The Interaction of Sustainability Governance Structure and Sustainability Management Control Systems: An Italian Case Study

Titolo Rivista MANAGEMENT CONTROL
Autori/Curatori Silvia Cantele, Silvia Valcozzena, Bettina Campedelli, Chiara de’ Stefani, Marco De Luca
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2024/2 Suppl.
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 22 P. 53-74 Dimensione file 314 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2024-002-S1004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This study aims to analyze sustainability governance mechanisms and understand which roles and responsibilities fall under a governance system, as well as the pro-cesses of integrating sustainability into management control systems. Qualitative research focused on the case study analysis of SIT. Interviews were conducted with key figures within the firm regarding roles and responsibilities in sustainability issues to address the peculiarities related to sustainability governance design and implementation and to delve into the role of sustainability management control systems. Several documents were also analyzed: sustainability reports, sustainabil-ity plans, corporate monographs, and questionnaires related to participation in sustainability ratings and awards. Based on a review of the literature on corporate governance and the integration of corporate sustainability into it, including the analysis of previous studies on sus-tainability management control systems, this study found that good sustainability governance and a coherent sustainability management control system play a key role. They provide support in decision-making, enable the implementation of stra-tegic objectives consistent with sustainability targets, identify actions and best practices for effective improvement in sustainability performance, and enable the firm to pursue sustainable success. From a practical point of view, this case study represents a good example of how sustainability can permeate all business pro-cesses, thus providing opportunities for growth and continuous improvement.

Keywords:sustainability governance, sustainability management control, sus-tainability committee, corporate sustainability director, case study

  1. Adams C. A., Larrinaga-Gonzalez C. (2007), Engaging with organizations in pursuit of improved sustainability accounting and performance, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(3), pp. 333-55. DOI: 10.1108/09513570710748535
  2. Aras G., Crowther D. (2008), Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability, Management Decision, 46(3), pp. 433-448. DOI: 10.1108/00251740810863870
  3. Ashrafi M., Acciaro M., Walker T. R., Magnan G. M., Adams M. (2019), Corporate sustainability in Canadian and US maritime ports, Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, pp. 386-397.
  4. Bansal P., Song H. C. (2017), Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility, Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), pp. 105-149.
  5. Baumgartner R. J., Ebner D. (2010), Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels, Sustainable Development, 18(2), pp. 76-89.
  6. Bocken N., Short S., Rana P., Evans S. (2013), A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling, Corporate Governance, 13(5), pp. 482-497.
  7. Comitato Corporate Governance (2020), Codice di corporate governance, Testo disponibile al sito: https://www.borsaitaliana.it/comitato-corporate-governance/codice/2020.pdf (consultato il 31.07. 2023).
  8. Danvila del Valle I., Esteban J. M. D., Pérez Ó. L. D. F. (2019), Corporate social responsibility and sustainability committee inside the board, European Journal of International Management, 13(2), pp. 159-176. DOI: 10.1504/EJIM.2019.098145
  9. De Graaf F. J., Stoelhorst J. W. (2013), The role of governance in corporate social responsibility: Lessons from Dutch finance, Business & Society, 52(2), pp. 282-317. DOI: 10.1177/0007650309336451
  10. Della Porta A., De Luca F., Aufiero C. (2023), “Radicare” la sostenibilità nella strategia attraverso i sistemi di management control: un caso di studio relativo ad una Pmi, Management Control, 2, pp. 43-68. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2023-002003
  11. De Villiers C., Rouse P., Kerr J. (2016), A new conceptual model of influences driving sustainability based on case evidence of the integration of corporate sustainability management control and reporting, Management Accounting, Control, and Reporting, 136, pp. 78-85.
  12. Ditillo A., Lisi I. E. (2016), Exploring sustainability control systems’ integration: The relevance of sustainability orientation, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2), pp. 125-148.
  13. D’Onza G. (2022), L’orientamento delle aziende ad uno sviluppo sostenibile: quale contributo da parte dei sistemi di management e controllo? Management Control, 1, pp. 5-15. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2022-001001.
  14. Dul, J., Hak, T. (2007), Case study methodology in business research. Routledge, pp. 1-295.
  15. Elmaghrabi M.E. (2021), CSR committee attributes and CSR performance: UK evidence, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(5), pp. 892-919. DOI: 10.1108/CG-01-2020-0036
  16. Enciso‐Alfaro S.Y., García‐Sánchez I. M. (2023), Corporate governance and environmental sustainability: Addressing the dual theme from a bibliometric approach, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), pp. 1025-1041.
  17. Fiorentino R., Garzella S., Lamboglia R., Mancini D. (2016), Strategie di sostenibilità: dalle motivazioni ai sistemi di misurazione della performance, Management Control, 2, pp. 115-142. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2016-002006
  18. Formentini M., Taticchi P. (2016), Corporate sustainability approaches and governance mechanisms in sustainable supply chain management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp. 1920-1933.
