Discutere lo spazio.Come le pratiche partecipative toscane dividono la controversia rispetto alla localizzazione di una moschea a Firenze

Titolo Rivista PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO
Autori/Curatori Julien O'Miel, Julien Talpin
Anno di pubblicazione 2013 Fascicolo 2013/3
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 25 P. 5-29 Dimensione file 321 KB
DOI 10.3280/PACO2013-003001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

While participatory democracy is often presented as a means for public authorities to channel conflict in setting up top-down deliberative initiatives, the study of a bottom-up participatory process offers a much complex picture, shedding a new light on the articulation between participation and conflict in the public sphere. The paper presents the results of an ethnographic study of a participatory process that took place in Florence in 2011-2012 at the request of the Muslim community of the city, using a disposition of the Regional law for participation. As a matter of fact, deliberation managed to bring down the tensions around the project of construction of a mosque that could have, as it happened in many other European cities, resulted in a harsh conflict over the symbolic appropriation of the territory. It worked so well that the absence of conflict resulted in very limited participation and discussion in the local public sphere, failing to create a shared legitimate output such as the localization of the future religious center. Despite such failure, the participatory process also fostered the empowerment of the Florentine Muslim community that witnessed the emergence of new leaders and a broader public recognition of its civic status in the city. This indirect outcome of the process could constitute a crucial resource for the future battles over the construction of the mosque. This study therefore confirms the need to study together the policy, the politics and the microfoundations of participatory democracy to understand fully its consequences. Only when all these elements are analyzed together can the effects of participation be adequately understood.;

