Early forms of accounting for sustainable development: The Grand Duchy of Tuscany in the XVI and XVII centuries

Titolo Rivista CONTABILITÀ E CULTURA AZIENDALE
Autori/Curatori Michele Bigoni, Zeila Occhipinti
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2023/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 25 P. 9-33 Dimensione file 139 KB
DOI 10.3280/CCA2023-002002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Introduction: The paper explores early forms of accounting for sustainable development by considering the Grand Duchy of Tuscany when it was under the rule of Cosimo I, Francesco I, Ferdinando I and Cosimo II de Medici. Aim of the work: The study shows how accounting practices were crucial means used by the Medici rulers to monitor the implementation of far-reaching environmental strategies that sought to balance civil and economic development with the need to protect the environment. Methodological approach: The work draws upon primary sources located at the State Archive of Pisa. Their interpretation has been informed by the literature that has explored the role of the State in promoting sustainable development and the place of accounting in this endeavour. Main findings: Accounting provided the Grand Dukes with crucial information on the Pisan territory, which enabled them to act on environmental matters to provide citizens with healthy and safe living conditions. Written information also allowed interventions that shaped the way in which citizens engaged with the environment so that human activity would not endanger natural resources. Originality: The paper offers a novel perspective on how accounting can support interventions by States which seek to promote sustainable development. It also provides evidence of very early forms of environmental accounting that were mobilised by a State which deeply cared for safeguarding nature.

Keywords:accounting, sustainability, Grand Duchy of Tuscany, power, state, Pisa.