  19. Gaya, H. J., & Smith, E. E. (2016), Developing a qualitative single case study in the strategic management realm: An appropriate research design, International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research, 7(2), pp. 529-538.
  20. Godos-Díez J. L., Cabeza-García L., Alonso-Martínez D., Fernández-Gago R. (2018), Factors influencing board of directors’ decision-making process as determinants of CSR engagement, Review of Managerial Science, pp. 12(1), pp. 229-253.
  21. Gomm R., Foster P., Hammersley M. (2000), Case study method: Key issues, key texts, Case study method, pp. 98-115.
  22. Gond J.P., Grubnic S., Herzig C., Moon J. (2012), Configuring management control systems: Theorizing the integration of strategy and sustainability, Management Accounting Research, 23, pp. 205-223.
  23. Gubitta P., Campagnolo D. (2021), A tutta SIT. Il percorso di sviluppo di un’impresa familiare: Sostenibile, innovativa, tecnologica, pp. 1-151, Italy, McGraw-Hill Education (Italy) S.r.l.
  24. Heidingsfelder J. (2019), Private sustainability governance in the making – A case study analysis of the fragmentation of sustainability governance for the gold sector, Resources Policy, 63, pp. 1-17.
  25. Hillman A.J., Keim G.D., Luce R.A. (2001), Board composition and stakeholder performance: Do stakeholder directors make a difference?, Business & Society, 40(3), pp. 295-315. DOI: 10.1177/000765030104000304
  26. Hosoda M. (2018), Management control systems and corporate social responsibility: perspectives from a Japanese small company, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(1), pp. 68-80. DOI: 10.1108/CG-05-2017-0105
  27. Hristov I., Chirico A., Ranalli F., Camilli R. (2022), La pianificazione della sostenibilità nelle aziende familiari: il ruolo dei key value drivers, Management Control, 3, pp. 109-134. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2022-003006
  28. https://www.sitcorporate.it/.
  29. https://www.sitcorporate.it/sostenibilita/governance-e-compliance/.
  30. https://www.sitcorporate.it/sostenibilita/introduzione/.
  31. https://www.sitcorporate.it/sostenibilita/made-to-matter/.
  32. https://www.sitcorporate.it/sostenibilita/materiali-a-supporto/.
  33. Landrum N. E. (2018), Stages of corporate sustainability: Integrating the strong sustainability worldview, Organization & Environment, 31(4), pp. 287-313. DOI: 10.1177/1086026617717456
  34. Lankoski L. (2016), Alternative conceptions of sustainability in a business context, Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, pp. 847-857.
  35. Lee M.D. (2011), Configuration of external influences: The combined effects of institutions and stakeholders on corporate social responsibility strategies, Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), pp. 281-298.
  36. Liu X., Zhang C. (2017), Corporate governance, social responsibility information disclosure, and enterprise value in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(2), pp. 1075-1084.
  37. López-Arceiz F. J., del Río C., Bellostas A. (2022), The mediating effect of sustainability strategy between sustainability committees and business performance: Can persistent assessment condition this effect?, Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(3), pp. 708-739. DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2021-0193
  38. Lu L. W. (2021), The moderating effect of corporate governance on the relationship between corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance, International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(3), pp. 193-206.
  39. Maas K., Schaltegger S., Crutzen N. (2016), Integrating corporate sustainability assessment, management accounting, control, and reporting, Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, pp. 237-248.
  40. Mackenzie C. (2007), Boards, incentives and corporate social responsibility: The case for a change of emphasis, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), pp. 935-943.
  41. Maraghini M. P. (2018), Management Control: il “gattopardo” per il governo aziendale, Management Control, 3, pp. 5-11. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2018-003001
  42. Marchi L. (2020), Dalla crisi allo sviluppo sostenibile. Il ruolo dei sistemi di misurazione e controllo, Management Control, 3, pp. 5-16. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2020-003001
  43. Merchant K., Riccaboni A. (2001), Il controllo di gestione, McGraw-Hill Companies.
  44. Michelon G., Parbonetti A. (2012), The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure, Journal of Management & Governance, 16(3), pp. 477-509.
  45. Molinari M., Maraghini M. P., Riccaboni A. (2021), Reporting di Sostenibilità e Controllo Manageriale: L’esperienza di Edison SpA, Management Control, 2, pp. 61-86. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2021-002004
  46. Newig J., Voss J. P., Monstadt J. (2007), Governance for sustainable development in the face of ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power: An introduction, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3-4), pp. 185-19. DOI: 10.1080/15239080701622832
  47. Njie, B., & Asimiran, S. (2014). Case study as a choice in qualitative methodology. Journal of research & method in Education, 4(3), 35-40.
