The social-cultural context of risk evaluation. An exploration of the interplay between cultural models of the social environment and parental control on the risk evaluation expressed by a sample of adolescents

Titolo Rivista PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE
Autori/Curatori Claudia Venuleo, Piergiorgio Mossi, Simone Rollo
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2019/3
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 26 P. 28-53 Dimensione file 297 KB
DOI 10.3280/PDS2019-003003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The objective of this study is to analyse the relationship between adolescent evaluation of health risk behaviours and family practices, while accounting for moderating effects of the cul-tural models through which adolescents interpret their social environment. Cultural models, perceived family practices and evaluation of the risk associated to alcohol consumption, drugs use, reckless driving and unprotected sexual behaviours were assessed among 392 adolescents (mean age: 16.88 ± 0.752) recruited in five different Italian high schools of the southern Italy. The findings show that, beside family dimensions (parental knowledge of children’s activities, parental inquiry about children’s activities, family rules on bed time), a component of adolescents’ cultural model - related to evaluation of the micro-social environment - has a direct effect on risk evaluation, stronger than the other variables; another component - related to the evaluation of the macro-social environment - moderates the role of the family dimensions. These results suggest the importance of cultural and social dimensions in the intervention programs.

Lo studio si propone di analizzare la relazione tra la valutazione dei comportamenti a ri-schio per la salute tra gli adolescenti e le pratiche genitoriali tenendo conto degli effetti di mo-derazione dei modelli culturali con cui gli adolescenti interpretano il loro ambiente sociale. In un campione di 392 adolescenti (età media: 16.88 ± 0.752), reclutati in cinque differenti istituti scolastici del Sud Italia, sono stati misurati i modelli culturali, le pratiche genitoriali per-cepite e la valutazione del rischio rispetto ad assunzione di alcol, uso di droghe, guida sperico-lata e comportamenti sessuali non protetti. I risultati mostrano che, oltre alle dimensioni familiari (conoscenza genitoriale delle attività dei figli, supervisione parentale sulle attività dei figli, regole famigliari sul tempo libero), una componente del modello culturale degli adolescenti - la valutazione dell’ambiente micro-sociale - ha un effetto diretto sulla valutazione del rischio, maggiore rispetto alle altre variabili; un’altra componente dei modelli culturali degli adolescenti la valutazione dell’ambiente ma-cro-sociale ha un effetto di moderazione rispetto al ruolo delle dimensioni familiari. I risultati suggeriscono l’importanza delle dimensioni culturali e sociali nella progettazione di interventi sui comportamenti a rischio.

Keywords:Pratiche familiari; ambiente sociale; modelli culturali; valutazione del rischio; comportamenti dannosi per la salute.

  1. Darlington, R. B., & Hayes, A. F. (2016). Regression analysis and linear models: Concepts, applications, and implementation. New York: Guilford Press.
  2. Ahnquist J., Lindström M. and Wamala S.P. (2008). Institutional trust and alcohol consumption in Sweden: the Swedish national public health survey 2006. BMC Public Health, 8: 283. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-28
  3. Albertos A., Osorio A., Lopez-del Burgo C., Carlos S., Beltramo C. and Trullols F. (2016). Parental knowledge and adolescents’ risk behaviors. Journal of Adolescence, 53: 231-236.
  4. Benzécri J.P. (1992). Correspondence analysis handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.
  5. Berten H., Cardoen D., Van Rossem R., Brondeel R. and Vettenburg N. (2013). Alcohol use among young adolescents in Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany and Austria: The effects of type of education. Young, 21: 363-385. DOI: 10.1177/110330881350630
  6. Blasius J. and Greenacre M. (1998). Visualization of Categorical Data. New York: Academic Press.
  7. Bond L., Butler H., Thomas L., Carlin J., Glover S., Bowes G. and Paton G. (2007). Social and school connectedness in early secondary school as predictors of late teenage substance use, mental health, and academic outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40: 357.e9–357.e18.
