The purposive approach assessed from a reflexive labour law perspective. Comments on A Purposive Approach to Labour Law by Guy Davidov

Titolo Rivista GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI
Autori/Curatori Ralf Rogowski
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2017/156
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 7 P. 773-779 Dimensione file 203 KB
DOI 10.3280/GDL2017-156008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

  1. Adams Z. (2016). Review of A Purposive Approach to Labour Law. CLJ: 632 ss.
  2. Atkinson J. (2017). Review of A Purposive Approach to Labour Law. ILJ: 303 ss.
  3. Atleson J. (1983). Values and Assumptions in American Labor Law. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
  4. Benjamin W. (1992[1940]). Theses on the Philosophy of History. In Benjamin W., Illuminations. London: Fontana, 245 ss.
  5. Collins H. (2010). Employment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon.
  6. Collins H. (2011). Theories of Rights as Justifications for Labour Law. In: Davidov G., Langille B. (eds.), The Idea of Labour Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 137 ss. Däubler W. (1975). Das soziale Ideal des Bundesarbeitsgerichts. Frankfurt, Köln: Europäische Verlagsanstalt.
  7. Davidov G. (2010). The Enforcement Crisis in Labour Law and the Fallacy of Voluntarist Solutions. IJCLLIR: 61 ss.
  8. Davidov G., Langille B., eds. (2006). Boundaries and frontiers of labour law: goals and means in the regulation of work. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.
  9. Deakin S. (2011). The Contribution of Labour Law to Economic Development & Growth. In: Davidov G., Langille B. (eds.), The Idea of Labour Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 56 ss.
  10. Del Punta R. (2016). Labour Law and the Capability Approach. IJCLLIR: 383 ss.
  11. Dukes R. (2014). The Labour Constitution. The Enduring Idea of Labour Law. Oxford: Ox-ford University Press.
  12. Estlund C. (2003). Working Together: How Workplace Bonds Strengthen a Diverse Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Estlund C. (2010). Regoverning the Workplace: From Self-Regulation to Co-Regulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  14. Forbath W. (1991). Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  15. Gadamer H.-G. (2010 [1960]). Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Seventh ed. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  16. Kahn Freund O. (1931). Das soziale Ideal des Reichsarbeitsgerichts. Mannheim, Berlin, Leipzig: Bensheimer.
  17. Klare K. (1978). Judicial Deradicalization of the Wagner Act and the Origins of Modern Legal Consciousness, 1937-1941. MinnLR: 265 ss.
  18. Koskenniemi M. (1989). From Apology to Utopia. The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Koskenniemi M. (2001). The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870-1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Luhmann N. (1974). Rechtssystem und Rechtsdogmatik. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
  21. Luhmann N. (2004). Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Rogowski R. (2013a). Reflexive Labour Law in the World Society. Cheltenham: Edward El-gar Publishing.
  23. Rogowski R. (2013b). Constitutional Courts as Autopoietic Organisations. In: Boulanger C., Wrase M. (eds.), Die Politik des Verfassungsrechts. Interdisziplinäre und vergleichende Perspektiven auf die Rolle und Funktion von Verfassungsgerichten. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 123 ss.
  24. Rogowski R. (2015). The emergence of reflexive global labour law. IB: 72 ss.
  25. Savigny F.K. von (2012[1840]). System des heutigen römischen Rechts. Band 1(Reprint). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.
  26. Sinzheimer H. (1923). Die Idee des Arbeitsrechts. ArbR: 721 ss.
  27. Teubner G. (1971). Standards und Direktiven in Generalklauseln: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der empirischen Sozialforschung bei der Präzisierung der Gute-Sitten-Klauseln im Privatrecht. Frankfurt am Mian: Athenäum.
  28. Teubner G. (1975). Folgenkontrolle und responsive Dogmatik. Rechtstheorie, 179 ss. Teubner G. (1993). Law as an Autopoietic System. Oxford: Blackwell.
  29. Viehweg T. (1953). Topik und Jurisprudenz. München: Beck.
  30. Webb S., Webb B. (1897). Industrial Democracy. London, New York, Bombay: Longmans, Green & Co.

  • A qualitative study on the unresolved problem of female genital mutilations, socio-cultural reasons, and policy issues in the Afar regions of Ethiopia Habtamu Wondimu, Girum Melkamu, Kassahun Dejene, in Cogent Public Health 2205706/2023
    DOI: 10.1080/27707571.2023.2205706

Ralf Rogowski, The purposive approach assessed from a reflexive labour law perspective. Comments on A Purposive Approach to Labour Law by Guy Davidov in "GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI " 156/2017, pp 773-779, DOI: 10.3280/GDL2017-156008