"C’è stata un po’ di incoerenza.." Adolescenti e norme in tempo di pandemia

Titolo Rivista SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO
Autori/Curatori Anna Rosa Favretto, Cristina Calvi, Domenico Carbone, Manuel Finelli
Anno di pubblicazione 2023 Fascicolo 2022/3
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 25 P. 38-62 Dimensione file 225 KB
DOI 10.3280/SD2022-003002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

;

Keywords:Adolescence - Legal socialization - Rules - Pandemic

  1. Ewick, Patricia, & Susan S. Silbey 1998. The Common Place of Law, Chicago: The University Chicago Press.
  2. Favretto, Anna Rosa, 2010. Obbedire o negoziare. Gli adolescenti e la disciplina famigliare. Roma: Donzelli.
  3. Adami, Rebecca, & Katy Dineen, 2021. Discourses of Childism: How Covid-19 Has Unveiled Prejudice, Discrimination and Social Injustice against Children in the Eveyday. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 29, 2: 353-370. DOI: 10.1163/15718182-2902000
  4. Alanen, Leena, 2020. A Relational Challenge to Post-corona Childhood Studies. Childhood. 27, 4: 431-434. DOI: 10.1177/090756822094554
  5. Bandura, Albert, 1996. Teoria socialcognitiva del pensiero e dell’azione morale. Rassegna di psicologia, XIII, 1: 23-92.
  6. Bosisio, Roberta, 2010. Bambini e agire morale. Milano: Guerini Scientifica.
  7. Cohn, Ellen S., Rick J. Trinkner, Cesar J. Rebellon, Karen T. van Gundy & Lindsey M. Cole, 2012. Legal Attitude and Legitimacy: Extending the Integrated legal Socialization Model. Victims and Offenders, 7, 2012: 385-406. DOI: 10.1080/15564886.2012.713902
  8. Cottino Amedeo, 2005. Disonesto ma non criminale: la giustizia e i privilegi dei potenti. Roma: Carocci.
  9. Craig, Stephanie G., Megan E. Ames, Samantha Feldman & Debra J. Pepler, 2021. Adherence to Public Health Measures in Adolescents versus Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Canada. -- https://psyarxiv.com/mxfz7/.
  10. Cressey, Donald R., 1954, The Differential Association Theory and Compulsive Crimes. The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, Vol. 45,1:29-40. DOI: 10.2307/113930
  11. Daniels, Nicola, Patricia Gillen, Karen Casson & Iseult Wilson, 2019. STEER: Factors to ConsiderWhen Designing Online Focus Groups Using Audiovisual Technology in Health Research. International Journal of qualitative methods, 18:1-11.
  12. Dardas, Latefa Ali, Inaam Khalaf, Manar Nabolsi, Omayyah Nassar & Suhaila Halasa, 2020. Developing an understanding of adolescents’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward COVID-19. The Journal of School Nursing, 36(6): 430-441.
  13. de Singly, François. 2003. Les uns vers les autres. Quand l’individualisme crée du lien. Paris: Colin.
  14. Dunn, Mattew R., Melissa DeJonckheere, Sam Schuiteman, Arianna Strome, Herbert Kelsey, Marika Waselewski, & Tammy Chang, 2021. “Stay home so this can be over:” A national study of youth perspectives on social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preventive Medicine Reports, 22, 101355.
  15. —, 2016. Come si apprendono le norme? La socializzazione normativa e giuridica. In Amedeo Cottino (a cura di), Lineamenti di sociologia del diritto. Bologna: Zanichelli Giuridica: 209-235.
  16. —, 2018. Crisi della fiducia, diritto e disuguaglianze nella protezione della salute pubblica: effetti di un paradosso. In Lucio d’Alessandro & Arianna Montanari (a cura di), Disuguaglianze e crisi della fiducia. Milano: FrancoAngeli: 229-244.
  17. Greenbaum, Tom, 2008. Internet focus groups are not focus groups - So don’t call them that. -- Retrieved from http://www.groupsplus.com/ pages/qmrr0798.htm