  8. Borawski E.A., Ievers-Landis C.E., Lovegreen L D. and Trapl E.S. (2003). Parental monitoring negotiated unsupervised time, and parental trust: The role of perceived parenting practices in adolescent health risk behaviors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33: 60-70. DOI: 10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00100-
  9. Boyer T.W. (2006). The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review. Developmental review, 26: 291-345.
  10. Carli R. and Paniccia R.M. (1999). Psicologia della formazione (Psychology of Education). Milano: Il Mulino.
  11. Carli R., Paniccia R.M., Atzori E., Cinalli S., Brescia F., Mazzeo G., Strignano O., Bucci F. and Dolcetti F. (2012). Psychosocial risk at a Hospital in Rome: the relationship between Local Culture and satisfaction at San Filippo Neri Hospital Complex Authority. Rivista di Psicologia Clinica, 1: 76-90.
  12. Ciavolino E., Redd R., Evrinomy A., Falcone M., Fini V., Kadianaki I., Kullasepp K., Mannarini T., Matsopoulos A., Mossi P., Rochira A., Santarpia A., Sammut G., Valsiner J., Veltri G.A. and Salvatore S. (2017). Views of Context. An instrument for the analysis of the cultural milieu. A first validation study. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 10 (2): 599-628.
  13. Coltman T., Devinney T.M., Midgley D.F. and Venaik S. (2008). Formative versus reflective measurement models: Two applications of formative measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61: 1250-1262.
  14. Crossley M.L. (2001). Rethinking psychological approaches towards health promotion. Psychology and Health, 16: 161-177. DOI: 10.1080/0887044010840549
  15. Crouter A.C. and Head M.R. (2002). Parental monitoring and knowledge of children. Handbook of Parenting, 3: 461-483.
  16. Guidi M. and Salvatore S. (2013). Parents’ images of their children’s school system. In: Giuseppina M., Koji K. and Antonio I., eds., Crossing Boundaries. Intercontextual dynamics between family and school. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 271-300.
  17. Hibell B., Guttormsson U., Ahlström S., Balakireva O., Bjarnason T., Kokkevi A. and Kraus L. (2012). The 2011 ESPAD report: substance use among students in 36 European countries. Stockholm: Modintryckoffset AB.
  18. Hill K G., White H.R., Chung I.-J., Hawkins J.D. and Catalano R.F. (2000). Early adult outcomes of adolescent binge drinking: person-and variable-centered analyses of binge drinking trajectories. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24: 892-901.
  19. Johnson B.B. and Covello V.T. (2012). The social and cultural construction of risk: Essays on risk selection and perception. vol. 3. Springer Science & Business Media. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-3395-
  20. Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2011). Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2010: Volume II, College students and adults ages 19-50. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
  21. Kumpfer K.L., Alvarado R., Smith P. and Bellamy N. (2002). Cultural sensitivity and adaptation in family-based prevention interventions. Prevention Science, 3: 241-246. DOI: 10.1023/A:101990290211
  22. Lamborn S.D., Mounts N.S., Steinberg L. and Dornbusch S.M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62: 1049-1065. DOI: 10.2307/113115
  23. Lebart L., Morineau A. and Warwick K.M. (1984). Multivariate descriptive statistical analysis; correspondence analysis and related techniques for large matrices. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  24. Lightfoot C. (1997). The culture of adolescent risk-taking. New York: Guilford Press.
  25. Ma M., Malcolm L.R., Diaz-Albertini K., Klinoff V.A., Leeder E., Barrientos S. and Kibler J.L. (2014). Latino cultural values as protective factors against sexual risks among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 37: 1215-1225.
  26. Mannarini T., Ciavolino E., Nitti M. and Salvatore S. (2012). The role of affects in culture based interventions: Implications for practice. Psychology, 3 (8): 569-577.
  27. Manton E., Pennay A. and Savic M. (2014). Public drinking, social connection and social capital: A qualitative study. Addiction Research & Theory, 22: 218-228. DOI: 10.3109/16066359.2013.81220
  28. Michael K. and Ben-Zur H. (2007). Risk-taking among adolescents: Associations with social and affective factors. Journal of Adolescence, 30: 17-31.
  29. Morrissey S.A. (2008). Performing risks: catharsis, carnival and capital in the risk society. Journal of Youth Studies, 11: 413-427. DOI: 10.1080/1367626080213971
  30. Moscatelli S. and Rubini M. (2009). Parenting styles in adolescence: The role of warmth, strictness, and psychological autonomy granting in influencing collective self-esteem and expectations for the future. In: Krause P.H. e Dailey T.M., eds., Parenting: Styles, Stresses, and Strategies. New York: Nova Publishers, pp. 341-349.
  31. Mossi P. and Salvatore S. (2011). Psychological transition from meaning to sense. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 4: 153-169.
