Il cambiamento amministrativo nelle democrazie occidentali fra new public management, modelli neo-weberiani e new public governance

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA TRIMESTRALE DI SCIENZA DELL’AMMINISTRAZIONE
Autori/Curatori Rosalba Chiarini
Anno di pubblicazione 2015 Fascicolo 2015/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 16 P. 39-54 Dimensione file 90 KB
DOI 10.3280/SA2015-002003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

L’articolo ricostruisce il dibattito sulle riforme amministrative e parimenti dà conto delle realizzazioni attraverso le quali, presso i vari paesi, è avvenuto e procede il cambiamento degli apparati pubblici. Nell’area occidentale avanzata, fin dagli anni ’80 del Novecento, la dottrina del New Public Management ha ispirato nuove architetture organizzative e operative del settore pubblico, attingendo alla cultura e alla strumentazione neo-manageriale, nonché ad indicatori di performance management. Nel corso degli anni ’90, sono emerse tuttavia delle specificità nei programmi di riforma e nuovi principi hanno affiancato l’approccio manageriale orientato al mercato, quali forme di governance multilivello e nuove modalità interattive, intergovernative e cooperative di public management, o lo sviluppo di formule di partnership pubblico-privato e di forme ibride nelle relazioni fra Stato, società e mercati. L’ultima sezione dell’articolo è dedicata alle trasformazioni della funzione manageriale nel settore pubblico italiano, le quali corrono fra il principio di distinzione con la sfera politica e l’introduzione di elementi di fiduciarietà.;

Keywords:Riforma amministrativa, managerialismo pubblico, rapporto tra politica e amministrazione

