Income inequality and CO2 emissions nexus: A long-run analysis for Turkey

Titolo Rivista ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Autori/Curatori Kemal Erkisi
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2024/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 21 P. 171-191 Dimensione file 319 KB
DOI 10.3280/EFE2024-001010
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

The relationship between economic factors and environmental impacts is of paramount significance in the pursuit of sustainable development and the implementation of effective measures to alleviate environmental deterioration. This research utilizes the VECM, FMOLS, CCR, and DOLS methodologies to examine the relationship between income inequality and CO2 emissions spanning from 1990 to 2022 in Turkey. Theoretical frameworks such as Boyce’s socio-economic dynamics, Veblen’s pecuniary emulation theory, and the marginal propensity to emit provide detailed insights into the complex relationship between economic inequality and environmental degradation. In synthesizing the literature on income inequality and CO2 emissions, we observe a wide spectrum of findings ranging from positive to negative associations, with some studies yielding inconclusive results in different nations and areas. Beyond income inequality, this research considers a wider range of CO2 explanatory factors, such as GDP per capita, industrial value added, energy consumption, renewable energy, population density, and the Gini index. The estimates reveal that income per capita, industrial value added, energy consumption, and population density show positive linkages with CO2 emissions. On the other hand, renewable energy share and income inequality reflect negative associations with CO2 emissions. Notably, an increase in the Gini coefficient, reflecting worse income distribution, is associated with a reduction in CO2 emissions in Turkey.

Keywords:carbon emissions, income inequality, economic growth, energy consumption, renewable energy.

Jel codes:Q53, Q56, O44, D31

  1. Andersson, F.N. (2023). Income inequality and carbon emissions in the United States 1929- 2019. Ecological Economics, 204, 107633.
  2. Baek, J. and Gweisah, G. (2013). Does income inequality harm the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States. Energy Policy, 62, 1434-1437.
  3. Bagwell, L.S., Bernheim, B.D. (1996). Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consump- tion. American Economic Review, 86(3), 349-373.
  4. Baloch, M.A., Danish, Khan, S.U.D., Ulucak, Z.S., Ahmad, A. (2020). Analyzing the rela- tionship between poverty, income inequality, and CO2 emission in Sub-Saharan African countries. Science of the Total Environment, 740.
  5. Belaïd, F., Boubaker, S., Kafrouni, R. (2020). Carbon emissions, income inequality and envi- ronmental degradation: The case of Mediterranean countries. European Journal of Com- parative Economics, 17(1), 73-102. DOI: 10.25428/1824-2979/202001-73-102
  6. Berthe, A., Elie, L. (2015). Mechanisms explaining the impact of economic inequality on environmental deterioration. Ecological Economics, 116, 191-200.
  7. Boyce, J.K. (1994). Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecological Econom- ics, 11(3), 169-178. DOI: 10.1016/0921-8009(94)90198-8
  8. Brockwell, P.J. and Davis, R.A. (2016). Introduction to Time Series and Forecasting (3rd ed.). Springer.
  9. Chu, L.K. and Hoang, D.P. (2023). The interaction of income inequality and urbanization in affecting environmental quality: International evidence. Australasian Journal of Environ- mental Management, 30(2), 215-241. DOI: 10.1080/14486563.2023.2224749
  10. Dada, J.T., Ajide, F.M. and Arnaut, M. (2023). Income inequality, shadow economy and en- vironmental degradation in Africa: quantile regression via moment’s approach. Interna- tional Journal of Development Issues, 22(2), 214-240. 0958305X18793109.
  11. Dorn, F., Maxand, S. and Kneib, T. (2021). The dependence between income inequality and carbon emissions: A distributional copula analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal.
  12. Engle, R.F. and Granger, C.W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 55(2), 251-276. DOI: 10.2307/1913236
  13. Grossman, G. and Krueger, A. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER Working Paper Series, 3914.
  14. Grunewald, N., Klasen, S., Martínez-Zarzoso, I. and Muris, C. (2017). The Trade-off between income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions. Ecological Economics, 142, 249-256.
  15. Gujarati, D.N. and Porter, D.C. (2018). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill Education.
  16. Guo, Q., Ahmad, W., Sofuoğlu, E. and Abbas, S. (2023). Testing the equity-pollution di- lemma from a global perspective: Does reducing consumption inequality impose environ- mental burdens? Gondwana Research, 122, 125-137.
  17. Hailemariam, A., Dzhumashev, R. and Shahbaz, M. (2019). Carbon emissions, income ine- quality and economic development. Empirical Economics, 59(3), 1139-1159.
  18. Hansen, B.E. (1999). Threshold Effects in Non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and in- ference. Journal of Econometrics, 93(2), 345-368.Huang, Z. and Duan, H. (2020). Estimating the threshold interactions between income ine- quality and carbon emissions. Journal of Environmental Management, 263, 110393.
  19. International Energy Agency – IEA (2023). SDG7 Database [Share of modern renewables data set]. IEA. Retrieved from -- https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/ sdg7-database.
  20. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dy- namics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
  21. Kasuga, H. and Takaya, M. (2017). Does inequality affect environmental quality? Evidence from major Japanese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3689-3701.
  22. Khan, A.Q., Saleem, N. and Fatima, S.T. (2018). Financial development, income inequality, and CO2 emissions in Asian countries using STIRPAT model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(7), 6308-6319.
  23. Liu, C., Jiang, Y., Xie, R. (2019). Does income inequality facilitate carbon emission reduction in the US? Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 380-387.
  24. Liu, Q., Wang, S., Zhang, W. and Li, J. (2018). Income distribution and environmental quality in China: A spatial econometric perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 14-26.
  25. Marinucci, N. and Ivanovski, K. (2023). Does inequality affect climate change? A regional and sectoral analysis. Social Indicators Research, 166(3), 705-729.
  26. Padhan, H., Haouas, I., Sahoo, B. and Heshmati, A. (2019). What matters for environmental quality in the Next Eleven Countries: economic growth or income inequality? Environ- mental Science and Pollution Research, 26(22), 23129-23148.
  27. Presberger, D. and Bernauer, T. (2023). Economic and political drivers of environmental im- pact shifting between countries. Global Environmental Change, 79, 102637.
  28. Ravallion, M. (2000). Carbon emissions and income inequality. Oxford Economic Papers, 52(4), 651-669.
  29. Uzar, U. and Eyuboglu, K. (2022). Does income inequality increase the ecological footprint in the US: evidence from FARDL test? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(4), 9514-9529.
  30. Wang, Q., Li, L. and Li, R. (2023). Uncovering the impact of income inequality and popula- tion aging on carbon emission efficiency: An empirical analysis of 139 countries. Science of the Total Environment, 857, 159508.
  31. World Bank (2023). World Development Indicators databank. Retrieved from World Devel- opment Indicators | DataBank (worldbank.org).
  32. Zhao, J., Dong, K. and Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2023). Moving Towards Sustainable Devel- opment: Can Narrowing Income Inequality Facilitate Green Growth in China?, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 25(02).

Kemal Erkisi, Income inequality and CO2 emissions nexus: A long-run analysis for Turkey in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 1/2024, pp 171-191, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2024-001010