  32. Ng M., Freeman M.K., Fleming T.D., Robinson M., Dwyer-Lindgren L., Thomson B., Wollum A., Sanman E., Wulf S., Lopez A.D., Murray C.J.L. and Gakidou E. (2014). Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980-2012. Jama, 311: 183-192.
  33. Pilkington H. (2007). In good company: Risk, security and choice in young people’s drug decisions. The Sociological Review, 55: 373-392.
  34. Rahn W.M. and Transue J.E. (1998). Social trust and value change: The decline of social capital in American youth, 1976-1995. Political Psychology, 19: 545-565. DOI: 10.1111/0162-895X.0011
  35. Richter M., Leppin A. and Gabhainn S.N. (2006). The relationship between parental socio-economic status and episodes of drunkenness among adolescents: findings from a cross-national survey. BMC Public Health, 6: 289. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-28
  36. Riesch S.K., Anderson L. S. and Krueger H.A. (2006). Parent-child communication processes: Preventing children’s health-risk behavior. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 11: 41-56.
  37. Romer D. (2010). Adolescent risk taking, impulsivity, and brain development: Implications for prevention. The Journal of the International Society for Developmental Psychobiology, 52: 263-276.
  38. Salvatore S., Fini V., Mannarini T., Veltri G.A., Avdi E., Battaglia F., Castro-Tejerina J., Ciavolino E., Cremaschi M., Kadianaki I., Kharlamow N.A., Krasteva A., KullaseppK..Matsopoulous A., Meschiari C., Mossi P., Psinas, P., Redd R., Rochira A., Santarpia A., Sammut G., Valsiner J. and Valmorbida A.(2018). Symbolic universes between present and future of Europe. first results of the map of European societies’ cultural milieu. PloS One 13: e0200223.
  39. Shweder R.A. and Sullivan. M.A. (1990). The semiotic subject of cultural psychology. In: Pervin L., ed., Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 399-416.
  40. Smetana J.G. (1996). Adolescent-parent conflict: Implications for adaptive and maladaptive development. In: Cicchetti D. and Toth S.L., eds., Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology. Adolescence: Opportunities and Challenges. Vol. 7. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, pp. 1-46.
  41. Thorlindsson T. (2011). Bring in the social context: Towards an integrated approach to health promotion and prevention. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 39: 19-25. DOI: 10.1177/1403494810394549
  42. Valsiner J. (2007). Personal culture and conduct of value. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 1: 59-65.
  43. Venuleo C. (2013). I modelli di valutazione di un servizio URP espressi dall’utenza di un’Azienda Sanitaria Locale. Un caso studio (The users’ models of evaluating one National Health Service Public-Relations Department. A case study). Psicologia della Salute, 3: 29-49. DOI: 10.3280/PDS2013-00300
  44. Venuleo C., Calogiuri S. and Rollo S. (2015). Unplanned reaction or something else? The role of subjective cultures in hazardous and harmful drinking. Social Science & Medicine,139: 9-17.
  45. Venuleo C. and Marinaci T. (2017). The social construction of the pathological gambler’s identity and its relationship with social adaptation: Narratives from members of Italian gambling anonymous and gam-anon family groups. Journal of Gambling Issues, 36: 138-163.
  46. Venuleo C., Mossi P. and Calogiuri S. (2018). Combining cultural and individual dimensions in the analysis of hazardous behaviours: An explorative study on the interplay between cultural models, impulsivity, and depression in hazardous drinking and gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues, 40: 69-115.
  47. Venuleo C., Mossi P. and Marinaci T. (2017). Meaning and risk. The role of subjective cultures in the evaluation of hazardous behaviours. Psicologia della Salute, 1: 48-75. DOI: 10.3280/PDS2017-00100
  48. Venuleo C., Rollo S., Marinaci T. and Calogiuri S. (2016). Towards a cultural understanding of addictive behaviours. The image of the social environment among problem gamblers, drinkers, internet users and smokers. Addiction Research & Theory, 24: 274-287. DOI: 10.3109/16066359.2015.112625
  49. Wildsmith E., Schelar E., Peterson K. and Manlove J. (2010). Sexually transmitted diseases among young adults: Prevalence, perceived risk, and risk-taking behaviors. Child Trends Research Brief, 10: 1-8.