  48. Olivotto L. (2022), Verso la trasformazione sostenibile dell’azienda, Management Control, 1, pp. 17-30. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2022-001002
  49. Orazalin N., Mahmood M. (2021), Toward sustainable development: board characteristics, country governance quality, and environmental performance, Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), pp. 3569-3588.
  50. Owen D. (2008), Chronicles of wasted time? A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting research, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(2), pp. 240-67. DOI: 10.1108/09513570810854428
  51. Pucheta-Martínez M. C., Gallego-Álvarez I. (2019), An international approach of the relationship between board attributes and the disclosure of corporate social responsibility issues, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), pp. 612-627.
  52. Rehman Khan M., Rehman Khan H. U., Ghouri A. M. (2022), Corporate social responsibility, sustainability governance and sustainable performance: A preliminary insight, Asian Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), pp. 1-28.
  53. Ricart J.E., Rodrìgues M.A., Sanchez P. (2005), Sustainability in the board room: an empirical examination of Dow Jones sustainability world index leaders, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 5(3), pp. 24-41. DOI: 10.1108/14720700510604670
  54. Ritchie J., Lewis J., Nicholls C. M., Ormston R. (Eds.) (2013), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, Sage Publication Ltd, London.
  55. Schaefer A., Williams S., Blundel R. (2018), Individual values and SME environmental engagement, Business and Society, 59(4), pp. 642-675. DOI: 10.1177/000765031775013
  56. Schaltegger S., Burritt R. (2005), Corporate sustainability, In Folmer, H., Tietenberg, T. (eds.), International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2005/06: A Survey of Current Issues, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  57. Schaltegger S., Lüdeke-Freund F., Hansen E. G. (2012), Business cases for sustainability: The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability, International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), pp. 95-119. DOI: 10.1504/IJISD.2012.046944
  58. Schrobback P., Meath C. (2020), Corporate sustainability governance: Insight from the Australian and New Zealand port industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 255, pp. 1-12.
  59. Shahab Y., Ntim C.G., Chengang Y., Ullah F., Fosu S. (2018), Environmental policy, environmental performance, and financial distress in China: Do top management team characteristics matter?, Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(8), pp. 1635-1652.
  60. Siggelkow N. (2007), Persuasion with case studies, Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), pp. 20-24.
  61. Spence L. J. (2016), Small business social responsibility: Expanding core CSR theory, Business and Society, 55(1), pp. 23-55. DOI: 10.1177/0007650314523256
  62. Taticchi P., Tonelli F., Pasqualino R. (2013), Performance measurement of sustainable supply chains: A literature review and a research agenda, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(8), pp. 782-804. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-03-2013-0037
  63. Uyar A., Karaman A.S., Kilic M. (2020), Is corporate social responsibility reporting a tool of signaling or greenwashing? Evidence from the worldwide logistics sector, Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, pp. 1-13.
  64. Uyar A., Kuzey C., Kilic M., Karaman A.S. (2021), Board structure, financial performance, corporate social responsibility performance, CSR committee, and CEO duality: Disentangling the connection in healthcare, CSR and Environmental Management, 28(6), pp. 1730-1748.
  65. Van Marrewijk M. (2003), Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion, Journal of Business Ethics, 44(2), pp. 95-105. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023331212247
  66. Velte P. (2016), Women on management board and ESG performance, Journal of Global Responsibility, 7(1), pp. 98-109. DOI: 10.1108/JGR-01-2016-0001
  67. Voß J. P., Bornemann B. (2011), The politics of reflexive governance: Challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management, Ecology and Society, 16(2), pp.1-24.
  68. Williamson O.E. (2010), Transaction cost economics: The natural progression, American Economic Review, 100(3), pp. 673-690.
  69. Windsor D. (2006), Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches, Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), pp. 93-114.
  70. Yin R.K. (2003), Designing case studies, Qualitative Research Methods, 5(14), pp. 359-386.
  71. Yin R.K. (2018), Case study research design and methods (6th Ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publishing.
  72. Zaman R., Jain T., Samara G., Jamali D. (2020), Corporate governance meets corporate social responsibility: Mapping the interface, Business & Society, 61(3), pp. 690-752. DOI: 10.1177/0007650320973415
  73. Eberhardt-Toth E. (2017), Who should be on a board corporate social responsibility committee?, Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp. 1926-1935.

Silvia Cantele, Silvia Valcozzena, Bettina Campedelli, Chiara de’ Stefani, Marco De Luca, The Interaction of Sustainability Governance Structure and Sustainability Management Control Systems: An Italian Case Study in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 2 Suppl./2024, pp 53-74, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2024-002-S1004