Welcoming territories? The accessibility of Extraordinary Reception Centers in Italian metropolitan cities

Author/s Luca Daconto, Luca Bottini, Simone Caiello
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2024/133
Language Italian Pages 13 P. 104-116 File size 166 KB
DOI 10.3280/SUR2024-133007
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The article presents an analysis of the accessibility of extraordinary reception centers in Italian metropolitan cities with the aim of detecting potential inequalities and risks of exclusion linked to the phenomena of peripheralisation, marginalization and invisibilisation of the recep-tion system and policies in Italy. Thanks to the availability of original data on the universe of CAS in different time periods, the results have allowed us to highlight the impact of policy changes and policies on accessibility and the characteristics of the reception system in Italy.

Keywords: asylum seekers, reception systems, CAS, accessibility, GIS, metropolitan cities

  1. Ambrosini M. (2013). ‘We are against a multi-ethnic society’: policies of exclusion at the urban level in Italy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(1): 136-55. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2011.644312
  2. Ambrosini M. (2021). The Urban Governance of Asylum as a “Battleground”: Policies of Exclusion and Efforts of Inclusion in Italian Towns. Geographical Review, 111(2): 187-205. DOI: 10.1080/00167428.2020.1735938
  3. Aru S. (2017). Spazi d’asilo. Il sistema di accoglienza in Italia tra norme e politiche alle diverse scale territoriali. Geotema, 61: 34-40.
  4. Bauder H. (2017). Sanctuary Cities: Policies and Practices in International Perspective. International Migration, 55(2): 174-187.
  5. Bauder H. (2021). Urban Solidarity: Perspectives of Migration and Refugee Accommodation and Inclusion. Critical Sociology, 47(6): 875-889. DOI: 10.1177/0896920520936332
  6. Bazurli R., de Graauw E. (2023). Explaining variation in city sanctuary policies: Insights from American and European cities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49(14): 3649-3670. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2023.2198811
  7. Bini V., Gambazza G. (2019). The Reception of Asylum Seekers in Urban Areas: The Case of the City of Milan. Belgeo. Revue Belge de Géographie, 1.
  8. Boffi M. (2012). Metodo e misurazione dell’accessibilità urbana. In Castrignanò M., Colleoni M., Pronello C. (a cura di). Muoversi in città. Accessibilità e mobilità nella metropoli contemporanea. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  9. Bottini L., Caiello S., Daconto L., Giunti S. (2022). The localization models of secondary reception structures for refugees and asylum seekers in Italy. First results from the MIGRATE project. In Bergamaschi M. (ed.), The multidimensional housing deprivation. Local dynamics of inequality, policies and challenges for the future. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  10. Bozorgmehr K., Razum O., Szecsenyi J., Maier W., Stock C. (2017). Regional deprivation is associated with the distribution of vulnerable asylum seekers: a nationwide small area analysis in Germany. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 71: 857-862.
  11. Campo F., Giunti S., Mendola M. (2021). The Refugee Crisis and Right-Wing Populism: Evidence from the Italian Dispersal Policy. IZA Discussion Paper, 14084.
  12. Campomori F., Ambrosini M. (2020). Multilevel governance in trouble: the implementation of asylum seekers’ reception in Italy as a battleground. Comparative Migration Studies, 8(1): 22.
  13. Castles S., Miller M.J. (2012). L’era delle migrazioni. Popoli in movimento nel mondo contemporaneo. Bologna: Odoya.
  14. Cittadinanza Attiva (2016). Incastrati - iniziative civiche sulla gestione dei centri di accoglienza straordinaria per richiedenti asilo. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.cittadinanzattiva.it/files/primo_piano/giustizia/inCAStrati-report.pdf (consultato il 31/05/2023)
  15. Daams M.N., Proietti P., Veneri, P. (2019). The effect of asylum seeker reception centers on nearby house prices: Evidence from The Netherlands. Journal of Housing Economics, 46: 101658.