  1. Lippi A. e Morisi M. (2005). Scienza dell’amministrazione. Bologna: il Mulino.
  2. Merloni F. (2006). Dirigenza pubblica e amministrazione imparziale. Bologna: il Mulino.
  3. Aberbach G. and Rockman B. (1988). Political and Bureaucratic Roles in Public Service Organizations. In: Campbell C. and Peters B.G., eds., Organizing Governance: Governing Organizations. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  4. Aucoin P. (1990). Administrative Reform in Public Management: Paradigms, Principles, Paradoxs and Pendulums. Governance, 3, 2: 115-137.
  5. Barlow J., Farnham D., Horton S. and Ridley F.F. (1996). Comparing Public Managers. In: Farnham D., Horton S., Barlow J. and Hondeghem A., eds., New Public Managers in Europe. Public Servants in Transition. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Benz A. (1995). Institutional Change in Intergovernmental Relations: The Dynamics of Multi-Level Structures. In: Hesse J.J. and Toonen T.A.J., eds., The European Yearbook of Comparative Government and Public Administration, Baden-Baden, CO: Nomos Westview Press.
  7. Bouckaert G., Peters B.G. and Verhoest K. (2010). The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations. Shifting Patterns of Public Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  8. Campbell C. (1983). Government Under Stress. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  9. Chaston I. (2011). Public Sector Management. Mission Impossible? Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Christensen T. and Laegreid P. (2007). Transcending New Public Management. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  11. Christensen T. and Laegreid P. (2011). Beyond NPM? Some Developments Features. In:
  12. Christensen T. and Laegreid P., eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, Aldershot: Ashgate.
  13. Christensen T. and Laegreid P. (2012). Administrative Reforms in Western Democracies.
  14. In: Peters B.G. and Pierre J., eds., The Sage Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.
  15. Derlien H.U. (1987). Public managers and politics. In: Kooiman J. E. and Eliassen K., eds., Managing Public Organizations. Lessons from Contemporary European Experience. London: Sage.
  16. Depré R., Hondeghem A. and Bodiguel J.L. (1996). Public Servants in Transition? In: Farnham D., Horton S., Barlow J. and Hondeghem A., eds., New Public Managers in Europe. Public Servants in Transition. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  17. Di Mascio F. (2011). Come i partiti controllano lo Stato. Il patronage in Europa. Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 41, 2: 291-314.
  18. Flynn N. and Strehl F., a cura di (1996). Public Sector Management in Europe. London: Prentice Hall.
  19. Fry G. (1988). The Thatcher Government, the Financial Management Initiative and the “New Civil Service”. Public Administration, 66, 4: 1-20.
  20. Gualmini E. (2003). L’amministrazione nelle democrazie contemporanee. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  21. Halligan J. (1988). The Australian Public Service Reform Program. In: Wittenhall R. and Nethercote J., eds., Hawke’s Second Government: Australian Commonwealth Administration 1984-87, Canberra: Raipa/Ccae.
  22. Hood C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons. Public Administration, 69, 1: 3-19.
  23. Hood C. (1996). Exploring Variations in Public Management Reform of the 1980s. In: Bekke H.A.G., Perry J.L. and Toonen T.A.J., eds., Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective, Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
  24. Kickert W.J.M. (2011). Public Management Reforms in Continental Europe: National Distinctiveness. In: Christensen T. and Laegreid P., eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, Aldershot: Ashgate.
  25. Knill C. (1999). Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform: Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies. Journal of Public Policy, 19, 2: 113-139.
  26. Koppenjan J.F.M. (2005). The formation of public-private partnerships: Lessons from nine transport infrastructure projects in the Netherlands. Public Administration, 83, 1: 135-157.
  27. Lane J.-E. (1993). The Public Sector, Concepts, Models and Approaches. London: Sage.
  28. Metcalfe L. and Richards S. (1987). Improving Public Management, London: Sage.
  29. Ongaro E. (2009). Public Management Reform and Modernization. Trajectories of Adminis trative Change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  30. Page E.C. and Wright V. (2007). From the Active to the Enabling State: The Changing Role of Top Officials in European Nations, Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  31. Painter M. and Peters B.G. (2010). Administrative Traditions in Comparative Perspective. In: Painter M. and Peters B.G., eds., Traditions and Public Administration. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  32. Peters B.G. (1997). Policy Transfers Between Governments: The Case of Administrative Reforms. West European Politics, 20, 4: 71-88.
  33. Peters B.G. and Pierre J. (2001). Developments in Intergovernmental Relations: Towards Multi-level Governance. Policy and Politics 29, 2: 131-135.
  34. Peters B.G. and Pierre J. (2004). Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
  35. Peters B.G. and Savoie D.J. (1994). Civil Service Reform: Misdiagnosing the Patient. Public Administration Review, 54, 5: 418-425.
  36. Pollitt C. (1993). Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience. Oxford: Blackwell.
  37. Pollitt C. (2009). Bureaucracies remember, post-bureaucratic organizations forget? Public Administration, 87, 2: 198-218.
  38. Pollitt C., Thiel S.V. and Holmburg V., a cura di (2007). New Public Management in Europe. Adaptation and Alternatives. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  39. Pollitt C. and Bouckaert G. (2011). Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  40. Rhodes R.A.W. (2000). The governance narrative: Key findings and lessons from the ESRC’s Whitehall Programme. Public Administration, 78, 2: 345-364.
  41. Rhodes R.A.W and Weller P. (2001). Conclusion: “Antipodean exceptionalism, European traditionalism”. In: Rhodes R.A.W. and Weller P., eds., The changing world of top officials: mandarins or valet? Buckingham: Open University Press.
  42. Rouban L. (2012). Politicization of the Civil Service. In: Peters B.G. and Pierre J., eds., The Sage Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.
  43. Sorensen E. and Torfing J., a cura di (2007). Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  44. Talamo V. (2007). Per una dirigenza pubblica riformata (contro lo spoils system all’italiana). In: Dell’Aringa C. e Della Rocca G., a cura di, Pubblici dipendenti. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
  45. Toonen T.A.J. (2012). Administrative Reform: Analytics. In: Peters B.G. and Pierre J., eds., The Sage Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage.
  46. Torfing J., Peters B.G., Pierre J. and Sorensen E. (2012). Interactive Governance. Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  47. Van Dooren W., Bouckaert G. and Halligan J. (2010). Performance Management in the Public Sector. London: Routledge.
  48. Veilleux G. and Savoie D. (1988). Kafka’s Castle: The Treasury Board of Canada Revisited. Canadian Public Administration, 31, 4: 517-538.
  49. Weller P. (1985). First Among Equals. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  50. Whettenhall R. (2003). The rethoric and reality of public-private partnerships. Public Organisation Review, 3, 1: 77-107.
  51. Wright V. (1994). Reshaping the State: the Implication for Public Administration. West European Politics, 17, 3: 102-137.

Rosalba Chiarini, Il cambiamento amministrativo nelle democrazie occidentali fra new public management, modelli neo-weberiani e new public governance in "RIVISTA TRIMESTRALE DI SCIENZA DELL’AMMINISTRAZIONE" 2/2015, pp 39-54, DOI: 10.3280/SA2015-002003