Smart city e adattamento ai cambiamenti climatici: i casi Genova e Copenhagen a confronto

Titolo Rivista ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI
Autori/Curatori Samantha Cenere
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2017/118
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 21 P. 141-161 Dimensione file 129 KB
DOI 10.3280/ASUR2017-118007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

La smart city è considerata da molti l’unico modello di sviluppo urbano in grado di coniugare crescita economica e risoluzione dei principali problemi legati all’urba-nizzazione, come il cambiamento climatico. L’articolo analizza la trasformazione in smart city e le strategie di adattamento climatico a Genova e Copenhagen, individuando in esse elementi di un processo di neoliberizzazione urbana, che, passando attraverso un fenomeno di policy transfer, dà luogo ad "assemblaggi" diversi.;

Keywords:Smart city, cambiamento climatico, Genova, Copenhagen, neoliberismo

  1. Allwinkle S. and Cruickshank P. (2011). Creating Smart-er Cities: An Overview. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2): 1-16.
  2. Amin A. (2006). The Good City. Urban Studies, 43 (5-6): 1009-1023.
  3. Andersen H.T. and Winther L. (2010). Crisis in the Resurgent City? The Rise of Copenhagen. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(3): 693-700.
  4. Andersen H.T., Hansen F. and Jørgensen J. (2002). The fall and rise of metropolitan government in Copenhagen. GeoJournal, 58: 43-52.
  5. Aru S. and Pollio A. (2013). Oltre la smart city. In: Santangelo M., Aru S. and Pollio A., a cura di, Smart city: ibridazioni, innovazioni e inerzie nelle città contemporanee. Roma: Carocci, 197-220.
  6. Bayliss D. (2007). The Rise of the Creative City: Culture and Creativity in Copenhagen. European Planning Studies, 15 (7): 889-903.
  7. Begossi F. (2005). Genova capitale europea della cultura. Un viaggio lungo un anno. Milano: Skira.
  8. Brand P. (2007). Green Subjection: The Politics of Neoliberal Urban Environmental Management. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31 (3): 616-632.
  9. Brenner N. and Theodore N. (2002). Cities and The Geography of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism”. Antipode, 34(3): 349-379.
  10. Brenner N., Madden D.J. and Wachsmuth D. (2011). Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory. City, 15(2): 225-240.
  11. Caragliu A., Del Bo C. and Nijkamp P. (2011). Smart Cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2): 65-82.
  12. Chatterton P. (2013). Towards an Agenda for Post-carbon Cities: Lessons from Lilac, the UK’s First Ecological, Affordable Cohousing Community. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5): 1654-1674.
  13. City of Copenhagen (2011). Copenhagen Climate Adaptation Plan. Copenhagen.
  14. City of Copenhagen – The Technical and Environmental Administration (2012). CPH 2025 Climate Plan. A Green, Smart and Carbon Neutral City. Copenhagen.
  15. Collier S.J. and Ong A. (2005). Global Assemblages. Technology, Politics, Ethics as Anthropological Problems. London: Blackwell Publishing.
  16. Comune di Genova (2010). SEAP – Piano d’azione per l’energia sostenibile. Genova.
  17. Copenhagen Capacity (2014). Smart City – A Stronghold in the Copenhagen Region. Executive Summary. Copenhagen.
  18. Copenhagen Connecting (s.d.). Copenhagen Connecting. A Unique and Innovative Opportunity to Shape the Future of Copenhagen. Copenhagen.
  19. Crivello S. (2014). Torino Smart city. Circolazione, riproduzione e adattamento di un'idea di città. Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, 111: 32-48.
  20. Dansero E., Testa C. e Toldo A. (2013). Verso la smart city, partendo dal cibo. In Santangelo M., Aru S. e Pollio A., a cura di, Smart city: ibridazioni, innovazioni e inerzie nelle città contemporanee. Roma: Carocci, 135-150.
  21. Datta A. (2015). New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘Entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues of Human Geography, 5(I): 3-22.
  22. Deakin M. and Al Waer H. (2011). From intelligent to smart cities. Intelligent Buildings International, 3(3): 140-152.
  23. Desfor G. and Jørgensen J. (2004). Flexible urban governance. The case of Copenhagen’s recent waterfront development. European Planning Studies, 12(4): 479-496.
  24. Gabrys J. (2014). Programming environments: environmentality and citizen sensing in the smart city. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32: 30-48.
  25. Gastaldi F. (2009). Genova, dalle Colombiane 1992 a Capitale Europea della Cultura 2004. Grandi eventi e processi di rigenerazione urbana. Territorio, 48: 110-114.
  26. Gastaldi F. (2010). Genova. La riconversione del waterfront portuale. Un percorso con esiti rilevanti. Storia, accadimenti, dibattito. In: Savino M., a cura di, Waterfront d’Italia. Piani politiche progetti. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 88-104.
