Journal title CITTADINANZA EUROPEA (LA)
Author/s Ermanno Calzolaio
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/1 Language Italian
Pages 20 P. 103-122 File size 72 KB
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The following essay deals with Protocol no° 16 to the ECHR, which enables highest courts and tribunals of the Contracting Parties to request the Court to give advisory opinions on questions of principle relating to the interpretation or application of the rights and freedoms defined in the Convention or the protocols. Despite the fact that advisory opinions shall not be binding (art. 5), this new instrument could strengthen the role of the Court in the shaping of a system of protection of human rights which is essentially case law based, in view of a more intense dialogue between national judges and the Court. In this perspective, the Author makes also some critical remarks about the recent decision of the EU Court of Justice according to which the project of adhesion of the EU to the ECHR is contrary to the Union Law.
Ermanno Calzolaio, La competenza consultiva della Corte Europea dei Diritti dell’Uomo dopo il Protocollo n. 16 in "CITTADINANZA EUROPEA (LA)" 1/2015, pp 103-122, DOI: 10.3280/CEU2015-001004