1. Anolli, L., & Mantovani, F. (2011). Come funziona la nostra mente. Apprendimento, simulazione e Serious Games. Bologna: il Mulino.
  2. Carr, N. (2010). The shallows. What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York: Norton ( Internet ci rende stupidi? Come la Rete sta cambiando il nostro cervello. Milano: Cortina, 2011).
  3. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1981). Le developpement social de l’intelligence. Paris: Inter Editions ( La costruzione sociale dell’intelligenza. Bologna: il Mulino, 1982).
  4. Fonagy, P. (2008). The mentalization-focused approach to social development. In F.N. Busch (Ed.), Mentalization. Theoretical Considerations, Research Findings and Clinical Interpretations (pp. 3-56). Amazon, UK: CRC Press.
  5. Foreman, R. (2005). The pankake people or “The Gods are pounding my head, Edge, 8 marzo 2005 (
  6. Greenfield, P.M. (2009).Technology and informal education: what is taught, what is learned. Science, 323, 69-71. DOI: 10.1126/science.1167190
  7. Lecce, S., Caputi, M., & Hughes, C. (2011). Does sensitivity to criticism mediate the relationship between theory of mind and academic achievement? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(3), 313-331. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.011
  8. Pea, R. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs of education. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp.47-87). Cambridge Ma., Cambridge University Press.
  9. Semin, G.R., & Echterhoff, G. (2011). Grounding Sociality. London: Taylor & Francis. 12
  10. Trentacosta, C.J. & Izard, C.E. (2007). Kindergarten children’s emotion competence as a predictor of their academic competence in first grade. Emotion, 7, 77-88. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.77

Alda M. Scopesi, Ricerca psicologica, nuove tecnologie e apprendimento scolastico in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 1/2013, pp 171-176, DOI: 10.3280/RIP2013-01013