Traveling with an approximate map

Journal title RICERCA PSICOANALITICA
Author/s Fabio Beni
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/3
Language Italian Pages 8 P. 39-46 File size 41 KB
DOI 10.3280/RPR2014-003004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The Author analyzes Seligman’s paper dedicated to complexity and uncertainty in the analytical process. In particular, the A. stresses the importance of managing the certainty of those hypercyclic recursivities typically present in some areas of psychopathology, often at the beginning of a possible treatment. In addition, the A. discusses Seligman’s considerations on the negative effects of the analyst’s rigid affiliation to a specific theory on maintaining analytical attention. The A. then suggests adopting a dialectic mental approach that entails a reflection permanently suspended between a "scientific" position and an "artistic" idea of psychoanalysis. This would reduce the risk of a scientistic or wild drift.

Keywords: Seligman, complexity, uncertainty, hypercycle, attention, psychoanalysis

  1. Beni F. (2009). Tossicodipendenze, psicoanalisi e complessità: La dissociazione farmacoindotta. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, XLIII, 4: 509-532.
  2. Beni F. (2013). La clinica della dissociazione farmaco-indotta: La pratica psicoanalitica in un caso di drug-addiction. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, XXIV, 2: 39-71.
  3. Beni F. & Santoni D. (2014). L’Orpha “chimico” come base di una nuova tecnologia analitica. Ricerca Psicoanlitica, n. 1/2014: 55-72.
  4. Eigen M. & Winkler R. (1981). Laws of Game: How the Principles of Nature Govern Chance. New York: Harper and Row.
  5. Lorenzini A. (2006). La crisi necessaria. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 1: 89-112.
  6. Smith N. (2001). Angels in the architecture: Contemporary case of a orphic functioning. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 29, 4: 575-583. DOI: 10.1521/jaap.29.4.575.21547
  7. Smith, N. (1999). From oedipus to orpha: Revisiting Ferenczi and Severn’s landmark case. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59, 4: 345-366. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023499908798
  8. Seligman S. (2005). Dynamic systems theories as a metaframework for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 2: 285-319. DOI: 10.1080/10481881509348832
  9. Pizer S.A. (1998). Building Bridges: The Negotiation of Paradox in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  10. Piers C. (2005). The mind’s multiplicity and continuity. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 15, 2: 229-254. DOI: 10.1080/10481881509348830

Fabio Beni, Viaggiare con una mappa approssimativa in "RICERCA PSICOANALITICA" 3/2014, pp 39-46, DOI: 10.3280/RPR2014-003004