Critical feminism to re-imagine a gendered narrative in organizational development

Journal title EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES
Author/s Marica Liotino, Monica Fedeli, Burcu Simsek
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2024/1
Language Italian Pages 19 P. 29-47 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/erp1-2024oa18280
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The contribution focuses on the growing research on Diversity Management (DM) and its implications for gender equity, particularly in the Italian context. Although DM is recognized as a vital strategic choice for organizations globally, its development in Italy takes a predominant focus on issues regarding the female workforce. In fact, despite being generally more educated than men, women face lower employment rates, which further narrow with an increase in the number of children, and tend to have lower income due to the precariousness of their employment contracts, gender imbalance in economic sectors, and limited opportunities for advancement. Within the theoretical framework, critical feminism focuses on dismantling patriarchal organizational structures, emphasizing reflection on privilege, structural reform for emancipation, increased gender awareness, and the reconstruction of solidarity. Simultaneously, social constructionism, rooted in the formulation of claims and narrative analysis, underscores the contextual and interactive nature of issues. Previous studies highlight the need for a contextual understanding of DM approaches, and it is in this regard that the present research aims to contribute. The study employs narrative inquiry to understand perceptions of gender equity in organizations in Vicenza. Fifteen semi-structured interviews with human resource managers and/or union representatives will explore policies and organizational practices promoting gender equity. Subsequently, three digital storytelling workshops will be organized with staff from organizations demonstrating virtuous practices, allowing them to share their experiences. This effort aims to examine and disseminate organizational models for improving gender equity practiced by businesses in Vicenza. The research aims to contribute to developing greater awareness and understanding of gender equity in Vicenza’s organizations and to provide insights and tools for promoting positive organizational change.

Keywords: ; Constructionism; Critical feminism; Organizational processes; Gender equality; Narrative inquiry

  1. Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a Feminist Life. Duke University Press.
  2. Andrews, M. (2007). Shaping History: Narratives of Political Change. Cambridge University Press.
  3. Andrews, M., Squire, C. and Tamboukou, M. (Eds) (2013). Doing Narrative Research, 2nd ed., Sage.
  4. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. University of Minnesota Press.
  5. Bakhtin, M. M. (2010). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press.
  6. Barkhuizen, Gary; Benson, Phil; Chik, Alice (2014). Narrative Inquiry in Language Teaching and Learning Research. New York: Routledge.
  7. Bierema, L. L., Sim, E., He, W., & Cox, A. B. (2022). Double jeopardy: the paradox and promise of coaching women leaders from a critical feminist perspective. Gender in Management: An International Journal, (ahead-of-print).
  8. Bierema, L.L. (2017). No woman left behind: critical leadership development to build gender consciousness and transform organizations. In Madsen, S.R. (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Gender and Leadership (pp. 145-162). Edward Elgar.
  9. Bonaiuti, G., Calvani, A., & Ranieri, M. (2017). Fondamenti di didattica: teoria e prassi dei dispositivi formativi. Carocci.
  10. Buemi, M., Guazzo, G., Conte, M. (2015). Il Diversity Management per una crescita inclusiva: strategie e strumenti. FrancoAngeli.
  11. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
  12. Camera Di Commercio Vicenza. (23 Gennaio, 2024). Conoscere Vicenza 2023: guida statistica della provincia di Vicenza. https://www.vi.camcom.it/it/servizi/studi-statistica-e-ricerca-economica/conoscere-vicenza.html.
  13. Chase S.E. (2018). Narrative Inquiry: towards theoretical and Methodological maturity. In Lincoln, Y. S., & N. K. Denzin. The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5. edition). Sage.
  14. Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2004). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. John Wiley & Sons.
  15. Santoni C. & Crespi I. (2022). Conciliazione famiglia e lavoro tra smart-working e diversity management. Una riflessione su pratiche e nuove semantiche. Autonomie locali e servizi sociali, 1, pp. 45-66. DOI: 10.1447/104028
  16. Colella, F., & Di Lorenzo, S. (2023). Diversità, inclusione e innovazione sociale nei sistemi organizzativi complessi: Una riflessione critica sulla Gender Diversity intersezionale in Italia. Mondi Migranti, 2, pp. 21-37. DOI: 10.3280/MM2023-002002
  17. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge.