  18. Guzek, Dominika, Dominika Skolmowska & Dominika Głąbska, 2020. Analysis of gender-dependent personal protective behaviors in a national sample: Polish adolescents’ COVID-19 experience (PLACE-19) study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16): 5770.
  19. Kourilsky. Chantal, 1988. Socialisation juridique: la naissance d’un champ de recherche et d’un concept aux confins de la sociologie du droit et de la psychologie. Annales de Vaucresson, 28: 49-72.
  20. La Mendola, Salvatore, 2007, (a cura di). Comunicare interagendo. Torino: UTET Università.
  21. Lupton, Deborah, 2012. Medicine as Culture. London: Sage.
  22. Maturo, Antonio, & Veronica Moretti. 2020. COVID-19, the triple bias, and the “Unheimlich”. The challenges of covid-19: global health and inequality. ESA RN16 Newsletter – Special Issue. 11:17-18.
  23. Podgórecki, Adam, 1973. Knowledge and Opinion about Law. London: Martin Robertson.
  24. Palmonari, Augusto (a cura di), 2011. Psicologia dell’adolescenza. Bologna: il Mulino.
  25. Oosterhoff, Benjamin, Cara A. Palmer, Jenna Wilson & Natalie Shook, 2020a. Adolescents’ Motivations to Engage in Social Distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Associations with Mental and Social Health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 67(2): 179-185:
  26. Oosterhoff, Benjamin, & Cara A. Palmer, 2020b. Psychological Correlates of News Monitoring, Social Distancing, Disinfecting, and Hoarding Behaviors among US Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic. PsyArXiv.
  27. Ronfani, Paola (a cura di), 2007. Non è giusto. Dilemmi morali e senso della giustizia nelle rappresentazioni degli adolescenti. Roma: Donzelli.
  28. Royzman, Edward B., & Jonathan Baron, 2002. The Preference for Indirect Harm. Social Justice Research, 15: 165–184. DOI: 10.1023/A:1019923923537
  29. Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, 1987. Law: A Map of Misreading. Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law. Law and Society Review, 14, 3: 37-51. DOI: 10.2307/141018
  30. —, 1990. Stato e diritto nella transizione post-moderna. Per un nuovo senso comune del giuridico. Sociologia del diritto, 3: 5-34.
  31. Saraceno, Chiara, 2021. La dimensione sociale della crisi Covid in Italia. Roma: Fondazione Friedrich Ebert. -- https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/rom/17184-20210118.pdf
  32. Schmid, Christine, 2012. The value “social responsibility” as motivating factor for adolescents’ readiness to participate in different types of political actions, and its socialization in parent and peer contexts. Journal of Adolescence, 35: 533-547.
  33. Trinkner, Rick, & Michael D. Reisig, 2021.Celebrating 50 years of legal socialization. Journal of Social Issues 77: 281-290.
  34. Trinkner Rick, & Ellen S. Cohn, 2014. Putting the ‘Social’ Back in Legal Socialization: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Cynism in Legal and Nonlegal Authorities. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 6: 602-617.
  35. Tyler, Tom R., 2021. Legal Socialization: Back to the Future. Journal of Social Issues, 77: 663-676. 10.1111/josi.12456
  36. Van Lancker, Wim, & Zachary Parolin, 2020. COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: a social crisis in the making. The Lancet Public Health 5(5):243–244. 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30084-0
  37. Wolfe, Scott E., Kyle McLean & Travis C. Pratt, 2017. I Learned It by Watching You: Legal Socialization and the Intergenerational Transmission of Legitimacy Attitudes. British Journal of Criminology, 57: 1123-1143.

Anna Rosa Favretto, Cristina Calvi, Domenico Carbone, Manuel Finelli, "C’è stata un po’ di incoerenza.." Adolescenti e norme in tempo di pandemia in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 3/2022, pp 38-62, DOI: 10.3280/SD2022-003002