Keywords:Particpation; public space; contentious politics; local government

  1. Bacqué, M-H., Rey, H., Sintomer, Y. (a cura di, 2005) Gestion de Proximité et Démocratie Participative: une Perspective Comparative. Paris: La Découverte.
  2. Allievi S. (a cura di, 2010) Mosques in Europe. Why a solution has become a problem, Londra, Alliance Publishing Trust.
  3. Allievi S. (2010), La guerra delle moschee. L’Europa e la sfida del pluralismo religioso, Venezia, Marsilio Allievi S. (a cura di, 2009), I musulmani e la società italiana. Percezioni reciproche, conflitti culturali, trasformazioni sociali, Torino, Franco Angeli.
  4. Biewener C., Bacqué M.-H. (2011), "Empowerment, développement et féminisme: entre projet de transformation sociale et néolibéralisme" in Bacqué M.-H., Sintomer Y. (a cura di), La démocratie participative. Histoire et généalogie, Paris, La Découverte.
  5. Blondiaux L. (2008), Le nouvel esprit de la démocratie. Actualité de la démocratie participative, Paris, Seuil.
  6. Blondiaux L., Fourniau J.-M. (2011) "Un bilan des recherches sur la participation du public en démocratie : beaucoup de bruit pour rien ? ", Participations, 1, pp.8-35.
  7. Bobbio L. (2010) "Types of Deliberation," Journal of Public Deliberation, 6, 2, Article 1.
  8. Bobbio L., Giannetti D. (2007), numero monografico sulle giurie di cittadini. Rivista italiana di politiche pubbliche, 2.
  9. Bombardieri M. (2011), Moschee d’Italia. Il diritto al luogo di culto. Il dibattito sociale e politico, Bologna, EMI.
  10. Bourdieu P. (1977), "Une classe objet". Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales. 17-18. pp. 2-5.
  11. Chambers S. (2009) « Rhetoric and the public sphere: has deliberative democracy abandoned mass democracy ? », Political Theory, 37 (3),pp. 323-350.
  12. Cesari J. (2005), “Mosques conflicts in European cities”, Journal of ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 6, pp. 1015-1024.
  13. Della Porta D., (2008)”La partecipazione nelle istituzioni: concettualizzare gli esperimenti didemocrazia deliberative e partecipativa”, Partecipazione e conflitto, No 0: 15-42.
  14. Esterling, K., Neblo, M., Lazer, D. (2011), “Means, Motive, and Opportunity in Becoming Informed About Politics. A deliberative Field Experiment With Members of Congress and Their Constituents”, Public opinion quarterly, 75 (3), pp. 483-507.
  15. Evans S., Boyte H.C. (1986), Free spaces, New York, Harper & Row.
  16. Fishkin, J. (2009), When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  17. Fishkin, J., Luskin, R. C. and Jowell, R. (2002) 'Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain', British Journal of Political Science, 32 (3), pp. 455-487.
  18. Floridia, A. (2008), “Democrazia deliberativa e processi decisionali: la legge della Regione Toscana sulla partecipazione”, Stato e mercato, 82, pp. 83-110.
  19. Floridia, A. (2013), la democrazia deliberativa : teorie, processi e sistemi, Roma, Carocci.
  20. Freschi A.-C., Raffini L. (2010), Democrazia, partecipazione e deliberazione. Partecipazione e conflitto, 3, pp. 5-15. Frisina A., “The invention of citizenship among young muslims in Italy”, in Jonker
  21. G., Amiraux V. (a cura di, 2005), Politics of Visibility. Young Muslims in European Public Spaces, Londra, Transcript, pp. 79-101.
  22. Fung, A. (2003), “Recipe for the Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (3), pp. 338-367.
  23. Gastil, J., Black, L., Moscovitz, K. (2008) “Ideology, Attitude Change, and Deliberation in Small Face-to-Face Groups.” Political Communication 25, pp. 23-46.
  24. Geisser V. (2003), La nouvelle islamophobie, Paris, La Découverte.
  25. Goodin, R., Dryzek, J. (2006) "Deliberative Impacts: The Macro Political Uptake of Mini-publics”, Politics and Society, 34 (2), pp. 219-243.
  26. Hendryks C. (2006). "When the forum meets interest politics: strategic uses of public deliberation". Politics and Society, 34, 4, pp. 571-602.
  27. Lichterman P. (2005), Elusive Togetherness. Church Groups Trying to Bridge America’s Divisions, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  28. Mansbridge, J. et al. (2010), “The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 18 (1), pp. 64-100.
  29. Mazeaud A. (2012) "L’instrumentation participative de l’action publique : logiques et effets. Une approche comparée des dispositifs participatifs conduits par la region Poitou-Charentes". Participations, 2, pp. 53-77.
  30. Mazeaud A., Sa Villa Boas M.-H., Berthomé K. (2012) "Penser les effets de la participation sur l’action publique à partir de ses impensés", Participations, 2, pp. 5-29.
  31. Pellizzoni L. (2007), Politiche pubbliche e nuove forme di partecipazione, partecipazione et conflitto », partecipazione e conflitto, 0, pp. 93-116
  32. Pellizzoni L. (2009), “Tre problemi per la teoria del consumerismo politico", partecipazione e conflitto, 3, pp. 43-49
  33. Putnam R. (1993), Making democracy work, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  34. Rosenberg S.W. (a cura di, 2008) Deliberation, participation and democracy. Can the people govern ? Londra, Palgrave Macmillan.
  35. Rowe G., Frewer L. (2004), “Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda”, Science, Technology and Human Values, 29 (4), pp. 512-556.
  36. Saint-Blanca C., Schmidt di Friedberg O. (2005), “Why are Mosques a Problem ? Local Politics and Fear of Islam in Northern italy”, Journal of ethnic and Migration Studies, 31, 6, pp. 1083-1104.
  37. Scott J. (2006), Il dominio è l'arte della resistenza. I «verbali segreti» dietro la storia ufficiale. Roma, Eleuthera.
  38. Smith G. (2009) Democratic innovations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Vitale T. (2009). «Conflictus interruptus ou de la difficulté à innover dans l'univers institutionnel italien», in Carrel M., Neveu C. et Ion J. (a cura di), Les intermittences de la démocratie. Formes d'action et visibilités citoyennes dans la ville,
  40. Paris, L’Harmattan, pp. 175-198.

  • Religion and local politics in Southern Europe: a research agenda Alberta Giorgi, Xabier Itçaina, in Religion, State and Society /2016 pp.276
    DOI: 10.1080/09637494.2016.1212588
  • Special section: religion and territorial politics in southern Europe Alberta Giorgi, Xabier Itçaina, in Religion, State and Society /2015 pp.114
    DOI: 10.1080/09637494.2015.1064224
  • L’islam et la cité pp.257 (ISBN:9782757416389)
  • Islam as a new social actor in Italian cities: mosque controversies as sites of inclusion and separation Bartolomeo Conti, in Religion, State and Society /2016 pp.238
    DOI: 10.1080/09637494.2016.1220770
  • S’approprier l’espace public. Les musulmans en Italie, de la marginalisation à la citoyenneté Bartolomeo Conti, in Les Cahiers d’EMAM /2016
    DOI: 10.4000/emam.1237

Julien O'Miel, Julien Talpin, Discutere lo spazio.Come le pratiche partecipative toscane dividono la controversia rispetto alla localizzazione di una moschea a Firenze in "PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO" 3/2013, pp 5-29, DOI: 10.3280/PACO2013-003001