  27. Genova Smart City (2010). Statuto dell’associazione Genova Smart City. Genova.
  28. Gazzari R. (2004). Un nuovo ruolo per le città globali. L’esperienza di Genova. SYMPHONYA Emerging Issues in Management, 1: 37-54.
  29. Gibson-Graham J.K. (2006). A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  30. Giffinger R. et al. (2007). Smart Cities: Ranking of European Medium-Sized Cities. Vienna: Vienna University of Technology – Centre of Regional Science (SRF).
  31. Goodspeed S. (2014). Smart Cities: Moving beyond Urban Cybernetics to Tackle Wicked Problems. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11: 1-14.
  32. Graham S. and Marvin S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism. Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
  33. Greenfield A. (2013). Against the Smart City. New York: Do Projects.
  34. Hall R.E. (2000). The Vision of A Smart City. 2nd International Life Extension Technology Workshop, Paris, September 28th: 1-6.
  35. Hall T. and Hubbard P. (1998). The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regime and Representation. Chichester: John Wiley.
  36. Harrison C. and Donnelly I.A. (2011). A theory of smart cities. 55th Annual meeting of the international society for the systems sciences. Hull: The University of Hull.
  37. Harvey D. (1989). From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler, 71(I): 3-17.
  38. Hollands R.G. (2015). Critical Interventions into the Corporate Smart City. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(I): 61-77.
  39. Hollands R.G. (2008). Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up?. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 12(3): 303-320.
  40. IBM’s Smarter Cities Challenge (2014). Copenhagen Report. Armonk.
  41. Jessop B. (1997). The entrepreneurial city: re-imagining localities, redesigning economic governance, or restructuring capital. In: Jewson N. and McGregor S., eds., Transforming Cities: Contested Governance and New Spatial Divisions. London: Routledge, 28-41.
  42. Jonas A.E. and While A. (2007). Greening the Entrepreneurial City. In Krueger R. and Gibbs D., eds., The Sustainable Development Paradox. Urban Political Economy in the Unitd States and Europe. New York: The Guilford Press, 123-159.
  43. Klauser F., Paasche T. and Söderström O. (2014). Michel Foucault and the smart city: power dynamics inherent in contemporary governing through code. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32: 869-885.
  44. Komninos N., Pallot M. and Schaffers H. (2013). Special issue on smart cities and the future internet in Europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(2): 119-134.
  45. Lombardi P. and Vanolo A. (2015). Smart City as a Mobile Technology: Critical Perspectives on Urban Development Policies. In Bolivar M.P., ed., Transforming City Governments for successful Smart Cities. New York: Springer.
  46. Lund Hansen A., Andersen H.T. and Clark E. (2001). Creative Copenhagen: Globalization, Urban Governance and Social Change. European Planning Studies, 9(7): 851-869.
  47. March H. and Ribera-Fumaz R. (2014). Smart Contradictions: The Politics of Making Barcelona a Self-sufficient City. European Urban and Regional Studies. DOI: 10.1177/0969776414554488
  48. Mazzara L. (2009). Il piano strategico nell’ente locale. Progettazione, sviluppo e strumenti di monitoraggio. Milano: IPSOA – Wolters Kluwer Italia.
  49. McCann E. (2011). Urban Policy Mobilities and Global Circuits of Knowledge: Toward a Research Agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1): 107-130.
  50. McFarlane C. (2011). Assemblage and Critical Urbanism. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 15(2): 204-224.
  51. Moraci F. and Fazia C. (2013). La città smart e le sfide alla sostenibilità. TeMA. Journal of Land Use Mobility and Environment, 6(1): 35-46.
  52. Murgante B. and Borruso G. (2013). Smart cities. Un'analisi critica delle opportunità e dei rischi. GEOmedia, 3: 6-10.
  53. Musco F. (2008). Cambiamenti Climatici, politiche di adattamento e mitigazione: una prospettiva urbana. Archivio di studi urbani e regionali, 93: 1-34.
  54. Nam T. and Pardo T.A. (2011). Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Washington: University of Maryland, 282-291
  55. Neirotti P. et al. (2014). Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38: 25-36.
  56. Ong A. (2007). Neoliberalism as a Mobile Technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 32: 3-8.
  57. Osborne T. and Rose N. (1999). Governing Cities: Notes on the Spatialisation of Virtue. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17: 737-760.
  58. Parlamento Europeo – Directorate General for Internal Policies (2014), Mapping Smart Cities in the EU, Brussels.
  59. Peck J. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35(6): 773-797.
