Sustainability in the Italian Scientific Perspective: A Focus on the Economic and Managerial Points of View

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Autori/Curatori Giuseppe Vito, Cristina Simone, Francesca Iandolo, Pietro Vito
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2018/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 18 P. 9-26 Dimensione file 287 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2018-002002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This paper traces the network of research Institutions working in Italy on the theme of sustainability from various disciplinary points of view, in particular from those of Economics and of Management, highlighting their main character in terms of Authors, scientific papers, topics most frequently dealt with, relationships between them. The network analysis is provided adapting methods of bibliographic mapping and clustering of scientific production. The bibliometric maps obtained can be downloaded, in their interactive version, at the following links: https://bit.ly/2QXhYpj

Questo lavoro ricostruisce la rete di Istituzioni di ricerca operanti in Italia sul tema della sostenibilità da vari punti di vista disciplinari, in particolare da quelli di Eco-nomia e Management, evidenziandone il carattere principale in termini di Autori, articoli scientifici, argomenti più frequentemente trattati, relazioni tra essi. La rete viene ricostruita adattando metodi bibliografici di mappatura e clustering della produzione scientifica. Le mappe bibliometriche ottenute possono essere scaricate, nella loro versione interattiva, ai seguenti link: https://bit.ly/2QXhYpj (mappa delle parole chiave), https://bit.ly/2SFxXFU (mappa delle riviste), https: // bit.ly/2ElrY5j (mappa delle organizzazioni).

Keywords:Sostenibilità, Italia, economia, gestione, bibliometria, vosviewer.