  18. Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, (1), pp. 139-167.
  19. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), pp. 1241-1299.
  20. Davis, A. Y. (1981). Women, race, & class. Vintage Books.
  21. De Simone, S., Agus, M., Lasio, D., & Serri, F. (2018). Development and validation of a measure of work-family interface. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 34(3), pp. 169-179.
  22. De Vita L., & Magliocco, A. (2018). Effects of gender quotas in Italy: A first impact assessment in the Italian banking sector. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 38(7-8), pp. 673-694. DOI: 10.1108/IJSSP-11-2017-0150
  23. Di Fabio, A. (2016). Diversity Management Questionnaire: Primo contributo alla versione italiana. Counseling, 9, 0-0.
  24. Esin, C., Fathi, M., & Squire, C. (2014). Narrative analysis: The constructionist approach. In U. Flick (Ed.). Handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 203-216). Sage.
  25. Ferrara, M. D. (2019). Lavoro femminile e diversity management tra mediazione sindacale e nuove opportunità del lavoro agile. Politiche del Lavoro, pp. 103-128.
  26. Filippi, S., Peters, K., & Suitner, C. (2023). Power to the people: A social identity perspective on organizational decentralization and employee well‐being. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology.
  27. Flick, U. (2013). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. SAGE Publications Limited.
  28. Gay V., Santacreu-Vasut E., Shoham A. (2013). The Grammatical Origins of Gender Roles. Berkeley Economic History Laboratory. hal-04046900.
  29. Geldsetzer, L. (1983). Che Cos’è l’ermeneutica?. Rivista di Filosofia neoscolastica, 75(4), pp. 594-622.
  30. Gergen, K. (1995). Social construction and the educational process. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale. Constructivism in education, (pp. 17-39). Routledge.
  31. Godino, A. (2006). Costruttivismo, filosofia e psicologia – Editoriale. Psychofenia, 9, pp. 7-11.
  32. Goodson, I. F., & Gill, S. R. (2011). The Narrative Turn in Social Research. Counterpoints, 386, pp. 17-33. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42981362.
  33. Guarascio C., Musumeci R., & Villa P. (2023). Il Contesto Macro: Cambiamenti Legislativi e Disparità di Genere. In Naldini, M., & Poggio, B. Genere e accademia. Carriere, culture e politiche (pp. 35-62). il Mulino.
  34. Harel, I., Papert, S. (eds) (1991). Constructionism. Ablex.
  35. Harris, C., Rousseau, G. G., & Venter, D. L. J. (2007). Employee perceptions of diversity management at a tertiary institution. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 10(1), pp. 51-71.
  36. Hartley, J., & McWilliam, K. (2009). Computational power meets human contact. Story circle: Digital storytelling around the world, pp. 1-15.
  37. Herdam, A.O. and McMillan-Capehart, A. (2010). Establishing a diversity program is not enough: exploring the determinants of diversity climate. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(1), pp. 39-53.
  38. hooks, B. (1984). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. South End Press.
  39. hooks, B. (2000). Feminism is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. South End Press.
  40. Istat (2020). The life of women and men in Europe. https://www.istat.it/donne-uomini/index.html?lang=it.
  41. Istat (2023). Rapporto Bes 2022: il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia. (2023, December 3). https://www.istat.it/it/archivio/282920.
  42. Jonsen, K., Maznevski, M. L., & Schneider, S. C. (2011). Special Review Article: Diversity and it’s not so diverse literature: An international perspective. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 11(1), pp. 35-62. DOI: 10.1177/1470595811398798
  43. Lambert, J. (2013). Digital Storytelling: Capturing Lives, Creating Community. Routledge.
  44. Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
  45. Manello, A., Falavigna, G., Isaia, E., & Rossi, M. C. (2023). Female top managers and credit risk: Evidence from Italian firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 23(6), pp. 1379-1403. DOI: 10.1108/CG-03-2022-0092
  46. Miller, G., & Holstein, J. (1989), On the sociology of social problems. In Miller, G. e Holstein, J. (a cura di), Perspectives on Social Problems (pp. 1-16). JAI Press.
  47. Mintzberg, H. (1981). Organization design: fashion or fit?. Harvard Bisiness Review, January-February. https://hbr.org/1981/01/organization-design-fashion-or-fit.