  1. State Archive of Pisa (AsP), collection Fiumi e Fossi (AFF)
  2. Deposit 10, Book of Decisions and Deliberations (Libro di Partiti e Deliberationi), 1568-1569.
  3. Deposit 30, Book of Decisions and Deliberations (Libro di Partiti e Deliberationi), 1601-1603.
  4. Deposit 454, Pine Tree Inventory (Campione de Pini), 1610-1621. Deposit 455, Requests for lifting the Servitù dei Pini, 1611.
  5. Cantini L. (1808). Legislazione toscana raccolta e illustrata. Stamperia Albizziniana per Pietro Fantosini e figlio.
  6. Adler R., Mansi M., Pandey R. (2021). The houbara bustard: a thematic analysis of a bird’s threatened extinction and a government’s accountability failure. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(5): 1190-1219. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-07-2019-4113
  7. Ascui F., Lovell H. (2011). As frames collide: Making sense of carbon accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 24(8): 978999. DOI: 10.1108/09513571111184724
  8. Atkins J., Grabsch, C., Jones M. (2014). Corporate biodiversity reporting: Exploring its anthropocentric nature. In: Jones M. (Ed.), Accounting for biodiversity. London: Routledge, 215-244.
  9. Atkins J., Maroun W. (2020). The Naturalist’s Journals of Gilbert White: exploring the roots of accounting for biodiversity and extinction accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 33(8): 1835-1870. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2450
  10. Jones M. (1996). Accounting for biodiversity: A pilot study. British Accounting Review, 28(4): 281-303.
  11. Atkins J., McBride K. (2022). “Fumifugium: Or the inconvenience of the Aer and Smoake of London Dissipated”: emancipatory social accounting in 17th century London. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 35(5): 1262-1286. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-01-2021-5108
  12. Atkins J., Thomson I. (2014). Accounting for biodiversity in nineteenth century Britain. In Jones M. (Ed.), Accounting for Biodiversity. Routledge, 267-286. Baldini M.B. (1578). Vita di Cosimo Medici, I Granduca di Toscana. Stamperia di Bartolomeo Sermartelli.
  13. Ball A. (2005). Environmental accounting and change in UK local government. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(3): 346-373. DOI: 10.1108/09513570510600738
  14. Ball A., Craig R. (2010). Using neo-institutionalism to advance social and environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(4): 283-293.
  15. Barut M., Raar J., Azim M.I. (2016). Biodiversity and local government: a reporting and accountability perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(2): 197-227. DOI: 10.1108/MAJ-08-2014-1082
  16. Bebbington J., Larrinaga C. (2014). Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6): 395-413.
  17. Bebbington, J. and Unerman, J. (2020). Advancing research into accounting and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 33(7), pp. 1657-1670. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-05-20204556
  18. Bigoni M., Funnell W., Verona R., Deidda Gagliardo E. (2018). Accounting and raison d’État in the Grand Duchy of Tuscany: Reopening the University of Pisa (1543-1609). Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 56: 1-19.
  19. Bigoni M., Lazzini S., Occhipinti Z., Verona R. (2022). Environmental accounting and state power in the Grand Duchy of Tuscany (1537-1621). Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, -available at: DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2021-5572
  20. Bigoni M., Mohammed S. (2023). Critique is unsustainable: a polemic. Critical Perspectives on Accounting.
  21. Cantini L. (1808), Legislazione toscana raccolta e illustrata. Stamperia Albizziniana per Pietro Fantosini e figlio.
  22. Cho C.H., Senn J., Sobkowiak M. (2022). Sustainability at stake during COVID19: Exploring the role of accounting in addressing environmental crises. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 82, 102327.
  23. Crowther D., Carter C., Cooper S. (2006). The poetics of corporate reporting: Evidence from the UK water industry. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17(2-3): 175-201.
  24. Cuckston T. (2018). Making extinction calculable. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 31(3): 849-874. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-10-2015-2264
  25. Diaz F. (1976). Il granducato di Toscana: I Medici. Torino: Utet.
  26. Eckersley R. (1992). Environmentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach. London: UCL Press.
  27. Fasano Guarini E. (1973). Lo Stato Mediceo di Cosimo I. Firenze: Sansoni Editore.
  28. Fiaschi R. (1998). Le Magistrature Pisane delle Acque. Pisa: Industrie Grafiche Lischi e Figli.
  29. Funnell W.N. (1998). Accounting in the service of the holocaust. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 9(4): 435-464. 30(7): 1614-1638. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2367
  30. Gasperini M., Greco G., Noferi M., Taglialagamba S. (2015). Il Principe, la città, l’acqua. L’acquedotto mediceo di Pisa. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.
  31. Gray R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability...and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1): 47-62.
  32. Khlif W., Karoui L., Ingley C. (2022). Systemic sustainability: toward an organic model of governance – a research note. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(1): 11-25.
  33. Kuckartz U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: a guide to methods, practice and using software. Los Angeles: Sage.
  34. Lai A., Panfilo S., Stacchezzini R. (2019). The governmentality of corporate (un)sustainability: the case of the ILVA steel plant in Taranto (Italy). Journal of Management and Governance, 23(1): 67-109.
  35. Larrinaga C., Bebbington J. (2001). Accounting change or institutional appropriation? A case study of the implementation of environmental accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(3): 269-292.
  36. Lohmann L. (2009). Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: The cases of carbon and cost-benefit. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3-4): 499-534.
  37. Magliacani M. (2022). How the sustainable development goals challenge public management. Action research on the cultural heritage of an Italian smart city. Journal of Management and Governance, -available at:
  38. Napier C.J. (2006). Accounts of change: 30 years of historical accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4-5): 445-507.
  39. Quinn M., Moreno A., Bhatta B. (2022). Accountability and accounting for fisheries six decades of reporting by the Electricity Supply Board of Ireland, 1935-1993. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, -available at: DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2021-5573
  40. Rimmel G., Jonäll K. (2013). Biodiversity reporting in Sweden: Corporate
  41. disclosure and preparers’ views. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26(5): 746-778. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-02-2013-1228
  42. Russell S.L., Thomson I. (2009). Analysing the role of sustainable development indicators in accounting for and constructing a Sustainable Scotland. Accounting Forum, 33(3): 225-244.
  43. Sobkowiak M., Cuckston T., Thomson, I. (2020). Framing sustainable development challenges: accounting for SDG-15 in the UK. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 33(7): 1671-1703. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ01-2019-3810
  44. Solomon J.F., Thomson I. (2009). Satanic Mills? An illustration of Victorian external environmental accounting. Accounting Forum, 33(1): 74-87.
  45. Thomson I. (2007). Mapping the terrain of sustainability accounting. In Unerman J., Bebbington J., O’Dwyer, B. (Eds.), Sustainability Accounting and Accountability. London: Routledge, 19-37.
  46. Thomson I., Grubnic S., Georgakopoulos G. (2014). Exploring accountingsustainability hybridisation in the UK public sector. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6): 453-476.
  47. Unerman J., Chapman C. (2014). Academic contributions to enhancing accounting for sustainable development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6): 385-394.
  48. Vollmer H. (2021). Public value and the planet: accounting in ecological reconstitution. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(7): 1527-1554. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-11-2019-4283
  49. Weir K. (2018). The purposes, promises and compromises of extinction accounting in the UK public sector. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 31(3): 875-899. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-03-2016-2494
  50. Weir K. (2019). The logics of biodiversity accounting in the UK public sector. Accounting Forum, 43(3): 348-379. DOI: 10.1080/01559982.2019.1605873

Michele Bigoni, Zeila Occhipinti, Early forms of accounting for sustainable development: The Grand Duchy of Tuscany in the XVI and XVII centuries in "CONTABILITÀ E CULTURA AZIENDALE" 2/2023, pp 9-33, DOI: 10.3280/CCA2023-002002