  1. Barile S., Calabrese M., Iandolo F. (2013). Sostenibilità e paradigmi service-based: possibilità e criticità per l’economia d’impresa. Sviluppo & Organizzazione, 252: 46-60.
  2. Barile S., Carrubbo L., Iandolo F., Caputo F. (2013). From ‘EGO’ to ‘ECO’ in B2B relationships. Journal of Business Market Management, 6(4): 228-253.
  3. Barile S., Saviano M., Iandolo F., Calabrese M. (2014). The viable systems approach and its contribution to the analysis of sustainable business behaviors. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31(6): 683-695.
  4. Beer S. (1979). The heart of enterprise: Wiley.
  5. Beer S. (1984). The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35(1): 7-25.
  6. Bergh J.C.J.M. v d (2009). The GDP paradox. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2): 117-35.
  7. Berkowitz S.D. (1982). An introduction to structural analysis: the network approach to social research. Butterworths.
  8. Borgonovi E., Compagni A. (2013). Sustaining universal health coverage: The interaction of social, political, and economic sustainability. Value in Health, 16(1 SUPPL.), S34-S38.
  9. Borrelli I.P. (2013). Not uniformity of local systems and sustainability of well-being. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilita, (1): 109-17.
  10. Carlucci F., Cirà A., Lanza G. (2018). Hybrid electric vehicles: Some theoretical considerations on consumption behaviour. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10 (4).
  11. Cesaretti G.P. (2014). Thinking sustainability global approach and sectoral approach “environmental issue – Food for sustainability and not just food”. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, (1), 11-21. DOI: 10.3280/RISS2014-001002
  12. Ciasullo M.V. et al. (2017). What about sustainability? An empirical analysis of consumers’ purchasing behavior in fashion context. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(9).
  13. Covino D. (2011). A systemic approach to environmental dimension of sustainable development. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, (1): 65-73.
  14. de Solla Price D.J. (1965). Networks of Scientific Papers. Science, 149(3683), 510-515.
  15. Edvardsson B., Tronvoll B., Gruber T. (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: A social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2): 327-339.
  16. Edwards A.R. (2005). The sustainability revolution: Portrait of a paradigm shift: New Society Publishers.
  17. Farioli F., Barile S., Saviano M., Iandolo F. (2017). Re-reading sustainability through the Triple Helix model in the frame of a systems perspective. The Sage Handbook of Nature, 10-37.
  18. Fleurbaey M. (2009). Beyond GDP: The quest for a measure of social welfare. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(4): 1029-75.
  19. Génova G., de la Vara J.L. (2018). The Problem Is Not Professional Publishing, But the Publish-or-Perish Culture. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1-3.
  20. Golinelli G.M. (2000). L’approccio sistemico al governo dell’impresa (Vol. 1). Cedam: Padova.
  21. Golinelli G.M. (2010). Viable Systems Approach (VSA): Governing Business Dynamics. Cedam: Padova.
  22. Kessler M.M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 14(1): 10-25.
  23. Komiyama H., Takeuchi K. (2006). Sustainability science: building a new discipline. In: Springer.
  24. Luthe T., Von Kutzschenbach M. (2016). Building Common Ground in Mental Models of Sustainability. Sustainability (United States), 9(5), 247-254.
  25. Markoulli M., Lee C.I.S.G., Byington E., Felps W.A. (2017). Mapping Human Resource Management: Reviewing the field and charting future directions. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 367-396.
  26. Misso R. et al. (2016). Convergence to sustainability of well-being -The European Governance for the future. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilita, 2, 9-18.
  27. Nosi C. et al. (2017). Does value co-creation really matter? An investigation of italian millennials intention to buy electric cars. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9 (12).
  28. Origgi G., Ramello G.B., Silva F. (2014). Publish or perish. Causes and consequences of a paradigm. Economia e Politica Industriale, 41(4), 9-25. DOI: 10.3280/POLI2014-004002
  29. Pezzey J. (1992). Sustainability: an interdisciplinary guide. Environmental Values, 321-362.
  30. Porter A.L., Kongthon A., Lu J.-C. (2002). Research profiling: Improving the literature review. Scientometrics, 53(3), 351. DOI: 10.1023/A:1014873029258
  31. Quattrociocchi B., Iandolo F., Fulco I., Calabrese M. (2018). Efficienza, efficacia e sostenibilità. Il contributo dell’Approccio Sistemico Vitale (ASV) all’orientamento dei comportamenti d’impresa. Il controllo manageriale e gli indicatori di performance dentro e fuori le organizzazioni: Alcuni contributi di studio, 11, 73.
  32. Saviano M., Barile S., Spohrer J.C., Caputo F. (2017). A service research contribution to the global challenge of sustainability. Journal of Service Theory Practice, 27(5): 951-976.
  33. Schoolman E.D., Guest J.S., Bush K.F., Bell A.R. (2012). How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 67-80.
  34. Simone C., Sala A.L. (2018). When critical purchase behaviour promotes socio-economic wellbeing: the case of Italian EPGs. International Journal of Environment and Health, 9(2): 183-196.
  35. Simone C., Barondini M.E., Calabrese M. (2015). Firm and territory: in searching for a sustainable relation. Four cases study from Italian secular firms. International Journal of Environment and Health, 7(4): 329-358.
  36. Small H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 24(4): 265-269.
  37. Tang M., Liao H., Wan Z., Herrera-Viedma E., Rosen M.A. (2018). Ten years of Sustainability (2009 to 2018): A bibliometric overview. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(5).
  38. van Eck N.J., Waltman L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2): 523-538.
  39. van Eck N.J., Waltman L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring scholarly impact (pp. 285-320): Springer.
  40. Vargo S.L., Maglio P.P., Akaka M.A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3): 145-152.
  41. Viola I., Rotondo G., Maccari N. (2013). The well-being beyond GDP. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilita, 1: 9-26.
  42. von Bertalanffy L. (1968). General system theory: foundations, development, applications. G. Braziller.
  43. Waage S.A., Geiser K., Irwin F., Weissman A.B., Bertolucci M.D., Fisk P., McPherson A. (2005). Fitting together the building blocks for sustainability: A revised model for integrating ecological, social, and financial factors into business decision-making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(12): 1145-1163.
  44. Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8): Cambridge University Press.
  45. Yang Y., Han H., Lee P.K.C. (2017). An exploratory study of the mechanism of sustainable value creation in the luxury fashion industry. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(4).

Giuseppe Vito, Cristina Simone, Francesca Iandolo, Pietro Vito, Sustainability in the Italian Scientific Perspective: A Focus on the Economic and Managerial Points of View in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 2/2018, pp 9-26, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2018-002002