  48. Mittiga, S. (2018). Il valore educativo del digital storytelling. Media Education, 9(2), pp. 308-328.
  49. Mohanty, C. T. (1984). Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Feminist Review, 30, pp. 61-88.
  50. Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2012). The competition-performance relation: A meta-analytic review and test of the opposing processes model of competition and performance. Psychological bulletin, 138(6), 1035.
  51. Nichols, L. T. (2003). Voices of social problems: A dialogical constructionist model. In Studies in Symbolic Interaction (pp. 93-123). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  52. Olsen, J. E., & Martins, L. L. (2012). Understanding organizational diversity management programs: A theoretical framework and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational behavior, 33(8), pp. 1168-1187.
  53. Pagano, R. (2009). La scientificità della pedagogia ermeneutica. La scientificità della pedagogia ermeneutica, pp. 79-88.
  54. Palumbo, R., & Manna, R. (2019). A portrait of workplace discrimination in Italy: Empirical evidence from a nationwide survey. Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 8(1), pp. 92-112. DOI: 10.1108/EBHRM-03-2019-0029
  55. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books. Trad. It. Mindstorms. Bambini computer e creatività. Emme, 1984.
  56. Papert, S. (1986). Constructionism: A new opportunity for elementary science education. NSF Grant Application.
  57. Parks, J. B., & Roberton, M. A. (2000). Development and validation of an instru-ment to measure attitudes toward sexist/nonsexist language. Sex Roles, 42, pp. 415-438.
  58. Poggio, B., Murgia, A., & De Bon, M. (2010). Interventi organizzativi e politiche di genere. Carocci.
  59. Ravazzani, S. (2016). Understanding approaches to managing diversity in the workplace: An empirical investigation in Italy. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 35(2), pp. 154-168. DOI: 10.1108/EDI-08-2014-0062
  60. Ravazzani, S., Mazzei, A., Fisichella, C., & Butera, A. (2021). Diversity and inclusion management: an analysis of practice developments in Italy. Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 39(3), pp. 213-229.
  61. Razetti F., Santoni V. (2019), Il mercato del welfare aziendale: l’intermediazione e il ruolo dei provider. In Maino F., Ferrera M. (a cura di) (2019). Nuove Alleanze per un welfare che cambia. Quarto Rapporto sul secondo welfare in Italia (pp. 119-152). Giappichelli.
  62. Riessman, C. K. (2002). Analysis of personal narratives. In J. F. Gubrium & Hol-stein J. A. (eds). Handbook of Interview Research (pp. 695-710). Sage.
  63. Scarinci, A. (2011). Digital storytelling: un’applicazione didattica per ripensare ai media attraverso i media.
  64. Schreier M. (2013). Qualitative Content Analysis. In U. Flick, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (pp. 170-183). Sage.
  65. Simsek, B. (2012). Enhancing Women’s Participation in Turkey through Digital Storytelling. Culture Science, 5(2), pp. 28-44.
  66. Simsek, B. (2016). Neoliberal Burdens for Women in Academy: “How Dare We Not Work”. Kadın/Women2000, 17(1), pp. 51-72.
  67. Snowden D (2010) Naturalizing Sensemaking’. In Mosier, K. L., & Fischer, U. M. (Eds.). Informed by knowledge: expert performance in complex situations (pp. 223-234). Psychology Press.
  68. Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (2017). Constructing social problems. Routledge.
  69. Tamboukou, M. (2008). A Foucauldian approach to narratives. In M Andrews et al. (eds). Doing Narrative Research (pp. 102-120). Sage.
  70. Trinchero, R. (2002). Manuale di ricerca educativa. FrancoAngeli. https://books.google.it/books?id=gu_t585nAPkC.
  71. Varisco, B.M. (2002). Costruttivismo socio culturale. Carocci.
  72. Wells, K. (2011). Narrative inquiry. Pocket Guides to Social Work Research Methods. Oxford University Press.

Marica Liotino, Monica Fedeli, Burcu Simsek, Il femminismo critico per re-immaginare una narrativa di genere nello sviluppo organizzativo in "EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES" 1/2024, pp 29-47, DOI: 10.3280/erp1-2024oa18280