  60. Peck J. and Theodore N. (2010). Mobilizing Policy: Models, Methods and Mutations. Geoforum, 41(2): 169-174.
  61. Peck J. and Tickell A. (2002). Neoliberalizing Space. Antipode, 34(3): 380-404.
  62. Rabari C. and Storper M. (2015). The Digital Skin of Cities: Urban Theory and Research in the Age of the Sensored and Metered City, Ubiquitous Computing and Big Data. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1): 27-42.
  63. Raco M. and Flint J. (2012), Introduction: Characterising the ‘New’ Politics of Sustainability. From Managing Growth to Coping with Crisis. In: Flint J. and Raco M., eds., The Future of Sustainable Cities. Critical Reflections, Bristol: Policy Press, 3-28.
  64. Rankin K. (2011). Assemblage and the politics of thick description. City, 15(5): 563-569.
  65. Ribaudo M., Torrigiani C., De Cindio F. and Palumbo M. (2016). The University in the Polis: An Emerging Role of Democratic Intermediary in e-Participation?. In: Torre T., Braccini A.M. and Spinelli R., eds., Empowering Organizations. Hiedelberg: Springer, 63–76.
  66. Robinson J. (2011). Cities in a World of Cities: The Comparative Gesture. Interna- tional Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(1): 1-23.
  67. Rocca G. (2004). Genova “Capitale Europea della Cultura”. Alcune ipotesi di possibili applicazioni didattiche. Ambiente, società e territorio, 4(1): 19-24.
  68. Rossi U. (2013). Smart city, crisi economica e sopravvivenza del capitalismo. In Santangelo M., Aru S. e Pollio A., Smart city: ibridazioni, innovazioni e inerzie nelle città contemporanee. Roma: Carocci, 53-68.
  69. Rossi U. and Vanolo A. (2015). Urban Neoliberalism. In: Wright J., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  70. Russell B., Pusey A. and Chatterton P. (2011). What can an assemblage do? Seven propositions for a more strategic and politicized assemblage thinking. City, 15(5): 577-583.
  71. Sennett R. (2012). No One Likes a City that’s Too Smart. --The Guardian, December 4th in: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/04/smart-city-rio-songdo-masdar.
  72. Shaffers H. et al. (2011). Smart Cities and the Future Internet: Towards Cooperation Frameworks for Open Innovation. In: Domingue J. et al., eds., The Future Internet. Future Internet Assembly 2011: Achievements and Technological Promises, Berlin: Springer, 431-446.
  73. Shelton T., Zook M. and Wiig A. (2015). The “actually existing smart city”. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1): 13-25.
  75. Söderström O., Paasche T. and Klauser F. (2014). Smart cities as corporate storytelling. City: Analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 18(3): 307-320.
  76. Swyngedouw E. (2007). Impossible “Sustainability” and the Postpolitical Condition. In: Krueger R. and Gibbs D., eds., The Sustainable Development Paradox. Urban Political, New York: The Guilford Press, 13-40.
  77. Swyngedouw E. (2013). Apocalypse now! Fear and doomsday pleasures. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 24(1): 9-18.
  78. Toldo A. (2013). Smart environment e governance ambientale. In: Santangelo M., Aru S. e Pollio A. (a cura di), Smart city: ibridazioni, innovazioni e inerzie nelle città contemporanee. Roma: Carocci, 107-133.
  79. Townsend A.M. (2013). Smart Cities. Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. New York: Norton and Company.
  80. TRANSFORM (2010). Status Quo Report Genoa.
  81. UGEC (2013), Urbanization and Global Environmental Change. In: ISSC and UNESCO, World Social Science Report 2013: Changing Global Environments, Paris: OECD Publishing.
  82. Vanolo A. (2011). La città creativa oltre le regole del mercato: Christiania, Copenhagen. Archivio di studi urbani e regionali, 100: 60-81.
  83. Vanolo A. (2014). Smartmentality: the Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy. Urban Studies, 51(5): 883-898.
  84. Ward K. (2008). Towards a Comparative (Re)turn in Urban Studies? Some Reflections. Urban Geography, 29(5): 405-410.
  85. Ward K. (2009). Towards a Relational Comparative Approach to the Study of Cities. Progress in Human Geography, 34(4): 471-487.
  86. While A., Jonas, A.E. and Gibbs D. (2004). The Environment and the Entrepreneurial City: Searching for Urban “Sustainability Fix” in Manchester and Leeds. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3): 549-569.
  87. While A., Jonas A.E. and Gibbs D. (2009). From Sustainable Development to Carbon Control: Eco-State Restructuring and the Politics of Urban and Regional Development. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(I): 79-93.
  88. Zizek S. (2008). Nature and its Discontents. SubStance, 37(3): 37-72.

Samantha Cenere, Smart city e adattamento ai cambiamenti climatici: i casi Genova e Copenhagen a confronto in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 118/2017, pp 141-161, DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2017-118007