  50. Wood M.D., Read J.P., Mitchell R.E. and Brand N.H. (2004). Do parents still matter? Parent and peer influences on alcohol involvement among recent high school graduates. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18: 19-30. DOI: 10.1037/0893-164X.18.1.1
  51. Zimmermann G. (2010). Risk perception, emotion regulation and impulsivity as predictors of risk behaviours among adolescents in Switzerland. Journal of Youth Studies, 13: 83-99. DOI: 10.1080/1367626090317348
  52. de Looze M., Pickett W., Raaijmakers Q., Kuntsche E., Hublet A., Nic Gabhainn S., Bjarnson T., Molcho M., Volleberg W. and Bogt T.T. (2012). Early risk behaviors and adolescent injury in 25 European and North American countries: A cross-national consistent relationship. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 32: 104-125. DOI: 10.1177/027243161141406
  53. Dressler W.W., Balieiro M.C., Ribeiro R.P. and Dos Santos J.E. (2007). Cultural consonance and psychological distress: Examining the associations in multiple cultural domains. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 31: 195-224.
  54. Follesø R. (2015). Youth at risk or terms at risk? Young, 23: 240-253. DOI: 10.1177/110330881558487
  55. Fosco G.M., Stormshak E.A., Dishion T.J. and Winter C.E. (2012). Family relationships and parental monitoring during middle school as predictors of early adolescent problem behavior. Journal of ClinicalChild & Adolescent Psychology, 41: 202-213. DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2012.65198
  56. Goldstein S.E., Davis-Kean P.E. and Eccles J.S. (2005). Parents, peers, and problem behavior: a longitudinal investigation of the impact of relationship perceptions and characteristics on the development of adolescent problem behavior. Developmental Psychology, 41 (2): 401-413. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.40
  57. Graham L., Jordan L., Hutchinson A. and de Wet N. (2018). Risky behaviour: a new framework for understanding why young people take risks. Journal of Youth Studies, 21: 324-339. DOI: 10.1080/13676261.2017.138030
  58. Gray M. and Steinberg L. (1999). Unpacking authoritative parenting: Reassessing a multidimensional construct. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 574-587. DOI: 10.2307/35356
  59. Grigsby T.J., Forster M. and Sussman S. (2015). A perspective on cigarette smoking during alcohol and substance use treatment. Substance Use & Misuse, 50: 1199-1204. DOI: 10.3109/10826084.2015.100775

  • What Adolescents Have to Say about Problematic Internet Use: A Qualitative Study Based on Focus Groups Simone Rollo, Claudia Venuleo, Lucrezia Ferrante, Raffaele De Luca Picione, in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health /2023 pp.7013
    DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20217013
  • The Meaning of Living in the Time of COVID-19. A Large Sample Narrative Inquiry Claudia Venuleo, Tiziana Marinaci, Alessandro Gennaro, Arianna Palmieri, in Frontiers in Psychology 577077/2020
    DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577077
  • Effect of the Social and Cultural Control on Young Eastern Ethnic Minority Groups’ Online-Startup Motivation Lifu Li, Kyeong Kang, in Entrepreneurship Research Journal /2024 pp.491
    DOI: 10.1515/erj-2021-0262
  • “What Game are We Playing?”: the Psychosocial Context of Problem Gambling and Gaming Among Italian High School Students Tiziana Marinaci, Claudia Venuleo, Lucrezia Ferrante, Salvatore Della Bona, in SSRN Electronic Journal /2021
    DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3870262
  • What game we are playing: the psychosocial context of problem gambling, problem gaming and poor well-being among Italian high school students Tiziana Marinaci, Claudia Venuleo, Lucrezia Ferrante, Salvatore Della Bona, in Heliyon e07872/2021 pp.e07872
    DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07872
  • A che gioco stiamo giocando? Uno studio sulle determinanti psicosociali del consumo di gioco problematico e del malessere tra gli adolescenti Claudia Vanuleo, Salvatore Della Bona, Tiziana Marinaci, in MISSION 62/2024 pp.43
    DOI: 10.3280/mis62-2023oa17023

Claudia Venuleo, Piergiorgio Mossi, Simone Rollo, The social-cultural context of risk evaluation. An exploration of the interplay between cultural models of the social environment and parental control on the risk evaluation expressed by a sample of adolescents in "PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE" 3/2019, pp 28-53, DOI: 10.3280/PDS2019-003003