Assessing the value for money of protected areas

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Autori/Curatori Francesca Visintin, Francesco Marangon, Maurizio Spoto
Anno di pubblicazione 2016 Fascicolo 2016/1
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 21 P. 49-69 Dimensione file 272 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2016-001006
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The increasing unavailability of public financing leads decision-makers to cut funds for protected areas without considering the ensuing environmental, economic and social impacts. The research investigated what and how much value the Miramare Natural Marine Reserve (Italy) was able to create from public funds. The environmental accounting approach was adopted, and environmental costs and benefits taken into account. Environmental benefits assessed ecosystem services such as gas regulation, nutrient cycling, biological control, food production, nursery, raw materials, recreation and science. The model demonstrated that the value produced by the Protected Area fully covered the money spent by public authorities by a rate of 2.5.;

Keywords:Area marina protetta, contabilità ambientale, servizi ecosistemici.

  1. MA – Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystem and Human Well-Being: Synthesys. Washington DC: Island Press.
  2. APAT – Agenzia per la Protezione dell’Ambiente e per i servizi Tecnici (2003). Analisi dei fattori di emissione di CO2 dal settore dei trasporti. Metodo di riferimento IPCC Modello COPERT ed analisi sperimentali Report 28/2003. Available from Internet URL: http://www.apat.gov.it//site/_contentfiles/00023100/ 23133_rapporti_03_28. pdf, 2003 (available only in Italian).
  3. Bishop R.C., Romano D. (1998). Environmental resource valuation: applications of the contingent valuation method in Italy. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  4. Castellarin C., Visintin G., Odorico R. (2001). Ittiofauna della Riserva Naturale Marina di Miramare (Golfo di Trieste, alto Adriatico). Annales Ser. hist. nat., 2, 25: 207-215 (available only in Italian).
  5. Costanza R., D’Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Naeem S., Limburg K., Paruelo J., O’Neill R.V., Raskin R, Sutton P., Van den Belt M. (1997). The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature, 387: 253-260.
  6. Daily G.C. (1997). Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press.
  7. Daily G.C., Soderquist T., Aniyar S., Arrow K., Dasgupta P., Ehrlich P.R., Folke C., Jansson A.M., Jansson B.O., Kautsky N., Levin S., Lubchenco J., Maler K.G., David S., Starrett D., Tilman D., Walker B. (2000). The Value of Nature and the Nature of Value. Science, 289: 395-396.
  8. De Groot R.S. (1992). Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision Making. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
  9. De Groot R.S. (1994). Environmental Functions and the Economic Value of Natural Ecosystems. In: Jansson A.M., Hammer M., Folke C., Costanza R. (Eds.). Investing in Natural Capital: the Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability. Island Press, International Society for Ecological Economics, 151-168.
  10. De Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M.J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41: 393-408.
  11. De Groot R.S., Brander L., van der Ploeg S., Costanza R., Bernard F., Braat L., Christie M., Crossman N., Ghermandi A., Hein L., Hussain S., Kumar P., McVittie,A., Portela R., Rodriguez L.C., ten Brink P., van Beukering P. (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 1, 1: 50-61.
  12. Fonda Umani S., Milani L., Borme D., De Olazabal A., Parlato S., Precali R., Kraus R., Lucic D., Njire J., Totti C., Romagnoli T., Pompei M., Cangini M. (2005). Inter-annual variations of planktonic food webs in the northern Adriatic Sea. Science of the Total Environment, 353, 1-3: 218-231.
  13. Hockings M., Stolton S., Leverington F., Dudley N., Courrau, J. (2006). Evaluating Effectiveness: a Framework for Assessing Management Effectiveness of Protected Areas, 2nd edition. IUCN Gland Switzerland and Cambridge UK.
  14. IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007). Working Group II Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – Fourth Assessment Report. Bruxelles: 6th April 2007. Available from Internet URL: http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM6avr07.pdf.
  15. Manente M. (2004). Il turismo nell’economia italiana. In: VV.AA. (Eds.). Rapporto sul turismo italiano 2004-2005. Firenze: Mercuri, 123-157 (available only in Italian).
  16. Marangon F., Spoto M., Visintin F. (2008). An Environmental Accounting Model for a Natural Reserve. In: Schaltegger S., Bennett M., Burritt R.L., Jasch C. (Eds.). Environmental Management Accounting for Cleaner Production, Series Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, 24, 267-282, Netherlands: Springer.
  17. MEF – Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze (2008). Relazione generale sulla situazione economica del Paese – 2006, Volume III, Appendice statistica, Roma. Available from Internet URL http://www.dt.tesoro.it/it/analisi_programmazione_ economico_finanziaria/documenti_programmatici/sezione1/rge.html (available only in Italian).
  18. Mitchell R., Carson R. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
  19. Nebbia G. (1996). Proposta di una rappresentazione input/output dei flussi di materia nella biosfera e nella tecnosfera. Contabilità ambientale. Annali di statistica, 13: 13-32 (available only in Italian).
  20. OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2004). Development of Statistics for Environmental Protection Expenditures and Revenues – August 2004. Available from Internet URL:http://www.oecd.org/.
  21. Pearce D. (1993). Economic Values and the Natural World. London: Earthscan.
  22. Redefining Progress (2003). Household ecological footprint calculator. Available from Internet URL: http://www. redefiningprogress.org/footprint/.
  23. Russi D., ten Brink P., Farmer A., Badura T., Coates D., Förster J., Kumar R., Davidson N. (2013). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Water and Wetlands. IEEP, London and Brussels; Ramsar Secretariat, Gland.
  24. TEEB (2010). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations. London and Washington: Pushpam Kumar Earthscan.
  25. Turner R.K. (1993). Sustainable Environmental Economics and Management. Principles and Practice. London: Belhaven Press.
  26. United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and World Bank (2014). System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012 – Central Framework. Available from Internet URL: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seeaRev/SEEA_CF_Final_ en.pdf.
  27. Wittmer H., Gundimeda H. (2012). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in Local and Regional Policy and Management. London and Washington: Earthscan.

  • Disaster-related losses of ecosystems and their services. Why and how do losses matter for disaster risk reduction? Yvonne Walz, Sally Janzen, Liliana Narvaez, Andrea Ortiz-Vargas, Jacob Woelki, Nathalie Doswald, Zita Sebesvari, in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 102425/2021 pp.102425
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102425
  • Environmental values and willingness to pay for a protected area: a segmentation of Italian university students M. B. Forleo, L. Romagnoli, N. Palmieri, in International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology /2019 pp.45
    DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2018.1488298

Francesca Visintin, Francesco Marangon, Maurizio Spoto, Assessing the value for money of protected areas in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 1/2016, pp 49-69, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2016-001006