Treatment Demand Among Socially Integrated Drug Users Accessing Treatment in Malta

Titolo Rivista SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Autori/Curatori Marilyn Clarke, Manuel Gellel, Roberta Gellel
Anno di pubblicazione 2016 Fascicolo 2016/suppl. 2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 23 P. 140-162 Dimensione file 186 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2016-SU2011
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Socially integrated drug users have received less attention than excluded and marginalized drug users who mostly present for treatment with a heroin addiction (EMCDDA, 2012; Terry et al 2007). In an attempt to dispel the myth that all drug users in treatment experience “chaos narratives” (Frank, 1995) and have lost control over their lives and are therefore helpless, unpredictable, and unreliable, this paper will explore treatment demand among socially integrated drug users. The paper begins with an attempt at unpacking the construct of the ‘socially integrated drug user’ by reviewing how this specific ‘type’ of user has been conceptualized in the literature. The empirical work uses secondary data (both numerical and interview data) collected initially by intake officers at the NGO Caritas and analyses trends for a number of treatment demand variables for a two year period, as well as a number of socio-demographic variables of such treatment service users such as employment status, family situation, educational attainment and living conditions. The paper shows how not all drug users are in fact incapable of participating in conventional life and engaging in ‘normal’ activities such as holding a job, maintaining stable accommodation and participating in education The paper will make recommendations for more effective intervention with such service users.;

Keywords:Socially Integrated Clients; Drug Users; Treatment Demand; Intervention; Addiction; Social exclusion

  1. Arthur M.W., Blitz C.C. (2000). Bridging the gap between science and practice in drug abuse prevention through needs assessment and strategic community planning. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(3): 241-55.
  2. Arthur M.W., Pollard J.D., Catalano R.F., Baglioni A.J. (2002). Measuring Risk and Protective Factors for Substance Use, Delinquency, and Other Adolescent Problem Behaviour. Evaluation Review, 26, December: 575-601.
  3. Becker H.S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press.
  4. Biernacki P. (1986). Pathways from heroin addiction. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  5. Blaszczynski A., McConaghy N., Frankova A. (1991). A comparison of relapsed and non-relapsed abstinent pathological gamblers following behavioural treatment. British Journal of Addiction. 86(11): 1485--1489.
  6. Bluthenthal R.N. (1998). Syringe exchange as a social movement: a case study of harm reduction in Oakland. Substance Use and Misuse, 33(5): 1147-1171.
  7. Clark M. (2006). Commitment to Crime the Role of the Criminal Justice System. European Journal of Criminology, 3(2): 201-220.
  8. Clark M. & Bonavia M. (in press). Exploring the Career Path of Recreational Marijuana Users: A Study among Emerging Adults in Malta Addicta0/2015).
  9. Duff C. (2005). Party drugs and party people: examining the normalization of recreational drug use in Melbourne, Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16(3): 161-170.
  10. Frank A. (1995). The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness, and Ethics. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  11. Haase T., Pratschke, J. (2010). Risk and Protection Factors for Substance Use Among Young People. A comparative Study of Early School-Leavers and School Attending Students. National Advisory Committee on Drugs (NACD), 2010.
  12. Hagan J. (1998). Youth development as a capitalization process. In: Jessor R., editor, New Perspectives on Adolescent Risk Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press: 499–517.
  13. Hirschi T. (1996). Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  14. Jaarvinen M., Ravn S. (2011). From recreational to regular drug use: qualitative interviews with young clubbers. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33(4): 554-569.
  15. Laub J.H., Sampson R.J. (1993). Turning Points in the Life Course: Why Change Matters to the Study of Crime. Criminology, 31: 301-325.
  16. Maruna S. (1997). Desistance and Development; the Psychosocial Process of ‘Going Straight’. The British Criminology Conference: Selected Proceedings Volume 2. Published 1999. ISSN 1464-4088.
  17. Maruna S. & Immarigeon R. (2004) After Crime and Punishment-Pathways to offender reintegration. Willan Publishing, ISBN- 1-84392-058-1.
  18. Matza D. (1969). Becoming Deviant. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-1-4128-1446-1.
  19. Parker H, Aldridge J., Measham F. (1998). Illegal leisure. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
  20. Parker H., Williams L., Aldridge J. (2005). Normalization of “Sensible” Recreational Drug Use: Further Evidence from the North West Longitudinal Study.
  21. (From Drugs and Popular Culture: Drugs, Media and Identity in Contemporary Society, P 74-95, 2007, Paul Manning, ed.--See NCJ-218196). Sociology, 2008, 36(4): 941-64.
  22. Peele S. (1998). Ten radical things NIAAA research shows about alcoholism. The Addictions Newsletter. 5(6): 17-19.
  23. Riley S., James C., Gregory D., Dingle H., Cadger M. (2001). Patterns of recreational drug use at dance events in Edinburgh, Scotland. Addiction, 96(7): 1035-1047.
  24. Siegel R. (1984). Changing patterns of cocaine use: longitudinal observations, consequences, and treatment. Cocaine: Pharmacology, effects, and treatment of abuse, 1984; 92.
  25. Terry P., Wright K.A. and Cochrane R. (2007). Factors contributing to changes in frequency of cannabis consumption by cannabis users in England: a structured interview study. Addiction Research and Theory, 15: 113-119. Waldorf D. (1970). Life Without Heroin: Some Social Adjustments during Long-Term Periods of Voluntary Abstention. Social Problems, Vol.18, No.2 (Autumn 1970): 228-243.
  26. Rodner S. (2005). “I am not a drug abuser, I am a drug user”: A Discourse analysis of 44 drug users’ construction of identity. Addiction Research and Theory, 13: 333-346.
  27. Eisenbach-Stangl I. Moskalewicz J. and Thom B., eds (2009). Two Worlds of Drug Consumption in Late Modern Societies. Surry, UK: Ashgate.
  28. EMCDDA (2012). EMCDDA INSIGHTS Social reintegration and employment: evidence and interventions for drug users in treatment. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  29. Gyarmathy V.A, Neaigus A. (2005). Marginalized and socially integrated groups of IDUs in Hungary: potential bridges of HIV infection. J Urban Health, 2005 Sep, 82(3 Suppl. 4): 101-12. DOI: 10.1093/jurban/jti11

Marilyn Clarke, Manuel Gellel, Roberta Gellel, Treatment Demand Among Socially Integrated Drug Users Accessing Treatment in Malta in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" suppl. 2/2016, pp 140-162, DOI: 10.3280/SES2016-SU2011