  16. Darling J. (2021). Refugee urbanism: seeing asylum “like a city”. Urban Geography, 42(7): 894-914. DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2020.1763611
  17. Declich F., Pitzalis S. (2021). Presenza migrante tra spazi urbani e non urbani. Etnografie su processi, dinamiche e modalità di accoglienza. Roma: Meltemi.
  18. Dekker R., Emilsson H., Krieger B., Scholten P. (2015). A Local Dimension of Integration Policies? A Comparative Study of Berlin, Malmö, and Rotterdam. International Migration Review, 49(3): 633-658.
  19. Della Puppa F., Sanò G. (eds.) (2021). Stuck and Exploited. Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Italy Between Exclusion, Discrimination and Struggles. Venezia: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.
  20. Dustmann C., Schönberg U., Stuhler J. (2016). The Impact of Immigration: Why Do Studies Reach Such Different Results?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(4): 31-56.
  21. Eurostat (2018, 2020). Asylum and managed migration database. EU 27, 2008-2019.
  22. Farrington J., Farrington C. (2005). Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: towards conceptualisation. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1): 1-12.
  23. Geurs K.T., van Wee B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2): 127-140.
  24. Giovannetti M. (2018). Riconosciuti e ‘diniegati’: dietro i numeri le persone. Questione Giustizia, 2. -- Testo disponibile al sito: http://questionegiustizia.it/rivista/2018/2/riconosciuti-e-diniegati-dietro-i-numeri-lepersone_533.php.
  25. Kaufmann V., Bergman M.M., Joye D. (2004). Motility: mobility as capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(4): 745-756.
  26. Kreichauf R., Glorius B. (2021). Introduction: displacement, asylum and the city – theoretical approaches and empirical findings. Urban Geography, 42(7): 869-893. DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2021.1978220
  27. Lichter D.T., Parisi D., Ambinakudige S. (2020). The Spatial Integration of Immigrants in Europe: A Cross-National Study. Population Research and Policy Review, 39(3): 465-491.
  28. Marchetti C. (2020). (Un)Deserving refugees: Contested access to the ‘community of value’ in Italy. In Goździak E.M., Main I., Suter B. (eds). Europe and the Refugee Response. A Crisis of Values?. London - New York: Routledge.
  29. Martens K. (2016). Transport Justice: Designing Fair Transportation Systems. New York - Abingdon: Routledge.
  30. Novak P. (2021). Deservingness and Uneven Geographies of Asylum Accommodation. Social Policy and Society, 20(3): 452-463. DOI: 10.1017/S1474746420000779
  31. OpenPolis, ActionAid (2021). Centri d’Italia 2021. Una mappa dell’accoglienza. Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.actionaid.it/informati/pubblicazioni/centri-italia-2021 (consultato il 31/05/2023).
  32. Papatzani E., Psallidaki T., Kandylis G., Micha I. (2022). Multiple Geographies of Precarity: Accommodation Policies for Asylum Seekers in Metropolitan Athens, Greece. European Urban and Regional Studies, 29(2): 189-203. DOI: 10.1177/09697764211040742
  33. Proietti P., Veneri P. (2021). The Location of Hosted Asylum Seekers in OECD Regions and Cities. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(1): 1243-1268.
  34. Rajé F., Grieco M., Hine J., Preston J. (eds). (2004). Transport, demand management and social exclusion. The need for ethnic perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  35. Sanyal R. (2012). Refugees and the City: An Urban Discussion. Geography Compass, 6(11): 633-644.
  36. UNHCR (2009). Media advisory: half of the world’s refugees now live in cities. -- Testo disponibile al sito: http://www.unhcr.org/4b1cda0e9.html (consultato 31/05/2023).
  37. Zill M., van Liempt I., Spierings B., Hooimeijer P. (2020). Uneven geographies of asylum accommodation: Conceptualizing the impact of spatial, material, and institutional differences on (un)familiarity between asylum seekers and local residents. Migration Studies, 8(4): 491-509.

Luca Daconto, Luca Bottini, Simone Caiello, Territori accoglienti? L’accessibilità dei centri di accoglienza straordinaria nelle città metropolitane italiane in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 133/2024, pp 104-116, DOI: 10.3280/SUR2024-133007